Attachment-oriented psychological intervention for couples facing breast cancer: protocol of a randomised controlled trial

Anne Nicolaisen, Dorte G Hansen, Mariët Hagedoorn, Henrik E Flyger, Nina Rottmann, Per Nielsen, Katrine Søe, Anne E Pedersen, Christoffer Johansen, Anne Nicolaisen, Dorte G Hansen, Mariët Hagedoorn, Henrik E Flyger, Nina Rottmann, Per Nielsen, Katrine Søe, Anne E Pedersen, Christoffer Johansen

Abstract

Background: There is evidence that both breast cancer patients and their partners are affected emotionally, when facing a breast cancer diagnosis. Several couple interventions have been evaluated, but there is a need for couple intervention studies with a clear theoretical basis and a strong design. The Hand in Hand intervention is designed to enhance interdependent coping in the couples and to address patients and partners that are both initially distressed and non-distressed.

Methods: The Hand in Hand study is a randomised controlled trial among 199 breast cancer patients and their partners. Couples were randomised to 4-8 couple sessions with a psychologist in addition to usual care, or to usual care only, approximately 2 months after the patients' primary surgery date. The intervention was delivered within 3 months, and outcomes were assessed prior to randomisation and 5 and 10 months after primary surgery date. The primary outcome is patients' cancer-specific distress at the 5-month follow-up measured by the Impact of Event Scale. Secondary outcomes are assessed for both breast cancer patients and partners. These outcomes are: general distress, symptoms of anxiety and depression, health-related quality of life and measures of dyadic adjustment, intimacy and partner involvement. Cancer-specific distress is also assessed for partners. Eligible patients were women ≥ 18 years newly diagnosed with primary breast cancer, cohabiting with a male partner, having no previous cancer diagnoses, receiving no neo-adjuvant treatment, having no history of hospitalisation due to psychosis, and able to read and speak Danish. Partners were eligible if they could read and speak Danish and were ≥ 18 years.

Discussion: This study investigates the effect of an attachment-oriented psychological intervention for breast cancer patients and their partners. The intervention has a theoretical framework and a strong design. If proven effective, this intervention would be helpful in optimising psychosocial care and rehabilitation of couples coping with breast cancer.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01368380.

Keywords: Attachment; Breast cancer; Partners; Psychological intervention; RCT.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study design.

References

    1. Adamson NA. Emotionally focused therapy with couples facing breast cancer: a theoretical foundation and descriptive case study. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology. 2013;31:712–726. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2013.835024.
    1. Aron A, Aron EN, Smollan D. Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1992;63:596–612. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596.
    1. Badr H, Krebs P. A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for couples coping with cancer. Psycho-Oncology. 2013;22:1688–1704. doi: 10.1002/pon.3200.
    1. Bartholomew K, Horowitz LM. Attachment styles among young adults: a test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1991;61:226–244. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.226.
    1. Baucom DH, Shoham V, Mueser KT, Daiuto AD, Stickle TR. Empirically supported couple and family interventions for marital distress and adult mental health problems. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1998;66:53–88. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.66.1.53.
    1. Boutron I, Moher D, Altman DG, Schulz KF, Ravaud P. Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: Explanation and elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2008;148:295–310. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-4-200802190-00008.
    1. Bowlby J. Attachment theory and its therapeutic implications. Adolescent Psychiatry. 1978;6:5–33.
    1. Bowlby J. Attachment and loss: retrospect and prospect. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. 1982;52:664–678. doi: 10.1111/j.1939-0025.1982.tb01456.x.
    1. Brady MJ, Cella DF, Mo F, Bonomi AE, Tulsky DS, Lloyd SR, Deasy S, Cobleigh M, Shimoto G. Reliability and validity of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-breast quality-of-life instrument. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 1997;15:974–986.
    1. Brandao T, Schulz MS, Matos PM. Psychological intervention with couples coping with breast cancer: a systematic review. Psychology and Health. 2014;29:491–516. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2013.859257.
    1. Brucker PS, Yost K, Cashy J, Webster K, Cella D. General population and cancer patient norms for the functional assessment of cancer therapy-general (FACT-G) Evaluation & the Health Professions. 2005;28:192–211. doi: 10.1177/0163278705275341.
    1. Burgess C, Cornelius V, Love S, Graham J, Richards M, Ramirez A. Depression and anxiety in women with early breast cancer: five year observational cohort study. BMJ. 2005;330:702. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38343.670868.D3.
    1. Burwell SR, Brucker PS, Shields CG. Attachment behaviors and proximity-seeking in cancer patients and their partners. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy. 2006;5:1–16. doi: 10.1300/J398v05n03_01.
    1. Busby DM, Christensen C, Crane DR, Larson JH. A revision of the dyadic adjustment scale for use with distressed and nondistressed couples: construct hierachy and multidimensional scales. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. 1995;21:289–308. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.1995.tb00163.x.
    1. Christensen S, Zachariae R, Jensen AB, Vaeth M, Moller S, Ravnsbaek J, von der Maase H. Prevalence and risk of depressive symptoms 3-4 months post-surgery in a nationwide cohort study of Danish women treated for early stage breast-cancer. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 2009;113:339–355. doi: 10.1007/s10549-008-9920-9.
    1. Cordova MJ, Andrykowski MA. Responses to cancer diagnosis and treatment: posttraumatic stress and posttraumatic growth. Seminars in Clinical Neuropsychiatry. 2003;8:286–296.
    1. Denton WH, Burleson BR, Clark TE, Rodriguez CP, Hobbs BV. A randomized trial of emotion-focused therapy for couples in a trainin clinic. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. 2000;26:65–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2000.tb00277.x.
    1. Fergus KD, Gray RE. Relationship vulnerabilities during breast cancer: patient and partner perspectives. Psychooncology. 2009;18:1311–1322. doi: 10.1002/pon.1555.
    1. Garfield R. The therapeutic alliance in couples therapy: clinical considerations. Family Process. 2004;43:457–465. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2004.00034.x.
    1. Hagedoorn M, Sanderman R, Bolks HN, Tuinstra J, Coyne JC. Distress in couples coping with cancer: a meta-analysis and critical review of role and gender effects. Psychological Bulletin. 2008;134:1–30. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.1.
    1. Hahn EA, Holzner B, Kemmler G, Sperner-Unterweger B, Hudgens SA, Cella D. Cross-cultural evaluation of health status using item response theory. Evaluation & the Health Professions. 2005;28:233–259. doi: 10.1177/0163278705275343.
    1. Hatcher RL, Gillaspy JA. Development and validation of a revised short version of the working alliance inventory. Psychotherapy Research. 2006;16:12–25. doi: 10.1080/10503300500352500.
    1. Henselmans I, Helgeson VS, Seltman H, de Vries J, Sanderman R, Ranchor AV. Identification and prediction of distress trajectories in the first year after a breast cancer diagnosis. Health Psychology. 2010;29:160–168. doi: 10.1037/a0017806.
    1. Hinnen C, Ranchor AV, Sanderman R, Snijders TAB, Hagedoorn M, Coyne JC. Course of distress in breast cancer patients, their partners, and matched control couples. Annals of Behavioral Medicine. 2008;36:141–148. doi: 10.1007/s12160-008-9061-8.
    1. Horowitz M, Wilner N, Alvarez W. Impact of event scale: a measure of subjective stress. Psychosomatic Medicine. 1979;41:209–218. doi: 10.1097/00006842-197905000-00004.
    1. Johnson SM, Greenman PS. The path to a secure bond: emotionally focused couple therapy. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2006;62:597–609. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20251.
    1. Johnson SM, Whiffen VE. Made to measure: adapting emotionally focused couple therapy to partners’ attachment styles. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice. 1999;6:366–381.
    1. Manne SL, Ostroff JS, Winkel G, Fox K, Grana G, Miller E, Ross S, Frazier T. Couple-focused group intervention for women with early stage breast cancer. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2005;73:634–646. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.73.4.634.
    1. Manne S, Winkel G, Ostroff J, Grana G. Partner unsupportive responses, avoidant coping, and distress among women with early stage breast cancer: patient and partner persepctives. Health Psychology. 2005;24:635–641. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.24.6.635.
    1. Manne SL, Winkel G, Rubin S, Edelson M, Rosenblum N, Bergman C, Hernandez E, Carlson J, Rocereto T. Mediators of a coping and communication-enhancing intervention and a supportive counseling intervention among women diagnosed with gynecological cancers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2008;76:1034–1045. doi: 10.1037/a0014071.
    1. Milberg A, Wåhlberg R, Jakobsson M, Olsson EC, Olsson M, Friedrichsen M. What is a ‘secure base’ when death is approaching? A study applying attachment theory to adult patients’ and family members’ experiences of palliative home care. Psycho-Oncology. 2011;21:886–895. doi: 10.1002/pon.1982.
    1. Mitchell AJ, Ferguson DW, Gill J, Paul J, Symonds P. Depression and anxiety in long-term cancer survivors compared with spouses and healthy controls: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncology. 2013;14:721–732. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70244-4.
    1. Nakaya N, Saito-Nakaya K, Bidstrup PE, Dalton SO, Frederiksen K, Steding-Jessen M, Uchitomi Y, Johansen C. Increased risk of severe depression in male partners of women with breast cancer. Cancer. 2010;116:5527–5534. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25534.
    1. Northouse LL, Mood DW, Schafenacker A, Kalemkerian G, Zalupski M, LoRusso P, Hayes DF, Hussain M, Ruckdeschel J, Fendrick AM, Trask P, Ronis DL, Kershaw T. Randomized clinical trial of a brief and extensive dyadic intervention for advanced cancer patients and their family caregivers. Psycho-Oncology. 2012;22:555–563. doi: 10.1002/pon.3036.
    1. Northouse LL, Templin T, Mood D, Oberst M. Couples adjustment to breast cancer and benign breast disease: a longitudinal analysis. Psycho-Oncology. 1998;7:37–48. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1611(199801/02)7:1<37::AID-PON314>;2-#.
    1. Peluso PR, MacIntosh H. Emotionally focused couples therapy and individual psychology: a dialogue across theories. Journal of Individual Psychology. 2007;63:247–269.
    1. Pielage SB, Luteijn F, Arrindell WA. Adult attachment, intimacy and psychological distress in a clinical and community sample. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy. 2005;12:455–464. doi: 10.1002/cpp.472.
    1. Pistrang N, Barker C. The partner relationship in psychological response to breast cancer. Social Science & Medicine. 1995;40:789–797. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)00136-H.
    1. Regan T, Lambert S, Girgis A, Kelly B, Kayser K, Turner J. Do couple-based interventions make a difference for couples affected by cancer?: A systematic review. BMC Cancer. 2012;12:279. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-279.
    1. Scott JL, Halford KW, Ward BG. United we stand? The effects of a couple-coping intervention on adjustment to early stage breast or gyneological cancer. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2004;72:1122–1135. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.72.6.1122.
    1. Shaver PR, Mikulincer M, Lavy S, Cassidy J. Understanding and Altering Hurt Feelings: An Attachment-Theoretical Perspective on the Generation and Regulation of Emotions. In: Vangelisti AL, editor. Feeling Hurt in Close Relationships. 2009. pp. 92–120.
    1. Sjovall K, Attner B, Lithman T, Noreen D, Gunnars B, Thome B, Olsson H. Influence on the health of the partner affected by tumor disease in the wife or husband based on a population-based register study of cancer in Sweden. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2009;27:4781–4786. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.6788.
    1. Sørensen J, Davidsen M, Gudex C, Pedersen KM, Brønnum-Hansen H. Danish EQ-5D population norms. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health. 2009;37:467–474. doi: 10.1177/1403494809105286.
    1. Waldrop DP, O’Connor TL, Trabold N. Waiting for the other shoe to drop: distress and coping during and after treatment for breast cancer. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology. 2011;29:450–473.
    1. Yellen SB, Cella DF, Webster K, Blendowski C, Kaplan E. Measuring fatigue and other anemia-related symptoms with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) measurement system. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 1997;13:63–74. doi: 10.1016/S0885-3924(96)00274-6.
    1. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavia. 1983;67:361–370. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.
Pre-publication history
    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:

Source: PubMed

Sponsorit ja yhteistyökumppanit

Sairaudet

Huumeiden interventiot

3
Tilaa