18F-FDG PET/CT response in a phase 1/2 trial of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer

Ronald L Korn, Daniel D Von Hoff, Mitesh J Borad, Markus F Renschler, Desmond McGovern, R Curtis Bay, Ramesh K Ramanathan, Ronald L Korn, Daniel D Von Hoff, Mitesh J Borad, Markus F Renschler, Desmond McGovern, R Curtis Bay, Ramesh K Ramanathan

Abstract

Background: Positron emission tomography (PET) is poised to become a useful imaging modality in staging and evaluating therapeutic responses in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC). This analysis from a phase 1/2 study examined the utility of early PET imaging in patients with mPC treated with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine.

Methods: Tumors were measured by [18F]2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose PET/computed tomography (CT) in patients who received nab-paclitaxel 100 (n = 13), 125 (n = 38), or 150 (n = 1) mg/m2 plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Lesion metabolic activity was evaluated at baseline and 6 and 12 weeks postbaseline.

Results: Fifty-two patients had baseline and ≥1 follow-up PET scan. The median maximum standardized uptake values per pancreatic lesion in the nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 and 125 mg/m2 cohorts were 5.1 and 6.5, respectively. Among patients who had a metabolic response by PET, those who received nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 had a 4-month survival advantage over those who received 100 mg/m2. All patients in the nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 cohort experienced an early complete metabolic response (CMR; 34%) or partial metabolic response (PMR; 66%). In the nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 cohort, investigator-assessed objective response rates were 77% and 44% among patients with a CMR and PMR, respectively, with no correlation between PET and CT response (Spearman r s = 0.22; P = 0.193). Patients in the nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 cohort with a CMR experienced a significantly longer overall survival vs those with a PMR (median, 23.0 vs 11.2 months; P = 0.011), and a significant correlation was found between best percentage change in tumor burden by PET and survival: for each 1% decrease in PET score, the risk of death decreased by 2%.

Conclusions: The majority of primary pancreatic tumors and their metastases were PET avid, and PET effectively measured changes in tumor metabolic activity at 6 and 12 weeks. These results support the antitumor activity of nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 for treating mPC and the utility of PET for measuring treatment response. Treatment response by PET analysis may be considered when evaluating investigational agents in mPC.

Trial registration: NCT00398086.

Keywords: Gemcitabine; Pancreatic cancer; Phase 1/2 clinical trial; Positron emission tomography; nab-Paclitaxel.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice, Guidelines of the International Conference on Harmonization. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients before entering the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

RLK: research funding: Celgene; DDVH: consultant or advisory role, honoraria, and research funding: Celgene; MJB: nothing to disclose; RCB: consultant: Celgene; DM: employment: Celgene; MFR: employment: Celgene; RKR: consultant or advisory role, honoraria, and research funding: Celgene.

The manuscript has not been submitted for publication nor is it under consideration for publication elsewhere.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Waterfall plot of best responses by 18F-FDG PET/CT. CMR, complete metabolic response; CT, computed tomography; nab-P, nab-paclitaxel; PET, positron emission tomography; PMR, partial metabolic response; SMD, stable metabolic disease. a The blue circle represents 0% best response from a single patient in the nab-P 100 mg/m2 cohort
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Overall survival by PET metabolic response among patients in the nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 cohort. CMR, complete metabolic response; OS, overall survival; PET, positron emission tomography; PMR, partial metabolic response
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Time to best response by CT in the 125 and 100 mg/m2nab-paclitaxel cohorts. CT, computed tomography

References

    1. Koers K, Francken AB, Haanen JB, Woerdeman LA, van der Hage JA. Vemurafenib as neoadjuvant treatment for unresectable regional metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:e251–e253. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.45.3845.
    1. Li J, Xiao Y. Application of FDG-PET/CT in radiation oncology. Front Oncol. 2013;3:80.
    1. McArthur GA, Puzanov I, Amaravadi R, Ribas A, Chapman P, Kim KB, et al. Marked, homogeneous, and early [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography responses to vemurafenib in BRAF-mutant advanced melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:1628–1634. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.1938.
    1. Qiao W, Zhao J, Xing Y, Wang C, Wang T. Predictive value of [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography for clinical outcome in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma prior to and after autologous stem cell transplant. Leuk Lymphoma. 2014;55:276–282. doi: 10.3109/10428194.2013.797974.
    1. Gebhart G, Gamez C, Holmes E, Robles J, Garcia C, Cortes M, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT for early prediction of response to neoadjuvant lapatinib, trastuzumab, and their combination in HER2-positive breast cancer: results from neo-ALTTO. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:1862–1868. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.112.119271.
    1. van Gool MH, Aukema TS, Schaake EE, Rijna H, Codrington HE, Valdés Olmos RA, et al. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography versus computed tomography in predicting histopathological response to epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment in resectable non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21:2831–2837. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3791-6.
    1. Engelmann BE, Loft A, Kjaer A, Nielsen HJ, Gerds TA, Benzon EV, et al. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography and biomarkers for early treatment response evaluation in metastatic colon cancer. Oncologist. 2014;19:164–172. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2013-0229.
    1. Teyton P, Metges JP, Atmani A, Jestin-Le Tallec V, Volant A, Visvikis D, et al. Use of positron emission tomography in surgery follow-up of esophageal cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13:451–458. doi: 10.1007/s11605-008-0749-7.
    1. Prestwich RJ, Subesinghe M, Gilbert A, Chowdhury FU, Sen M, Scarsbrook AF. Delayed response assessment with FDG-PET-CT following (chemo) radiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Clin Radiol. 2012;67:966–975. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2012.02.016.
    1. Yu L, Jia C, Wang X, Lu P, Tian M, Wang W, et al. Evaluation of 18F-FDG PET/CT in early-stage cervical carcinoma. Am J Med Sci. 2011;341:96–100. doi: 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e3181f48df6.
    1. Reske SN, Grillenberger KG, Glatting G, Port M, Hildebrandt M, Gansauge F, et al. Overexpression of glucose transporter 1 and increased FDG uptake in pancreatic carcinoma. J Nucl Med. 1997;38:1344–1348.
    1. Ramanathan RK, Goldstein D, Korn RL, Arena F, Moore M, Siena S, et al. Positron emission tomography response evaluation from a randomized phase III trial of weekly nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone for patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:648–653. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw020.
    1. Cancer Facts and Figures 2017. American Cancer Society. . 2017. Accessed 10 Feb 2017.
    1. SEER Stat Fact Sheets: Pancreas Cancer. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. 2017. Accessed 10 Feb 2017.
    1. Conroy T, Desseigne F, Ychou M, Bouche O, Guimbaud R, Becouarn Y, et al. FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1817–1825. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1011923.
    1. Goldstein D, El-Maraghi RH, Hammel P, Heinemann V, Kunzmann V, Sastre J, et al. nab-Paclitaxel plus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer: long-term survival from a phase III trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015. doi 10.1093/jnci/dju413.
    1. Von Hoff DD, Ervin T, Arena FP, Chiorean EG, Infante J, Moore M, et al. Increased survival in pancreatic cancer with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1691–1703. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1304369.
    1. Celgene Corporation. Abraxane for injectable suspension (paclitaxel protein-bound particles for injectable suspension) (albumin-bound): Summit, NJ: Celgene Corporation; 2015.
    1. Young H, Baum R, Cremerius U, Herholz K, Hoekstra O, Lammertsma AA, et al. Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET Study Group. Eur J Cancer. 1999;35:1773–1782. doi: 10.1016/S0959-8049(99)00229-4.
    1. Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:205–216. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.3.205.
    1. Therasse P, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Data Center Evaluation of response: new and standard criteria. Ann Oncol. 2002;13(Suppl 4):127–129. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdf649.
    1. Von Hoff DD, Ramanathan RK, Borad MJ, Laheru DA, Smith LS, Wood TE, et al. Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel is an active regimen in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase I/II trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:4548–4554. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.36.5742.
    1. Mileshkin L, Hicks RJ, Hughes BG, Mitchell PL, Charu V, Gitlitz BJ, et al. Changes in 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose and 18F-fluorodeoxythymidine positron emission tomography imaging in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with erlotinib. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:3304–3315. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2763.
    1. Beatty GL, Torigian DA, Chiorean EG, Saboury B, Brothers A, Alavi A, et al. A phase I study of an agonist CD40 monoclonal antibody (CP-870,893) in combination with gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19:6286–6295. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-1320.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa