18F-FDG uptake in PET/CT is a potential predictive biomarker of response to anti-PD-1 antibody therapy in non-small cell lung cancer

Kazuki Takada, Gouji Toyokawa, Yasuto Yoneshima, Kentaro Tanaka, Isamu Okamoto, Mototsugu Shimokawa, Sho Wakasu, Akira Haro, Atsushi Osoegawa, Tetsuzo Tagawa, Yoshinao Oda, Yoichi Nakanishi, Masaki Mori, Kazuki Takada, Gouji Toyokawa, Yasuto Yoneshima, Kentaro Tanaka, Isamu Okamoto, Mototsugu Shimokawa, Sho Wakasu, Akira Haro, Atsushi Osoegawa, Tetsuzo Tagawa, Yoshinao Oda, Yoichi Nakanishi, Masaki Mori

Abstract

To examine the association between 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) uptake in positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and the response to anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody therapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, 89 patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC were retrospectively analysed. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) in 18F-FDG PET/CT and the response to anti-PD-1 antibodies were recorded. A cut-off value of SUVmax was determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for patient stratification. Among the 89 patients evaluated, 24 were classified as responders (all partial response), and 65 as non-responders. The average SUVmax of the responders was 15.60 (range, 6.44-51.10), which was significantly higher than that of the non-responders (11.61; range, 2.13-32.75; P = 0.0168, Student's t-test). The cut-off SUVmax value selected for stratification was 11.16 (sensitivity and specificity, 0.792 and 0.585, respectively). The response rate of patients with SUVmax value ≥ 11.16 (41.3% [19/46]) was significantly higher than that of patients with SUVmax < 11.16 (11.6% [5/43], P = 0.0012, Chi-squared test). The SUVmax in 18F-FDG PET/CT is a potential predictive marker of response to anti-PD-1 antibody therapy in NSCLC patients. Further prospective studies of large populations are necessary to validate these results.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
SUVmax of non-responders and responders to anti-PD-1 mAb therapy. Box and whisker plot showing SUVmax of 89 NSCLC patients classified as responders (PR, n = 24) and non-responders (PD + SD, n = 65). The midline, box edges, and outer bars indicate the median, first and third quartiles, and the upper and lower whiskers, respectively. Dots represent individual patients. SUVmax, maximum standardized uptake value; PD-1, programmed cell death-1; mAb, monoclonal antibody; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; PD, progressive disease; SD, stable disease; PR, partial response; CR, complete response.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Response rates stratified by SUVmax. (a) Receiver operating characteristic curve to determine the optimal cut-off value for SUVmax. (b) Average response rates of patients with SUVmax values above and below the cut-off. SUVmax, maximum standardized uptake value; AUC, area under curve; PD, progressive disease; SD, stable disease; PR, partial response; CR, complete response.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Survival of NSCLC patients stratified by SUVmax. Kaplan–Meier survival curves of progression-free survival (a) and overall survival (b) of patients stratified by SUVmax. SUVmax, maximum standardized uptake value; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer.

References

    1. Pardoll DM. The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy. Nature reviews. Cancer. 2012;12:252–264. doi: 10.1038/nrc3239.
    1. Takeuchi S, et al. Impact of initial PET/CT staging in terms of clinical stage, management plan, and prognosis in 592 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging. 2014;41:906–914. doi: 10.1007/s00259-013-2672-8.
    1. Liao S, et al. Prognostic value of metabolic tumor burden on 18F-FDG PET in nonsurgical patients with non-small cell lung cancer. European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging. 2012;39:27–38. doi: 10.1007/s00259-011-1934-6.
    1. Kasahara N, et al. Correlation of tumor-related immunity with 18F-FDG-PET in pulmonary squamous-cell carcinoma. Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 2018;119:71–77. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.03.001.
    1. Kaira K, et al. 2-Deoxy-2-[fluorine-18] fluoro-d-glucose uptake on positron emission tomography is associated with programmed death ligand-1 expression in patients with pulmonary adenocarcinoma. European journal of cancer (Oxford, England: 1990) 2018;101:181–190. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.06.022.
    1. Takada K, et al. Metabolic characteristics of programmed cell death-ligand 1-expressing lung cancer on (18) F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Cancer medicine. 2017;6:2552–2561. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1215.
    1. Kaira K, et al. Biological significance of 18F-FDG uptake on PET in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 2014;83:197–204. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2013.11.025.
    1. Appelberg R, et al. The Warburg effect in mycobacterial granulomas is dependent on the recruitment and activation of macrophages by interferon-gamma. Immunology. 2015;145:498–507. doi: 10.1111/imm.12464.
    1. Palsson-McDermott EM, O’Neill LA. The Warburg effect then and now: from cancer to inflammatory diseases. BioEssays: news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology. 2013;35:965–973. doi: 10.1002/bies.201300084.
    1. Lopci Egesta, Toschi Luca, Grizzi Fabio, Rahal Daoud, Olivari Laura, Castino Giovanni Francesco, Marchetti Silvia, Cortese Nina, Qehajaj Dorina, Pistillo Daniela, Alloisio Marco, Roncalli Massimo, Allavena Paola, Santoro Armando, Marchesi Federica, Chiti Arturo. Correlation of metabolic information on FDG-PET with tissue expression of immune markers in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are candidates for upfront surgery. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 2016;43(11):1954–1961. doi: 10.1007/s00259-016-3425-2.
    1. Truillet C, et al. Imaging PD-L1 Expression with ImmunoPET. Bioconjugate chemistry. 2018;29:96–103. doi: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.7b00631.
    1. Niemeijer AN, et al. Whole body PD-1 and PD-L1 positron emission tomography in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. Nature communications. 2018;9:4664. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07131-y.
    1. Bensch F, et al. (89)Zr-atezolizumab imaging as a non-invasive approach to assess clinical response to PD-L1 blockade in cancer. Nat Med. 2018;24:1852–1858. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0255-8.
    1. Hettich M, Braun F, Bartholoma MD, Schirmbeck R, Niedermann G. High-Resolution PET Imaging with Therapeutic Antibody-based PD-1/PD-L1 Checkpoint Tracers. Theranostics. 2016;6:1629–1640. doi: 10.7150/thno.15253.
    1. Goldstraw P, et al. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals for the revision of the TNM stage groupings in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM Classification of malignant tumours. Journal of thoracic oncology: official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. 2007;2:706–714. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31812f3c1a.
    1. Nagai Y, et al. Genetic heterogeneity of the epidermal growth factor receptor in non-small cell lung cancer cell lines revealed by a rapid and sensitive detection system, the peptide nucleic acid-locked nucleic acid PCR clamp. Cancer research. 2005;65:7276–7282. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-05-0331.
    1. Marchetti A, et al. ALK Protein Analysis by IHC Staining after Recent Regulatory Changes: A Comparison of Two Widely Used Approaches, Revision of the Literature, and a New Testing Algorithm. Journal of thoracic oncology: official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. 2016;11:487–495. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2015.12.111.
    1. Teraoka S, et al. Early Immune-Related Adverse Events and Association with Outcome in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Nivolumab: A Prospective Cohort Study. J Thorac Oncol. 2017;12:1798–1805. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2017.08.022.
    1. Eisenhauer EA, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) European journal of cancer (Oxford, England: 1990) 2009;45:228–247. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa