Pharmacokinetics and Glucodynamics of Ultra Rapid Lispro (URLi) versus Humalog® (Lispro) in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Phase I Randomised, Crossover Study

Jennifer Leohr, Mary Anne Dellva, David E Coutant, Elizabeth LaBell, Tim Heise, Grit Andersen, Eric Zijlstra, Lidia Hermanski, Leszek Nosek, Helle Linnebjerg, Jennifer Leohr, Mary Anne Dellva, David E Coutant, Elizabeth LaBell, Tim Heise, Grit Andersen, Eric Zijlstra, Lidia Hermanski, Leszek Nosek, Helle Linnebjerg

Abstract

Background and objective: Ultra rapid lispro (URLi) is a novel insulin lispro formulation developed to more closely match physiological insulin secretion and improve postprandial glucose control. This study compared the insulin lispro pharmacokinetics and glucodynamics, safety and tolerability of URLi and Humalog® after a single subcutaneous dose in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Methods: This was a phase I, randomised, two-period, two-treatment, double-blind, crossover study in 38 patients with T2DM. At each dosing visit, patients received either 15 units of URLi or Humalog, followed by a 10 h automated euglycaemic clamp procedure. Serum insulin lispro and blood glucose were measured.

Results: Insulin lispro appeared in the serum 5 min faster (p < 0.0001) and exposure was 6.4-fold greater in the first 15 min (p < 0.0001) with URLi versus Humalog. Exposure beyond 3 h postdose was 26% lower and the duration of exposure was 51 min shorter with URLi versus Humalog. Onset of insulin action was 13 min faster (p < 0.0001) and insulin action was 4.2-fold greater within the first 30 min (p < 0.0001) with URLi versus Humalog. Insulin action beyond 4 h postdose was 20% lower (p = 0.0099) with URLi versus Humalog. Overall insulin lispro exposure and total glucose infused were similar for URLi and Humalog. Both treatments were well tolerated.

Conclusions: This is the first study to investigate URLi in patients with T2DM using a euglycaemic clamp procedure. URLi demonstrated ultra-rapid pharmacokinetics and glucodynamics in patients with T2DM. CLINICALTRIALS.

Gov identifier: NCT03305822.

Conflict of interest statement

Jennifer Leohr, Mary Anne Dellva, David E. Coutant, Elizabeth LaBell and Helle Linnebjerg are employees and shareholders of Eli Lilly and Company. Tim Heise has received consulting fees or honoraria from Mylan and Novo Nordisk. Additionally, research funds to Tim Heise’s institution were received from Adocia, Boehringer Ingelheim, Dance Pharmaceuticals, Eli Lilly and Company, Gan & Lee Pharmaceuticals, Johnson & Johnson, Mars, Medimmune, Mylan, Nordic Bioscience, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Poxel, Saniona, Sanofi, Wockhardt and Zealand Pharma. Time Heise, Grit Andersen, Eric Zijlstra, Lidia Hermanski and Leszek Nosek are employees of Profil. Additionally, Eric Ziljstra has received payments for lectures from Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk, Roche Diabetes Care and Aerami Therapeutics.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Trial design. SC subcutaneous, U units, URLi ultra rapid lispro
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Mean (± standard error [SE]) serum insulin lispro concentration–time profile for ultra rapid lispro (URLi) and Humalog. a Insulin lispro concentration–time profile 0–10 h after injection and b insulin lispro concentration–time profile 0–1 h after injection. The dashed line indicates the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ). U units
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Mean locally weighted scatterplot smoothing (LOESS) fit of the glucose infusion rate over time for ultra rapid lispro (URLi) and Humalog. a Glucose infusion rate profile 0–10 h after injection and b glucose infusion rate profile 0–2 h after injection. U units
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Mean (± standard error [SE]) C-peptide profiles following a single 15-unit (U) subcutaneous injection of ultra rapid lispro (URLi) or Humalog

References

    1. Davies MJ, D’Alessio DA, Fradkin J, Kernan WN, Mathieu C, Mingrone G, et al. Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018: a consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) Diabetologia. 2018;61(12):2461–2498. doi: 10.1007/s00125-018-4729-5.
    1. American Diabetes Association, 9. Pharmacologic approaches to glycemic treatment: standards of medical care in diabetes-2019. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(Suppl 1):S90–102.
    1. Chon S, Lee YJ, Fraterrigo G, Pozzilli P, Choi MC, Kwon MK, et al. Evaluation of glycemic variability in well-controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2013;15(6):455–460. doi: 10.1089/dia.2012.0315.
    1. Umpierrez GE, Kovatchev BP. Glycemic variability: how to measure and its clinical implication for type 2 diabetes. Am J Med Sci. 2018;356(6):518–527. doi: 10.1016/j.amjms.2018.09.010.
    1. Zinman B, Marso SP, Poulter NR, Emerson SS, Pieber TR, Pratley RE, et al. Day-to-day fasting glycaemic variability in DEVOTE: associations with severe hypoglycaemia and cardiovascular outcomes (DEVOTE 2) Diabetologia. 2018;61(1):48–57. doi: 10.1007/s00125-017-4423-z.
    1. Hirsch IB. Glycemic variability and diabetes complications: does it matter? Of course it does! Diabetes Care. 2015;38(8):1610–1614. doi: 10.2337/dc14-2898.
    1. Heinemann L, Heise T, Wahl LC, Trautmann ME, Ampudia J, Starke AA, et al. Prandial glycaemia after a carbohydrate-rich meal in type I diabetic patients: using the rapid acting insulin analogue [Lys(B28), Pro(B29)] human insulin. Diabet Med. 1996;13(7):625–629. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199607)13:7<625::AID-DIA134>;2-2.
    1. Humalog [package insert]. Indianapolis (IN); Eli Lilly and Company; 2015.
    1. Remodulin [package insert for US]. Research Triangle Park (NC); United Therapeutics Corporation; 2014.
    1. Pratt E, Leohr J, Heilmann C, Johnson J, Landschulz W. Treprostinil causes local vasodilation, is well tolerated, and results in faster absorption of insulin lispro. Diabetes. 2017;66(Suppl. 1):A253.
    1. Paavola CD, Cox AL, Sperry AE, Hansen RJ, Li S, Bradley SA, et al. A stable, hexameric, ultra-rapid insulin formulation containing citrate. Diabetes. 2017;66(Suppl. 1):A254.
    1. Klaff LJ, Cao D, Dellva MA, Tobian J, Miura J, Dahl D, et al. Ultra rapid lispro (URLi) improves postprandial glucose (PPG) control vs. Humalog (Lispro) in T1D: PRONTO-T1D study. Diabetes. 2019;68(Suppl. 1):144-OR.
    1. Blevins T, Zhang Q, Frias JP, Jinnouchi H, Chang AM. Randomized double-blind clinical trial comparing Ultra rapid lispro with Lispro in a basal-bolus regimen in patients with type 2 diabetes: PRONTO-T2D. Diabetes Care. 2020 (in press).
    1. Chow S, Liu J. Design and analysis of bioavailability and bioequivalence studies. 3. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor and Francis Group, LLC; 2009. pp. 88–90.
    1. Linneberg H, Zhang Q, LaBell ES, Dellva MA, Coutant DE, Hovelmann U, et al. Pharmacokinetics and glucodynamics of ultra rapid lispro (URLi) vs Humalog® (Lispro) in younger adults and elderly patients with type 1 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2020 doi: 10.1007/s40262-020-00903-0.
    1. Brod M, Nikolajsen A, Weatherall J, Pfeiffer KM. Understanding post-prandial hyperglycemia in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a web-based survey in Germany, the UK, and USA. Diabetes Ther. 2016;7(2):335–348. doi: 10.1007/s13300-016-0175-x.
    1. Schaper NC, Nikolajsen A, Sandberg A, Buchs S, Bogelund M. Timing of insulin injections, adherence, and glycemic control in a multinational sample of people with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional analysis. Diabetes Ther. 2017;8(6):1319–1329. doi: 10.1007/s13300-017-0317-9.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa