Etoricoxib in the treatment of osteoarthritis over 52-weeks: a double-blind, active-comparator controlled trial [NCT00242489]

Sean P Curtis, Barry Bockow, Chester Fisher, Joseph Olaleye, Amy Compton, Amy T Ko, Alise S Reicin, Sean P Curtis, Barry Bockow, Chester Fisher, Joseph Olaleye, Amy Compton, Amy T Ko, Alise S Reicin

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term efficacy and tolerability of etoricoxib, a COX-2 selective inhibitor, in osteoarthritis (OA) patients.

Methods: A double-blind, randomized, multicenter study was conducted in 617 patients with OA of the knee. The base study was 14 weeks in duration and consisted of 2 parts; in Part I (6 weeks), patients were allocated to once daily oral etoricoxib 5, 10, 30, 60, 90 mg or placebo. In Part II (8 weeks); the placebo, etoricoxib 5 and 10 mg groups were reallocated to etoricoxib 30, 60, or 90 mg qd or diclofenac 50 mg t.i.d. Treatment was continued for consecutive 12 and 26 week extensions. Primary efficacy endpoints were the WOMAC VA 3.0 pain subscale and investigator global assessment of disease status. Safety and tolerability were assessed by collecting adverse events throughout the study.

Results: Compared with placebo, the etoricoxib groups displayed significant (p < 0.05), dose-dependent efficacy for all primary endpoints in Part I; efficacy was maintained throughout the 52 weeks of the study. During the 46-week active-comparator controlled period, the etoricoxib groups demonstrated clinical efficacy that was similar to that of diclofenac 150 mg and was generally well tolerated, with a lower incidence of gastrointestinal (GI) nuisance symptoms compared with diclofenac (13.1, 14.7, and 13.5% for etoricoxib 30, 60, and 90 mg, respectively compared with 22.5% for diclofenac).

Conclusion: In this extension study, etoricoxib, at doses ranging from 30 to 90 mg, demonstrated a maintenance of significant clinical efficacy in patients with OA through 52 weeks of treatment. Etoricoxib displayed clinical efficacy similar to diclofenac 150 mg and was generally well tolerated.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00242489.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study Design. The patient flow during the entire 52-week period is illustrated. The efficacy and safety evaluation for this report is based on data from the 46-week active-comparator controlled period.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Patient accounting. † Number represents any patient who discontinued during the active comparator controlled period. Percent is calculated using the number of patients that entered the first extension as the denominator. ‡ Other Reasons include lost to follow-up, patient moved, patient withdrew consent, or protocol deviation.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Primary efficacy endpoints from during the active comparator controlled period (weeks 6 to 52). This is a comparison of etoricoxib 30, 60, and 90 mg with diclofenac 150 mg during the active comparator controlled extension periods. LS Mean Change from Baseline (Randomization) is shown. Modified intention-to-treat approach with last value carried forward was used. The number of patients at later visits (≥34 weeks) was small. Data should, therefore, be interpreted with caution. SE = Standard error. = 30 mg etoricoxib; = 60 mg etoricoxib; = 90 mg etoricoxib; = 150 mg diclofenac.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Primary endpoints evaluating efficacy of etoricoxib. LS Mean Change from Baseline is shown for patients receiving 30, 60 or 90 mg etoricoxib for up to 52 weeks. Modified Intention-to-Treat Approach With Last Value Carried Forward was performed. As the numbers of patients were small and decreased over time, data should be interpreted with caution. Screening (S) to baseline (R) = NSAID washout period; SE = Standard error ○ = 30 mg etoricoxib; * = 60 mg etoricoxib; ◆ = 90 mg etoricoxib.

References

    1. Hochberg MC. Development and progression of osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol. 1996;23:1497–1499.
    1. Solomon L. Clinical Features of Osteoarthritis. In: Ruddy S, Harris ED and Sledge CB, editor. Kelley's Textbook of Rheumatology. 6th. Philadelphia, London, New York, St. Louis, Sydney, Toronto, WB Saunders Company; 2001. pp. 1409–1418.
    1. Hochberg MC, Dougados M. Pharmacological therapy of osteoarthritis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2001;15:583–593. doi: 10.1053/berh.2001.0175.
    1. Matsumoto AK, Cavanaugh PFJ. Etoricoxib. Drugs Today (Barc ) 2004;40:395–414. doi: 10.1358/dot.2004.40.5.850488.
    1. Gottesdiener K, Schnitzer T, Fisher C, Bockow B, Markenson J, Ko A, DeTora L, Curtis S, Geissler L, Gertz BJ. Results of a randomized, dose-ranging trial of etoricoxib in patients with osteoarthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2002;41:1052–1061. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/41.9.1052.
    1. Curtis SP, Bolognese J, Lee M, Watson DJ, Harper S. GI-related treatment discontinuations with etoricoxib compared with nonselective cyclooxygenase inhibitors (NSAIDS) and placebo. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;61:187.
    1. Hunt RH, Harper S, Callegari P, Yu C, Quan H, Evans J, James C, Bowen B, Rashid F. Complementary studies of the gastrointestinal safety of the cyclo-oxygenase-2-selective inhibitor etoricoxib. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003;17:201–210. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01407.x.
    1. B BHS, C F, M G, J B, K OB, B S, S B, S RA, P CS. Tolerability and effectiveness of etoricoxib compared to diclofenac sodium in patients with osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled study (EDGE trial) Arthritis Rheum. 2005;50:346–347.
    1. Silverstein FE, Faich G, Goldstein JL, Simon LS, Pincus T, Whelton A, Makuch R, Eisen G, Agrawal NM, Stenson WF, Burr AM, Zhao WW, Kent JD, Lefkowith JB, Verburg KM, Geis GS. Gastrointestinal toxicity with celecoxib vs nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: the CLASS study: A randomized controlled trial. Celecoxib Long-term Arthritis Safety Study. JAMA. 2000;284:1247–1255. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.10.1247.
    1. Bombardier C, Laine L, Reicin A, Shapiro D, Burgos-Vargas R, Davis B, Day R, Ferraz MB, Hawkey CJ, Hochberg MC, Kvien TK, Schnitzer TJ. Comparison of upper gastrointestinal toxicity of rofecoxib and naproxen in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. VIGOR Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:1520–8, 2. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200011233432103.
    1. Curtis SP, Mukhopadhyay S, Ramey D, Reicin AS. Etoricoxib cardiovascular safety summary. Circulation. 2003;108:378–379. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000084801.04026.7B.
    1. Bresalier RS, Sandler RS, Quan H, Bolognese JA, Oxenius B, Horgan K, Lines C, Riddell R, Morton D, Lanas A, Konstam MA, Baron JA. Cardiovascular events associated with rofecoxib in a colorectal adenoma chemoprevention trial. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1092–1102. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa050493.
    1. Solomon SD, McMurray JJ, Pfeffer MA, Wittes J, Fowler R, Finn P, Anderson WF, Zauber A, Hawk E, Bertagnolli M. Cardiovascular risk associated with celecoxib in a clinical trial for colorectal adenoma prevention. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1071–1080. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa050405.
    1. Brater DC, Harris C, Redfern JS, Gertz BJ. Renal effects of cox-2-selective inhibitors. Am J Nephrol. 2001;21:1–15. doi: 10.1159/000046212.
    1. Murray MD, Brater DC. Renal toxicity of the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1993;33:435–465.
    1. Curtis SP, Ng J, Yu Q, Shingo S, Bergman G, McCormick CL, Reicin AS. Renal effects of etoricoxib and comparator nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in controlled clinical trials. Clin Ther. 2004;26:70–83. doi: 10.1016/S0149-2918(04)90007-0.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa