Make Better Choices (MBC): study design of a randomized controlled trial testing optimal technology-supported change in multiple diet and physical activity risk behaviors

Bonnie Spring, Kristin Schneider, H G McFadden, Jocelyn Vaughn, Andrea T Kozak, Malaina Smith, Arlen C Moller, Leonard Epstein, Stephanie W Russell, Andrew DeMott, Donald Hedeker, Bonnie Spring, Kristin Schneider, H G McFadden, Jocelyn Vaughn, Andrea T Kozak, Malaina Smith, Arlen C Moller, Leonard Epstein, Stephanie W Russell, Andrew DeMott, Donald Hedeker

Abstract

Background: Suboptimal diet and physical inactivity are prevalent, co-occurring chronic disease risk factors, yet little is known about how to maximize multiple risk behavior change. Make Better Choices, a randomized controlled trial, tests competing hypotheses about the optimal way to promote healthy change in four bundled risk behaviors: high saturated fat intake, low fruit and vegetable intake, low physical activity, and high sedentary leisure screen time. The study aim is to determine which combination of two behavior change goals--one dietary, one activity--yields greatest overall healthy lifestyle change.

Methods/design: Adults (n = 200) with poor quality diet and sedentary lifestyle will be recruited and screened for study eligibility. Participants will be trained to record their diet and activities onto a personal data assistant, and use it to complete two weeks of baseline. Those who continue to show all four risk behaviors after baseline recording will be randomized to one of four behavior change prescriptions: 1) increase fruits and vegetables and increase physical activity, 2) decrease saturated fat and increase physical activity, 3) increase fruits and vegetable and decrease saturated fat, or 4) decrease saturated fat and decrease sedentary activity. They will use decision support feedback on the personal digital assistant and receive counseling from a coach to alter their diet and activity during a 3-week prescription period when payment is contingent upon meeting behavior change goals. They will continue recording on an intermittent schedule during a 4.5-month maintenance period when payment is not contingent upon goal attainment. The primary outcome is overall healthy lifestyle change, aggregated across all four risk behaviors.

Discussion: The Make Better Choices trial tests a disseminable lifestyle intervention supported by handheld technology. Findings will fill a gap in knowledge about optimal goal prescription to facilitate simultaneous diet and activity change. Results will shed light on which goal prescription maximizes healthful lifestyle change.

Trial registration: Clinical Trials Gov. Identifier NCT00113672.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Screen shot of the MBC program on a PDA. Participants select the MBC icon to open the program.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Screen shot of the goal thermometers. The goal thermometers reflect the fruit and vegetable consumption and moderate activity of a hypothetical participant.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Protocol timeline. Participants record diet and activity daily for 2 weeks of baseline, followed by 3 weeks of behavioral prescription. They complete one recreational laboratory session during baseline and one during prescription. They record intermittently during 4.5 months of follow-up after prescription period ends.

References

    1. McGinnis JM, Foege WH. Actual causes of death in the United States. JAMA. 1993;270:2207–2212. doi: 10.1001/jama.270.18.2207.
    1. US Department of Health and Human Services. Physical activity and health: A report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: CDC; 1996.
    1. US Preventive Services Task Force. Guidelines to clinical preventive services. 2. Alexandria, VA: International Medical Publishing; 1996.
    1. Hooper L, Griffiths B, Abrahams W, Alexander S, Atkins G, Atkinson R, Wray L. Dietetic guidelines: Diet in secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. J Hum Nutr Dietet. 2004;17:337–349. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2004.00533.x.
    1. Van Horn L, Kavey RE. Diet and cardiovascular disease prevention: What works? Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 1997;19:197–211. doi: 10.1007/BF02892285.
    1. CDC. Trends in leisure-time physical inactivity by age, sex, and race/ethnicity --- United States, 1994--2004. MMWR. 2005;54(39)
    1. CDC. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. The burden of chronic diseases and their risk factors: National and state perspectives. 2002.
    1. Katz DL, Brunner RL, St. Jeor ST, Scott B, Jekel JF, Brownell KD. Dietary fat consumption in a cohort of American adults, 1985-1991: Covariates, secular trends, and compliance with guidelines. American Journal of Health Promotion. 1998;12:382–390.
    1. Emmons KM, Marcus BH, Linnan L, Rossi JS, Abrams DB. Mechanisms in multiple risk factor interventions: Smoking, physical activity, and dietary fat intake among manufacturing workers. Preventive Medicine. 1994;23:481–489. doi: 10.1006/pmed.1994.1066.
    1. Fine LJ, Philogene GS, Gramling R, Coups EJ, Sinha S. Prevalence of multiple chronic disease risk factors: 2001 national health interview survey. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2004;27(2S):18–24. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.04.017.
    1. Gillman MW, Pinto BM, Tennstedt S, Glanz K, Marcus B, Friedman RH. Relationship of physical activity with dietary behaviors among adults. PreventiveMedicine. 2001;32:295–301.
    1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Bulletin No. 24. AIHW Cat. No. Aus 57. Canberra: AIHW; 2005. Living dangerously: Australians with multiple risk factors for cardiovascular disease.
    1. Bickel WK, Vuchinich RE, Eds. Reframing health behavior change with behavioral economics. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc; 2000.
    1. Saelens BE, Epstein LH. Behavioral engineering of activity choice in obese children. International Journal of Obesity. 1998;22:275–277. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0800570.
    1. Epstein LH, Gordy CC, Raynor HA, Beddome M, Kilanowski CK, Paluch R. Increasing fruit and vegetable intake and decreasing fat and sugar intake in families at risk for childhood obesity. Obesity Research. 2001;9(3):171–178. doi: 10.1038/oby.2001.18.
    1. Goldfield GS, Epstein LH. Can fruits and vegetables and activities substitute for snack foods? Health Psychology. 2002;21:299–303. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.21.3.299.
    1. Muraven BE, Epstein LH. Behavioral engineering of activity choice in obese children. International Journal of Obesity. 1998;22:275–277. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0800570.
    1. Baumeister RF, Heatherton TF, Tice DM. Losing control: How and why people fail at self-regulation. New York: Academic Press; 1994.
    1. Polivy J. The effects of behavioral inhibition: Integrating internal cues, cognition, behavior, and affect. Psychological Inquiry. 1998;9:181–204. doi: 10.1207/s15327965pli0903_1.
    1. Block G, Gillespie C, Rosenbaum EH, Jenson C. A rapid food screener to assess fat and fruit and vegetable intake. Am J Prev Med. 2000;18:284–288. doi: 10.1016/S0749-3797(00)00119-7.
    1. Kohl HW, Blair SN, Paffenbarger RS Jr, Macera CA, Kronenfeld JJ. A mail survey of physical activity habits as related to measured physical fitness. American Journal of Epidemiology. 1988;127:1228–39.
    1. Lim PO, Shiels P, MacDonald TM. The Dundee Step Test: a novel exercise test suitable for the outpatient management of hypertension. Journal of Hypertension. 1998;16:1701.
    1. Ainsworth BE, Haskell WL, Whitt MC, Irwin ML, Swartz AM, Strath SJ, O' Brien WL, Bassett DR Jr, Schmitz KH, Emplaincourt PO, Jacobs DR Jr, Leon AS. Compendium of physical activities: An update of activity codes and MET intensities. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;9:S498–S516.
    1. Stables G, Heimendinger J, Eds. 5 A Day for Better Health Program. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2001.
    1. United States Department of Agriculture. Nutrition and Your Health: Dietary Guidelines for Americans. Washington, DC: USDA; 1995.
    1. Francis JA, Stewart SH, Hounsell S. Dietary restraint and the selective processing of forbidden and nonforbidden food words. Cognitive Therapy and Research. 1997;21:633–646. doi: 10.1023/A:1021804207132.
    1. Block G, Gillespie C, Rosenbaum EH, Jenson C. A rapid food screener to assess fat and fruit and vegetable intake. Am J Prev Med. 2000;18:284–288. doi: 10.1016/S0749-3797(00)00119-7.
    1. Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Gibbon M, First MB. The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID). I: History, rationale, and description. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1992;49(8):624–9.
    1. Hamilton M. Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness. British Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology. 1967;6(4):278–296.
    1. Ryan RM, Frederick CM, Lepes D, Rubio N, Sheldon KM. Intrinsic motivation and exercise adherence. International Journal of Sport Psychology. 1997;28:335–354.
    1. Neumark-Sztainer D, Story M, Hannan PJ, Perry CL, Irving LM. Weight-related concerns and behaviors among overweight and nonoverweight adolescents: Implications for preventing weight-related disorders. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine. 2002;156:171–178.
    1. Crowne DP, Marlow D. A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology. 1960;24:349–354. doi: 10.1037/h0047358.
    1. Rozin P, Levine E, Stoess C. Chocolate craving and liking. Appetite. 1991;17:199–212. doi: 10.1016/0195-6663(91)90022-K.
    1. Schumann A, Nigg CR, Rossi JS, Jordan P J, Garber C, Carol E, Riebe D, Benisovich SV. Construct validity of the stages of change of exercise adoption for different intensities of physical activity in four samples of differing age groups. American Journal of Health Promotion. 2002;16:280–287.
    1. Prochaska JO, Marcus BH. In: Exercise Adherence II. Dishman R, editor. Illinois: Human Kinetics Press; 1995. The Transtheoretical model: Applications to exercise.
    1. Ling AMC, Horwath C. Self-efficacy and consumption of fruit and vegetables: Validation of a summated scale. American Journal of Health Promotion. 1999;13:290–298.
    1. Marcus BH, Selby VC, Niaura RS, Rossi JS. Self-efficacy and the stages of exercise behavior change. Research Quarterly of Exercise and Sport. 1992;63:60–66.
    1. Channon S, Hayward A. The effect of short-term fasting on processing of food cues in normal subjects. International Journal of Eating Disorders. 1990;9:447- 452.
    1. Overduin J, Jansen A, Louwerse E. Stroop interference and food intake. Int J Eat Disord. 1995;18:277–285. doi: 10.1002/1098-108X(199511)18:3<277::AID-EAT2260180310>;2-3.
    1. Rogers PJ, Green MW. Dieting, dietary restraint and cognitive performance. British Journal of Clinical Psychology. 1993;32:113–6.
    1. Watson D, Clark L, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1988;54:219–235. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.54.2.219.
    1. Harris J, Benedict F. A biometric study of basal metabolism in man. Washington DC: Carnegie Institute of Washingon; 1919.
    1. Verbeke G, Molenberghs G. Linear Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data. New York: Springer; 2000.
    1. Rosenthal R, Rosnow RL, Rubin DB. Contrasts and effect sizes in behavioral research: A correlational approach. Psychological Science. 2000;11:446–453. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00287.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa