Amphilimus- vs. zotarolimus-eluting stents in patients with diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease: the SUGAR trial

Rafael Romaguera, Pablo Salinas, Josep Gomez-Lara, Salvatore Brugaletta, Antonio Gómez-Menchero, Miguel A Romero, Sergio García-Blas, Raymundo Ocaranza, Pascual Bordes, Marcelo Jiménez Kockar, Neus Salvatella, Victor A Jiménez-Díaz, Mar Alameda, Ramiro Trillo, Dae Hyun Lee, Pedro Martín, María López-Benito, Alfonso Freites, Virginia Pascual-Tejerina, Felipe Hernández-Hernández, Bruno García Del Blanco, Mohsen Mohandes, Francisco Bosa, Eduardo Pinar, Gerard Roura, Josep Comin-Colet, Antonio Fernández-Ortiz, Carlos Macaya, Xavier Rossello, Manel Sabate, Stuart J Pocock, Joan A Gómez-Hospital, SUGAR trial investigators, Carlos H Salazar, Luis Ortega-Paz, José M de la Torre Hernández, Armando Pérez de Prado, Juan Sanchis, Soledad Ojeda, José L Ferreiro, Montserrat Gracida, Lara Fuentes, Luis Teruel, Guillem Muntané-Carol, Rocío Castillo-Poyo, Pilar Jiménez-Quevedo, Angel Cequier, Rafael Romaguera, Pablo Salinas, Josep Gomez-Lara, Salvatore Brugaletta, Antonio Gómez-Menchero, Miguel A Romero, Sergio García-Blas, Raymundo Ocaranza, Pascual Bordes, Marcelo Jiménez Kockar, Neus Salvatella, Victor A Jiménez-Díaz, Mar Alameda, Ramiro Trillo, Dae Hyun Lee, Pedro Martín, María López-Benito, Alfonso Freites, Virginia Pascual-Tejerina, Felipe Hernández-Hernández, Bruno García Del Blanco, Mohsen Mohandes, Francisco Bosa, Eduardo Pinar, Gerard Roura, Josep Comin-Colet, Antonio Fernández-Ortiz, Carlos Macaya, Xavier Rossello, Manel Sabate, Stuart J Pocock, Joan A Gómez-Hospital, SUGAR trial investigators, Carlos H Salazar, Luis Ortega-Paz, José M de la Torre Hernández, Armando Pérez de Prado, Juan Sanchis, Soledad Ojeda, José L Ferreiro, Montserrat Gracida, Lara Fuentes, Luis Teruel, Guillem Muntané-Carol, Rocío Castillo-Poyo, Pilar Jiménez-Quevedo, Angel Cequier

Abstract

Aim: Patients with diabetes mellitus are at high risk of adverse events after percutaneous revascularization, with no differences in outcomes between most contemporary drug-eluting stents. The Cre8 EVO stent releases a formulation of sirolimus with an amphiphilic carrier from laser-dug wells, and has shown clinical benefits in diabetes. We aimed to compare Cre8 EVO stents to Resolute Onyx stents (a contemporary polymer-based zotarolimus-eluting stent) in patients with diabetes.

Methods and results: We did an investigator-initiated, randomized, controlled, assessor-blinded trial at 23 sites in Spain. Eligible patients had diabetes and required percutaneous coronary intervention. A total of 1175 patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive Cre8 EVO or Resolute Onyx stents. The primary endpoint was target-lesion failure, defined as a composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically indicated target-lesion revascularization at 1-year follow-up. The trial had a non-inferiority design with a 4% margin for the primary endpoint. A superiority analysis was planned if non-inferiority was confirmed. There were 106 primary events, 42 (7.2%) in the Cre8 EVO group and 64 (10.9%) in the Resolute Onyx group [hazard ratio (HR): 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.44-0.96; Pnon-inferiority < 0.001; Psuperiority = 0.030]. Among the secondary endpoints, Cre8 EVO stents had significantly lower rate than Resolute Onyx stents of target-vessel failure (7.5% vs. 11.1%, HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.46-0.99; P = 0.042). Probable or definite stent thrombosis and all-cause death were not significantly different between groups.

Conclusion: In patients with diabetes, Cre8 EVO stents were non-inferior to Resolute Onyx stents with regard to target-lesion failure composite outcome. An exploratory analysis for superiority at 1 year suggests that the Cre8 EVO stents might be superior to Resolute Onyx stents with regard to the same outcome.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03321032.

Keywords: Diabetes mellitus; Drug-eluting stents; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Randomized trial.

© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Figures

Graphical Abstract
Graphical Abstract
In the SUGAR trial, 1175 patients with diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease were randomly assigned to receive Cre8 EVO or Resolute Onyx stents. Patients allocated to Cre8 EVO stents had a reduced risk of target lesion failure at 1-year follow-up.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Trial flowchart.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Primary endpoint and its components. Time-to-event curves are shown for patients in the intention-to-treat population who were randomly assigned to receive Cre8 EVO stents or Resolute Onyx stents. CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; MI, myocardial infarction.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Prespecified subgroup analyses of the primary endpoint. AMI, acute myocardial infarction; HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin; LDL, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; SGLT2i, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors; STEMI, ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

References

    1. Saeedi P, Petersohn I, Salpea P et al.; IDF Diabetes Atlas Committee. Global and regional diabetes prevalence estimates for 2019 and projections for 2030 and 2045: results from the International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 9(th) edition. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2019;157:107843.
    1. Inohara T, Kohsaka S, Spertus JA et al. Comparative trends in percutaneous coronary intervention in Japan and the United States, 2013 to 2017. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020;76:1328–1340.
    1. Farkouh ME, Domanski M, Sleeper LA et al.; FREEDOM Trial Investigators. Strategies for multivessel revascularization in patients with diabetes. N Engl J Med 2012;367:2375–2384.
    1. Kaul U, Bangalore S, Seth A et al.; TUXEDO-India Investigators. Paclitaxel-eluting versus everolimus-eluting coronary stents in diabetes. N Engl J Med 2015;373:1709–1719.
    1. Bavishi C, Chugh Y, Kimura T et al. Biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stent vs. contemporary durable polymer drug-eluting stents in patients with diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes 2020;6:81–88.
    1. Romaguera R, Brugaletta S, Gomez-Lara J et al. Rationale and study design of the RESERVOIR trial: a randomized trial comparing reservoir-based polymer-free amphilimus-eluting stents versus everolimus-eluting stents with durable polymer in patients with diabetes mellitus. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2015;85:E116–E122.
    1. Woods TC. Dysregulation of the mammalian target of rapamycin and p27Kip1 promotes intimal hyperplasia in diabetes mellitus. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2013;6:716–727.
    1. Lightell DJ Jr, Woods TC. Relative resistance to mammalian target of rapamycin inhibition in vascular smooth muscle cells of diabetic donors. Ochsner J 2013;13:56–60.
    1. Koskinas KC, Chatzizisis YS, Antoniadis AP, Giannoglou GD. Role of endothelial shear stress in stent restenosis and thrombosis: pathophysiologic mechanisms and implications for clinical translation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:1337–1349.
    1. Carrié D, Berland J, Verheye S et al. Five-year clinical outcome of multicenter randomized trial comparing amphilimus – with paclitaxel-eluting stents in de novo native coronary artery lesions. Int J Cardiol 2020;301:50–55.
    1. Pivato CA, Leone PP, Petriello G et al. The Cre8 amphilimus-eluting stent for the treatment of coronary artery disease: safety and efficacy profile. Expert Rev Med Devices 2020;17:267–275.
    1. Romaguera R, Gómez-Hospital JA, Gomez-Lara J et al. A randomized comparison of reservoir-based polymer-free amphilimus-eluting stents versus everolimus-eluting stents with durable polymer in patients with diabetes mellitus: the RESERVOIR clinical trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2016;9:42–50.
    1. Hemert ND, Rozemeijer R, Voskuil M et al.; ReCre8 Study Investigators. Clinical outcomes after permanent polymer or polymer-free stent implantation in patients with diabetes mellitus: the ReCre8 diabetes substudy. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; doi:10.1002/ccd.29685. Publshed online ahead of print 3 April 2021.
    1. Godino C, Pivato CA, Chiarito M et al.; Italian Nobori Stent ProspectIve REgistry-1 (INSPIRE-1) and AmphilimuS iTalian mUlticenTre rEgistry (ASTUTE) investigators. Polymer-free amphilimus-eluting stent versus biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent in patients with and without diabetes mellitus. Int J Cardiol 2017;245:69–76.
    1. Sardella G, Stella P, Chiarito M et al. Clinical outcomes with reservoir-based polymer-free amphilimus-eluting stents in real-world patients according to diabetes mellitus and complexity: the INVESTIG8 registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2018;91:884–891.
    1. Romaguera R, Salinas P, Brugaletta S et al. Second-generation drug-eluting stents in diabetes (SUGAR) trial: rationale and study design. Am Heart J 2020;222:174–182.
    1. American Diabetes Association. 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: standards of medical care in diabetes-2018. Diabetes Care 2018;41: S13–S27.
    1. Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A et al.; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J 2019;40:87–165.
    1. Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N et al.; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): the Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J 2021;42:373–498.
    1. Cosentino F, Grant PJ, Aboyans V et al.; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2019 ESC Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD. Eur Heart J 2020;41:255–323.
    1. Visseren FLJ, Mach F, Smulders YM et al.; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice. Eur Heart J 2021;42:3227–3337.
    1. Romaguera R, Ojeda S, Cruz-Gonzalez I, Moreno R. Spanish Cardiac Catheterization and Coronary Intervention Registry. 30th official report of the Interventional Cardiology Association of the Spanish Society of Cardiology (1990–2020) in the year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) 2021;S1885-5857(21)00317-0. doi:10.1016/j.recesp.2021.07.018.
    1. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS et al.; Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. Third universal definition of myocardial infarction. Circulation 2012;126:2020–2035.
    1. Garcia-Garcia HM, McFadden EP, Farb A et al.; Academic Research Consortium. Standardized end point definitions for coronary intervention trials: the Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document. Circulation 2018;137:2635–2650.
    1. Silber S, Serruys PW, Leon MB et al. Clinical outcome of patients with and without diabetes mellitus after percutaneous coronary intervention with the resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent: 2-year results from the prospectively pooled analysis of the international global RESOLUTE program. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2013;6:357–368.
    1. Iglesias JF, Heg D, Roffi M et al. Five-year outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus treated with biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents. J Am Heart Assoc 2019;8:e013607.
    1. Olesen KKW, Pareek M, Madsen M et al. Ten-year outcomes of sirolimus-eluting versus zotarolimus-eluting coronary stents in patients with versus without diabetes mellitus (SORT OUT III). Am J Cardiol 2020;125:349–353.
    1. Heath JM, Sun Y, Yuan K et al. Activation of AKT by O-linked N-acetylglucosamine induces vascular calcification in diabetes mellitus. Circ Res 2014;114:1094–1102.
    1. Kolandaivelu K, Swaminathan R, Gibson WJ et al. Stent thrombogenicity early in high-risk interventional settings is driven by stent design and deployment and protected by polymer-drug coatings. Circulation 2011;123:1400–1409.
    1. Madhavan MV, Howard JP, Naqvi A et al. Long-term follow-up after ultrathin vs. conventional 2nd-generation drug-eluting stents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Heart J 2021;42:2643–2654.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa