MRI of axillary brachial plexus blocks: a randomised controlled study

Trygve Kjelstrup, Per K Hol, Frédéric Courivaud, Hans-Jørgen Smith, Magne Røkkum, Øivind Klaastad, Trygve Kjelstrup, Per K Hol, Frédéric Courivaud, Hans-Jørgen Smith, Magne Røkkum, Øivind Klaastad

Abstract

Background: Axillary plexus blocks are usually guided by ultrasound, but alternative methods may be used when ultrasound equipment is lacking. For a nonultrasound-guided axillary block, the need for three injections has been questioned.

Objectives: Could differences in block success between single, double and triple deposits methods be explained by differences in local anaesthetic distribution as observed by MRI?

Design: A blinded and randomised controlled study.

Setting: Conducted at Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Norway from 2009 to 2011.

Patients: Forty-five ASA 1 to 2 patients scheduled for surgery were randomised to three equally sized groups. All patients completed the study.

Interventions: Patients in the single-deposit group had an injection through a catheter parallel to the median nerve. In the double-deposit group the patients received a transarterial block. In the triple-deposit group the injections of the two other groups were combined. Upon completion of local anaesthetic injection the patients were scanned by MRI, before clinical block assessment. The distribution of local anaesthetic was scored by its closeness to terminal nerves and cords of the brachial plexus, as seen by MRI. The clinical effect was scored by the degree of sensory block in terminal nerve innervation areas.

Main outcome measures: Sensory block effect and MRI distribution pattern.

Results: The triple-deposit method had a higher success rate (100%) than the single-deposit method (67%) and the double-deposit method (67%) in blocking all cutaneous nerves distal to the elbow (P = 0.04). The patients in the triple-deposit group most often had the best MRI scores. For any nerve or cord, at least one of the single-deposit or double-deposit groups had a similarly high MRI score as the triple-deposit group.

Conclusion: Distal to the elbow, the triple-deposit method had the highest sensory block success rate. This could be explained to some extent by analysis of the magnetic resonance images.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01033006.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of the study.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Single-deposit group, catheter injection; double-deposit group, transarterial injections; triple-deposit group, transarterial and catheter injections. MRI of local anaesthetic (LA) in the right axilla, cross-sectional view. Typical LA distribution for three axillary block methods, from patients with successful sensory block. T2-weighted MRI images with fat suppression. The LA appears white. In the triple-deposit group, the artery (black circular area) is more centrally located in the LA area. In the double-deposit case, two LA compartments are recognised.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
MRI of the right axilla, cross-sectional view. T2-weighted MRI image with fat suppression from a patient with a successful sensory block after a single local anaesthetic (LA) injection, through a short catheter positioned parallel to the median nerve. The local anaesthetic appears white. The musculocutaneous nerve (Mcn) is clearly seen before entering the coracobrachial muscle and is surrounded by LA.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Single-deposit group, catheter injection; double-deposit group, transarterial injections; triple-deposit group, transarterial and catheter injections. MRI of right shoulder and axilla with local anaesthetic (LA), coronal (frontal) view. Typical LA distribution for three axillary block methods with successful sensory block. Maximum intensity projections of coronal T2-weighted MR images with fat suppression. The LA appears white. It extends more proximally in the single- and triple-deposit groups than in the double-deposit group (P = 0.001), although the distal distribution is almost equal in all groups. The catheter with an extension tube is seen as a white string.

References

    1. Thompson GE, Rorie DK. Functional anatomy of the brachial plexus sheaths. Anesthesiology 1983; 59:117–122
    1. Koscielniak-Nielsen ZJ, Stens-Pedersen HL, Lippert FK. Readiness for surgery after axillary block: single or multiple injection techniques. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1997; 14:164–171
    1. Chan VW, Perlas A, McCartney CJ, et al. Ultrasound guidance improves success rate of axillary brachial plexus block. Can J Anaesth 2007; 54:176–182
    1. Kjelstrup T. Transarterial block as an addition to a conventional catheter technique improves the axillary block. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2006; 50:112–116
    1. Landsverk SA, Kvandal P, Kjelstrup T, et al. Human skin microcirculation after brachial plexus block evaluated by wavelet transform of the laser Doppler flowmetry signal. Anesthesiology 2006; 105:478–484
    1. Pere P, Pitkanen M, Tuominen M, et al. Clinical and radiological comparison of perivascular and transarterial techniques of axillary brachial plexus block. Br J Anaesth 1993; 70:276–279
    1. Kjelstrup T, Courivaud F, Klaastad O, et al. High-resolution MRI demonstrates detailed anatomy of the axillary brachial plexus. A pilot study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2012; 56:914–919
    1. Klaastad O, Smedby O, Thompson GE, et al. Distribution of local anesthetic in axillary brachial plexus block: a clinical and magnetic resonance imaging study. Anesthesiology 2002; 96:1315–1324
    1. Sauter AR, Dodgson MS, Stubhaug A, et al. Electrical nerve stimulation or ultrasound guidance for lateral sagittal infraclavicular blocks: a randomized, controlled, observer-blinded, comparative study. Anesth Analg 2008; 106:1910–1915
    1. Mandrekar JN. Measures of interrater agreement. J Thorac Oncol 2011; 6:6–7
    1. Chin KJ, Alakkad H, Cubillos JE. Single, double or multiple-injection techniques for nonultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus block in adults undergoing surgery of the lower arm. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 8:CD003842.
    1. Cornish PB, Leaper CJ, Hahn JL. The ‘axillary tunnel’: an anatomic reappraisal of the limits and dynamics of spread during brachial plexus blockade. Anesth Analg 2007; 104:1288–1291
    1. Winnie AP, Radonjic R, Akkineni SR, Durrani Z. Factors influencing distribution of local anesthetic injected into the brachial plexus sheath. Anesth Analg 1979; 58:225–234
    1. Imasogie N, Ganapathy S, Singh S, et al. A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus blocks using 2 versus 4 injections. Anesth Analg 2010; 110:1222–1226
    1. Tran de QH, Pham K, Dugani S, Finlayson RJ. A prospective, randomized comparison between double-, triple-, and quadruple-injection ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2012; 37:248–253
    1. Bernucci F, Gonzalez AP, Finlayson RJ, Tran de QH. A prospective, randomized comparison between perivascular and perineural ultrasound-guided axillary brachial plexus block. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2012; 37:473–477
    1. Sia S, Bartoli M, Lepri A, et al. Multiple-injection axillary brachial plexus block: a comparison of two methods of nerve localization-nerve stimulation versus paresthesia. Anesth Analg 2000; 91:647–651
    1. Sia S, Bartoli M. Selective ulnar nerve localization is not essential for axillary brachial plexus block using a multiple nerve stimulation technique. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2001; 26:12–16
    1. Sia S, Lepri A, Ponzecchi P. Axillary brachial plexus block using peripheral nerve stimulator: a comparison between double- and triple-injection techniques. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2001; 26:499–503
    1. Sia S, Lepri A, Campolo MC, Fiaschi R. Four-injection brachial plexus block using peripheral nerve stimulator: a comparison between axillary and humeral approaches. Anesth Analg 2002; 95:1075–1079
    1. Casati A, Danelli G, Baciarello M, et al. A prospective, randomized comparison between ultrasound and nerve stimulation guidance for multiple injection axillary brachial plexus block. Anesthesiology 2007; 106:992–996

Source: PubMed

Sponsorit ja yhteistyökumppanit

Sairaudet

Huumeiden interventiot

3
Tilaa