Utility of a smartphone application in assessing palmar circulation prior to radial artery harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafting: rationale and design of the randomised CAPITAL iRADIAL-CABG trial

Cheng Yee Goh, Simon Parlow, Pietro Di Santo, Trevor Simard, Richard Jung, Zeeshan Ahmed, Louis Verreault-Julien, Peter Kuhar, Vincent Chan, Talal Al-Atassi, Hadi Toeg, Jordan Bernick, George A Wells, Marc Ruel, Benjamin Hibbert, Cheng Yee Goh, Simon Parlow, Pietro Di Santo, Trevor Simard, Richard Jung, Zeeshan Ahmed, Louis Verreault-Julien, Peter Kuhar, Vincent Chan, Talal Al-Atassi, Hadi Toeg, Jordan Bernick, George A Wells, Marc Ruel, Benjamin Hibbert

Abstract

Introduction: There is emerging evidence supporting the use of the radial artery (RA) as a preferred secondary conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) as it is associated with higher rates of graft patency at 5 years when compared with saphenous vein grafts (SVG). The modified Allen's test (MAT) is traditionally regarded as the standard of care in the assessment of ulnar artery (UA) patency prior to RA harvesting. Unfortunately, due to high false-positive rates, a substantial number of pre-CABG patients are found to have an abnormal MAT despite normal UA patency, resulting in inappropriate exclusion from RA harvesting. The SVG is generally used in its place when this occurs, resulting in potentially lower rates of long-term graft patency.

Methods and analysis: The CAPITAL iRADIAL-CABG trial is currently enrolling participants 18 years of age or older undergoing CABG for whom the treating physician is considering the use of an RA conduit. Eligible patients will be randomised in a 1:1 fashion to MAT or smartphone-based photoplethysmography application assessment to assess collateral palmar circulation prior to RA harvesting. The primary outcome of the trial is the use of the RA as a conduit during CABG. The primary safety outcome is postoperative palmar ischaemia as determined by clinical assessment or requirement of vascular intervention. Secondary outcomes include vascular complications, early graft failure, need for rescue percutaneous coronary intervention during the index hospitalisation and a composite cardiovascular outcome of myocardial infarction, stroke and cardiovascular death prior to discharge from hospital. A total of 236 participants are planned to be recruited.

Ethics and dissemination: The study was approved by the Ottawa Heart Science Network Research Ethics Board (approval number 20180865-01H). The study results will be disseminated via conference presentations and peer-reviewed publications.

Trial registration number: NCT03810729.

Keywords: Adult cardiology; Cardiothoracic surgery; Coronary heart disease.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

References

    1. Goldman S, Zadina K, Moritz T, et al. . Long-term patency of saphenous vein and left internal mammary artery grafts after coronary artery bypass surgery: results from a department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:2149–56. 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.08.064
    1. Possati G, Gaudino M, Prati F, et al. . Long-term results of the radial artery used for myocardial revascularization. Circulation 2003;108:1350–4. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000087402.13786.D0
    1. Deb S, Cohen EA, Singh SK, et al. . Radial artery and saphenous vein patency more than 5 years after coronary artery bypass surgery: results from RAPS (radial artery patency study). J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:28–35. 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.03.037
    1. Collins P, Webb CM, Chong CF. Radial artery versus saphenous vein patency trial I. radial artery versus saphenous vein patency randomized trial: five-year angiographic follow-up. Circulation 2008;117:2859–64.
    1. Buxton BF, Raman JS, Ruengsakulrach P, et al. . Radial artery patency and clinical outcomes: five-year interim results of a randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;125:1363–70. 10.1016/S0022-5223(02)73241-8
    1. Petrovic I, Nezic D, Peric M, et al. . Radial artery vs saphenous vein graft used as the second conduit for surgical myocardial revascularization: long-term clinical follow-up. J Cardiothorac Surg 2015;10:127. 10.1186/s13019-015-0331-9
    1. Gaudino M, Benedetto U, Fremes S, et al. . Radial-Artery or saphenous-vein grafts in coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 2018;378:2069–77. 10.1056/NEJMoa1716026
    1. Aldea GS, Bakaeen FG, Pal J, et al. . The Society of thoracic surgeons clinical practice guidelines on arterial conduits for coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 2016;101:801–9. 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.09.100
    1. Jarvis MA, Jarvis CL, Jones PR, et al. . Reliability of Allen's test in selection of patients for radial artery harvest. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:1362–5. 10.1016/S0003-4975(00)01551-4
    1. Di Santo P, Harnett DT, Simard T, et al. . Photoplethysmography using a smartphone application for assessment of ulnar artery patency: a randomized clinical trial. CMAJ 2018;190:E380–8. 10.1503/cmaj.170432
    1. Barbeau GR, Arsenault F, Dugas L, et al. . Evaluation of the ulnopalmar arterial arches with pulse oximetry and plethysmography: comparison with the Allen's test in 1010 patients. Am Heart J 2004;147:489–93. 10.1016/j.ahj.2003.10.038
    1. Raja JM, Elsakr C, Roman S, et al. . Apple watch, Wearables, and heart rhythm: where do we stand? Ann Transl Med 2019;7:417. 10.21037/atm.2019.06.79
    1. Avram R, Olgin JE, Kuhar P, et al. . A digital biomarker of diabetes from smartphone-based vascular signals. Nat Med 2020;26:1576–82. 10.1038/s41591-020-1010-5
    1. Gagnon M-P, Ngangue P, Payne-Gagnon J, et al. . m-Health adoption by healthcare professionals: a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2016;23:212–20. 10.1093/jamia/ocv052
    1. Plante TB, Urrea B, MacFarlane ZT, et al. . Validation of the instant blood pressure smartphone APP. JAMA Intern Med 2016;176:700–2. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.0157
    1. Zens M, Grotejohann B, Tassoni A, et al. . Development of a modular research platform to create medical observational studies for mobile devices. JMIR Res Protoc 2017;6:e99. 10.2196/resprot.7705
    1. Gaudino M, Benedetto U, Fremes S, et al. . Association of radial artery graft vs saphenous vein graft with long-term cardiovascular outcomes among patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2020;324:179–87. 10.1001/jama.2020.8228
    1. Meharwal ZS, Trehan N. Functional status of the hand after radial artery harvesting: results in 3,977 cases. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;72:1557–61. 10.1016/S0003-4975(01)03088-0

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa