Specific and general adaptations following motor imagery practice focused on muscle strength in total knee arthroplasty rehabilitation: A randomized controlled trial

Armin H Paravlic, Rado Pisot, Uros Marusic, Armin H Paravlic, Rado Pisot, Uros Marusic

Abstract

Background: Motor imagery (MI) has been a widely used strategy in the past two decades to enhance physical capabilities among orthopaedic patients. However, its effectiveness is still questioned, since the demonstrated effects were likely task-dependent, with little evidence of transfer to tasks not specifically trained with MI.

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate whether an MI practice focused on maximal isometric knee extension strength, causes additional specific and general adaptations upon neuromuscular and functional variables when compared to conventional rehabilitation only, in patients submitted to total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Design: Parallel group randomized controlled clinical trial.

Participants: Thirty-four patients (56% man) submitted to TKA.

Program: Patients were randomly assigned to an MI practice group (MIp: 15 minutes per day/5 days per week in addition to routine physical therapy) or control group (CON) that performed routine physical therapy alone for four weeks.

Outcome measures: The maximal isometric knee extension strength of the operated leg was defined as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were spatial and temporal gait parameters, 30-second chair sit-to-stand performance, a self-reported physical function assessed by the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) questionnaire, and an MI ability score. All measurements were conducted before and one month after TKA.

Results: Significant differences in treatment effects were observed for the MIp group compared to CON: the MIp showed less strength decrease (ES = 1.15, 95% CI: 0.32, 1.99, p = 0.022); faster self-selected speed under single (ES = 2.12, 95% CI: 1.16, 3.08, p = 0.001) and dual task (ES = 1.59, large, 95% CI: 0.67, 2.50, p = 0.002) conditions; brisk-pace gait speed during single (ES = 1.32, 95% CI: 0.47, 2.17, p = 0.020) and dual task conditions (ES = 1.31, large, 95% CI: 0.38, 2.23, p = 0.013); improved chair sit-to-stand (ES = 1.45, large, 95% CI: 0.58, 2.31, p = 0.004) performance; and a higher score on MI ability questionnaires for kinaesthetic imagery (KI) (ES = 0.55, 95% CI: -0.23, 1.34, p = 0.010) and internal visual imagery (EVI) (ES = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.18, 1.80, p = 0.039) scales, respectively. In addition, only MIp showed unaltered single and double support periods, as well as stride length and cadence during single task self-selected gait condition. Finally, analysis showed that the improved MI ability score achieved at the end of MI training was significantly correlated with the changes in the strength of the operated leg (kinaesthetic imagery: r = 0.741, p = 0.004; and internal visual imagery: r = 0.623, p = 0.023).

Conclusions: MI training, when added in a corollary to routine physical therapy, led to improvements in both specific and general adaptations that were related to patients' physical capabilities. While future studies must also evaluate the long-term effects, conducting MI training during acute and post-acute rehabilitation phases is advised, especially when the extent and range of physical exercise is limited or made impossible.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03684148.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. Flow chart of participant enrolment,…
Fig 1. Flow chart of participant enrolment, randomized group allocation, and final analysis.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Illustration showing gait speed results during walking in: a) self-selected pace under single-task condition; b) self-selected pace under dual-task condition; c) brisk-pace under single-task condition and d) brisk-pace under dual-task condition. Data are presented as means and standard deviations. * indicates a significant change of p< 0.05; ** indicates a significant change of p< 0.01 from PRE to POST, respectively.

References

    1. Cram P, Lu X, Kates SL, Singh JA, Li Y, Wolf BR. Total knee arthroplasty volume, utilization, and outcomes among Medicare beneficiaries, 1991–2010. JAMA. 2012;308(12):1227–36. 10.1001/2012.jama.11153
    1. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Jt Surg—Ser A. 2007;89(4):780–5.
    1. Walsh M, Woodhouse LJ, Thomas SG, Finch E. Physical Impairments and Functional Limitations: A Comparison of Individuals 1 Year After Total Knee Arthroplasty With Control Subjects. Phys Ther. 1998;78(3):248–58. 10.1093/ptj/78.3.248
    1. Schache MB, McClelland JA, Webster KE. Lower limb strength following total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review. Knee. 2014;21(1):12–20. 10.1016/j.knee.2013.08.002
    1. Skoffer B, Dalgas U, Mechlenburg I. Progressive resistance training before and after total hip and knee arthroplasty: A systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2015;29(1):14–29. 10.1177/0269215514537093
    1. Kittelson AJ, Stackhouse SK, Stevens-lapsley JE. Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation after total joint arthroplasty: A critical review of recent controlled studies. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2013;49(6):909–20.
    1. Langer N, Hänggi J, Müller NA. Effects of limb immobilization on brain plasticity. Neurology. 2012;78:182–8. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31823fcd9c
    1. Hart JM, Pietrosimone B, Hertel J, Ingersoll CD. Quadriceps Activation Following Knee Injuries: A Systematic Review. J Athl Train. 2010;45(1):87–97. 10.4085/1062-6050-45.1.87
    1. Morita S, Kusaka T, Tanaka S, Yamada E, Arima N, Itoh S, et al. The Relationship between Muscle Weakness and Activation of the Cerebral Cortex Early after Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. J Phys Ther Sci. 2013;25(3):301–7.
    1. Marusic U, Grosprêtre S. Non-physical approaches to counteract age-related functional deterioration: Applications for rehabilitation and neural mechanisms. Eur J Sport Sci. 2018;18(5):639–49. 10.1080/17461391.2018.1447018
    1. Paravlic AH, Kovač S, Pisot R, Marusic U. Neurostructural correlates of strength decrease following total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis. Bosn J basic Med Sci. 2019;
    1. Marusic U, Verghese J, Mahoney JR. Cognitive-Based Interventions to Improve Mobility: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018;19(6):484–491.e3. 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.02.002
    1. Jeannerod M. Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition. Neuroimage. 2001;14(1 II):103–9.
    1. Jeannerod M. The representing brain: neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Behav Brain Sci. 1994;17(2):187–245.
    1. Miller KJ, Schalk G, Fetz EE, den Nijs M, Ojemann JG, Rao RPN. Cortical activity during motor execution, motor imagery, and imagery-based online feedback. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2010;107(9):4430–5. 10.1073/pnas.0913697107
    1. Braun S, Beurskens A, Kleynen M, Schols J, Wade D. Rehabilitation with mental practice has similar effects on mobility as rehabilitation with relaxation in people with Parkinson ‘ s disease: a multicentre randomised trial. J Physiother. 2011;57(1):27–34. 10.1016/S1836-9553(11)70004-2
    1. Marusic U, Grosprêtre S, Paravlic A, Kovač S, Pišot R, Taube W. Motor Imagery during Action Observation of Locomotor Tasks Improves Rehabilitation Outcome in Older Adults after Total Hip Arthroplasty. Neural Plast. 2018;2018(March):1–9.
    1. Zimmermann-Schlatter A, Schuster C, Puhan MA, Siekierka E, Steurer J. Efficacy of motor imagery in post-stroke rehabilitation: A systematic review. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2008;5.
    1. Jacobson AF, Umberger WA, Palmieri PA, Alexander TS, Myerscough RP, Draucker CB, et al. Guided Imagery for Total Knee Replacement: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study. J Altern Complement Med. 2016;22(7):563–75. 10.1089/acm.2016.0038
    1. Zach S, Dobersek U, Filho E, Inglis V, Tenenbaum G. A meta-analysis of mental imagery effects on post-injury functional mobility, perceived pain, and self-efficacy. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2018;34:79–87.
    1. Paravlic AH, Slimani M, Tod D, Marusic U, Milanovic Z, Pisot R. Effects and Dose–Response Relationships of Motor Imagery Practice on Strength Development in Healthy Adult Populations: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Sport Med. 2018;
    1. Brown K, Kachelman J, Topp R, Quesada PM, Nyland J, Malkani A, et al. Predictors of functional task performance among patients schelduled for total knee arthroplasty. J Strength Cond Res. 2009;23(2):436–43. 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318198fc13
    1. Mizner RL, Petterson SC, Stevens JE, Axe MJ, Snyder-Mackler L. Preoperative quadriceps strength predicts functional ability one year after total knee arthroplasty. J Rheumatol. 2005;32(8):1533–9.
    1. Hopkins WG. Estimating Sample Size for Magnitude-Based Inferences. Sportscience. 2006;10:63–70.
    1. Lienhard K, Lauermann SP, Schneider D, Item-Glatthorn JF, Casartelli NC, Maffiuletti NA. Validity and reliability of isometric, isokinetic and isoinertial modalities for the assessment of quadriceps muscle strength in patients with total knee arthroplasty. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2013;23(6):1283–8. 10.1016/j.jelekin.2013.09.004
    1. Sakpal T. Sample size estimation in clinical trial. Perspect Clin Res. 2010;1(2):67–9.
    1. Boonstra MC, De Waal Malefijt MC, Verdonschot N. How to quantify knee function after total knee arthroplasty? Knee. 2008;15(5):390–5. 10.1016/j.knee.2008.05.006
    1. Paravlic A, Marusic U, Gerzevic M, Urzi F, Simunic B. The Effects of different exercise-based interventions on functional fitness of older adults. Ann Kinesiol. 2016;7(2):117–37.
    1. Binkley JM, Stratford PW, Lott S a, Riddle DL. The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS): Scale development, measurement properties, and clinical application. Phys Ther. 1999;79(4):371–83.
    1. Paravlić A, Pišot S, Mitić P. Validation of the Slovenian version of motor imagery questionnaire 3 (MIQ-3): promising tool in modern comprehensive rehabilitation practice. Slov J Public Heal. 2018;57(4):201–10.
    1. Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gøtzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, et al. CONONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;
    1. Pankaj B. Intention-to-treat and per-protocol analysis. Can Med Assoc Journa. 2011;183(6):2011.
    1. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd Editio Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
    1. Hopkins WG, Marshall SW, Batterham AM, Hanin J. Progressive Statistics for Studies in Sports Medicine and Exercise Science. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2009;41(1):3–13.
    1. Pišot R, Marusic U, Biolo G, Mazzucco S, Lazzer S, Grassi B, et al. Greater loss in muscle mass and function but smaller metabolic alterations in older compared with younger men following 2 wk of bed rest and recovery. J Appl Physiol. 2016;120(8):922–9. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00858.2015
    1. Mizner RLR, Petterson SSC, Stevens JE, Vandenborne K, Snyder-Mackler L, Stevens E, et al. Early Quadriceps Strength Loss After Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg. 2005;87–A(5):1047–54.
    1. Hortobagyi T, Dempsey L, Fraser D, Zheng D, Hamilton G, Lambert J, et al. Changes in muscle strength, muscle fiber size and myofibrillar gene expression after immobilzation and retraining in Humans. J Physiol. 2000;524(1):293–304.
    1. Moon Y-W, Kim H-J, Ahn H-S, Lee D-H. Serial Changes of Quadriceps and Hamstring Muscle Strength Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis. PLoS One. 2016;11(2):e0148193 10.1371/journal.pone.0148193
    1. Duchateau J, Hainaut K. Effects of immobilization on contractile properties, recruitment and firing rates of human motor units. J Physiol. 1990;422:55–65. 10.1113/jphysiol.1990.sp017972
    1. Moukarzel M, Di Rienzo F, Lahoud J-C, Hoyek F, Collet C, Guillot A, et al. The therapeutic role of motor imagery during the acute phase after total knee arthroplasty: a pilot study. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;0(0):1–8.
    1. Cupal DD, Brewer BW. Effects of relaxation and guided imagery on knee strength, reinjury anxiety, and pain following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Rehabil Psychol. 2001;46(1):28–43.
    1. Porro CA, Francescato MP, Cettolo V, Diamond ME, Baraldi P, Zuiani C, et al. Primary motor and sensory cortex activation during motor performance and motor imagery: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurosci. 1996;16(23):7688–98.
    1. Yao WX, Ranganathan VK, Allexandre D, Siemionow V, Yue GH. Kinesthetic imagery training of forceful muscle contractions increases brain signal and muscle strength. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013;7(9):561.
    1. Ranganathan VK, Siemionow V, Liu JZ, Sahgal V, Yue GH. From mental power to muscle power—Gaining strength by using the mind. Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(7):944–56. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.11.018
    1. Lebon F, Guillot A, Collet C. Increased muscle activation following motor imagery during the rehabilitation of the anterior cruciate ligament. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2012;37(1):45–51. 10.1007/s10484-011-9175-9
    1. Yue GH, Cole KJ. Strength increases from the motor program: comparison of training with maximal voluntary and imagined muscle contractions. J Neurophysiol. 1992;67(5):1114–23. 10.1152/jn.1992.67.5.1114
    1. Martin KA, Moritz SE, Hall CR. Imagery Use in Sport: A Literature Review and Applied Model. Vol. 13, The Sport Psychologist. 1999. p. 245–68.
    1. Olsson CJ, Nyberg L. Motor imagery: If you can’t do it, you won’t think it. Scand J Med Sci Sport. 2010;20(5):711–5.
    1. Guillot A, Collet C, Nguyen VA, Malouin F, Richards C, Doyon J. Brain activity during visual versus kinesthetic imagery: An fMRI study. Hum Brain Mapp. 2009;30(7):2157–72. 10.1002/hbm.20658
    1. Stinear CM, Byblow WD, Steyvers M, Levin O, Swinnen SP. Kinesthetic, but not visual, motor imagery modulates corticomotor excitability. Exp Brain Res. 2006;168(1–2):157–64. 10.1007/s00221-005-0078-y
    1. Ridderinkhof KR, Brass M. How kinesthetic motor imagery works: A predictive-processing theory of visualization in sports and motor expertise. J Physiol Paris. 2015;109(1–3):53–63. 10.1016/j.jphysparis.2015.02.003
    1. Grosprêtre S, Jacquet T, Lebon F, Papaxanthis C, Martin A. Neural mechanisms of strength increase after one-week motor imagery training. Eur J Sport Sci. 2017;(December):1–10. 10.1080/17461391.2016.1218939
    1. Lebon F, Collet C, Guillot A. Benefits of motor imagery training on muscle strength. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24(6):1680–7. 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181d8e936
    1. Kittelson AJ, Stevens-Lapsley JE. Walking speed in the total joint arthroplasty population. Top Geriatr Rehabil. 2012;28(2):104–9.
    1. Abbasi-Bafghi H, Fallah-Yakhdani HR, Meijer OG, De Vet HCW, Bruijn SM, Yang LY, et al. The effects of knee arthroplasty on walking speed: A meta-analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012;13(1):1.
    1. Rahmann AE, Brauer SG, Nitz JC. A Specific Inpatient Aquatic Physiotherapy Program Improves Strength After Total Hip or Knee Replacement Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(5):745–55. 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.12.011
    1. Mizner RL, Snyder-Mackler L. Altered loading during walking and sit-to-stand is affected by quadriceps weakness after total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Res. 2005;23(5):1083–90. 10.1016/j.orthres.2005.01.021
    1. Papegaaij S, Hortobágyi T, Godde B, Kaan WA, Erhard P, Voelcker-Rehage C. Neural correlates of motor-cognitive dual-tasking in young and old adults. PLoS One. 2017;12(12):1–23.
    1. Ceïde ME, Ayers EI, Lipton R, Verghese J. Walking While Talking and Risk of Incident Dementia. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry [Internet]. 2018;26(5):580–8. Available from: 10.1016/j.jagp.2017.12.009
    1. Toulotte C, Thevenon A, Watelain E, Fabre C. Identification of healthy elderly fallers and non-fallers by gait analysis under dual-task conditions. Clin Rehabil. 2006;20(3):269–76. 10.1191/0269215506cr929oa
    1. Huang H-T, Chen C-H, Chang J-J, Guo L-Y, Lin H-T, Wu W-L. Quantitative gait analysis after unilateral knee arthroplasty for patients with bilateral knee osteoarthritis. J Med Biol Eng. 2008;28(1):11–6.
    1. McClelland JA, Webster KE, Feller JA. Gait analysis of patients following total knee replacement: A systematic review. Knee. 2007;14(4):253–63. 10.1016/j.knee.2007.04.003

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa