Core-shell hydrogel particles harvest, concentrate and preserve labile low abundance biomarkers

Caterina Longo, Alexis Patanarut, Tony George, Barney Bishop, Weidong Zhou, Claudia Fredolini, Mark M Ross, Virginia Espina, Giovanni Pellacani, Emanuel F Petricoin 3rd, Lance A Liotta, Alessandra Luchini, Caterina Longo, Alexis Patanarut, Tony George, Barney Bishop, Weidong Zhou, Claudia Fredolini, Mark M Ross, Virginia Espina, Giovanni Pellacani, Emanuel F Petricoin 3rd, Lance A Liotta, Alessandra Luchini

Abstract

Background: The blood proteome is thought to represent a rich source of biomarkers for early stage disease detection. Nevertheless, three major challenges have hindered biomarker discovery: a) candidate biomarkers exist at extremely low concentrations in blood; b) high abundance resident proteins such as albumin mask the rare biomarkers; c) biomarkers are rapidly degraded by endogenous and exogenous proteinases.

Methodology and principal findings: Hydrogel nanoparticles created with a N-isopropylacrylamide based core (365 nm)-shell (167 nm) and functionalized with a charged based bait (acrylic acid) were studied as a technology for addressing all these biomarker discovery problems, in one step, in solution. These harvesting core-shell nanoparticles are designed to simultaneously conduct size exclusion and affinity chromatography in solution. Platelet derived growth factor (PDGF), a clinically relevant, highly labile, and very low abundance biomarker, was chosen as a model. PDGF, spiked in human serum, was completely sequestered from its carrier protein albumin, concentrated, and fully preserved, within minutes by the particles. Particle sequestered PDGF was fully protected from exogenously added tryptic degradation. When the nanoparticles were added to a 1 mL dilute solution of PDGF at non detectable levels (less than 20 picograms per mL) the concentration of the PDGF released from the polymeric matrix of the particles increased within the detection range of ELISA and mass spectrometry. Beyond PDGF, the sequestration and protection from degradation for a series of additional very low abundance and very labile cytokines were verified.

Conclusions and significance: We envision the application of harvesting core-shell nanoparticles to whole blood for concentration and immediate preservation of low abundance and labile analytes at the time of venipuncture.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The technology described herein is licensed (patent pending) to the authors institutions (George Mason University, USA and Istituto Superiore di Sanita', Italy). Under faculty guidelines the University authors can received a share of the patent royalties owned by the university.

Figures

Figure 1. Bait chemistry.
Figure 1. Bait chemistry.
Figure 2. Schematic illustration of core shell…
Figure 2. Schematic illustration of core shell particle.
The nanoparticle consists of a NIPAm-AAc core that functions as a bait. After adding particles to the protein solution, biomarkers are attracted and entrapped in this bait. A NIPAm shell increases the sieving properties of nanoparticles.
Figure 3. Light scattering and atomic force…
Figure 3. Light scattering and atomic force microscopy characterization of nanoparticles.
(A) At room temperature, core is approximately 360 nm in size whereas adding core-shell particles have a diameter of 700 nm at pH 4.5. Core and core shell particles follow a typical temperature dependent behavior. (B) Particle suspension in MilliQ water (pH 5.5, 1 µg/mL) was deposited on freshly cleaved mica under humid atmosphere at room temperature for 15 minutes and dried under nitrogen. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) image of nanoparticles was acquired. Particles have a diameter of approximately 800 nm and exhibit a homogeneous size distribution. The scale bar for particle height shows a maximum height of 168 nm. The AFM picture was acquired under dry status therefore the particles are distorted (flattened) from their spherical shape due to drying on the mica surface.
Figure 4. SDS-PAGE Analysis of PDGF incubated…
Figure 4. SDS-PAGE Analysis of PDGF incubated particles.
(A) Lane 1) Starting solution containing BSA and PDGF (Control), 2) Supernatant (OUT); 3) Particle content (IN). Particles remove PDGF from carrier albumin with a total exclusion of albumin itself. (B) Lane 1) Starting solution containing PDGF, BSA, aprotinin (MW 6,500 Da), lysozyme (MW 14,400 Da), trypsin inhibitor (MW 21,500 Da), carbonic anhydrase (MW 31,000 Da), and ovalbumin (MW 45,000 Da) (Control), 2) Supernatant (OUT); 3) Particle content (IN). Particles harvest PDGF together with low molecular weight proteins and exclude proteins above ca 20,000 Da.
Figure 5. Core shell particles raise the…
Figure 5. Core shell particles raise the concentration of undetectable PDGF into the detection range of ELISA assay.
(A) ELISA readings of the starting solution of PDGF in Calibrator diluent RD6-3 (R&D Systems, animal serum with preservatives) at a concentration of 18.92+/−4.313 pg/mL and PDGF eluted from core-shell particles (85.27+/−2.24 pg/mL). (B) PDGF concentration in the core-shell particle eluate plotted against the quantity of particles utilized for the incubation, duplicate experiments. (C) ELISA standard curve of PDGF concentration versus absorbance. The standard curve was generated with two repeats for each PDGF calibrator concentration.
Figure 6. Core shell particles increase the…
Figure 6. Core shell particles increase the concentration of extremely dilute PDGF approximately 10-folds (1000 percent) as measured by ELISA assay.
(A) ELISA readings of the starting solution of PDGF in Calibrator diluent RD6-3 (R&D Systems, animal serum with preservatives) at a concentration of 63.69+/−1.448 pg/mL and PDGF eluted from core-shell particles (491.14+/−4.818 pg/mL). (B) PDGF concentration in core-shell particle eluate plotted against the quantity of particles utilized for the incubation, duplicate experiments. (C) ELISA standard curve of PDGF concentration versus absorbance. The standard curve was generated with two repeats for each PDGF calibrator concentration.
Figure 7. Core shell particles increase the…
Figure 7. Core shell particles increase the concentration of native PDGF in serum as measured by ELISA assay.
(A) ELISA readings of the starting serum solution in Calibrator diluent RD6-3 (R&D Systems, animal serum with preservatives) at a concentration of 170.91+/−4.66 pg/mL and PDGF eluted from core-shell particles (1743.43+/−11.06 pg/mL). (B) PDGF concentration in core-shell particle eluate plotted against the quantity of particles utilized for the incubation, duplicate experiments. (C) ELISA standard curve of PDGF concentration versus absorbance. The standard curve was generated with two repeats for each PDGF calibrator concentration.
Figure 8. SDS PAGE analysis showing chemokines…
Figure 8. SDS PAGE analysis showing chemokines uptake by particles.
Core-shell particles were incubated with the following chemokines, mucosae-associated epithelial chemokine (MEC/CCL28), stromal cell-derived factor-1 beta, (SDF-1β/CXCL12b), and eotaxin-2 (CCL24), in presence of bovine serum albumin (BSA). Solutions of the chemokines and BSA are shown in lanes 1, 4, and 7. After incubation with the particles, no chemokine was left in the supernatant (S, lane 2, 5, and 8) and all the chemokine was captured by particles (P, lanes 3, 6, and 9). BSA was totally excluded by particles.
Figure 9. Immunoblot analysis showing that core-shell…
Figure 9. Immunoblot analysis showing that core-shell particles protect captured PDGF from tryptic degradation.
(A) Sypro ruby total protein staining and (B) Immunoblot analysis with anti-PDGF antibody of the same PVDF membrane are presented. Lane 1) control PDGF+BSA solution; 2) content of particles incubated with PDGF+BSA (IN); 3) supernatant of particles incubated with PDGF+BSA (OUT); 4) content of particles incubated with BSA+PDGF+trypsin (IN+TRYPSIN); 5) supernatant of particles incubated with BSA+PDGF+trypsin (OUT+TRYPSIN); 6) BSA+PDGF+trypsin without particles incubated for 40 minutes (+TRYPSIN 40′); 7)) BSA+PDGF+trypsin without particles incubated for 20 minutes (+TRYPSIN 20′); 8)) BSA+PDGF+trypsin without particles incubated for 10 minutes (+TRYPSIN 10′); 9)) BSA+PDGF+trypsin without particles incubated for 0 minutes (+TRYPSIN 0′).
Figure 10. SDS PAGE analysis showing that…
Figure 10. SDS PAGE analysis showing that core-shell particles protect chemokines from enzymatic degradation.
Core-shell particles were incubated with the following chemokines, mucosae-associated epithelial chemokine (MEC/CCL28), stromal cell-derived factor-1 beta, (SDF-1β/CXCL12b), and eotaxin-2 (CCL24), in presence of trypsin. Solution of the chemokines (control) are shown in Lanes 1, 4, and 7. Chemokines incubated with particles (Lane 3, 6, and 9) are protected from tryptic degradation whereas chemokines not incubated with particles (Lane 2, 5, and 8) are susceptible to proteolytic digestion.
Figure 11. Immunoblot analysis demonstrating recovery of…
Figure 11. Immunoblot analysis demonstrating recovery of PDGF spiked in human serum.
Lane 1) Human serum plus PDGF (5 ng/µL): when serum is not incubated with particles, PDGF cannot be detected; 2) particle supernatant (OUT); 3) particle content (IN); 4) Human serum plus PDGF (2 ng/µL): when serum is not incubated with particles, PDGF cannot be detected; 2) particle supernatant (OUT); 3) particle content (IN).

References

    1. Liotta LA, Ferrari M, Petricoin E. Clinical proteomics: written in blood. Nature. 2003;425:905.
    1. Anderson NL, Anderson NG. The human plasma proteome: history, character, and diagnostic prospects. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2002;1:845–867.
    1. Petricoin EF, Ardekani AM, Hitt BA, Levine PJ, Fusaro VA, et al. Use of proteomic patterns in serum to identify ovarian cancer. Lancet. 2002;359:572–577.
    1. Merrell K, Southwick K, Graves SW, Esplin MS, Lewis NE, et al. Analysis of low-abundance, low-molecular-weight serum proteins using mass spectrometry. J Biomol Tech. 2004;15:238–248.
    1. Petricoin EF, Belluco C, Araujo RP, Liotta LA. The blood peptidome: a higher dimension of information content for cancer biomarker discovery. Nat Rev Cancer. 2006;6:961–967.
    1. Lopez MF, Mikulskis A, Kuzdzal S, Bennett DA, Kelly J, et al. High-resolution serum proteomic profiling of Alzheimer disease samples reveals disease-specific, carrier-protein-bound mass signatures. Clin Chem. 2005;51:1946–1954.
    1. Zhou M, Lucas DA, Chan KC, Issaq HJ, Petricoin EF, 3rd, et al. An investigation into the human serum “interactome”. Electrophoresis. 2004;25:1289–1298.
    1. Ayache S, Panelli M, Marincola FM, Stroncek DF. Effects of storage time and exogenous protease inhibitors on plasma protein levels. Am J Clin Pathol. 2006;126:174–184.
    1. Luchini A, Geho DH, Bishop B, Tran D, Xia C, et al. Smart hydrogel particles: biomarker harvesting: one-step affinity purification, size exclusion, and protection against degradation. Nano Lett. 2008;8:350–361.
    1. Hoffman AS. Hydrogels for biomedical applications. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2002;54:3–12.
    1. Drury JL, Mooney DJ. Hydrogels for tissue engineering: scaffold design variables and applications. Biomaterials. 2003;24:4337–4351.
    1. Bowen-Pope DF, Malpass TW, Foster DM, Ross R. Platelet-derived growth factor in vivo: levels, activity, and rate of clearance. Blood. 1984;64:458–469.
    1. Hennink WE, van Nostrum CF. Novel crosslinking methods to design hydrogels. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2002;54:13–36.
    1. Pelton R. Temperature-sensitive aqueous microgels. Adv Colloid Interface Sci. 2000;85:1–33.
    1. Nayak S, Gan D, Serpe MJ, Lyon LA. Hollow thermoresponsive microgels. Small. 2005;1:416–421.
    1. Fortina P, Kricka LJ, Surrey S, Grodzinski P. Nanobiotechnology: the promise and reality of new approaches to molecular recognition. Trends Biotechnol. 2005;23:168–173.
    1. Moghimi SM, Hunter AC, Murray JC. Nanomedicine: current status and future prospects. FASEB J. 2005;19:311–330.
    1. Sakamoto JH, Smith BR, Xie B, Rokhlin SI, Lee SC, et al. The molecular analysis of breast cancer utilizing targeted nanoparticle based ultrasound contrast agents. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2005;4:627–636.
    1. Li X, Ponten A, Aase K, Karlsson L, Abramsson A, et al. PDGF-C is a new protease-activated ligand for the PDGF alpha-receptor. Nat Cell Biol. 2000;2:302–309.
    1. Fredriksson L, Li H, Eriksson U. The PDGF family: four gene products form five dimeric isoforms. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2004;15:197–204.
    1. Heinrich MC, Corless CL, Duensing A, McGreevey L, Chen CJ, et al. PDGFRA activating mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Science. 2003;299:708–710.
    1. Baxter EJ, Hochhaus A, Bolufer P, Reiter A, Fernandez JM, et al. The t(4;22)(q12;q11) in atypical chronic myeloid leukaemia fuses BCR to PDGFRA. Hum Mol Genet. 2002;11:1391–1397.
    1. Yu J, Ustach C, Kim HR. Platelet-derived growth factor signaling and human cancer. J Biochem Mol Biol. 2003;36:49–59.
    1. Board R, Jayson GC. Platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR): a target for anticancer therapeutics. Drug Resist Updat. 2005;8:75–83.
    1. Kabbinavar F, Hurwitz HI, Fehrenbacher L, Meropol NJ, Novotny WF, et al. Phase II, randomized trial comparing bevacizumab plus fluorouracil (FU)/leucovorin (LV) with FU/LV alone in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:60–65.
    1. McArthur GA, Demetri GD, van Oosterom A, Heinrich MC, Debiec-Rychter M, et al. Molecular and clinical analysis of locally advanced dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans treated with imatinib: Imatinib Target Exploration Consortium Study B2225. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:866–873.
    1. Mathew P, Thall PF, Jones D, Perez C, Bucana C, et al. Platelet-derived growth factor receptor inhibitor imatinib mesylate and docetaxel: a modular phase I trial in androgen-independent prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:3323–3329.
    1. Kubo T, Piperdi S, Rosenblum J, Antonescu CR, Chen W, et al. Platelet-derived growth factor receptor as a prognostic marker and a therapeutic target for imatinib mesylate therapy in osteosarcoma. Cancer. 2008;112:2119–2129.
    1. Kagami S, Kakinuma T, Saeki H, Tsunemi Y, Fujita H, et al. Increased serum CCL28 levels in patients with atopic dermatitis, psoriasis vulgaris and bullous pemphigoid. J Invest Dermatol. 2005;124:1088–1090.
    1. Jahnz-Rozyk K, Targowski T, Glodzinska-Wyszogrodzka E, Plusa T. Cc-chemokine eotaxin as a marker of efficacy of specific immunotherapy in patients with intermittent IgE-mediated allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. Allergy. 2003;58:595–601.
    1. Robak E, Kulczycka L, Sysa-Jedrzejowska A, Wierzbowska A, Robak T. Circulating proangiogenic molecules PIGF, SDF-1 and sVCAM-1 in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Eur Cytokine Netw. 2007;18:181–187.
    1. Baggiolini M, Dewald B, Moser B. Interleukin-8 and related chemotactic cytokines–CXC and CC chemokines. Adv Immunol. 1994;55:97–179.
    1. Frederick MJ, Clayman GL. Chemokines in cancer. Expert Rev Mol Med. 2001;3:1–18.
    1. Braude EA, Nachod FC. Determination of Organic Structures by Physical Methods. New York: Academic Press; 1955.
    1. Denizli A, Piskin E. Dye-ligand affinity systems. J Biochem Biophys Methods. 2001;49:391–416.
    1. Sereikaite J, Bumelis VA. Examination of dye-protein interaction by gel-permeation chromatography. Biomed Chromatogr. 2006;20:195–199.
    1. Fredolini C, Meani F, Reeder KA, Rucker S, Patanarut A, et al. Concentration and Preservation of Very Low Abundance Biomarkers in Urine, such as Human Growth Hormone (hGH), by Cibacron Blue F3G-A Loaded Hydrogel Particles. Nano Res. 2008;1:502–518.
    1. Uekama K, Hirayama F, Arima H. Recent Aspect of Cyclodextrin-Based Drug Delivery System. J Inclusion Phenom Macrocyclic Chem. 2006;56:3–8.
    1. Jin S, Lee Y, Kang H. Methyl-β-cyclodextrin, a specific cholesterol-binding agent, inhibits melanogenesis in human melanocytes through activation of ERK. Arch Dermatol Res. 8:451–454.
    1. Cai W, Yao X, Shao X, Pan Z. Bimodal Complexations of Steroids with Cyclodextrins by a Flexible Docking Algorithm. J Inclusion Phenom Macrocyclic Chem. 2005;51:41–51.
    1. Borst C, Holzgrabe U. Enantioseparation of dopa and related compounds by cyclodextrin-modified microemulsion electrokinetic chromatography. J Chromatogr A 2008
    1. Dodziuk H. Cyclodextrins and Their Complexes: Chemistry, Analytical Methods, Applications. Hoboken: Wiley-VCH; 2006.
    1. Elmas B, Onur M, Şenel S, Tuncel A. Temperature controlled RNA isolation by N-isopropylacrylamide-vinylphenyl boronic acid copolymer latex. Colloid Polym Sci. 2002;280:1137–1146.
    1. Kataoka K, Miyazaki H, Okano T, Sakurai Y. Sensitive Glucose-Induced Change of the Lower Critical Solution Temperature of Poly[N,N-(dimethylacrylamide)-co-3-(acrylamido)-phenylboronic acid] in Physiological Saline. Macromolecules. 1994;27:1061–1062.
    1. Lorand JP, Edwards JO. Polyol Complexes and Structure of the Benzeneboronate Ion. J Org Chem. 1959;24:769–774.
    1. Mader HS, Wolfbeis OS. Boronic acid based probes for microdetermination of saccharides and glycosylated biomolecules. Mikrochim Acta. 2008;162:1–34.
    1. Yamauchi A, Suzuki I, Hayashita T. Saccharide recognition by Boronic Acid Fluorophore/Cyclodextrin Complexes in Water. In: Geddes CDL, Joseph R, editors. Glucose Sensing, Topics in Fluorescence Spectroscopy. Springer; 2006. pp. 237–258.
    1. Zhang Y, Gao X, Hardcastle K, Wang B. Water-soluble fluorescent boronic acid compounds for saccharide sensing: substituent effects on their fluorescence properties. Chemistry. 2006;12:1377–1384.
    1. Jones CD, Lyon LA. Synthesis and Characterization of Multiresponsive Core-Shell Microgels. Macromolecules. 2000;33:8301–8306.
    1. Couvreur P, Reddy LH, Mangenot S, Poupaert JH, Desmaele D, et al. Discovery of new hexagonal supramolecular nanostructures formed by squalenoylation of an anticancer nucleoside analogue. Small. 2008;4:247–253.
    1. Cho EC, Kim JW, Fernandez-Nieves A, Weitz DA. Highly responsive hydrogel scaffolds formed by three-dimensional organization of microgel nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 2008;8:168–172.
    1. Smith ER, Zurakowski D, Saad A, Scott RM, Moses MA. Urinary biomarkers predict brain tumor presence and response to therapy. Clinical cancer research. 2008;14:2378–2386.
    1. Barratt J, Topham P. Urine proteomics: the present and future of measuring urinary protein components in disease. CMAJ. 2007;177:361–368.
    1. Pecora R. Dynamic Light Scattering: Applications of Photo Correlation Spectroscopy. Springer; 1985. p. 436.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa