Bicycling to school improves the cardiometabolic risk factor profile: a randomised controlled trial

Lars Ostergaard, Line A B Børrestad, Jakob Tarp, Lars Bo Andersen, Lars Ostergaard, Line A B Børrestad, Jakob Tarp, Lars Bo Andersen

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate whether bicycling to school improves cardiometabolic risk factor profile and cardiorespiratory fitness among children.

Design: Prospective, blinded, randomised controlled trial.

Setting: Single centre study in Odense, Denmark

Participants: 43 children previously not bicycling to school were randomly allocated to control group (n=20) (ie, no change in lifestyle) or intervention group (ie, bicycling to school) (n=23).

Primary and secondary outcome measures: Change in cardiometabolic risk factor score and change in cardiorespiratory fitness.

Results: All participants measured at baseline returned at follow-up. Based upon intention-to-treat (ITT) analyses, clustering of cardiometabolic risk factors was lowered by 0.58 SD (95% CI -1.03 to -0.14, p=0.012) in the bicycling group compared to the control group. Cardiorespiratory fitness (l O(2)/min) per se did not increase significantly more in the intervention than in the control group (β=0.0337, 95% CI -0.06 to 0.12, p=0.458).

Conclusions: Bicycling to school counteracted a clustering of cardiometabolic risk factors and should thus be recognised as potential prevention of type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease (CVD). The intervention did, however, not elicit a larger increase in cardiorespiratory fitness in the intervention group as compared with the control group.

Trial registration: Registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01236222).

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Participants flow diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Dose−response between bicycling to school and fitness improvement in the intervention group.

References

    1. Grundy SM. Metabolic syndrome pandemic. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2008;28:629–36
    1. Weiss R, Dziura J, Burgert TS, et al. Obesity and the metabolic syndrome in children and adolescents. N Engl J Med 2004;350:2362–74
    1. Gami AS, Witt BJ, Howard DE, et al. Metabolic syndrome and risk of incident cardiovascular events and death: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49:403–14
    1. Stern MP, Williams K, Gonzalez-Villalpando C, et al. Does the metabolic syndrome improve identification of individuals at risk of type 2 diabetes and/or cardiovascular disease? Diab Care 2004;27:2676–81
    1. Camhi SM, Katzmarzyk PT. Tracking of cardiometabolic risk factor clustering from childhood to adulthood. Int J Pediat Obes 2010;5:122–9
    1. Andersen LB, Harro M, Sardinha LB, et al. Physical activity and clustered cardiovascular risk in children: a cross-sectional study (The European Youth Heart Study). Lancet 2006;368:299–304
    1. Ekelund U, Anderssen S, Andersen LB, et al. Prevalence and correlates of the metabolic syndrome in a population-based sample of European youth. Am J Clin Nutr 2009;89:90–6
    1. Cooper AR, Wedderkopp N, Wang H, et al. Active travel to school and cardiovascular fitness in Danish children and adolescents. Med Sci Sports Exer 2006;38:1724–31
    1. Østergaard L, Grøntved A, Børrestad LA, et al. Cycling to school is associated with lower BMI and lower odds of being overweight or obese in a large population-based study of Danish adolescents. J Phys Activity Health 2012;9:617–25
    1. Sattelmair J, Pertman J, Ding EL, et al. Dose response between physical activity and risk of coronary heart disease: a meta-analysis. Circulation 2011;124:789–95
    1. Department_For_Transport. National Travel Survey: 2010 (accessed 28 Feb 2012)
    1. Lubans DR, Boreham CA, Kelly P, et al. The relationship between active travel to school and health-related fitness in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Activity 2011;8:5
    1. Schulz KF, Grimes DA. Generation of allocation sequences in randomised trials: chance, not choice. Lancet 2002;359:515–19
    1. Cole TJ, Bellizzi MC, Flegal KM, et al. Establishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey. BMJ 2000;320:1240–3
    1. Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, et al. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia 1985;28:412–19
    1. Kolle E, Steene-Johannessen J, Andersen LB, et al. Objectively assessed physical activity and aerobic fitness in a population-based sample of Norwegian 9- and 15-year-olds. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2010;20:e41–7
    1. Trost SG, Loprinzi PD, Moore R, et al. Comparison of accelerometer cut points for predicting activity intensity in youth. Med Sci Sports Exer 2011;43:1360–8
    1. Møller NC, Kristensen PL, Wedderkopp N, et al. Objectively measured habitual physical activity in 1997/1998 vs 2003/2004 in Danish children: the European Youth Heart Study. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2009;19:19–29
    1. Twisk J, Proper K. Evaluation of the results of a randomized controlled trial: how to define changes between baseline and follow-up. J Clin Epidemiol 2004;57:223–8
    1. Pocock SJ. Clinical trials with multiple outcomes: a statistical perspective on their design, analysis, and interpretation. Control Clin Trials 1997;18:530–45; discussion 46–9
    1. Eisenmann JC. On the use of a continuous metabolic syndrome score in pediatric research. Cardiovasc Diabetol 2008;7:17.
    1. Ford ES, Li C, Zhao G, et al. Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome among U.S. adolescents using the definition from the International Diabetes Federation. Diab Care 2008;31:587–9
    1. Andersen LB, Lawlor DA, Cooper AR, et al. Physical fitness in relation to transport to school in adolescents: the Danish youth and sports study. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2009;19:406–11
    1. Cooper AR, Wedderkopp N, Jago R, et al. Longitudinal associations of cycling to school with adolescent fitness. Prev Med 2008;47:324–8
    1. Møller NC, Østergaard L, Gade JR, et al. The effect on cardiorespiratory fitness after an 8-week period of commuter cycling—a randomized controlled study in adults. Prev Med 2011;53:172–7
    1. Oja P MA, Heinonen A, Kukkonen-Harjula K, et al. Physiological effects of walking and cycling to work. Scand J Med Sci Sports 1991;1:151–7
    1. Swain DP, Abernathy KS, Smith CS, et al. Target heart rates for the development of cardiorespiratory fitness. Med Sci Sports Exer 1994;26:112–16
    1. McGough JJ, Faraone SV. Estimating the size of treatment effects: moving beyond p values. Psychiatry (Edgmont) 2009;6:21–9
    1. Hillier TA, Rousseau A, Lange C, et al. Practical way to assess metabolic syndrome using a continuous score obtained from principal components analysis. Diabetologia 2006;49:1528–35

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa