Comparative performance of gene-based warfarin dosing algorithms in a multiethnic population

S A Lubitz, S A Scott, E B Rothlauf, A Agarwal, I Peter, D Doheny, S Van Der Zee, M Jaremko, C Yoo, R J Desnick, J L Halperin, S A Lubitz, S A Scott, E B Rothlauf, A Agarwal, I Peter, D Doheny, S Van Der Zee, M Jaremko, C Yoo, R J Desnick, J L Halperin

Abstract

Summary background: Gene-based warfarin dosing algorithms have largely been developed in homogeneous populations, and their generalizability has not been established.

Objectives: We sought to assess the performance of published algorithms in a racially diverse and multiethnic sample, and determine if additional clinical variables or genetic variants associated with dose could enhance algorithm performance.

Patients and methods: In 145 compliant patients on warfarin with a goal international normalized ratio (INR) of 2-3, stable, therapeutic doses were compared with predicted doses using 12 reported algorithms that incorporated CYP2C9 and VKORC1 variants. Additional covariates tested with each model included race, concurrent medications, medications known to interact with warfarin and previously described CYP4F2, CALU and GGCX variants.

Results: The mean patient age was 67 +/- 14 years; 90 (62%) were male. Eighty-two (57%) were Caucasian, 28 (19%) African-American, 20 (14%) Hispanic and 15 (10%) Asian. The median warfarin dose was 35 mg per week (interquartile range 23-53 mg per week). Gene-based dosing algorithms explained 37-55% of the variation in warfarin dose requirements. Neither the addition of race, number of concurrent medications nor the number of concurrent medications interacting with warfarin enhanced algorithm performance. Similarly, consideration of CYP4F2, CALU or GGCX variant genotypes did not improve algorithms.

Conclusions: Existing gene-based dosing algorithms explained between approximately one-third and one-half of the variability in warfarin dose requirements in this racially and ethnically diverse cohort. Additional clinical and recently described genetic variants associated with warfarin dose did not enhance prediction in our patient population.

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure of Conflict of Interests

The authors state that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Therapeutic warfarin dose according to CYP2C9, VKORC1, CYP4F2, CALU and GGCX genotype. Weekly therapeutic warfarin doses were compared across genotypes. The boxes display the interquartile range of warfarin doses. Whiskers represent observed doses beyond this range with values less than or equal to 1.5 times the interquartile range. The median dose is indicated by the solid black bar. The number of individuals with each genotype is displayed in parenthesis.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Therapeutic warfarin dose according to race. Weekly therapeutic warfarin doses were compared across races. The boxes display the inter-quartile range of warfarin doses. Whiskers represent observed doses beyond this range with values less than or equal to 1.5 times the interquartile range. The median dose is indicated by the solid black bar.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa