Remote Ischemic Preconditioning and Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Karolina Stokfisz, Anna Ledakowicz-Polak, Michal Kidawa, Marzenna Zielinska, Karolina Stokfisz, Anna Ledakowicz-Polak, Michal Kidawa, Marzenna Zielinska

Abstract

Background: Contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) is a common cause of hospital-acquired AKI and a serious complication of percutaneous coronary intervention.

Objective: The aim of the present study was to assess whether remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) reduces the incidence of CI-AKI.

Methods: We conducted a prospective, randomized, sham-controlled clinical study. The study included 101 patients admitted to the Intensive Cardiac Therapy Clinic of Medical University of Lodz for elective percutaneous coronary intervention. The participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either a control group (n = 51) or an RIPC group (n = 50). In the latter, RIPC was achieved before percutaneous coronary intervention by 4 cycles of 5-minute inflation of a cuff on the left upper arm to 200 mm Hg followed by 5-minute deflation. In the control group, a deflated cuff was placed on the left arm for 40 minutes. Serum creatinine concentration was measured to check for the presence of CI-AKI within 48 to 72 hours of percutaneous coronary intervention. Serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin level was also measured within 3 hours.

Results: CI-AKI occurred in 2 patients from the RIPC group (4%) and 3 patients from the control group (5.9%), but the difference was not significant (P = 0.98). The patients who developed CI-AKI also demonstrated increased serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin concentrations (the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve = 0.97; 95% CI, 0.938-1.00; P < 0.00) and the optimal cutoff point value was 118.9 ng/mL.

Conclusions: The use of RIPC before elective percutaneous coronary intervention was not found to prevent CI-AKI. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03761368. (Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2020; 81:XXX-XXX).

Keywords: Contrast-induced acute kidney injury; Coronary angiography; Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Remote ischemic preconditioning.

© 2020 The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart of patients in the study. ITT = intention-to-treat analysis; RIPC = remote ischemic preconditioning.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) concentration changes (difference between value at baseline and 3 hours after percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]) in remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC)(+) and RIPC(-) patients.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Receiver operating characteristic curve and the optimal cutoff point of serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin concentration 3 hours after percutaneous coronary intervention (118.9 ng/mL) with respect to the occurrence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury (area under curve = 0.97; sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 91%, and Youden's index = 0.92).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) concentration on admission, as a factor of renal damage, correlates with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) on admission, as a parameter of impaired renal function (A) and NGAL level 3 hours after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) also correlates with eGFR 48 to 72 hours after PCI (B).

References

    1. Nash K, Hafeez A, Hou S. Hospital-acquired renal insufficiency. Am J Kidney Dis. 2002 May;39(5):930–936. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.2002.32766.
    1. Mehran R, Nikolsky E. Contrast-induced nephropathy: definition, epidemiology, and patients at risk. Kidney Int Suppl2006: S11–15. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5000368.
    1. Best PJ, Lennon R, Ting HH. The impact of renal insufficiency on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 Apr 3;39(7):1113–1119. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(02)01745-x.
    1. Morcos SK, Thomsen HS, Webb JA. Contrast-media-induced nephrotoxicity: a consensus report. Contrast Media Safety Committee, European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Eur Radiol. 1999;9(8):1602–1613. doi: 10.1007/s003300050894.
    1. Kashani K, Cheungpasitporn W, Ronco C. Biomarkers of acute kidney injury: the pathway from discovery to clinical adoption. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017 Jul 26;55(8):1074–1089. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2016-0973.
    1. Teo SH, Endre ZH. Biomarkers in acute kidney injury (AKI) Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2017 Sep;31(3):331–344. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2017.10.003.
    1. Przyklenk K, Bauer B, Ovize M. Regional ischemic 'preconditioning' protects remote virgin myocardium from subsequent sustained coronary occlusion. Circulation. 1993 Mar;87(3):893–899. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.87.3.893.
    1. Stokfisz K, Ledakowicz-Polak A, Zagorski M. Ischaemic preconditioning - Current knowledge and potential future applications after 30 years of experience. Adv Med Sci. 2017 Sep;62(2):307–316. doi: 10.1016/j.advms.2016.11.006.
    1. 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease European Heart Journal. 2013;34:2949–3003. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht296.
    1. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Acute Kidney Injury Work Group KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for Acute Kidney Injury. Kidney inter., Suppl. 2012;2:1–138.
    1. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization European Heart Journal. 2014;35:2541–2619. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu278.
    1. Mehran R, Aymong ED, Nikolsky E. A simple risk score for prediction of contrastinduced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention: development and initial validation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Oct 6;44(7):1393–1399. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.06.068.
    1. Er F, Nia AM, Dopp H. Ischemic preconditioning for prevention of contrast medium-induced nephropathy: randomized pilot RenPro Trial (Renal Protection Trial) Circulation. 2012 Jul 17;126(3):296–303. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.096370.
    1. Valappil SP, Kunjukrishnapillai S, Viswanathan S. Remote ischemic preconditioning for prevention of contrast induced nephropathy-Insights from an Indian study. Indian Heart J. 2018;70(6):857‐863. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2017.11.012.
    1. Balbir Singh G, Ann SH, Park J. Remote Ischemic Preconditioning for the Prevention of Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Diabetics Receiving Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. PLoS One. 2016 Oct 10;11(10) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164256.
    1. Menting TP, Sterenborg TB, de Waal Y. Remote Ischemic Preconditioning To Reduce Contrast-Induced Nephropathy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015 Oct;50(4):527–532. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.04.002.
    1. Moretti C, Cerrato E, Cavallero E. The EUROpean and Chinese cardiac and renal Remote Ischemic Preconditioning Study (EURO-CRIPS CardioGroup I): A randomized controlled trial. Int J Cardiol. 2018 Apr 15;257:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.12.033.
    1. Zagidullin NS, Dunayeva AR1, Plechev VV. Nephroprotective effects of remote ischemic preconditioning in coronary angiography. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2017;65(3):299–307. doi: 10.3233/CH-16184.
    1. Zhou F, Song W, Wang Z. Effects of remote ischemic preconditioning on contrast nduced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018 Jan;97(2):e9579. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009579.
    1. Tumlin J, Stacul F, Adam A. CIN Consensus Working Panel. Pathophysiology of contrast-induced nephropathy. Am J Cardiol. 2006 Sep 18;98(6A):14K–20K. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.01.020.
    1. Goldenberg I, Matetzky S. Nephropathy induced by contrast media: pathogenesis, risk factors and preventive strategies. CMAJ. 2005;172(11):1461–1471. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.1040847.
    1. Haase M, Devarajan P, Haase-Fielitz A. The outcome of neutrophil gelatinase- associated lipocalin-positive subclinical acute kidney injury: a multicenter pooled analysis of prospective studies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:1752–1761. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2010.11.051.
    1. McCullough PA, Shaw AD, Haase M. Diagnosis of acute kidney injury using functional and injury biomarkers: workgroup statements from the tenth Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative Consensus Conference. Contrib Nephrol. 2013;182:13–29. doi: 10.1159/000349963. Epub 2013 May 13.
    1. Moledina DG, Parikh CR. Phenotyping of Acute Kidney Injury: Beyond Serum Creatinine. Semin Nephrol. 2018;38(1):3–11. doi: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2017.09.002.
    1. Demirtas S, Caliskan A, Karahan O. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin as a biomarker for acute kidney injury in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Exp Clin Cardiol. 2013;18(2):107‐109.
    1. Parikh CR, Devarajan P, Zappitelli M. Postoperative biomarkers predict acute kidney injury and poor outcomes after pediatric cardiac surgery. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;22(9):1737‐1747. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2010111163.
    1. Prowle JR, Calzavacca P, Licari E. Combination of biomarkers for diagnosis of acute kidney injury after cardiopulmonary bypass. Ren Fail. 2015;37(3):408‐416. doi: 10.3109/0886022X.2014.1001303.
    1. De Geus HR, Bakker J, Lesaffre EM. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin at ICU admission predicts for acute kidney injury in adult patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;183(7):907‐914. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200908-1214OC.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa