General Practitioners' Participation in a Large, Multicountry Combined General Practitioner-Patient Survey: Recruitment Procedures and Participation Rate

Peter P Groenewegen, Stefan Greß, Willemijn Schäfer, Peter P Groenewegen, Stefan Greß, Willemijn Schäfer

Abstract

Background. The participation of general practitioners (GPs) is essential in research on the performance of primary care. This paper describes the implementation of a large, multicountry study in primary care that combines a survey among GPs and a linked survey among patients that visited their practice (the QUALICOPC study). The aim is to describe the recruitment procedure and explore differences between countries in the participation rate of the GPs. Methods. Descriptive analyses were used to document recruitment procedures and to assess hypotheses potentially explaining variation in participation rates between countries. Results. The survey was implemented in 31 European countries. GPs were mainly selected through random sampling. The actual implementation of the study differed between countries. The median participation rate was 30%. Both material (such as the payment system of GPs in a country) and immaterial influences (such as estimated survey pressure) are related to differences between countries. Conclusion. This study shows that the participation of GPs may indeed be influenced by the context of the country. The implementation of complex data collection is difficult to realize in a completely uniform way. Procedures have to be tuned to the context of the country.

Figures

Box 1
Box 1
Box 1: Study design of the QUALICOPC study.

References

    1. Cook J. V., Dickinson H. O., Eccles M. P. Response rates in postal surveys of healthcare professionals between 1996 and 2005: an observational study. BMC Health Services Research. 2009;9, article 160 doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-160.
    1. Pit S. W., Vo T., Pyakurel S. The effectiveness of recruitment strategies on general practitioner's survey response rates—a systematic review. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2014;14, article 76 doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-76.
    1. PHAMEU database. 2014, .
    1. Schäfer W. L. A., Boerma W. G. W., Kringos D. S., et al. QUALICOPC, a multi-country study evaluating quality, costs and equity in primary care. BMC Family Practice. 2011;12, article 115 doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-12-115.
    1. Schäfer W. L. A., Boerma W. G. W., Kringos D. S., et al. Measures of quality, costs and equity in primary health care instruments developed to analyse and compare primary care in 35 countries. Quality in Primary Care. 2013;21(2):67–79.
    1. Porter S. R. Raising response rates: what works? Multiple surveys of students and survey fatigue. New Directions for Institutional Research. 2004;121:15–21.
    1. Porter S. R., Whitcomb M. E., Weitzer W. H. Multiple surveys of students and survey fatigue. New Directions for Institutional Research. 2004;2004(121):63–73. doi: 10.1002/ir.101.
    1. Frey B. S., Meier S. Pro-social behavior in a natural setting. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 2004;54(1):65–88. doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2003.10.001.
    1. Olson M. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, Mass, USA: Harvard University Press; 1971.
    1. Parkinson A., Jorm L., Douglas K. A., et al. Recruiting general practitioners for surveys: reflections on the difficulties and some lessons learned. Australian Journal of Primary Health. 2015;21(2):254–258. doi: 10.1071/py13129.
    1. Wong S. T., Chau L. W., Hogg W., et al. An international cross-sectional survey on the Quality and Costs of Primary Care (QUALICO-PC): recruitment and data collection of places delivering primary care across Canada. BMC Family Practice. 2015;16, article 20 doi: 10.1186/s12875-015-0236-7.
    1. Kringos D. S., Boerma W. G., Bourgueil Y., et al. The European primary care monitor: structure, process and outcome indicators. BMC Family Practice. 2010;11, article 81 doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-11-81.
    1. World Values Survey, August 2014, .
    1. Eurostat. August 2014, .
    1. Kringos D., Boerma W., Bourgueil Y., et al. The strength of primary care in Europe: an international comparative study. British Journal of General Practice. 2013;63(616):e742–e750. doi: 10.3399/bjgp13x674422.
    1. Brady A. Opportunity sampling. In: Jupp V., editor. The Sage Dictionary of Social Research Methods. Thousand Oaks, Calif, USA: Sage; 2006.
    1. Barclay S., Todd C., Finlay I., Grande G., Wyatt P. Not another questionnaire! Maximizing the response rate, predicting non-response and assessing non-response bias in postal questionnaire studies of GPs. Family Practice. 2002;19(1):105–111. doi: 10.1093/fampra/19.1.105.
    1. Hummers-Pradier E., Scheidt-Nave C., Martin H., Heinemann S., Kochen M. M., Himmel W. Simply no time? Barriers to GPs' participation in primary health care research. Family Practice. 2008;25(2):105–112. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmn015.
    1. Stinchecombe A. L. The Logic of Social Research. Chicago, Ill, USA: University of Chicago Press; 2005.
    1. Snijkers G., Haraldsen G., Jones J., Willimack D. K. Designing and Conducting Business Surveys. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons; 2013.
    1. Baruch Y., Holtom B. C. Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research. Human Relations. 2008;61(8):1139–1160. doi: 10.1177/0018726708094863.
    1. Lewis E. F., Hardy M., Snaith B. Estimating the effect of nonresponse bias in a survey of hospital organizations. Evaluation & the Health Professions. 2013;36(3):330–351. doi: 10.1177/0163278713496565.
    1. Flanigan T. S., McFarlane E., Cook S. Conducting survey research among physicians and other medical professionals: a review of current literature. Proceedings of the American Statistical Association Survey Research Methods Section (AAPOR '08); May 2008; New Orleans, La, USA. pp. 4136–4147.
    1. Lulofs J. G. Professies en de markt voor vertrouwensgoederen. In: Lindenberg S., Stokman F. N., editors. Modellen in de Sociologie. Deventer, Netherlands: Van loghum Slaterus; 1983.
    1. Krause E. A. Death of the Guilds: Professions, States and the Advance of Capitalism, 1930 to the Present. New Haven, Conn, USA: Yale University Press; 1986.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorit ja yhteistyökumppanit

Sairaudet

Huumeiden interventiot

3
Tilaa