Energy density, portion size, and eating occasions: contributions to increased energy intake in the United States, 1977-2006
Kiyah J Duffey, Barry M Popkin, Kiyah J Duffey, Barry M Popkin
Abstract
Background: Competing theories attempt to explain changes in total energy (TE) intake; however, a rigorous, comprehensive examination of these explanations has not been undertaken. Our objective was to examine the relative contribution of energy density (ED), portion size (PS), and the number of eating/drinking occasions (EOs) to changes in daily TE.
Methods and findings: Using cross-sectional nationally representative data from the Nationwide Food Consumption Survey (1977-78), Continuing Survey of Food Intakes of Individuals (1989-91), and National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (1994-98 and 2003-06) for adults (aged ≥19 y), we mathematically decompose TE (kcal/d) to understand the relative contributions of each component-PS (grams/EO), ED (kcal/g/EO) and EO(number)-to changes in TE over time. There was an increase in TE intake (+570 kcal/d) and the number of daily EOs (+1.1) between 1977-78 and 2003-06. The average PS increased between 1977-78 and 1994-98, then dropped slightly between 1994-98 and 2003-06, while the average ED remained steady between 1977-78 and 1989-91, then declined slightly between 1989-91 and 1994-98. Estimates from the decomposition statistical models suggest that between 1977-78 and 1989-91, annualized changes in PS contributed nearly 15 kcal/d/y to increases in TE, while changes in EO accounted for just 4 kcal/d/y. Between 1994-98 and 2003-06 changes in EO accounted for 39 kcal/d/y of increase and changes in PS accounted for 1 kcal/d/y of decline in the annualized change in TE.
Conclusions: While all three components have contributed to some extent to 30-y changes in TE, changes in EO and PS have accounted for most of the change. These findings suggest a new focus for efforts to reduce energy imbalances in US adults.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
References
- Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Ogden CL, Curtin LR. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2008. JAMA. 2010;303:235–241.
- Duffey K, Popkin B. Shifts in patterns and consumption of beverages between 1965 and 2002. Obes Res. 2007;15:2739–2747.
- Swinburn B, Sacks G, Ravussin E. Increased food energy supply is more than sufficient to explain the US epidemic of obesity. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;90:1453–1456.
- Kant AK, Graubard BI. Secular trends in patterns of self-reported food consumption of adult Americans: NHANES 1971–1975 to NHANES 1999–2002. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;84:1215–1223.
- Popkin BM, Duffey KJ. Does hunger and satiety drive eating anymore? Increasing eating occasions and decreasing time between eating occasions in the United States. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;91:1–6.
- Bellisle F, McDevitt R, Prentice AM. Meal frequency and energy balance. Br J Nutr. 1997;77(Suppl 1):S57–S70.
- Piernas C, Popkin BM. Snacking increased among U.S. adults between 1977 and 2006. J Nutr. 2010;140:325–332.
- Smiciklas-Wright H, Mitchell DC, Mickle SJ, Goldman JD, Cook A. Foods commonly eaten in the United States, 1989–1991 and 1994–1996: are portion sizes changing? J Am Diet Assoc. 2003;103:41–47.
- Nielsen S, Popkin B. Patterns and trends in portion sizes, 1977–1998. JAMA. 2003;289:450–453.
- Young LR, Nestle M. The contribution of expanding portion sizes to the US obesity epidemic. Am J Public Health. 2002;92:246–249.
- Young LR, Nestle M. Expanding portion sizes in the US marketplace: implications for nutrition counseling. J Am Diet Assoc. 2003;103:231–234.
- Rolls BJ, Drewnowski A, Ledikwe JH. Changing the energy density of the diet as a strategy for weight management. J Am Diet Assoc. 2005;105:S98–S103.
- Rolls BJ, Barnett RobertA. Volumetrics: feel full on fewer calories. New York City: HarperCollins; 1999.
- Rolls BJ. Plenary Lecture 1: dietary strategies for the prevention and treatment of obesity. Proc Nutr Soc. 2010;69:70–79.
- Flood JE, Roe LS, Rolls BJ. The effect of increased beverage portion size on energy intake at a meal. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006;106:1984–1990; discussion 1990–1981.
- Ello-Martin JA, Ledikwe JH, Rolls BJ. The influence of food portion size and energy density on energy intake: implications for weight management. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;82:236S–241S.
- Ledikwe JH, Blanck HM, Khan LK, Serdula MK, Seymour JD, et al. Dietary energy density determined by eight calculation methods in a nationally representative United States population. J Nutr. 2005;135:273–278.
- Rolls BJ, Roe LS, Meengs JS. Larger portion sizes lead to a sustained increase in energy intake over 2 days. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006;106:543–549.
- Bell EA, Castellanos VH, Pelkman CL, Thorwart ML, Rolls BJ. Energy density of foods affects energy intake in normal-weight women. Am J Clin Nutr. 1998;67:412–420.
- Bell EA, Rolls BJ. Energy density of foods affects energy intake across multiple levels of fat content in lean and obese women. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001;73:1010–1018.
- Rolls BJ, Bell EA, Castellanos VH, Chow M, Pelkman CL, et al. Energy density but not fat content of foods affected energy intake in lean and obese women. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;69:863–871.
- Stubbs RJ, Johnstone AM, Harbron CG, Reid C. Covert manipulation of energy density of high carbohydrate diets in ‘pseudo free-living’ humans. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1998;22:885–892.
- Rolls BJ, Bell EA, Thorwart ML. Water incorporated into a food but not served with a food decreases energy intake in lean women. Am J Clin Nutr. 1999;70:448–455.
- Kral TV, Rolls BJ. Energy density and portion size: their independent and combined effects on energy intake. Physiol Behav. 2004;82:131–138.
- Rolls BJ, Roe LS, Meengs JS. Reductions in portion size and energy density of foods are additive and lead to sustained decreases in energy intake. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006;83:11–17.
- Rizek R. The 1977–78 Nationwide Food Consumption Survey. Fam Econ Rev. 1978;4:3–7.
- US Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Services. Dietary intake data: what we eat in America, NHANES 2003–2004. 2006. Nov, Available: . Accessed 29 March 2010.
- US Department of Agriculture Human Nutrition Information Service. The continuing survey of food intakes by individuals and the diet and health knowledge survey 1991: survey operations report. 1993. Jan, Available: . Accessed 29 March 2010.
- US Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Services. Dietary intake data: what we eat in America, NHANES 2005–2006. 2008. Jul, Available: . Accessed 29 March 2010.
- Popkin BM, Haines PS, Siega-Riz AM. Dietary patterns and trends in the United States: the UNC-CH approach. Appetite. 1999;32:8–14.
- Nielsen SJ, Popkin BM. Changes in beverage intake between 1977 and 2001. Am J Prev Med. 2004;27:205–210.
- Duffey KJ, Popkin BM. Adults with healthier dietary patterns have healthier beverage patterns. J Nutr. 2006;136:2901–2907.
- Duffey K, Gordon-Larsen P, Ayala GX, Popkin BM. Birthplace is associated with more adverse dietary profiles for US vs. foreign born Latino adults. J Nutr. 2008;138:2428–2435.
- Piernas C, Popkin BM. Trends in snacking among U.S. children. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010;29:398–404.
- Nielsen S, Siega-Riz A, Popkin B. Trends in food locations and sources among adolescents and young adults. Prev Med. 2002;35:107–113.
- Nielsen S, Siega-Riz A, Popkin B. Trends in energy intake in the U.S. between 1977 and 1996: similar shifts seen across age groups. Obes Res. 2002;10:370–378.
- Popkin BM, Duffey KJ. Does hunger and satiety drive eating anymore? Increasing eating occasions and decreasing time between eating occasions in the United States. Am J Clin Nutr. 2010;91:1342–1347.
- Lindstorm DP, Woubalem Z. The demographic components of fertility decline in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a decomposition analysis. Genus. 2003;59:147–158.
- Smith H, Morgan SP, Koropeckyj-Cox T. A decomposition of trends in the nonmarital fertility ratios of blacks and whites in the United States, 1960–1992. Demography. 1996;33:141–151.
- Das Gupta P. A general method of decomposing a difference between two rates into several components. Demography. 1978;15:99–112.
- Spurlock M. Don't eat this book: fast food and the supersizing of America. Berkeley (California): Berkley Trade; 2006. 320
- Wansink B, Painter JE, North J. Bottomless bowls: Why visual cues of portion size may influence intake. Obes Res. 2005;13:93–100.
- Diliberti N, Bordi PL, Conklin MT, Roe LS, Rolls BJ. Increased portion size leads to increased energy intake in a restaurant meal. Obes Res. 2004;12:562–568.
- Raynor HA, Van Walleghen EL, Niemeier H, Butryn ML, Wing RR. Do food provisions packaged in single-servings reduce energy intake at breakfast during a brief behavioral weight-loss intervention? J Am Diet Assoc. 2009;109:1922–1925.
- Stroebele N, Ogden LG, Hill JO. Do calorie-controlled portion sizes of snacks reduce energy intake? Appetite. 2009;52:793–796.
- Nielsen SJ, Popkin BM. Patterns and trends in food portion sizes, 1977–1998. JAMA. 2003;289:450–453.
- Wansink B. What really determines what we eat. The hidden truth. Diabetes Self Manag. 2006;23:44, 47–48, 51.
- Arriaga EE. Measuring and explaining the change in life expectancies. Demography. 1984;21:83–96.
- Vaupel JW, Romo VC. Decomposing change in life expectancy: A bouquet of formulas in honor of Nathan Keyfitz's 90th Birthday. Demography. 2003;40:201–216.
- Guenther P, Perloff BP. Effects of procedural differences between 1977 and 1987 in the Nationwide Food Consumption Survey on estimates of food and nutrient intakes: results of the USDA 1988 Bridging Study. Washington (District of Columbia): US Department of Agriculture Human Nutrition Information Service; 1990.
- Guenther PM, Perloff BP, Vizioli TL., Jr Separating fact from artifact in changes in nutrient intake over time. J Am Diet Assoc. 1994;94:270–275.
- Heitmann BL, Lissner L, Osler M. Do we eat less fat, or just report so? Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2000;24:435–442.
- Schoeller DA. Limitations in the assessment of dietary energy intake by self-report. Metabolism. 1995;44:18–22.
- Schatzkin A, Kipnis V, Carroll RJ, Midthune D, Subar AF, et al. A comparison of a food frequency questionnaire with a 24-hour recall for use in an epidemiological cohort study: results from the biomarker-based Observing Protein and Energy Nutrition (OPEN) study. Int J Epidemiol. 2003;32:1054–1062.
- Trabulsi J, Troiano RP, Subar AF, Sharbaugh C, Kipnis V, et al. Precision of the doubly labeled water method in a large-scale application: evaluation of a streamlined-dosing protocol in the Observing Protein and Energy Nutrition (OPEN) study. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2003;57:1370–1377.
- Bailey RL, Mitchell DC, Miller C, Smiciklas-Wright H. Assessing the effect of underreporting energy intake on dietary patterns and weight status. J Am Diet Assoc. 2007;107:64–71.
- Heitmann BL, Lissner L. Dietary underreporting by obese individuals—is it specific or non-specific? BMJ. 1995;311:986–989.
Source: PubMed