Addressing ethnic disparity in antenatal care: a qualitative evaluation of midwives' experiences with the MAMAACT intervention

Helle Johnsen, Nazila Ghavami Kivi, Cecilie H Morrison, Mette Juhl, Ulla Christensen, Sarah F Villadsen, Helle Johnsen, Nazila Ghavami Kivi, Cecilie H Morrison, Mette Juhl, Ulla Christensen, Sarah F Villadsen

Abstract

Background: In Denmark, 13% of all children are born by non-Western immigrant women. The public antenatal care has not adapted to this increased diversity of women. Compared to women coming from Western countries, non-Western immigrant women have an increased prevalence of severe maternal morbidity and higher risks of maternal death, stillbirth and infant death. Suboptimal care is a contributing factor to these ethnic disparities, and thus the provision of appropriate antenatal care services is pivotal to reducing these disparities and challenges to public health. Yet, little is known about the targeted interventions which have been developed to reduce these inequities in reproductive health. The MAMAACT intervention, which included a training course for midwives, a leaflet and a mobile application, as well as additional visit time, was developed and tested at a maternity ward to increase responses to pregnancy warning signs among midwives and non-Western immigrant women.

Aim: To explore the feasibility and acceptability of the MAMAACT intervention among midwives and identify factors affecting midwives' delivery of the intervention.

Methods: Eight mini-group interviews with midwives (n = 18) were undertaken. Systematic text condensation was used to analyse data.

Results: Three main categories were identified, which were 'Challenges of working with non-Western immigrant women', 'Attitudes towards and use of the leaflet and mobile application', and 'Organisational factors affecting the use of the MAMAACT intervention'.

Conclusions: The MAMAACT intervention was found to be feasible as well as acceptable among midwives. Women turning to relatives for pregnancy-related advice, time constraints during midwifery visits, incomplete clinical records and lack of professional interpreter assistance impacted midwives' delivery of the MAMAACT intervention. Midwives displayed a readiness for the MAMAACT intervention; however, there is a need to further examine how contextual factors may impact the use of the intervention in antenatal care.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, Retrospective Registration (07/2/2020), registration number NCT04261400.

Keywords: Antenatal care; Complex interventions; Ethnicity; Inequity; Maternal and child health; Migration; Pregnancy.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The MAMAACT app

References

    1. Danmarks Statistik. Statistikbanken. . Accessed 19 Jan 2018.
    1. Poulsen A, Brot C. Anbefalinger for svangreomsorgen. 2. Danmark: Sundhedsstyrelsen; 2013.
    1. Det Sundhedsvidenskabelige Fakultet . Forskningsprojektet Sulim - Opsummering af resultater. Sundhed og inklusion af indvandrere og etniske minoriteter i Danmark- Velfærdsinstitutionernes rolle i forskellige livsfaser. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen; 2016.
    1. WHO Regional Office for Europe . Improving the health care of pregnant refugee and migrant women and newborn children (Technical guidance on refugee and migrant health) Copenhagen: World Health Organization; 2018. pp. 1–40.
    1. Keygnaert I, World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe, Health Evidence Network . What is the evidence on the reduction of inequalities in accessibility and quality of maternal health care delivery for migrants? A review of the existing evidence in the WHO European Region. Copenhagen: World Health Organisation Regional Office for Europe: HEN; 2016.
    1. Urquia ML, Glazier RH, Mortensen L, Nybo-Andersen A-M, Small R, Davey M-A. m.fl. Severe maternal morbidity associated with maternal birthplace in three high-immigration settings. Eur J Pub Health. 2015;25(4):620–625. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cku230.
    1. van den Akker T, van Roosmalen J. Maternal mortality and severe morbidity in a migration perspective. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;32:26–38. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2015.08.016.
    1. Linard M, Blondel B, Estellat C, Deneux-Tharaux C, Luton D, Oury J. M.fl. Association between inadequate antenatal care utilisation and severe perinatal and maternal morbidity: an analysis in the PreCARE cohort. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;125(5):587–595. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14794.
    1. Villalonga-Olives E, Kawachi I, von Steinbüchel N. Pregnancy and birth outcomes among immigrant women in the US and Europe: a systematic review. J Immigr Minor Health. 2017;19(6):1469–1487. doi: 10.1007/s10903-016-0483-2.
    1. Villadsen SF, Mortensen LH, Andersen AMN. Ethnic disparity in stillbirth and infant mortality in Denmark 1981–2003. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2008;63(2):106–112. doi: 10.1136/jech.2008.078741.
    1. Tweed EJ, Mackay DF, Nelson SM, Cooper S-A, Pell JP. Five-minute Apgar score and educational outcomes: retrospective cohort study of 751,369 children. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2016;101(2):F121–F126. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-308483.
    1. Spallek J, Zeeb H, Razum O. What do we have to know from migrants’ past exposures to understand their health status? A life course approach. Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2011;8(1):6. doi: 10.1186/1742-7622-8-6.
    1. Essén B, Bödker B, Sjöberg NO, Langhoff-Roos J, Greisen G, Gudmundsson S. M.fl. Are some perinatal deaths in immigrant groups linked to suboptimal perinatal care services? BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;109(6):677–682. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01077.x.
    1. Almeida LM, Caldas J, Ayres-de-Campos D, Salcedo-Barrientos D, Dias S. Maternal healthcare in migrants: a systematic review. Matern Child Health J. 2013;17(8):1346–1354. doi: 10.1007/s10995-012-1149-x.
    1. Brehm Christensen M, Fredsted Villadsen S, Weber T, Wilken-Jensen C, Nybo Andersen A-M. Higher rate of serious perinatal events in non-Western women in Denmark. Dan Med J. 2016;63:3.
    1. Lawn JE, Blencowe H, Waiswa P, Amouzou A, Mathers C, Hogan D. M.fl. Stillbirths: rates, risk factors, and acceleration towards 2030. Lancet. 2016;387(10018):587–603. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00837-5.
    1. McGarry O. What strategies to address communication barriers for refugees and migrants in health care settings have been implemented and evaluated across the WHO European Region?: themed issues on migration and health, IX. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2018.
    1. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M. m.fl. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:a1655. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1655.
    1. Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, Bond L, Bonell C, Hardeman W. m.fl. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. 2015. pp. 1–134.
    1. Lewin S, Booth A, Glenton C, Munthe-Kaas H, Rashidian A, Wainwright M. m.fl. Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings: introduction to the series. Implement Sci. 2018;13(S1):s13012.
    1. Villadsen SF, Mortensen LH, Andersen A-MN. Care during pregnancy and childbirth for migrant women: how do we advance? Development of intervention studies--the case of the MAMAACT intervention in Denmark. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2016;32:100–112. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2015.08.013.
    1. Seeleman C, Suurmond J, Stronks K. Cultural competence: a conceptual framework for teaching and learning. Med Educ. 2009;43(3):229–237. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03269.x.
    1. Indvandrere i Danmark. Copenhagen: Danmarks Statistik; 2013. . Accessed 20 June 2019.
    1. Eldridge SM, Lancaster GA, Campbell MJ, Thabane L, Hopewell S, Coleman CL. m.fl. Defining Feasibility and Pilot Studies in Preparation for Randomised Controlled Trials: Development of a Conceptual Framework. Lazzeri C, editor. PLOS ONE. 2016;11(3):e0150205. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150205.
    1. O’Cathain A, Hoddinott P, Lewin S, Thomas KJ, Young B, Adamson J. m.fl. Maximising the impact of qualitative research in feasibility studies for randomised controlled trials: guidance for researchers. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2015;1:1. doi: 10.1186/s40814-015-0026-y.
    1. Malterud K. Kvalitative forskningsmetoder for medisin og helsefag: en innføring. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget; 2017.
    1. Green J, Thorogood N. Qualitative methods for health research. 3. SAGE: Los Angeles; 2014.
    1. Darwin Z, Green J, McLeish J, Willmot H, Spiby H. Evaluation of trained volunteer doula services for disadvantaged women in five areas in England: women’s experiences. Health Soc Care Community. 2017;25(2):466–477. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12331.
    1. Akhavan S. Midwives’ views on factors that contribute to health care inequalities among immigrants in Sweden: a qualitative study. Int J Equity Health. 2012;11(1):47. doi: 10.1186/1475-9276-11-47.
    1. Lathrop B. A systematic review comparing group prenatal care to traditional prenatal care. Nurs Womens Health. 2013;17(2):118–130. doi: 10.1111/1751-486X.12020.
    1. Riggs E, Muyeen S, Brown S, Dawson W, Petschel P, Tardiff W. M.fl. Cultural safety and belonging for refugee background women attending group pregnancy care: an Australian qualitative study. Birth. 2017;44(2):145–152. doi: 10.1111/birt.12272.
    1. Lyons SM, O’Keeffe FM, Clarke AT, Staines A. Cultural diversity in the Dublin maternity services: the experiences of maternity service providers when caring for ethnic minority women. Ethn Health. 2008;13(3):261–276. doi: 10.1080/13557850801903020.
    1. McFadden A, Renfrew MJ, Atkin K. Does cultural context make a difference to women’s experiences of maternity care? A qualitative study comparing the perspectives of breast-feeding women of Bangladeshi origin and health practitioners: cultural context of maternity care. Health Expect. 2013;16(4):e124–e135. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00770.x.
    1. Tait RC, Chibnall JT. Racial/ethnic disparities in the assessment and treatment of pain: psychosocial perspectives. Am Psychol. 2014;69(2):131–141. doi: 10.1037/a0035204.
    1. Tucker CM, Arthur TM, Roncoroni J, Wall W, Sanchez J. Patient-centered, culturally sensitive health care. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2015;9(1):63–77. doi: 10.1177/1559827613498065.
    1. Kleinman A, Benson P. Anthropology in the Clinic: The Problem of Cultural Competency and How to Fix It. PLoS Med. 2006;3(10):e294. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0030294.
    1. Jongen C, McCalman J, Bainbridge R. Health workforce cultural competency interventions: a systematic scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):232. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3001-5.
    1. Horvat L, Horey D, Romios P, Kis-Rigo J. Cultural competence education for health professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;5:1.
    1. Gatny HH, Axinn WG. Willingness to participate in research during pregnancy: race, experience, and motivation. Field Methods. 2012;24(2):135–154. doi: 10.1177/1525822X11419819.
    1. Bowen DJ, Kreuter M, Spring B, Cofta-Woerpel L, Linnan L, Weiner D. m.fl. How we design feasibility studies. Am J Prev Med. 2009;36(5):452–457. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.02.002.
    1. Fahy K. What is woman-centred care and why does it matter? Women Birth. 2012;25(4):149–151. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2012.10.005.
    1. Uddannelses- og Forskningsministeriet. BEK nr 700 af 08/06/2016. Bekendtgørelse om uddannelsen til professionsbachelor i jordemoderkundskab. . Accessed 6 Jul 2018.
    1. Nielsen K, Randall R. Opening the black box: presenting a model for evaluating organizational-level interventions. Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 2013;22(5):601–617. doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2012.690556.
    1. Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM, Obstfeld D. Organizing and the process of Sensemaking. Organ Sci. 2005;16(4):409–421. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1050.0133.
    1. Binder P, Borné Y, Johnsdotter S, Essén B. Shared language is essential: communication in a multiethnic obstetric care setting. J Health Commun. 2012;17(10):1171–1186. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2012.665421.
    1. Patton MQ. Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. HSR Health Serv Res. 1999;34(5):1189–1208.
    1. Fletcher A, Jamal F, Moore G, Evans RE, Murphy S, Bonell C. Realist complex intervention science: applying realist principles across all phases of the Medical Research Council framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions. Evaluation. 2016;22(3):286–303. doi: 10.1177/1356389016652743.
    1. Sundheds- og Ældreministeriet. Bekendtgørelse af lov om videnskabsetisk behandling af sundhedsvidenskabelige forskningsprojekter. LBK nr 1083 af 15/09/2017. . Accessed 4 Apr 2018.
    1. Datatilsynet. Vejledning Samtykke September 2019. Datatilsynet; 2019. . Accessed 5 Feb 2020.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorit ja yhteistyökumppanit

Sairaudet

Huumeiden interventiot

3
Tilaa