Psychosocial work environment and sickness absence among British civil servants: the Whitehall II study

F M North, S L Syme, A Feeney, M Shipley, M Marmot, F M North, S L Syme, A Feeney, M Shipley, M Marmot

Abstract

Objectives: This study sought to examine the association between the psychosocial work environment and subsequent rates of sickness absence.

Methods: The analyses were based on a cohort of male and female British civil servants (n=9072). Rates of short spells (<or=7 days) and long spells (>7 days) of sickness absence were calculated for different aspects of the psychosocial work environment, as measured by self-reports and personnel managers' ratings (external assessments).

Results: Low levels of work demands, control, and support were associated with higher rates of short and long spells of absence in men and, to a lesser extent, in women. The differences were similar for the self-reports and external assessments. After adjustment for grade of employment, the differences were diminished but generally remained significant for short spells. The combination of high demands and low control was only associated with higher rates of short spells in the lower grades.

Conclusions: The psychosocial work environment predicts rates of sickness absence. Increased levels of control and support at work could have beneficial effects in terms of both improving the health and well-being of employees and increasing productivity.

References

    1. Annu Rev Public Health. 1985;6:367-81
    1. Soc Sci Med. 1983;17(20):1497-503
    1. Int J Epidemiol. 1985 Sep;14(3):378-88
    1. J Health Soc Behav. 1986 Mar;27(1):62-77
    1. J Appl Psychol. 1988 Feb;73(1):11-9
    1. J Appl Psychol. 1988 May;73(2):193-8
    1. Am J Public Health. 1988 Aug;78(8):910-8
    1. Ann Clin Res. 1988;20(1-2):143-5
    1. Am J Public Health. 1988 Oct;78(10):1336-42
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1989 Mar;129(3):483-94
    1. Am J Epidemiol. 1989 Mar;129(3):495-502
    1. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1989 Aug;15(4):271-9
    1. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1989 Jun;15(3):165-79
    1. Soc Sci Med. 1991;32(1):15-27
    1. J Appl Psychol. 1991 Feb;76(1):46-53
    1. Lancet. 1991 Jun 8;337(8754):1387-93
    1. J Appl Psychol. 1991 Jun;76(3):398-407
    1. BMJ. 1993 Feb 6;306(6874):361-6
    1. Scand J Soc Med. 1994 Mar;22(1):27-34
    1. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1995 Apr;49(2):124-30
    1. J Appl Psychol. 1985 May;70(2):314-28
    1. J Health Soc Behav. 1982 Jun;23(2):132-44
    1. N Engl J Med. 1976 Apr 29;294(18):987-94
    1. Biometrics. 1977 Mar;33(1):159-74
    1. Acad Manage J. 1976 Jun;19(2):195-212
    1. Int J Epidemiol. 1977 Mar;6(1):17-21
    1. J Health Soc Behav. 1979 Jun;20(2):139-60
    1. Am J Public Health. 1981 Jul;71(7):694-705

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa