Left atrial appendage closure in patients with a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: results from the multicenter German LAARGE registry

Christian Fastner, Johannes Brachmann, Thorsten Lewalter, Uwe Zeymer, Horst Sievert, Martin Borggrefe, Christian Weiß, Volker Geist, Alexander Krapivsky, Matthias Käunicke, Harald Mudra, Matthias Hochadel, Steffen Schneider, Jochen Senges, Ibrahim Akin, Christian Fastner, Johannes Brachmann, Thorsten Lewalter, Uwe Zeymer, Horst Sievert, Martin Borggrefe, Christian Weiß, Volker Geist, Alexander Krapivsky, Matthias Käunicke, Harald Mudra, Matthias Hochadel, Steffen Schneider, Jochen Senges, Ibrahim Akin

Abstract

Background: Interventional left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) effectively prevents thromboembolic events in atrial fibrillation patients. Impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) increases not only the thromboembolic risk but also the complication rates of cardiac interventions. The LAAC procedure's benefit in patients with an impaired LVEF, therefore, has yet to be investigated.

Methods: LAARGE is a prospective, non-randomized registry depicting the clinical reality of LAAC in Germany. Procedure was conducted with different standard commercial devices, and follow-up period was one year. In the sense of an as-treated analysis, patients with started procedure and documented LVEF were selected from the whole database.

Results: 619 patients from 37 centers were categorized into one of three groups: LVEF > 55% (56%), 36-55% (36%), and ≤ 35% (8%). Prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidity increased with LVEF reduction (p < 0.001 for trend). CHA2DS2-VASc score was 4.3, 4.8, and 5.1 (p < 0.001), and HAS-BLED score was 3.7, 4.1, and 4.2 (p < 0.001). Implantation success was consistently high (97.9%), rates of intra-hospital MACCE (0.5%), and other major complications (4.2%) were low (each p = NS). Kaplan-Meier estimation showed a decrease in survival free of stroke with LVEF reduction during one-year follow-up (89.3 vs. 87.0 vs. 79.8%; p = 0.067), a trend which was no longer evident after adjustment for relevant confounding factors. Rates of non-fatal strokes (0.4 vs. 1.1 vs. 0%) and severe bleedings (0.7 vs. 0.0 vs. 3.1%) were consistently low across all groups (each p = NS).

Conclusions: LVEF reduction neither influenced the procedural success nor the effectiveness and safety of stroke prevention by LAAC.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02230748.

Keywords: Atrial fibrillation; Bleeding risk; Depressed left ventricular function; Ischemic stroke; LAA closure; LAARGE.

Conflict of interest statement

Johannes Brachmann reports grants and personal fees from Biotronik (Berlin, Germany), Medtronic (Dublin, Ireland), Pfizer (New York City, NY, USA), and St. Jude Medical (Saint Paul, MN, USA). Horst Sievert reports study honoraria to institution, payment of travel expenses, consulting fees (personal honoraria had not been paid) from Abbott (Chicago, IL, USA), Boston Scientific (Marlborough, MA, USA), Lifetech (Nanshan District, Shenzhen, China), and Occlutech (Jena, Germany). Matthias Käunicke reports personal fees from Boston Scientific (Marlborough, MA, USA). Matthias Hochadel, Steffen Schneider, and Jochen Senges report unrestricted grants from Boston Scientific (Marlborough, MA, USA) for performing statistical analyses. Christian Fastner, Thorsten Lewalter, Uwe Zeymer, Martin Borggrefe, Christian Weiß, Volker Geist, Alexander Krapivsky, Harald Mudra, and Ibrahim Akin do not report any relevant conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Freedom from all-cause death and non-fatal stroke after left atrial appendage closure

References

    1. Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, Ahlsson A, Atar D, Casadei B, Castella M, Diener HC, Heidbuchel H, Hendriks J, Hindricks G, Manolis AS, Oldgren J, Popescu BA, Schotten U, Van Putte B, Vardas P. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(38):2893–2962. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw210.
    1. D'Ancona G, Safak E, Ince H. Left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with atrial fibrillation and high risk of fall: a clinical dilemma or a budgetary issue? Clin Res Cardiol. 2019;108(12):1406–1407. doi: 10.1007/s00392-019-01476-0.
    1. Hohnloser SH, Basic E, Nabauer M. Comparative risk of major bleeding with new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and phenprocoumon in patients with atrial fibrillation: a post-marketing surveillance study. Clin Res Cardiol. 2017;106(8):618–628. doi: 10.1007/s00392-017-1098-x.
    1. Thihalolipavan S, Morin DP. Atrial fibrillation and heart failure: update 2015. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2015;58(2):126–135. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2015.07.004.
    1. Maisel WH, Stevenson LW. Atrial fibrillation in heart failure: epidemiology, pathophysiology, and rationale for therapy. Am J Cardiol. 2003;91(6):2–8. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9149(02)03373-8.
    1. Abraham JM, Connolly SJ. Atrial fibrillation in heart failure: stroke risk stratification and anticoagulation. Heart Fail Rev. 2014;19(3):305–313. doi: 10.1007/s10741-014-9420-4.
    1. Schymik G, Tzamalis P, Herzberger V, Bergmann J, Bramlage P, Wurth A, Conzelmann LO, Luik A, Schrofel H. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: a single-centre experience in 2000 patients (TAVIK Registry) Clin Res Cardiol. 2017;106(12):1018–1025. doi: 10.1007/s00392-017-1151-9.
    1. Geis NA, Puls M, Lubos E, Zuern CS, Franke J, Schueler R, von Bardeleben RS, Boekstegers P, Ouarrak T, Zahn R, Ince H, Senges J, Katus HA, Bekeredjian R. Safety and efficacy of MitraClip therapy in patients with severely impaired left ventricular ejection fraction: results from the German transcatheter mitral valve interventions (TRAMI) registry. Eur J Heart Fail. 2018;20(3):598–608. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.910.
    1. Plicht B, Konorza TF, Kahlert P, Al-Rashid F, Kaelsch H, Janosi RA, Buck T, Bachmann HS, Siffert W, Heusch G, Erbel R. Risk factors for thrombus formation on the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug after left atrial appendage occlusion. JACC Cardiovasc Interven. 2013;6(6):606–613. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.02.014.
    1. Reddy VY, Sievert H, Halperin J, Doshi SK, Buchbinder M, Neuzil P, Huber K, Whisenant B, Kar S, Swarup V, Gordon N, Holmes D, Committee PAS, Investigators Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure vs warfarin for atrial fibrillation: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014;312(19):1988–1998. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.15192.
    1. Mahajan R, Brooks AG, Sullivan T, Lim HS, Alasady M, Abed HS, Ganesan AN, Nayyar S, Lau DH, Roberts-Thomson KC, Kalman JM, Sanders P. Importance of the underlying substrate in determining thrombus location in atrial fibrillation: implications for left atrial appendage closure. Heart (British Cardiac Society) 2012;98(15):1120–1126. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2012-301799.
    1. Tzikas A, Holmes DR, Jr, Gafoor S, Ruiz CE, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Diener HC, Cappato R, Kar S, Lee RJ, Byrne RA, Ibrahim R, Lakkireddy D, Soliman OI, Nabauer M, Schneider S, Brachman J, Saver JL, Tiemann K, Sievert H, Camm AJ, Lewalter T. Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion: the Munich consensus document on definitions, endpoints and data collection requirements for clinical studies. EuroIntervention. 2016;12(1):103–111. doi: 10.4244/EIJV12I1A18.
    1. Fastner C, Nienaber CA, Park JW, Brachmann J, Zeymer U, Goedde M, Sievert H, Geist V, Lewalter T, Krapivsky A, Kaunicke M, Maier J, Ozdemir B, Hochadel M, Schneider S, Senges J, Akin I. Impact of left atrial appendage morphology on indication and procedural outcome after interventional occlusion: results from the prospective multicentre German LAARGE registry. EuroIntervention. 2018;14(2):151–157. doi: 10.4244/eij-d-17-00866.
    1. Lip GY, Nieuwlaat R, Pisters R, Lane DA, Crijns HJ. Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach: the euro heart survey on atrial fibrillation. Chest. 2010;137(2):263–272. doi: 10.1378/chest.09-1584.
    1. Prom R, Usedom JE, Dull RB. Antithrombotics in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and normal sinus rhythm: an evidence appraisal. Ann Pharmacother. 2014;48(2):226–237. doi: 10.1177/1060028013511058.
    1. Holmes DR, Reddy VY, Turi ZG, Doshi SK, Sievert H, Buchbinder M, Mullin CM, Sick P. Percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage versus warfarin therapy for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet (London, England) 2009;374(9689):534–542. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(09)61343-x.
    1. Holmes DR, Jr, Kar S, Price MJ, Whisenant B, Sievert H, Doshi SK, Huber K, Reddy VY. Prospective randomized evaluation of the Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure device in patients with atrial fibrillation versus long-term warfarin therapy: the PREVAIL trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(1):1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.04.029.
    1. Sardi GL, Gaglia MA, Jr, Maluenda G, Torguson R, Laynez-Carnicero A, Ben-Dor I, Hauville C, Xue Z, Suddath WO, Kent KM, Satler LF, Pichard AD, Lindsay J, Waksman R. Outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention utilizing drug-eluting stents in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Am J Cardiol. 2012;109(3):344–351. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2011.09.016.
    1. Boersma LV, Schmidt B, Betts TR, Sievert H, Tamburino C, Teiger E, Pokushalov E, Kische S, Schmitz T, Stein KM, Bergmann MW, E Investigators Implant success and safety of left atrial appendage closure with the WATCHMAN device: peri-procedural outcomes from the EWOLUTION registry. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(31):2465–2474. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv730.
    1. Tzikas A, Shakir S, Gafoor S, Omran H, Berti S, Santoro G, Kefer J, Landmesser U, Nielsen-Kudsk JE, Cruz-Gonzalez I, Sievert H, Tichelbacker T, Kanagaratnam P, Nietlispach F, Aminian A, Kasch F, Freixa X, Danna P, Rezzaghi M, Vermeersch P, Stock F, Stolcova M, Costa M, Ibrahim R, Schillinger W, Meier B, Park JW. Left atrial appendage occlusion for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: multicentre experience with the AMPLATZER Cardiac Plug. EuroIntervention. 2016;11(10):1170–1179. doi: 10.4244/EIJY15M01_06.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa