Cost-effectiveness of a nurse-led internet-based vascular risk factor management programme: economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled clinical trial

J P Greving, H A H Kaasjager, J W P Vernooij, M M C Hovens, J Wierdsma, H M H Grandjean, Y van der Graaf, G A de Wit, F L J Visseren, J P Greving, H A H Kaasjager, J W P Vernooij, M M C Hovens, J Wierdsma, H M H Grandjean, Y van der Graaf, G A de Wit, F L J Visseren

Abstract

Objective: To assess the cost-effectiveness of an internet-based, nurse-led vascular risk factor management programme in addition to usual care compared with usual care alone in patients with a clinical manifestation of a vascular disease.

Design: Cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a randomised controlled trial (the Internet-based vascular Risk factor Intervention and Self-management (IRIS) study).

Setting: Multicentre trial in a secondary and tertiary healthcare setting.

Participants: 330 patients with a recent clinical manifestation of atherosclerosis in the coronary, cerebral, or peripheral arteries and with ≥2 treatable vascular risk factors not at goal.

Intervention: The intervention consisted of a personalised website with an overview and actual status of patients' vascular risk factors, and mail communication with a nurse practitioner via the website for 12 months. The intervention combined self-management support, monitoring of disease control and pharmacotherapy.

Main outcome measures: Societal costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness.

Results: Patients experienced equal health benefits, that is, 0.86 vs 0.85 QALY (intervention vs usual care) at 1 year. Adjusting for baseline differences, the incremental QALY difference was -0.014 (95% CI -0.034 to 0.007). The intervention was associated with lower total costs (€4859 vs €5078, difference €219, 95% CI -€2301 to €1825). The probability that the intervention is cost-effective at a threshold value of €20,000/QALY, is 65%. At mean annual cost of €220 per patient, the intervention is relatively cheap.

Conclusions: An internet-based, nurse-led intervention in addition to usual care to improve vascular risk factors in patients with a clinical manifestation of a vascular disease does not result in a QALY gain at 1 year, but has a small effect on vascular risk factors and is associated with lower costs.

Trial registration number: NCT00785031.

Keywords: EPIDEMIOLOGY; HEALTH ECONOMICS; VASCULAR MEDICINE.

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Trial profile.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Incremental costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) for a nurse-led, internet-based vascular risk factor management programme compared with usual care: cost-effectiveness plane for incremental costs and QALYs at 1 year, with CE threshold line (€20 000/QALY). (B) Cost-effectiveness acceptability curve showing the probability that a nurse-led, internet-based vascular risk factor management programme is cost-effective compared with usual care over a range of societal willingness-to-pay values.

References

    1. Kannel WB. Overview of atherosclerosis. Clin Ther 1998;20(Suppl B):B2–17. 10.1016/S0149-2918(98)80027-1
    1. Antithrombotic Trialists’ Collaboration. Collaborative meta-analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients. BMJ 2002;324:71–86. 10.1136/bmj.324.7329.71
    1. Baigent C, Keech A, Kearney PM et al. . Efficacy and safety of cholesterol-lowering treatment: prospective meta-analysis of data from 90,056 participants in 14 randomised trials of statins. Lancet 2005;366:1267–78. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67394-1
    1. Yusuf S, Sleight P, Pogue J et al. . Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators. N Engl J Med 2000;342:145–53. 10.1056/NEJM200001203420301
    1. Gaede P, Lund-Andersen H, Parving HH et al. . Effect of a multifactorial intervention on mortality in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2008;358:580–91. 10.1056/NEJMoa0706245
    1. Yusuf S, Hawken S, Ounpuu S et al. . Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study. Lancet 2004;364:937–52. 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17018-9
    1. Brouwer BG, Visseren FL, Algra A et al. . Effectiveness of a hospital-based vascular screening programme (SMART) for risk factor management in patients with established vascular disease or type 2 diabetes: a parallel-group comparative study. J Intern Med 2010;268:83–93.
    1. Kotseva K, Wood D, De Backer G et al. . Cardiovascular prevention guidelines in daily practice: a comparison of EUROASPIRE I, II, and III surveys in eight European countries. Lancet 2009;373:929–40. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60330-5
    1. Goessens BM, Visseren FL, Sol BG et al. . A randomized, controlled trial for risk factor reduction in patients with symptomatic vascular disease: the multidisciplinary Vascular Prevention by Nurses Study (VENUS). Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 2006;13:996–1003. 10.1097/01.hjr.0000216549.92184.40
    1. Vernooij JW, Kaasjager HA, van der Graaf Y et al. . Internet based vascular risk factor management for patients with clinically manifest vascular disease: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2012;344:e3750 10.1136/bmj.e3750
    1. Jacobs N, Evers S, Ament A et al. . Cost-utility of a cardiovascular prevention program in highly educated adults: intermediate results of a randomized controlled trial. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2010;26:11–19. 10.1017/S0266462309990845
    1. Carr LJ, Bartee RT, Dorozynski C et al. . Internet-delivered behavior change program increases physical activity and improves cardiometabolic disease risk factors in sedentary adults: results of a randomized controlled trial. Prev Med 2008;46:431–8. 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.12.005
    1. Glasgow RE, Kurz D, King D et al. . Twelve-month outcomes of an internet-based diabetes self-management support program. Patient Educ Couns 2012;87:81–92. 10.1016/j.pec.2011.07.024
    1. Southard BH, Southard DR, Nuckolls J. Clinical trial of an internet-based case management system for secondary prevention of heart disease. J Cardiopulm Rehabil 2003;23:341–8. 10.1097/00008483-200309000-00003
    1. Goldzweig CL, Orshansky G, Paige NM et al. . Electronic patient portals: evidence on health outcomes, satisfaction, efficiency, and attitudes. A systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2013;159:677–87. 10.7326/0003-4819-159-10-201311190-00006
    1. Stalman WAB, Scheltens T, Burgers JS et al. . Dutch Guideline Cardiovascular Risk Management 2006. Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands: Van Zuiden Communications B.V., 2006.
    1. Hakkaart-van Roijen L. Manual Short Form- Health and Labour Questionnaire. The Netherlands: Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, 2010.
    1. van Roijen L, Essink-Bot ML, Koopmanschap MA et al. . Labor and health status in economic evaluation of health care. The Health and Labor Questionnaire. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1996;12:405–15. 10.1017/S0266462300009764
    1. Hakkaart-van Roijen L, Tan SS, Bouwmans CAM. Manual for cost research, methods and standard cost prices for economic evaluations in health care. Diemen: National Health Care Institute, 2010.
    1. The Drug Information System of National Health Care Institute, The Netherlands.
    1. Z-Index.
    1. Koopmanschap MA, Rutten FF, van Ineveld BM et al. . The friction cost method for measuring indirect costs of disease. J Health Econ 1995;14:171–89. 10.1016/0167-6296(94)00044-5
    1. EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. The EuroQol Group. Health Policy 1990;16:199–208. 10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9
    1. Lamers LM, Stalmeier PF, McDonnell J et al. . Measuring the quality of life in economic evaluations: the Dutch EQ-5D tariff. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2005;149:1574–8.
    1. Wilson PW, D'Agostino RB, Levy D et al. . Prediction of coronary heart disease using risk factor categories. Circulation 1998;97:1837–47. 10.1161/01.CIR.97.18.1837
    1. Raftery JP, Yao GL, Murchie P et al. . Cost effectiveness of nurse led secondary prevention clinics for coronary heart disease in primary care: follow up of a randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2005;330:707 10.1136/bmj.38342.665417.8F
    1. Sacks N, Cabral H, Kazis LE et al. . A web-based nutrition program reduces health care costs in employees with cardiac risk factors: before and after cost analysis. J Med Internet Res 2009;11:e43 10.2196/jmir.1263

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa