Patient safety during anesthesia in Ukraine: national audit results

Kateryna Bielka, Iurii Kuchyn, Nataliia Semenko, Uliana Kashchii, Iryna Pliuta, Kateryna Bielka, Iurii Kuchyn, Nataliia Semenko, Uliana Kashchii, Iryna Pliuta

Abstract

Background: Although anesthesiologists are one of the leaders in patient safety, anesthesia in low and low-middle income countries still need improvement in safety mesures with evidence-based practice application. The study aim was to audit the safety principles implementation in the Ukrainian anesthesiologist`s practice.

Methods: The study was held in March 2021-Februrary 2022 by filling out an online questionnarie. The link to the survey was distributed through Ukrainian Anesthesiologists Association (UAA) members emails and also published on UAA webpage and facebook page. The email was sent to 1000 UAA members.

Results: Summary 210 respondents took part in the study. Among the respondents, 79.1% of respondents are aware of the Helsinki Declaration on Patient Safety in Anesthesiology, but only 40,3% declared that the principles of this Declaration had been implemented in their medical institutions. Even though most of the respondents declared that the quality of the work has improved with the application of the Helsinki Declaration, 16% stated, that there is no positive impact. Most of the medical institutions include mandatory perioperative monitoring, while 17% of hospitals have no access to pulse oximetry for all patients in the operating room and intensive care unit. Concerning using clinical protocols, the one on the treatment of massive bleeding is used in 60.3% of cases, on infection control in 60.5%. In relation to checklists, 28.2% of respondents have never heard about the WHO Safe Surgery checklist. Checklists for equipment inspection are used in only 27.8% of medical institutions. 72.8% hospitals keep records of anaesthesia complications.

Conclusion: The study showed that significant positive steps are being taken to improve patient safety in Ukraine, where most hospitals comply with the minimum standarts of monitoring during anesthesia. Although there are many challenges for improvement, more hospitals need to implement WHO Safe Surgery and equipment checklists, protocols etc. These areas are a priority for further development in Ukraine.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05175976 on 04/01/2022.

Keywords: Helsinki Declaration; Monitoring in the operating room; Patient safety.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Responder’s workplaces distribution structure
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Clinical protocols use in the everyday practice in Ukrainian hospitals
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Equipment checklists availability in Ukrainian operating rooms
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Difficult airway trolleys/tables availability in Ukrainian operating rooms
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Anesthesia complications reporting in the Ukrainian hospitals

References

    1. Staender SE, Mahajan RP. Anesthesia and patient safety: have we reached our limits? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2011;24:349–353. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e328344d90c.
    1. Horton JB, Reece EM, Broughton G, 2nd, Janis JE, Thornton JF, Rohrich RJ. Patient safety in the office-based setting. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117(4):61e–80e. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000204796.65812.68.
    1. Mellin-Olsen J, Staender S, Whitaker DK, et al. The Helsinki Declaration on Patient Safety in Anaesthesiology. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010;27:592–597. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32833b1adf.
    1. Balzer F, Spies C, Schaffartzik W, et al. Patient safety in anaesthesia: assessment of status quo in the Berlin-Brandenburg area, Germany. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2011;28:749–752. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e328348ee35.
    1. Wu HHL, Lewis SR, Čikkelová M, Wacker J, Smith AF. Patient safety and the role of the Helsinki Declaration on Patient Safety in Anaesthesiology. Euro J Anaesthesiol. 2019;36(12):946–954. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001043.
    1. McColl E, Jacoby A, Thomas L, et al. Design and use of questionnaires: a review of best practice applicable to surveys of health service staff and patients. Health Technol Assess. 2001;5:1–256. doi: 10.3310/hta5310.
    1. Kelley K, Clark B, Brown V, et al. Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research. Int J Qual Healthcare. 2003;15:261–266. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzg031.
    1. Afonso AM, Cadwell JB, Staffa SJ, Zurakowski D, Vinson AE. Burnout rate and risk factors among anesthesiologists in the United States. Anesthesiology. 2021;134:683–696. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003722.
    1. Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, Lipsitz SR, Breizat AH, Dellinger EP, Herbosa T, Joseph S, Kibatala PL, Lapitan MC, et al. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(5):491–499. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0810119.
    1. Bergs J, Hellings J, Cleemput I, Zurel O, De Troyer V, Van Hiel M, Demeere JL, Claeys D, Vandijck D. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of the World Health Organization surgical safety checklist on postoperative complications. Br J Surg. 2014;101(3):150–158. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9381.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa