Efficacy of post-operative analgesia after posterior lumbar instrumented fusion for degenerative disc disease: a prospective randomized comparison of epidural catheter and intravenous administration of analgesics
Torsten Kluba, Fabian Hofmann, Sabine Bredanger, Gunnar Blumenstock, Thomas Niemeyer, Torsten Kluba, Fabian Hofmann, Sabine Bredanger, Gunnar Blumenstock, Thomas Niemeyer
Abstract
This prospective study aimed to compare the efficacy of epidural (EDA) versus intravenous (PCA) application of analgesics after lumbar fusion. Fifty-two patients scheduled for elective posterior instrumented lumbar fusion were randomized into two groups. EDA patients received an epidural catheter intraoperatively, and administration of ropivacain and sulfentanil was started after a normal postoperative wake-up test in the recovery room area. PCA patients received intravenous opioids in the post-operative period. Differences between EDA and PCA groups in terms of patient satisfaction with respect to pain relief were not significant. Nevertheless, EDA patients reported less pain on the third day after surgery. There were significantly more side effects in the EDA group, including complete reversible loss of sensory function and motor weakness. There were no major side effects, such as infection or persisting neurological deficits, in either group. The routine use of epidural anesthesia for lumbar spine surgery has too many risks and offers very little advantage over PCA.
Keywords: epidural analgesia; intravenous application; lumbar fusion; perioperative pain..
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest: the authors report no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
- Blumenthal S, Borgeat A, Nadig M, et al. Postoperative analgesia after anterior correction of thoracic scoliosis: a prospective randomized study comparing continuous double epidural catheter technique with intravenous morphine. Spine. 2006;31:1646–51.
- Feldstein G, Ramanathan S. Obstetrical lumbar epidural anesthesia in patients with previous posterior spinal fusion for kyphoscoliosis. Anesth Analg. 1985;64:83–5.
- Fisher CG, Belanger L, Gofton EG, et al. Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with patient-controlled epidural analgesia after lumbar spinal fusion. Spine. 2003;28:739–43.
- Yukawa Y, Kato F, Ito K, et al. A prospective randomized study of preemptive analgesia for postoperative pain in the patients undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusion: Continuous subcutaneous morphine, continuous epidural morphine, and diclofenac sodium. Spine. 2005;30:2357–61.
- Kumar RJ, Menon KV, Ranjith TC. Use of epidural analgesia for pain management after major spinal surgery. J Orthop Surg. 2003;11:67–72.
- Joshi GP, McCarrol SM, O'Rourke K. Postoperative analgesia after lumbar laminectomy: Epidural fentanyl infusion versus patient controlled intravenous morphine. Anesth Anal. 1995;80:511–4.
- Sucato DJ, Duey-Holtz A, Elerson E, Safavi F. Postoperative analgesia following surgical correction for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison of continuous epidural analgesia and patient-controlled analgesia. Spine. 2005;30:211–7.
- Cohen BE, Hartman MB, Wade JT, et al. Postoperative pain control after lumbar spine fusion. Patient-controlled analgesia versus continuous epidural analgesia. Spine. 1997;22:1892–6.
- Grass JA. Fentanyl: Clinical use as postoperative analgesic – epidural/intrathecal route. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1992;7:419–30.
- Müller M, Burger C, Andermahr J, et al. Spondylodiscitis after perioperative peridural catheter. Anaesthesist. 2004;53:1189–94.
- Eilers K, Schenk M, Putzier M, et al. Use of peridural catheters in the treatment of postoperative pain after spinal instrumented fusion: an experience report. Z Orthop. 2002;140:621–5.
- Yoshimoto H, Nagashima K, Sato S, et al. A prospective evaluation of anaesthesia for posterior lumbar fusion: the effectiveness of preoperative epidural anesthesia with morphine. Spine. 2005;30:863–9.
Source: PubMed