Effects of surgical face masks on cardiopulmonary parameters during steady state exercise

J Lässing, R Falz, C Pökel, S Fikenzer, U Laufs, A Schulze, N Hölldobler, P Rüdrich, M Busse, J Lässing, R Falz, C Pökel, S Fikenzer, U Laufs, A Schulze, N Hölldobler, P Rüdrich, M Busse

Abstract

Wearing face masks reduce the maximum physical performance. Sports and occupational activities are often associated with submaximal constant intensities. This prospective crossover study examined the effects of medical face masks during constant-load exercise. Fourteen healthy men (age 25.7 ± 3.5 years; height 183.8 ± 8.4 cm; weight 83.6 ± 8.4 kg) performed a lactate minimum test and a body plethysmography with and without masks. They were randomly assigned to two constant load tests at maximal lactate steady state with and without masks. The cardiopulmonary and metabolic responses were monitored using impedance cardiography and ergo-spirometry. The airway resistance was two-fold higher with the surgical mask (SM) than without the mask (SM 0.58 ± 0.16 kPa l-1 vs. control [Co] 0.32 ± 0.08 kPa l-1; p < 0.01). The constant load tests with masks compared with those without masks resulted in a significantly different ventilation (77.1 ± 9.3 l min-1 vs. 82.4 ± 10.7 l min-1; p < 0.01), oxygen uptake (33.1 ± 5 ml min-1 kg-1 vs. 34.5 ± 6 ml min-1 kg-1; p = 0.04), and heart rate (160.1 ± 11.2 bpm vs. 154.5 ± 11.4 bpm; p < 0.01). The mean cardiac output tended to be higher with a mask (28.6 ± 3.9 l min-1 vs. 25.9 ± 4.0 l min-1; p = 0.06). Similar blood pressure (177.2 ± 17.6 mmHg vs. 172.3 ± 15.8 mmHg; p = 0.33), delta lactate (4.7 ± 1.5 mmol l-1 vs. 4.3 ± 1.5 mmol l-1; p = 0.15), and rating of perceived exertion (6.9 ± 1.1 vs. 6.6 ± 1.1; p = 0.16) were observed with and without masks. Surgical face masks increase airway resistance and heart rate during steady state exercise in healthy volunteers. The perceived exertion and endurance performance were unchanged. These results may improve the assessment of wearing face masks during work and physical training.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Timeline of the study; Pre-examination: informed consent, medical history, body plethysmography, DIET double incremental cycle ergometer test to detect the lactate minimum, Constant-load-test with and without mask: in randomized order, impedance cardiography, blood pressure, ergo-spirometry and blood lactate concentration.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Body plethysmography measurements with spirometry masks.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Graphs showing the mean cardiac responses (n = 13) during the continuous load test with (SM) and without (Co) a surgical mask. (A) HR: heart rate; (B) SV: stroke volume; (C) CO: cardiac output; (D) SBP & DBP: systolic & diastolic blood pressure. Rest values were determined immediately prior to exercise.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The graphs show the mean cardiac responses (n = 13) during the continuous load test with and without a surgical mask. (A) VE: minute ventilation; (B) VO2: oxygen uptake; (C) LAC: blood lactate concentration; (D) RPE: rating of perceived exertion (D). The rest values were determined immediately prior to exercise.

References

    1. Islam MS, et al. Current knowledge of COVID-19 and infection prevention and control strategies in healthcare settings: a global analysis. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2020 doi: 10.1017/ice.2020.237.
    1. Laestadius L, et al. Online national health agency mask guidance for the public in light of COVID-19: content analysis. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020;6:e19501. doi: 10.2196/19501.
    1. Liang M, et al. Efficacy of face mask in preventing respiratory virus transmission: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Travel. Med. Infect. Dis. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101751.
    1. Leung NHL, et al. Respiratory virus shedding in exhaled breath and efficacy of face masks. Nat. Med. 2020;26:676–680. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0843-2.
    1. Cowling BJ, Zhou Y, Ip DKM, Leung GM, Aiello AE. Face masks to prevent transmission of influenza virus: a systematic review. Epidemiol. Infect. 2010;138:449–456. doi: 10.1017/S0950268809991658.
    1. Eikenberry SE, et al. To mask or not to mask: Modeling the potential for face mask use by the general public to curtail the COVID-19 pandemic. Infect. Dis. Model. 2020;5:293–308.
    1. Chu DK, et al. Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2020 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31142-9.
    1. Cheng VC-C, et al. The role of community-wide wearing of face mask for control of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic due to SARS-CoV-2. J. Infect. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.04.024.
    1. Lee HP, Wang DY. Objective assessment of increase in breathing resistance of N95 respirators on human subjects. Ann Occup Hyg. 2011;55:917–921.
    1. Kyung SY, Kim Y, Hwang H, Park J-W, Jeong SH. Risks of N95 face mask use in subjects With COPD. Respir. Care. 2020;65:658–664. doi: 10.4187/respcare.06713.
    1. Louhevaara VA. Physiological effects associated with the use of respiratory protective devices. A review. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health. 1984;10:275–281. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.2327.
    1. Melissant CF, Lammers JW, Demedts M. Relationship between external resistances, lung function changes and maximal exercise capacity. Eur. Respir. J. 1998;11:1369–1375. doi: 10.1183/09031936.98.11061369.
    1. Francis KT, Brasher J. Physiological effects of wearing mouthguards. Br. J. Sports. Med. 1991;25:227–231. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.25.4.227.
    1. Bailey SP, et al. Effects of an over-the-counter vented mouthguard on cardiorespiratory responses to exercise and physical agility. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2015;29:678–684. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000668.
    1. Schulze A, Laessing J, Kwast S, Busse M. Influence of a vented mouthguard on physiological responses in handball. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2018 doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002596.
    1. Lässing J, et al. Effects of custom-made mouthguards on cardiopulmonary exercise capacity. Int. J. Sports Med. 2020;41:1–8. doi: 10.1055/a-1090-0751.
    1. Prince SA, Elliott CG, Scott K, Visintini S, Reed JL. Device-measured physical activity, sedentary behaviour and cardiometabolic health and fitness across occupational groups: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2019;16:30. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0790-9.
    1. Fikenzer S, et al. Effects of surgical and FFP2/N95 face masks on cardiopulmonary exercise capacity. Clin. Res. Cardiol. 2020 doi: 10.1007/s00392-020-01704-y.
    1. Busse MW, Maassen N, Konrad H. Relation between plasma K+ and ventilation during incremental exercise after glycogen depletion and repletion in man. J. Physiol. 1991;443:469–476. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1991.sp018845.
    1. Tegtbur U, Busse MW, Braumann KM. Estimation of an individual equilibrium between lactate production and catabolism during exercise. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 1993;25:620–627. doi: 10.1249/00005768-199305000-00015.
    1. Criée, C-P. Recommendations for Whole Body Plethysmography (Body Plethysmography): Recommendations of the German Respiratory Tract League and the German Society for Pneumology and Respiratory Medicine..
    1. Wahl P, et al. Accuracy of a modified lactate minimum test and reverse lactate threshold test to determine maximal lactate steady state. J Strength Cond Res. 2017;31:3489–3496. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000001770.
    1. Hasler ED, et al. Effect of breathing oxygen-enriched air on exercise performance in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: randomized, placebo-controlled cross-over trial. Respiration. 2020;99:213–224. doi: 10.1159/000505819.
    1. Harms CA, et al. Effects of respiratory muscle work on cardiac output and its distribution during maximal exercise. J. Appl. Physiol. 1998;85:609–618. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1998.85.2.609.
    1. Ryan KL, Cooke WH, Rickards CA, Lurie KG, Convertino VA. Breathing through an inspiratory threshold device improves stroke volume during central hypovolemia in humans. J. Appl. Physiol. 2008;104:1402–1409. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00439.2007.
    1. Convertino VA, Cooke WH, Lurie KG. Inspiratory resistance as a potential treatment for orthostatic intolerance and hemorrhagic shock. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 2005;76:319–325.
    1. Fagoni N, et al. Effect of lower body negative pressure on phase I cardiovascular responses at exercise onset. Int. J. Sports Med. 2020;41:209–218. doi: 10.1055/a-1028-7496.
    1. Siebenmann C, Lundby C. Regulation of cardiac output in hypoxia. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports. 2015;25:53–59. doi: 10.1111/sms.12619.
    1. Astorino T, et al. High-intensity interval training increases cardiac output and VO2 max. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2016;49:265–273. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001099.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa