Clinical trial of a home safety toolkit for Alzheimer's disease

Kathy J Horvath, Scott A Trudeau, James L Rudolph, Paulette A Trudeau, Mary E Duffy, Dan Berlowitz, Kathy J Horvath, Scott A Trudeau, James L Rudolph, Paulette A Trudeau, Mary E Duffy, Dan Berlowitz

Abstract

This randomized clinical trial tested a new self-directed educational intervention to improve caregiver competence to create a safer home environment for persons with dementia living in the community. The sample included 108 patient/caregiver dyads: the intervention group (n = 60) received the Home Safety Toolkit (HST), including a new booklet based on health literacy principles, and sample safety items to enhance self-efficacy to make home safety modifications. The control group (n = 48) received customary care. Participants completed measures at baseline and at twelve-week follow-up. Multivariate Analysis of Covariance (MANCOVA) was used to test for significant group differences. All caregiver outcome variables improved in the intervention group more than in the control. Home safety was significant at P ≤ 0.001, caregiver strain at P ≤ 0.001, and caregiver self-efficacy at P = 0.002. Similarly, the care receiver outcome of risky behaviors and accidents was lower in the intervention group (P ≤ 0.001). The self-directed use of this Home Safety Toolkit activated the primary family caregiver to make the home safer for the person with dementia of Alzheimer's type (DAT) or related disorder. Improving the competence of informal caregivers is especially important for patients with DAT in light of all stakeholders reliance on their unpaid care.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Example of recommendations in Home Safety Toolkit using health literacy principles.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Flow diagram of referrals, randomization, and progress of the groups through the Home Safety Toolkit clinical trial.

References

    1. World Alzheimer’s Report 2009. Alzheimer’s Disease International. London, UK: 2009. .
    1. Alzheimer’s Association. Alzheimer’s Disease Facts and Figures 2013. Chicago, Ill, USA: Alzheimer’s Association; 2013.
    1. Plassman BL, Langa KM, Fisher GG, et al. Prevalence of dementia in the United States: the aging, demographics, and memory study. Neuroepidemiology. 2007;29(1-2):125–132.
    1. Miniño AM, Murphy SL, Xu J, Kochanek KD. Deaths: final data for 2008. National Vital Statistics Reports. 2007;59(10):1–126.
    1. Larson EB, Shadlen M-F, Wang L, et al. Survival after initial diagnosis of Alzheimer disease. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2004;140(7):501–I26.
    1. National Alliance for Caregiving & AARP. Caregiving in the United States: Executive Summary. Bethesda, Md, USA: National Alliance for Caregiving; 2009.
    1. World Health Organization. Dementia: A Public Health Priority. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2012.
    1. National Alliance for Caregiving, Schulz R, Cook T. Caregiving Costs: Declining Health in the Alzheimer’s Caregiver as Dementia Increases in the Care Recipient. Bethesda, Md, USA: National Alliance for Caregiving; 2011.
    1. Schulz R, Sherwood PR. Physical and mental health effects of family caregiving. American Journal of Nursing. 2008;108(9):23–27.
    1. Lau DT, Scandrett KG, Jarzebowski M, Holman K, Emanuel L. Health-related safety: a framework to address barriers to aging in place. The Gerontologist. 2007;47(6):830–837.
    1. Wahl H-W, Fänge A, Oswald F, Gitlin L, Iwarsson S. The home environment and disability-related outcomes in aging individuals: what is the empirical evidence? The Gerontologist . 2009;49(3):355–367.
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Injury prevention & control: data & statistics (WISQARS) 2012, .
    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Home and recreational safety. 2012, .
    1. Oleske DM, Wilson RS, Bernard BA, Evans DA, Terman EW. Epidemiology of injury in people with Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 1995;43(7):741–746.
    1. Horvath KJ, Harvey RM, Trudeau SA. A home safety program for community based wanderers: outcomes from the veterans home safety project. In: Nelson AL, Algase DL, editors. Evidence-Based Protocols for Managing Wandering Behaviors. New York, NY, USA: Springer; 2007. pp. 259–276.
    1. Lach HW, Reed AT, Smith LJ, Carr DB. Alzheimer’s disease: assessing safety problems in the home: while many caregivers are practicing some form of safety precautions, they may not be aware of all of their options or the best way to prevent accidents. Geriatric Nursing. 16(4):160–164.
    1. Rowe MA, Fehrenbach N. Injuries sustained by community-dwelling individuals with dementia. Clinical Nursing Research. 2004;13(2):98–110.
    1. Cosentino S, Metcalfe J, Cary MS, de Leon J, Karlawish J. Memory awareness influences everyday decision making capacity about medication management in Alzheimer’s disease. International Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease. 2011;2011:9 pages.483897
    1. Takechi H, Kokuryu A, Kubota T, Yamada H. Relative preservation of advanced activities in daily living among patients with mild-to-moderate dementia in the community and overview of support provided by family caregivers. International Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease. 2012;2012:7 pages.418289
    1. Marquardt G, Johnston D, Black BS, et al. A descriptive study of home modifications for people with dementia and barriers to implementation. Journal of Housing for the Elderly. 2011;25(3):258–273.
    1. Horvath KJ, Hurley AC, Duffy ME, et al. Caregiver competence to prevent home injury to the care recipient with dementia. Rehabilitation Nursing. 2005;30(5):189–197.
    1. Lach HW, Chang Y-P. Caregiver perspectives on safety in home dementia care. Western Journal of Nursing Research. 2007;29(8):993–1014.
    1. Hurley AC, Gauthier MA, Horvath KJ, et al. Promoting safer home environments for persons with Alzheimer’s disease: the home safety/injury model. Journal of Gerontological Nursing. 2004;30(6):43–51.
    1. Jerusalem M, Mittag W. Self-efficacy in stressful life transitions. In: Bandura A, editor. Self-Efficacy in Changing Societies. chapter 6. New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press; 1995. pp. 177–201.
    1. Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall; 1986.
    1. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. ‘Mini mental state’. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 1975;12(3):189–198.
    1. Junghans C, Feder G, Hemingway H, Timmis A, Jones M. Recruiting patients to medical research: double blind randomised trial of “opt-in” versus “opt-out” strategies. British Medical Journal. 2005;331(7522):940–942.
    1. Chow SC, Liu JP. Design and Analysis of Clinical Trials: Concepts and Methodologies. 2nd edition. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons; 2004.
    1. Torgerson DJ, Roberts C. Understanding controlled trials. Randomisation methods: concealment. British Medical Journal. 1999;319(7206):375–376.
    1. Doak CC, Doak LG, Root JH. Teaching Patients with Low Literacy Skills. Philadelphia, Pa, USA: J. B. Lippincott; 1996.
    1. Department of Veterans Affairs. Worksheet to Make the Home Safer. Bedford, Mass, USA: VAMC; 2003.
    1. Smith T, Gildeh N, Holmes C. The Montreal cognitive assessment: validity and utility in a memory clinic setting. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. 2007;52(5):329–332.
    1. Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2005;53(4):695–699.
    1. Crum RM, Anthony JC, Bassett SS, Folstein MF. Population-based norms for the Mini-Mental State Examination by age and educational level. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1993;269(18):2386–2391.
    1. Ylikoski R, Erkinjuntti T, Sulkava R, Juva K, Tilvis R, Valvanne J. Correction for age, education and other demographic variables in the use of the Mini Mental State Examination in Finland. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica. 1992;85(6):391–396.
    1. Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. The Gerontologist. 1969;9(3):179–186.
    1. Pfeffer RI, Kurosaki TT, Harrah CH, Jr., Chance JM, Filos S. Measurement of functional activities in older adults in the community. Journals of Gerontology. 1982;37(3):323–329.
    1. Steffen AM, McKibbin C, Zeiss AM, Gallagher-Thompson D, Bandura A. The revised scale for caregiving self-efficacy: reliability and validity studies. The Journals of Gerontology B. 2002;57(1):P74–P86.
    1. Pender NJ, Bar-Or O, Wilk B, Mitchell S. Self-efficacy and perceived exertion of girls during exercise. Nursing Research. 2002;51(2):86–91.
    1. Bass DM, Noelker LS, Rechlin LR. The moderating influence of service use on negative caregiving consequences. Journals of Gerontology B. 1996;51(3):S121–S131.
    1. Sherbourne CD, Stewart AL. The MOS social support survey. Social Science and Medicine. 1991;32(6):705–714.
    1. Lach HW, Thomas Reed A, Smith LJ, Carr DB. Alzheimer’s disease: assessing safety problems in the home. Geriatric Nursing. 1995;16(4):160–164.
    1. Gitlin LN, Schinfeld S, Winter L, Corcoran M, Boyce AA, Hauck W. Evaluating home environments of persons with dementia: interrater reliability and validity of the Home Environmental Assessment Protocol (HEAP) Disability and Rehabilitation. 2002;24(1–3):59–71.
    1. Weinberg SL, Abramowitz SK. Data Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences Using SPSS. New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press; 2002.
    1. Tabachnick B, Fidell L. Using Multivariate Statistics. Boston, Mass, USA: Allyn & Bacon; 2007.
    1. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. PLoS Medicine. 2010;7(3):1–7.
    1. Institute of Education Sciences. What works clearinghouse. 2013, .
    1. Pöysti MM, Laakkonen M, Strandberg T, et al. Gender differences in dementia spousal caregiving. International Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease. 2012;2012:5 pages.162960

Source: PubMed

Sponsorit ja yhteistyökumppanit

Sairaudet

Huumeiden interventiot

3
Tilaa