Can municipality-based post-discharge follow-up visits including a general practitioner reduce early readmission among the fragile elderly (65+ years old)? A randomized controlled trial

Lau Caspar Thygesen, Sara Fokdal, Thomas Gjørup, Rod S Taylor, Ann-Dorthe Zwisler, Prevention of Early Readmission Research Group, Peter Schou, Natasha Georgieva Roseva-Nielsen, Gerda Pedersen, Lia Clemensen, Jytte Hykkelbjerg Bruhn, Inge Jekes, Lone Haagensen, Anette Rise, Vivi Kenhof, Henrik Ancher Sørensen, Knut Borch-Johnsen, Lau Caspar Thygesen, Sara Fokdal, Thomas Gjørup, Rod S Taylor, Ann-Dorthe Zwisler, Prevention of Early Readmission Research Group, Peter Schou, Natasha Georgieva Roseva-Nielsen, Gerda Pedersen, Lia Clemensen, Jytte Hykkelbjerg Bruhn, Inge Jekes, Lone Haagensen, Anette Rise, Vivi Kenhof, Henrik Ancher Sørensen, Knut Borch-Johnsen

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate how municipality-based post-discharge follow-up visits including a general practitioner and municipal nurse affect early readmission among high-risk older people discharged from a hospital department of internal medicine.

Design and setting: Centrally randomized single-centre pragmatic controlled trial comparing intervention and usual care with investigator-blinded outcome assessment.

Intervention: The intervention was home visits with a general practitioner and municipal nurse within seven days of discharge focusing on medication, rehabilitation plan, functional level, and need for further health care initiatives. The visit was concluded by planning one or two further visits. Controls received standard health care services.

Patients: People aged 65 + years discharged from Holbæk University Hospital, Denmark, in 2012 considered at high risk of readmission.

Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was readmission within 30 days. Secondary outcomes at 30 and 180 days included readmission, primary health care, and municipal services. Outcomes were register-based and analysis used the intention-to-treat principle.

Results: A total of 270 and 261 patients were randomized to intervention and control groups, respectively. The groups were similar in baseline characteristics. In all 149 planned discharge follow-up visits were carried out (55%). Within 30 days, 24% of the intervention group and 23% of the control group were readmitted (p = 0.93). No significant differences were found for any other secondary outcomes except that the intervention group received more municipal nursing services.

Conclusion: This municipality-based follow-up intervention was only feasible in half the planned visits. The intervention as delivered had no effect on readmission or subsequent use of primary or secondary health care services.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02094040.

Keywords: Community health nursing; Denmark; frail elderly; patient readmission; population register; primary health care; quality of health care; randomized controlled trial.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow diagram. Note: *Inclusion criteria were patients aged 65 years or older discharged alive from the Department of Internal Medicine of Holbæk University Hospital, Denmark and living in one of the three surrounding municipalities and who had dementia or two of the following conditions: two or more hospital admissions within the 12 months before the index admission, loss of physical functioning, treatment of two or more concurrent medical or surgical conditions, mental disorder, six or more prescription medications, symptoms of cognitive disturbance, substance abuse problem, disadvantaged social network, or need for increasing home care following the index admission.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Time to (A) first readmission, (B) first unplanned readmission, and (C) first readmission to a department of medicine.

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Trends in aging: United States and worldwide. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2003;52:101–4.
    1. Christensen K, Doblhammer G, Rau R, Vaupel JW. Ageing populations: The challenges ahead. Lancet 2009; 374:1196–1208.
    1. Campbell SE, Seymour DG, Primrose WR. A systematic literature review of factors affecting outcome in older medical patients admitted to hospital. Age Ageing 2004;33:110–15.
    1. Moore C, Wisnivesky J, Williams S, McGinn T. Medical errors related to discontinuity of care from an inpatient to an outpatient setting. J Gen Intern Med 2003;18:646–51.
    1. Frydenberg K, Brekke M. Poor communication on patients ’ medication across health care levels leads to potentially harmful medication errors. Scand J Prim Health Care 2012;30:234–40.
    1. Kripalani S, LeFevre F, Phillips CO, Williams MV, Basaviah P, Baker DW. Deficits in communication and information transfer between hospital-based and primary care physicians: Implications for patient safety and continuity of care. JAMA 2007;297:831–41.
    1. Huntley AL, Thomas R, Mann M, Huws D, Elwyn G, Paranjothy S, et al. . Is case management effective in reducing the risk of unplanned hospital admissions for older people? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Fam Pract 2013; 30:266–75.
    1. Balaban RB, Weissman JS, Samuel PA, Woolhandler S. Redefining and redesigning hospital discharge to enhance patient care: A randomized controlled study. J Gen Intern Med 2008;23:1228–33.
    1. Evans RL, Hendricks RD. Evaluating hospital discharge planning: A randomized clinical trial. Med Care 1993;31:358–70.
    1. Hendriksen C, Stromgard E, Sorensen KH. Hospitalization of elderly people: A 3-year controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 1989;37:117–22.
    1. Jack BW, Chetty VK, Anthony D, Greenwald JL, Sanchez GM, Johnson AE et al. . A reengineered hospital discharge program to decrease rehospitalization: A randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2009;150:178–87.
    1. Laramee AS, Levinsky SK, Sargent J, Ross R, Callas P. Case management in a heterogeneous congestive heart failure population: A randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med 2003;163:809–17.
    1. Legrain S, Tubach F, Bonnet-Zamponi D, Lemaire A, Aquino JP, Paillaud E, et al. . A new multimodal geriatric discharge- planning intervention to prevent emergency visits and rehospitalizations of older adults: The optimization of medication in AGEd multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 2011;59:2017–28.
    1. Naylor M, Brooten D, Jones R, Lavizzo-Mourey R, Mezey M, Pauly M. Comprehensive discharge planning for the hospitalized elderly: A randomized clinical trial. Ann Intern Med 1994;120:999–1006.
    1. Bolas H, Brookes K, Scott M, McElnay J. Evaluation of a hospital-based community liaison pharmacy service in Northern Ireland. Pharm World Sci 2004;26:114–20.
    1. Eggink RN, Lenderink AW, Widdershoven JW, van den Bemt PM. The effect of a clinical pharmacist discharge service on medication discrepancies in patients with heart failure. Pharm World Sci 2010;32:759–66.
    1. Benbassat J, Taragin MI. The effect of clinical interventions on hospital readmissions: A meta-review of published meta-analyses. Isr J Health Policy Res 2013;2:1.
    1. Takeda A, Taylor SJC, Taylor RS, Khan F, Krum H, Underwood M. Clinical service organisation for heart failure. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 9. Art. No. CD002752.
    1. Elkan R, Kendrick D, Dewey M, Hewitt M, Robinson J, Blair M, et al. . Effectiveness of home based support for older people: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2001; 323:719–25.
    1. Leppin AL, Gionfriddo MR, Kessler M, Brito JP, Mair FS, Gallacher K. Preventing 30-day hospital readmissions: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. JAMA Intern Med 2014;174:1095–1107.
    1. Rytter L, Jakobsen HN, Ronholt F, Hammer AV, Andreasen AH, Nissen A, et al. . Comprehensive discharge follow-up in patients’ homes by GPs and district nurses of elderly patients: A randomized controlled trial. Scand J Prim Health Care 2010;28:146–53.
    1. Beswick AD, Rees K, Dieppe P, Ayis S, Gooberman-Hill R, Horwood J, et al. . Complex interventions to improve physical function and maintain independent living in elderly people: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2008; 371:725–35.
    1. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 2010;340:c332.
    1. Lynge E, Sandegaard JL, Rebolj M. The Danish National Patient Register. Scand J Public Health 2011;39(7 Suppl):30–3.
    1. Pedersen CB. The Danish civil registration system. Scand J Public Health 2011;39(7 Suppl):22–5.
    1. Andersen JS, Olivarius NF, Krasnik A. The Danish National Health Service Register. Scand J Public Health 2011;39(7 Suppl):34–7.
    1. Fokdal S, Sørensen SK, Al-Najer A. Implementering af opfølgende hjemmebesøg i 9 kommuner i Region Sjælland [Implementation of follow-up home visits in 9 municipalities in Region Zealand, Denmark]. Holbæk: Municipality of Holbæk; 2013.
    1. Lehn SF, Rod MH, Thygesen LC, Zwisler A-D. Implementering af opfølgende hjemmebesøg i Region Sjælland [Implementation of follow-up home visits in Region Zealand]. Copenhagen: National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark; 2014.
    1. Carroll C, Patterson M, Wood S, Booth A, Rick J, Balain S. A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity. Implement Sci 2007;2:40.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa