Analysis of sensorimotor control in people with and without neck pain using inertial sensor technology: study protocol for a 1-year longitudinal prospective observational study

Filippo Moggioli, Tomas Pérez-Fernández, Sonia Liébana, Elena Bocos Corredor, Susan Armijo-Olivo, Josue Fernandez-Carnero, Rafael Raya, Pablo Conde, Oscar Rodríguez-López, Cristina Sánchez, Aitor Martín-Pintado-Zugasti, Filippo Moggioli, Tomas Pérez-Fernández, Sonia Liébana, Elena Bocos Corredor, Susan Armijo-Olivo, Josue Fernandez-Carnero, Rafael Raya, Pablo Conde, Oscar Rodríguez-López, Cristina Sánchez, Aitor Martín-Pintado-Zugasti

Abstract

Introduction: Neck pain is a very common musculoskeletal disorder associated with high socioeconomic costs derived from work absenteeism and medical expenses. Previous studies have suggested that patients with neck pain of different origins present sensorimotor control impairments compared with the asymptomatic population. However, there is a small number of published studies focusing on these with conflicting results. In addition, the existing methodological limitations highlight the need for more and better quality studies. Moreover, longitudinal studies are necessary to investigate whether changes in pain or disability in individuals with chronic neck pain over time associate with changes in cervical sensorimotor control.

Methods and analysis: This is a descriptive, observational, longitudinal, prospective study consecutively enrolling 52 patients with non-specific neck pain and 52 age-matched asymptomatic participants.Intensity of pain, neck disability, duration of symptoms, topography of pain and comorbidities will be registered at baseline. Sensorimotor control variables including active range of motion, movement speed, acceleration, smoothness of motion, head repositioning accuracy and motion coupling patterns will be recorded as primary outcomes by means of inertial sensors during the following tests consecutively performed in two sessions separated by 12 months: (1) kinematics of planar movements, (2) kinematics of the craniocervical flexion movement, (3) kinematics during functional tasks and (4) kinematics of task-oriented neck movements in response to visual targets.Secondary outcomes will include: (1) Regular physical activity levels, (2) Kinesiophobia, (3) Symptoms related to central sensitisation and (4) The usability of the inertial measurement unit sensor technology.

Ethics and dissemination: This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of CEU San Pablo University (495/21/39). Patients will be recruited after providing written informed consent and they will be able to withdraw their consent at any time. Only the study investigators will have access to the study data. The results will be disseminated through scientific publications, conferences and media.

Trial registration number: NCT05032911.

Keywords: back pain; health informatics; rehabilitation medicine.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: RR is the CEO of Werium Solutions, manufacturer of the inertial wearable sensor used in the study. The other authors declare no conflict of interest.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Placement of wearable inertial sensors on the forehead and T4.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Example of real-time range of motion values displayed on a computer screen.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Task-oriented virtual reality game.

References

    1. Cohen SP. Epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of neck pain. Mayo Clin Proc 2015;90:284–99. 10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.09.008
    1. Hoy D, March L, Woolf A, et al. . The global burden of neck pain: estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73:1309–15. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204431
    1. Meisingset I, Woodhouse A, Stensdotter AK. Evidence for a general stiffening motor control pattern in neck pain: a cross sectional study pathophysiology of musculoskeletal disorders. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2015;16.
    1. Sjölander P, Michaelson P, Jaric S, et al. . Sensorimotor disturbances in chronic neck pain--range of motion, peak velocity, smoothness of movement, and repositioning acuity. Man Ther 2008;13:122–31. 10.1016/j.math.2006.10.002
    1. Sarig Bahat H, Weiss PL, Laufer Y. The effect of neck pain on cervical kinematics, as assessed in a virtual environment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010;91:1884–90. 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.09.007
    1. Sarig Bahat H, Weiss PLT, Sprecher E, et al. . Do neck kinematics correlate with pain intensity, neck disability or with fear of motion? Man Ther 2014;19:252–8. 10.1016/j.math.2013.10.006
    1. Tsang SMH, Szeto GPY, Lee RYW. Altered spinal kinematics and muscle recruitment pattern of the cervical and thoracic spine in people with chronic neck pain during functional task. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2014;24:104–13. 10.1016/j.jelekin.2013.10.011
    1. Tsang SMH, Szeto GPY, Lee RYW. Movement coordination and differential kinematics of the cervical and thoracic spines in people with chronic neck pain. Clin Biomech 2013;28:610–7. 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.05.009
    1. Salehi R, Rasouli O, Saadat M, et al. . Cervical movement kinematic analysis in patients with chronic neck pain: a comparative study with healthy subjects. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2021;53:102377. 10.1016/j.msksp.2021.102377
    1. Brumagne S, Diers M, Danneels L, et al. . Neuroplasticity of sensorimotor control in low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2019;49:402–14. 10.2519/jospt.2019.8489
    1. Moghaddas D, de Zoete RMJ, Edwards S, et al. . Differences in the kinematics of the cervical and thoracic spine during functional movement in individuals with or without chronic neck pain: a systematic review. Physiotherapy 2019;105:421–33. 10.1016/j.physio.2019.01.007
    1. de Zoete RMJ, Osmotherly PG, Rivett DA, et al. . Sensorimotor control in individuals with idiopathic neck pain and healthy individuals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2017;98:1257–71. 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.09.121
    1. Hesby BB, Hartvigsen J, Rasmussen H, et al. . Electronic measures of movement impairment, repositioning, and posture in people with and without neck pain-a systematic review. Syst Rev 2019;8:220. 10.1186/s13643-019-1125-2
    1. Stenneberg MS, Rood M, de Bie R, et al. . To what degree does active cervical range of motion differ between patients with neck pain, patients with whiplash, and those without neck pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2017;98:1407–34. 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.10.003
    1. Lemmers GPG, Heijmans MWM, Scafoglieri A, et al. . Three-dimensional kinematics of the cervical spine using an electromagnetic tracking device. differences between healthy subjects and subjects with non-specific neck pain and the effect of age. Clin Biomech 2018;54:111–7. 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.03.012
    1. de Zoete RMJ, Osmotherly PG, Rivett DA, et al. . Cervical sensorimotor control does not change over time and is not related to chronic idiopathic neck pain characteristics: a 6-month longitudinal observational study. Phys Ther 2020;100:268–82. 10.1093/ptj/pzz167
    1. de Zoete RMJ, Osmotherly PG, Rivett DA, et al. . No differences between individuals with chronic idiopathic neck pain and asymptomatic individuals on 7 cervical sensorimotor control tests: a cross-sectional study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2020;50:33–43. 10.2519/jospt.2020.8846
    1. Meisingset I, Stensdotter A-K, Woodhouse A, et al. . Neck motion, motor control, pain and disability: a longitudinal study of associations in neck pain patients in physiotherapy treatment. Man Ther 2016;22:94–100. 10.1016/j.math.2015.10.013
    1. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. . The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Bull World Health Organ 2007;85:867–72. 10.2471/BLT.07.045120
    1. Andrade Ortega JA, Delgado Martínez AD, Almécija Ruiz R. Validation of the Spanish version of the neck disability index. Spine 2010;35:E114–8. 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181afea5d
    1. Raya R, Garcia-Carmona R, Sanchez C, et al. . An inexpensive and easy to use cervical range of motion measurement solution using inertial sensors. Sensors 2018;18:2582–17. 10.3390/s18082582
    1. Pérez-Fernández T, Armijo-Olivo S, Liébana S, et al. . A novel use of inertial sensors to measure the craniocervical flexion range of motion associated to the craniocervical flexion test: an observational study. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2020;17:152. 10.1186/s12984-020-00784-1
    1. de Zoete RMJ, Osmotherly PG, Rivett DA, et al. . No differences between individuals with chronic idiopathic neck pain and asymptomatic individuals on seven cervical sensorimotor control tests: a cross-sectional study. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2019;23:1–37. 10.2519/jospt.2019.8846
    1. Sevilla-Gonzalez MDR, Moreno Loaeza L, Lazaro-Carrera LS, et al. . Spanish version of the system usability scale for the assessment of electronic tools: development and validation. JMIR Hum Factors 2020;7:e21161. 10.2196/21161
    1. Sarig H, Chen X, Reznik D. Interactive cervical motion kinematics : Sensitivity, speci fi city and clinically signi fi cant values for identifying kinematic impairments in patients with chronic neck pain. Manual Therapy 2014:1–8.
    1. Roman-Viñas B, Serra-Majem L, Hagströmer M, et al. . International physical activity questionnaire: reliability and validity in a Spanish population. Eur J Sport Sci 2010;10:297–304. 10.1080/17461390903426667
    1. Gómez-Pérez L, López-Martínez AE, Ruiz-Párraga GT. Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Tampa scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK). J Pain 2011;12:425–35. 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.08.004
    1. Cuesta-Vargas AI, Neblett R, Gatchel RJ, et al. . Cross-Cultural adaptation and validity of the Spanish fear-avoidance components scale and clinical implications in primary care. BMC Fam Pract 2020;21:1–9. 10.1186/s12875-020-01116-x
    1. Cuesta-Vargas AI, Roldan-Jimenez C, Neblett R, et al. . Cross-cultural adaptation and validity of the Spanish central sensitization inventory. Springerplus 2016;5:1837. 10.1186/s40064-016-3515-4
    1. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, et al. . G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 2007;39:175–91. 10.3758/BF03193146
    1. Turvey MT, Fonseca S. Nature of motor control: perspectives and issues. Adv Exp Med Biol 2009;629:405–21. 10.1007/978-0-387-77064-2_6
    1. Riemann BL, Lephart SM. The sensorimotor system, part I: the physiologic basis of functional joint stability. J Athl Train 2002;37:71–9.
    1. Jull GA, O'Leary SP, Falla DL. Clinical assessment of the deep cervical flexor muscles: the craniocervical flexion test. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2008;31:525–33. 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.08.003
    1. World Medical Association . World Medical association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 2013;310:2191–4. 10.1001/jama.2013.281053

Source: PubMed

Sponsorit ja yhteistyökumppanit

Sairaudet

Huumeiden interventiot

3
Tilaa