Leading the way together: a cluster randomised controlled trial of the 5R Shared Leadership Program in older adult walking groups

Katrien Fransen, Tegan Cruwys, Catherine Haslam, Peter Iserbyt, Jan Seghers, Julie Vanderlinden, Jannique van Uffelen, Elvire Verbaanderd, Filip Boen, Katrien Fransen, Tegan Cruwys, Catherine Haslam, Peter Iserbyt, Jan Seghers, Julie Vanderlinden, Jannique van Uffelen, Elvire Verbaanderd, Filip Boen

Abstract

Background: With a rapidly ageing society, healthy ageing has become a key challenge. Engagement in physical activity, and particularly walking, is a key strategy that contributes to healthy ageing amongst older adults. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of a group walking program for older adults that incorporates the 5R Shared Leadership Program (5RS). By implementing a structure of shared leadership and strengthening peer leaders' identity leadership, 5RS aims to cultivate a shared social identity amongst participants, which has in other contexts been associated with greater performance and well-being.

Methods: A cluster randomised controlled trial was conducted to test the efficacy of the 5RS group walking program on group identification, group cohesion, walking activity, and well-being, compared to a regular group walking program for older adults. Nineteen older adult walking groups (i.e., the clusters; N = 503; Mage = 69.23 years, SD = 6.68) all participated in a 12-week structured group walking program. Nine walking groups (n = 304) were randomly assigned to the intervention in which participants received the 5RS program in addition to regular group walking.

Results: 5RS was successful in strengthening the identity leadership qualities of the appointed peer leaders. Multilevel regressions showed that 5RS succeeded in increasing group cohesion and walking activity to a greater extent than a regular group walking program, while participants' group identification and well-being increased to a similar extent in both conditions. Furthermore, structural equation modelling revealed that group identification mediated the impact of peer leaders' identity leadership on group cohesion and well-being (but not walking activity).

Conclusion: By harnessing the capacity of the group and its peer leaders, the 5RS program offers a promising intervention to engage older adults in physical activity.

Trial registration: The study was retrospectively registered as clinical trial on 9 September 2021 ( NCT05038423 ).

Keywords: 5RS; Elderly; Group identification; Identity leadership; Peer leadership; Physical activity; Social identification; Walking group; Well-being; cohesion.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The 5R Shared Leadership Program, as developed by Fransen et al. [43]
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Study design and timeline
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Results of the paired samples t-tests, comparing the identity leadership of the informal leaders at the pretest with the identity leadership of the task, motivational, and social leader at the posttest
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Pre- and postscores on the different outcomes for both the 5RS intervention and comparison group
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Structural equation model including the difference scores (Δ = posttest – pretest) of the identity leadership of the peer leaders, participants’ identification with their walking group, the group cohesion, participants’ well-being, and their walking activity. Standardised regression coefficients (with their standard errors) are depicted and the proportions of explained variance are presented in italics. ***p < .001

References

    1. Revision. United Nations. World Population Prospects: The 2019. 2019.
    1. Rowe JW, Kahn RL. Successful aging 2.0: Conceptual expansions for the 21st century. J Gerontol B. 2015;70(4):593–596. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbv025.
    1. World Health Organisation. World report on ageing and health. 2015. Retrieved from: .
    1. Arem H, Moore SC, Patel A, Hartge P, Berrington de Gonzalez A, Visvanathan K, et al. Leisure Time Physical Activity and Mortality: A Detailed Pooled Analysis of the Dose-Response Relationship. JAMA. Intern Med. 2015;175(6):959–967.
    1. Jak AJ. The impact of physical and mental activity on cognitive aging. Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2012;10:273–291. doi: 10.1007/7854_2011_141.
    1. Ströhle A. Physical activity, exercise, depression and anxiety disorders. J Neural Transm. 2008;116(6):777. doi: 10.1007/s00702-008-0092-x.
    1. Morris JN, Hardman AE. Walking to health. Sports Medicine. 1997;23(5):306–332. doi: 10.2165/00007256-199723050-00004.
    1. Murphy MH, Nevill AM, Murtagh EM, Holder RL. The effect of walking on fitness, fatness and resting blood pressure: A meta-analysis of randomised, controlled trials. Preventive Med. 2007;44(5):377–385. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2006.12.008.
    1. Kassavou A, Turner A, French DP. Do interventions to promote walking in groups increase physical activity? A meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013;10:18. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-18.
    1. Hanson S, Jones A. Is there evidence that walking groups have health benefits? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(11):710. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2014-094157.
    1. Kritz M, Thøgersen-Ntoumani C, Mullan B, Stathi A, Ntoumanis N. “It’s better together”: A nested longitudinal study examining the benefits of walking regularly with peers versus primarily alone in older adults. J Aging Phys Act. 2021;29(3):455–465. doi: 10.1123/japa.2020-0091.
    1. Stevens M, Cruwys T. Membership in sport or exercise groups predicts sustained physical activity and longevity in older adults compared to physically active matched controls. Ann Behav Med. 2020;54(8):557–566. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaaa003.
    1. Hwang J, Wang L, Siever J, Medico TD, Jones CA. Loneliness and social isolation among older adults in a community exercise program: a qualitative study. Aging Ment Health. 2019;23(6):736–742. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2018.1450835.
    1. Tajfel H, Turner JC. An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: Austin WG, Worchel S, editors. The social psychology of intergroup relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole; 1979. pp. 33–47.
    1. Turner JC, Hogg MA, Oakes PJ, Reicher SD, Wetherell MS. Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Blackwell; 1987.
    1. Haslam SA, Fransen K, Boen F. The new psychology of sport and exercise: The social identity approach: Sage Publications Ltd; 2020. p. 506.
    1. Haslam C, Jetten J, Cruwys T, Dingle G, Haslam SA. The new psychology of health: Unlocking the social cure. London: Routledge; 2018. p. 510.
    1. Haslam C, Cruwys T, Haslam SA, Dingle GA, Chang MX-L. Groups 4 Health: Evidence that a social-identity intervention that builds and strengthens social group membership improves mental health. J Affect Disord. 2016;194:188–195. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.01.010.
    1. Steffens NK, La Rue CJ, Haslam C, Walter ZC, Cruwys T, Munt KA, et al. Social identification-building interventions to improve health: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Psychol Rev. 2020;15(1):85–112. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2019.1669481.
    1. Stevens M, Rees T, Polman R. Social identification, exercise participation, and positive exercise experiences: Evidence from parkrun. J Sports Sci. 2019;37(2):221–228. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2018.1489360.
    1. Stevens M, Cruwys T, Rees T, Haslam SA, Boen F, Fransen K. Physical activity. In: Haslam SA, Fransen K, Boen F, editors. The new psychology of sport and exercise: The Social Identity Approach. London: Sage Publications Ltd; 2020. pp. 167–186.
    1. Elgar FJ, Davis CG, Wohl MJ, Trites SJ, Zelenski JM, Martin MS. Social capital, health and life satisfaction in 50 countries. Health Place. 2011;17(5):1044–1053. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.06.010.
    1. National Academies of Sciences E, Medicine. Social isolation and loneliness in older adults: Opportunities for the health care system. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2020. 316 p.
    1. Haslam SA, Reicher SD, Platow MJ. The new psychology of leadership: Identity, influence and power. New York: Psychology Press; 2011. p. 267.
    1. Stevens M, Rees T, Cruwys T. Social identity leadership in sport and exercise: Current status and future directions. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2021;55:101931. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.101931.
    1. Steffens NK, Fransen K, Haslam SA. Leadership. In: Haslam SA, Fransen K, Boen F, editors. The new psychology of sport and exercise: The Social Identity Approach. London: Sage Publications Ltd; 2020. pp. 41–58.
    1. Fransen K, Haslam SA, Steffens NK, Mallett C, Peters K, Boen F. Making ‘us’ better: High-quality athlete leadership relates to health and burnout in professional Australian football teams. Eur J Sport Sci. 2020;20(7):953–963. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2019.1680736.
    1. Fransen K, McEwan D, Sarkar M. The impact of identity leadership on performance and well-being in team sport: Is psychological safety the missing link? Psychol Sport Exerc. 2020;51:101763. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2020.101763.
    1. Steffens NK, Slade EL, Stevens M, Haslam SA, Rees T. Putting the ‘we’ into workout: The association of identity leadership with exercise class attendance and effort, and the mediating role of group identification and comfort. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2019;45:101544. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2019.101544.
    1. Stevens M, Rees T, Coffee P, Haslam SA, Steffens NK, Polman R. Leaders promote attendance in sport and exercise sessions by fostering social identity. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2018;28:2100–2108. doi: 10.1111/sms.13217.
    1. Mertens N, Boen F, Haslam SA, Steffens NK, Bruner MW, Barker J, et al. Harnessing the power of ‘us’: A randomized wait-list controlled trial of the 5R Shared Leadership Development Program (5RS) in basketball teams. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2021;54:101936. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2021.101936.
    1. Mertens N, Boen F, Steffens NK, Cotterill ST, Haslam SA, Fransen K. Leading together towards a stronger ‘us’: An experimental test of the effectiveness of the 5R Shared Leadership Program in basketball teams. J Sci Med Sport. 2020;23(8):770–775. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2020.01.010.
    1. Stevens M, Rees T, Steffens NK, Haslam SA, Coffee P, Polman R. Leaders’ creation of shared identity impacts group members’ effort and performance: Evidence from an exercise task. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(7):e0218984. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0218984.
    1. Miller AJ, Slater MJ, Turner MJ. Coach identity leadership behaviours are positively associated with athlete resource appraisals: The mediating roles of relational and group identification. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2020;51:101755. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2020.101755.
    1. Fransen K, Steffens NK, Haslam SA, Vanbeselaere N, Vande Broek G, Boen F. We will be champions: Leaders' confidence in 'us' inspires team members' team confidence and performance. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2016;26(12):1455–1469. doi: 10.1111/sms.12603.
    1. Fransen K, Haslam SA, Steffens NK, Vanbeselaere N, De Cuyper B, Boen F. Believing in us: Exploring leaders’ capacity to enhance team confidence and performance by building a sense of shared social identity. J Exp Psych Appl. 2015;21(1):89–100. doi: 10.1037/xap0000033.
    1. Stevens M, Rees T, Coffee P, Steffens NK, Haslam SA, Polman R. Leading us to be active: A two-wave test of relationships between identity leadership, group identification, and attendance. Sport Exerc Perform Psychol. 2020;9(1):128–142.
    1. Fransen K, Decroos S, Vande Broek G, Boen F. Leading from the top or leading from within? A comparison between coaches' and athletes' leadership as predictors of team identification, team confidence, and team cohesion. Int J Sports Sci Coach. 2016;11(6):757–771. doi: 10.1177/1747954116676102.
    1. Thøgersen-Ntoumani C, Quested E, Smith BS, Nicholas J, McVeigh J, Fenton SAM, et al. Feasibility and preliminary effects of a peer-led motivationally-embellished workplace walking intervention: A pilot cluster randomized trial (the START Trial) Contemp Clin Trials. 2020;91:105969. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.105969.
    1. Kritz M, Thøgersen-Ntoumani C, Mullan B, McVeigh J, Ntoumanis N. Effective peer leader attributes for the promotion of walking in older adults. Gerontologist. 2020;60(6):1137–1148. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaa014.
    1. Hulteen RM, Waldhauser KJ, Beauchamp MR. Promoting health-enhancing physical activity: a state-of-the-art review of peer-delivered interventions. Curr Obes Rep. 2019;8(4):341–353. doi: 10.1007/s13679-019-00366-w.
    1. Ginis KA, Nigg CR, Smith AL. Peer-delivered physical activity interventions: An overlooked opportunity for physical activity promotion. Transl Behav Med. 2013;3(4):434–443. doi: 10.1007/s13142-013-0215-2.
    1. Fransen K, Haslam SA, Steffens NK, Mallett CJ, Peters K, Mertens N, et al. All for us and us for all: Introducing the 5R Shared Leadership Program. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2020;51:101762. doi: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2020.101762.
    1. Fransen K, Vanbeselaere N, De Cuyper B, Vande Broek G, Boen F. The myth of the team captain as principal leader: Extending the athlete leadership classification within sport teams. J Sports Sci. 2014;32(14):1389–1397. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2014.891291.
    1. Haslam SA, Steffens NK, Peters K, Boyce RA, Mallett CJ, Fransen K. A social identity approach to leadership development: The 5R program. J Pers Psychol. 2017;16(3):113–124.
    1. Slater MJ, Barker JB. Doing social identity leadership: Exploring the efficacy of an identity leadership intervention on perceived leadership and mobilization in elite disability soccer. J Appl Sport Psychol. 2019;31(1):65–86. doi: 10.1080/10413200.2017.1410255.
    1. Edelmann CM, Boen F, Fransen K. The power of empowerment: Predictors and benefits of shared leadership in organizations. Front Psychol. 2020;11:3281. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.582894.
    1. Fransen K, Mertens N, Cotterill ST, Vande Broek G, Boen F. From autocracy to empowerment: Teams with shared leadership perceive their coaches to be better leaders. J Appl Sport Psychol. 2020;32(1):5–27. doi: 10.1080/10413200.2019.1617370.
    1. Pelssers J, Delecluse C, Opdenacker J, Kennis E, Van Roie E, Boen F. "Every step counts!": Effects of a structured walking intervention in a community-based senior organization. J Aging Phys Act. 2013;21(2):167–185. doi: 10.1123/japa.21.2.167.
    1. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A-G. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods. 2009;41:1149–1160. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.
    1. Liu Y, Lachman ME. A group-based walking study to enhance physical activity among older adults: The role of social engagement. Res Aging. 2021;43(9-10):368–377. doi: 10.1177/0164027520963613.
    1. Molino-Lova R, Pasquini G, Vannetti F, Paperini A, Forconi T, Polcaro P, et al. Effects of a structured physical activity intervention on measures of physical performance in frail elderly patients after cardiac rehabilitation: a pilot study with 1-year follow-up. Intern Emerg Med. 2013;8(7):581–589. doi: 10.1007/s11739-011-0654-z.
    1. Steffens NK, Haslam SA, Reicher SD, Platow MJ, Fransen K, Yang J, et al. Leadership as social identity management: Introducing the Identity Leadership Inventory (ILI) to assess and validate a four-dimensional model. Leadersh Q. 2014;25:1001–1024. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.05.002.
    1. Doosje B, Ellemers N, Spears R. Perceived intragroup variability as a function of group status and identification. J Exp Soc Psychol. 1995;31(5):410–436. doi: 10.1006/jesp.1995.1018.
    1. Carron AV, Widmeyer WN, Brawley LR. The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sport teams - The Group Environment Questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology. 1985;7(3):244–266. doi: 10.1123/jsp.7.3.244.
    1. Tennant R, Hiller L, Fishwick R, Platt S, Joseph S, Weich S, et al. The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007;5(1):63. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-5-63.
    1. Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjöström M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(8):1381–1395. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB.
    1. Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, Irwin ML, Swartz AM, Strath SJ, et al. Compendium of physical activities: an update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(Supplement):S498–S516. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200009001-00009.
    1. R Core Team. R . A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2021.
    1. Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus User’s Guide. 8th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén; 2017.
    1. McNeish D, Stapleton LM, Silverman RD. On the unnecessary ubiquity of hierarchical linear modeling. Psychol Methods. 2017;22(1):114–140. doi: 10.1037/met0000078.
    1. Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling. 1999;6(1):1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118.
    1. Kwak L, Kremers S, Walsh A, Brug H. How is your walking group running? Health Educ. 2006;106(1):21–31. doi: 10.1108/09654280610637175.
    1. Kassavou A, Turner A, French DP. The role of walkers’ needs and expectations in supporting maintenance of attendance at walking groups: A longitudinal multi-perspective study of walkers and walk group leaders. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(3):e0118754. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118754.
    1. World Health Organization. WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. 2020. Retrieved from: .
    1. Rothman AJ. Toward a theory-based analysis of behavioral maintenance. Health Psychology. 2000;19(1s):64–69. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.19.Suppl1.64.
    1. Barford A, Dorling D, Smith GD, Shaw M. Life expectancy: Women now on top everywhere. BMJ. 2006;332(7545):808. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7545.808.
    1. Pollard TM, Wagnild JM. Gender differences in walking (for leisure, transport and in total) across adult life: A systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):341. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4253-4.
    1. Rigby BP, Dodd-Reynolds CJ, Oliver EJ. Inequities and inequalities in outdoor walking groups: a scoping review. Public Health Rev. 2020;41(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s40985-020-00119-4.
    1. Kwasnicka D, Donnachie C, Thøgersen-Ntoumani C, Hunt K, Gray CM, Ntoumanis N, et al. The Aussie-FIT process evaluation: feasibility and acceptability of a weight loss intervention for men, delivered in Australian Football League settings. Psychology & Health. 2021;1-20.
    1. Hunt K, Wyke S, Bunn C, Donnachie C, Reid N, Gray CM. Scale-up and scale-out of a gender-sensitized weight management and healthy living program delivered to overweight men via professional sports clubs: The wider implementation of Football Fans in Training (FFIT) Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(2):584. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17020584.
    1. Moschny A, Platen P, Klaaßen-Mielke R, Trampisch U, Hinrichs T. Barriers to physical activity in older adults in Germany: a cross-sectional study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8(1):121. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-121.
    1. Burton E, Farrier K, Hill KD, Codde J, Airey P, Hill A-M. Effectiveness of peers in delivering programs or motivating older people to increase their participation in physical activity: Systematic review and meta-analysis. J Sports Sci. 2018;36(6):666–678. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2017.1329549.
    1. McCann J, Ridgers ND, Carver A, Thornton LE, Teychenne M. Effective recruitment and retention strategies in community health programs. Health Promot J Austr. 2013;24(2):104–110. doi: 10.1071/HE13042.
    1. Capalb DJ, O'Halloran P, Liamputtong P. Why older people engage in physical activity: an exploratory study of participants in a community-based walking program. Aust J Prim Health. 2014;20(1):74–78. doi: 10.1071/PY12090.
    1. Wurzer BM, Hurkmans EJ, Waters DL. The use of peer-led community-based programs to promote healthy aging. Curr Geriatr Rep. 2017;6(3):202–211. doi: 10.1007/s13670-017-0217-x.
    1. Tarrant M, Haslam C, Carter M, Calitri R, Haslam SA. Social identity interventions. In: Hagger MS, Cameron LD, Hamilton K, Hankonen N, Lintunen T, editors. Behavior change interventions: Practical guides to behavior change: Cambridge University Press; 2020. p. 649–60.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa