A pilot trial of intravital microscopy in the study of the tumor vasculature of patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis

Emmanuel M Gabriel, Minhyung Kim, Daniel T Fisher, Catherine Mangum, Kristopher Attwood, Wenyan Ji, Debabrata Mukhopadhyay, Sanjay P Bagaria, Matthew W Robertson, Tri A Dinh, Keith L Knutson, Joseph J Skitzki, Michael B Wallace, Emmanuel M Gabriel, Minhyung Kim, Daniel T Fisher, Catherine Mangum, Kristopher Attwood, Wenyan Ji, Debabrata Mukhopadhyay, Sanjay P Bagaria, Matthew W Robertson, Tri A Dinh, Keith L Knutson, Joseph J Skitzki, Michael B Wallace

Abstract

Aberrancies in the tumor microvasculature limit the systemic delivery of anticancer agents, which impedes tumor response. Using human intravital microscopy (HIVM), we hypothesized that HIVM would be feasible in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). During cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for PC, HIVM was performed in both tumor and non-tumor areas. The primary outcome was HIVM feasibility to measure vessel characteristics. We secondarily evaluated associations between HIVM vessel characteristics and oncologic outcomes (RECIST response to neoadjuvant therapy and disease-specific survival). Thirty patients with PC were enrolled. Nineteen patients (63.3%) received neoadjuvant therapy. HIVM was feasible in all patients. Compared to non-tumor (control) areas, PC areas had a lower density of functional vessels, higher proportion of non-functional vessels, smaller lumenal diameters, and lower blood flow velocity. Qualitative differences in these vessel characteristics were observed among patients who had partial response, stable disease, or progressive disease after receiving neoadjuvant therapy. However, no statistically significant relationships were found between HIVM vessel characteristics and oncologic outcomes. These novel findings comprise the first-in-human, real-time evidence of the microscopic differences between normal and tumor-associated vessels and form the basis for our larger, ongoing clinical trial appropriately powered to determine the clinical utility of HIVM (NCT03823144).

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
HIVM images of tumor and non-tumor vessels among individual. The right side panel shows examples of PC-associated tumor vessels from different histologies, including appendiceal adenocarcinoma (A), ovarian serous carcinoma (B), and mesothelioma (C). Yellow arrowheads highlight aberrantly arranged PC-associated vessel architecture (such as the acute hair-pin turn in part B), and yellow arrows highlight non-functional vessels as noted by the absence of fluorescein uptake. Non-tumor associated vessels from the same patients in the left side panel show normal, streamlined blood vessels, fewer non-functional vessels, and a higher number of functional (fluorescent) blood vessels. Red arrows highlight functional, normal blood vessels. Non-tumor areas were found to have some non-functional blood vessels, and conversely tumor areas were also found to have some functional blood vessels (red arrows).
Figure 2
Figure 2
HIVM observations from non-tumor (left panel) and tumor (right panel) areas obtained from a current smoker (A) and from a patient who received pre-operative radiotherapy (B). There was a similar proportion of non-functional vessels between the tumor and non-tumor areas in the current smoker, suggesting pre-existing background changes in the microvasculature due to smoking use. In patients who received pre-operative radiotherapy (n = 3), there was a high proportion of non-functional vessels observed (64.7%). These findings suggest that radiation-induced changes had affected the tumor microvasculature.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Examples of HIVM tumor observations for patients who had partial response (A), stable disease (B), and progressive disease (C) by standard RECIST criteria. The left side panels depict baseline imaging (CT scan or MRI) prior to neoadjuvant therapy. The middle panels depict follow-up imaging after neoadjuvant therapy just prior to undergoing CRS-HIPEC. Yellow arrows highlight the areas of disease. The right side panels depict HIVM PC-associated vessel observations. Patients who had achieved partial response had the highest density of functional vessels, lowest density of non-functional vessels, and the lowest proportion of non-function vessels when compared to patients who had stable disease or progressive disease. Although the subset analysis of patients who had neoadjuvant therapy did not show significant associations between RECIST response and tumor HIVM vessel characteristics, these individual patient observations provide early evidence that there may be a correlation between tumor response and tumor-associated vessels.

References

    1. Franko J, et al. Treatment of colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis with systemic chemotherapy: a pooled analysis of north central cancer treatment group phase III trials N9741 and N9841. J. Clin. Oncol. 2012;30:263–267. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.37.1039.
    1. Jayne DG, Fook S, Loi C, Seow-Choen F. Peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer. Br. J. Surg. 2002;89:1545–1550. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02274.x.
    1. Torre LA, et al. Ovarian cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018;68:284–296. doi: 10.3322/caac.21456.
    1. Elias D, et al. Peritoneal colorectal carcinomatosis treated with surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy: retrospective analysis of 523 patients from a multicentric French study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2010;28:63–68. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.9285.
    1. Glehen O, et al. Toward curative treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis from nonovarian origin by cytoreductive surgery combined with perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy: a multi-institutional study of 1,290 patients. Cancer. 2010;116:5608–5618. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25356.
    1. van Driel WJ, et al. hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in ovarian cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018;378:230–240. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1708618.
    1. Glehen O, et al. Peritoneal carcinomatosis from gastric cancer: a multi-institutional study of 159 patients treated by cytoreductive surgery combined with perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2010;17:2370–2377. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1039-7.
    1. Jewell A, McMahon M, Khabele D. Heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the management of advanced ovarian cancer. Cancers. 2018;10:296. doi: 10.3390/cancers10090296.
    1. Witkamp AJ, de Bree E, Van Goethem R, Zoetmulder FA. Rationale and techniques of intra-operative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2001;27:365–374. doi: 10.1053/ctrv.2001.0232.
    1. Fisher DT, et al. Intraoperative intravital microscopy permits the study of human tumour vessels. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:10684. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10684.
    1. Chauhan VP, et al. Angiotensin inhibition enhances drug delivery and potentiates chemotherapy by decompressing tumour blood vessels. Nat. Commun. 2013;4:2516. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3516.
    1. Minchinton AI, Tannock IF. Drug penetration in solid tumours. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2006;6:583–592. doi: 10.1038/nrc1893.
    1. Hamad I, Moghimi SM. Critical issues in site-specific targeting of solid tumours: the carrier, the tumour barriers and the bioavailable drug. Exp. Opin. Drug Deliv. 2008;5:205–219. doi: 10.1517/17425247.5.2.205.
    1. Jain RK, Munn LL, Fukumura D. Dissecting tumour pathophysiology using intravital microscopy. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2002;2:266–276. doi: 10.1038/nrc778.
    1. Fukumura D, Duda DG, Munn LL, Jain RK. Tumor microvasculature and microenvironment: novel insights through intravital imaging in pre-clinical models. Microcirculation. 2010;17:206–225. doi: 10.1111/j.1549-8719.2010.00029.x.
    1. Zlotecki RA, Baxter LT, Boucher Y, Jain RK. Pharmacologic modification of tumor blood flow and interstitial fluid pressure in a human tumor xenograft: network analysis and mechanistic interpretation. Microvasc. Res. 1995;50:429–443. doi: 10.1006/mvre.1995.1069.
    1. Quenet ED, et al. A UNICANCER phase III trial of hyperthermic intra-peritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC): PRODIGE 7. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:abstr LBA 3503. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.36.18_suppl.LBA3503.
    1. Verwaal VJ, et al. 8-year follow-up of randomized trial: cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus systemic chemotherapy in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal cancer. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2008;15:2426–2432. doi: 10.1245/s10434-008-9966-2.
    1. Verwaal VJ, et al. Randomized trial of cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus systemic chemotherapy and palliative surgery in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis of colorectal cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2003;21:3737–3743. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.187.
    1. Badgwell B, et al. Lessons learned from a phase II clinical trial of laparoscopic HIPEC for gastric cancer. Surg. Endosc. 2018;32:512. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5668-9.
    1. Gabriel EM, et al. Intravital microscopy in the study of the tumor microenvironment: from bench to human application. Oncotarget. 2018;9:20165–20178. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.24957.
    1. Golas L, et al. Efficacy of retinal lesion screening in Von Hippel–Lindau patients with widefield color fundus imaging versus widefield FA. Ophthal. Surg. Lasers Imaging Retina. 2019;50:260–265. doi: 10.3928/23258160-20191031-12.
    1. Williams BK, Jr, et al. Choroidal melanoma simulating adenoma of the retinal pigment epithelium arising at the site of congenital hypertrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium. Ocul. Oncol. Pathol. 2020;6:39–43. doi: 10.1159/000501084.
    1. Fisher DT, et al. IL-6 trans-signaling licenses mouse and human tumor microvascular gateways for trafficking of cytotoxic T cells. J. Clin. Invest. 2011;121:3846–3859. doi: 10.1172/JCI44952.
    1. Kikuta J, Ishii M. Recent advances in intravital imaging of dynamic biological systems. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 2012;119:193–197. doi: 10.1254/jphs.12R03CP.
    1. Pittet MJ, Weissleder R. Intravital imaging. Cell. 2011;147:983–991. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.004.
    1. Gajewski TF, Schreiber H, Fu YX. Innate and adaptive immune cells in the tumor microenvironment. Nat. Immunol. 2013;14:1014–1022. doi: 10.1038/ni.2703.
    1. Hanahan D, Coussens LM. Accessories to the crime: functions of cells recruited to the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Cell. 2012;21:309–322. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.02.022.
    1. Joyce JA, Fearon DT. T cell exclusion, immune privilege, and the tumor microenvironment. Science. 2015;348:74–80. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa6204.
    1. Chang YS, et al. Mosaic blood vessels in tumors: frequency of cancer cells in contact with flowing blood. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2000;97:14608–14613. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.26.14608.
    1. di Tomaso E, et al. Mosaic tumor vessels: cellular basis and ultrastructure of focal regions lacking endothelial cell markers. Cancer Res. 2005;65:5740–5749. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-4552.
    1. Emblem KE, et al. Vessel architectural imaging identifies cancer patient responders to anti-angiogenic therapy. Nat. Med. 2013;19:1178–1183. doi: 10.1038/nm.3289.
    1. Baluk P, et al. Abnormalities of basement membrane on blood vessels and endothelial sprouts in tumors. Am. J. Pathol. 2003;163:1801–1815. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63540-7.
    1. Mäkitie T, Summanen P, Tarkkanen A, Kivelä T. Microvascular loops and networks as prognostic indicators in choroidal and ciliary body melanomas. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1999;91:359–367. doi: 10.1093/jnci/91.4.359.
    1. Grantab R, Sivananthan S, Tannock IF. The penetration of anticancer drugs through tumor tissue as a function of cellular adhesion and packing density of tumor cells. Cancer Res. 2006;66:1033–1039. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3077.
    1. Grantab RH, Tannock IF. Penetration of anticancer drugs through tumour tissue as a function of cellular packing density and interstitial fluid pressure and its modification by bortezomib. BMC Cancer. 2012;12:214. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-214.
    1. Hagendoorn J, et al. Onset of abnormal blood and lymphatic vessel function and interstitial hypertension in early stages of carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 2006;66:3360–3364. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2655.
    1. Lee I, et al. Effect of hemodilution and resuscitation on tumor interstitial fluid pressure, blood flow, and oxygenation. Microvasc. Res. 1994;48:1–12. doi: 10.1006/mvre.1994.1034.
    1. Boucher Y, Leunig M, Jain RK. Tumor angiogenesis and interstitial hypertension. Cancer Res. 1996;56:4264–4266.
    1. Leunig M, et al. Angiogenesis, microvascular architecture, microhemodynamics, and interstitial fluid pressure during early growth of human adenocarcinoma LS174T in SCID mice. Cancer Res. 1992;52:6553–6560.
    1. Jain RK. Normalizing tumor microenvironment to treat cancer: bench to bedside to biomarkers. J. Clin. Oncol. 2013;31:2205–2218. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.46.3653.
    1. Dewhirst MW, Secomb TW. Transport of drugs from blood vessels to tumour tissue. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2017;17:738–750. doi: 10.1038/nrc.2017.93.
    1. Mayo Clinic. Intravital microscopy (IVM) in patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). In: [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US). Available online: & rank=1. Accessed June 23, 2020.
    1. Resetkova E. Pathologic aspects of inflammatory breast carcinoma: part 1. Histomorphology and differential diagnosis. Semin. Oncol. 2008;35:25–32. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2007.11.013.
    1. Gong Y. Pathologic aspects of inflammatory breast cancer: part 2. Biologic insights into its aggressive phenotype. Semin. Oncol. 2008;35:33–40. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2007.11.014.
    1. Primeau AJ, et al. The distribution of the anticancer drug Doxorubicin in relation to blood vessels in solid tumors. Clin. Cancer Res. 2005;11:8782–8788. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-1664.
    1. Patel KJ, Trédan O, Tannock IF. Distribution of the anticancer drugs doxorubicin, mitoxantrone and topotecan in tumors and normal tissues. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 2013;72:127–138. doi: 10.1007/s00280-013-2176-z.
    1. Almerey T, Gabriel EM, Torp KD, Bagaria SP. Intraoperative fluid restriction in hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. J. Surg. Res. 2018;231:77–82. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.05.015.
    1. Gabriel E, et al. Robotic-assisted cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) J. Robot. Surg. 2019;13:175–179. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-0820-7.
    1. Mayo Clinic. Intravital microscopy in human solid tumors. In: [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US). Available online: =. Accessed June 23, 2020.
    1. Burger RA, et al. Independent radiologic review of the Gynecologic Oncology Group Study 0218, a phase III trial of bevacizumab in the primary treatment of advanced epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 2013;131:21–26. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.07.100.
    1. Struller F, et al. Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy with low-dose cisplatin and doxorubicin (PIPAC C/D) in patients with gastric cancer and peritoneal metastasis: a phase II study. Ther. Adv. Med. Oncol. 2019;11:1758835919846402. doi: 10.1177/1758835919846402.
    1. Hassan R, et al. Efficacy and safety of avelumab treatment in patients with advanced unresectable mesothelioma: phase 1b results from the JAVELIN solid tumor trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5:351–357. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.5428.
    1. Kalogeromitros DC, et al. Allergy skin testing in predicting adverse reactions to fluorescein: a prospective clinical study. Acta Ophthalmol. 2011;89:480–483. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2009.01722.x.
    1. Wallace MB, et al. The safety of intravenous fluorescein for confocal laser endomicroscopy in the gastrointestinal tract. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2010;31:548–552. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04207.x.
    1. Gabriel E, et al. Water lavage as an adjunct to cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) Am. J. Surg. 2017;214:462–467. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.05.016.
    1. Sugarbaker PH. Surgical treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis: 1988 Du Pont lecture. Can. J. Surg. 1989;32:164–170.
    1. Wallace MB, et al. Preliminary accuracy and interobserver agreement for the detection of intraepithelial neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus with probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy. Gastrointest. Endosc. 2010;72:19–24. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.01.053.
    1. Gheorghe C, Iacob R, Becheanu G, Dumbrav Abreve M. Confocal endomicroscopy for in vivo microscopic analysis of upper gastrointestinal tract premalignant and malignant lesions. J. Gastrointest. Liver Dis. 2008;17:95–100.
    1. Humphris J, Swartz D, Egan BJ, Leong RW. Status of confocal laser endomicroscopy in gastrointestinal disease. Trop. Gastroenterol. 2012;33:9–20. doi: 10.7869/tg.2012.3.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa