The Method of Randomization for Cluster-Randomized Trials: Challenges of Including Patients with Multiple Chronic Conditions

Denise Esserman, Heather G Allore, Thomas G Travison, Denise Esserman, Heather G Allore, Thomas G Travison

Abstract

Cluster-randomized clinical trials (CRT) are trials in which the unit of randomization is not a participant but a group (e.g. healthcare systems or community centers). They are suitable when the intervention applies naturally to the cluster (e.g. healthcare policy); when lack of independence among participants may occur (e.g. nursing home hygiene); or when it is most ethical to apply an intervention to all within a group (e.g. school-level immunization). Because participants in the same cluster receive the same intervention, CRT may approximate clinical practice, and may produce generalizable findings. However, when not properly designed or interpreted, CRT may induce biased results. CRT designs have features that add complexity to statistical estimation and inference. Chief among these is the cluster-level correlation in response measurements induced by the randomization. A critical consideration is the experimental unit of inference; often it is desirable to consider intervention effects at the level of the individual rather than the cluster. Finally, given that the number of clusters available may be limited, simple forms of randomization may not achieve balance between intervention and control arms at either the cluster- or participant-level. In non-clustered clinical trials, balance of key factors may be easier to achieve because the sample can be homogenous by exclusion of participants with multiple chronic conditions (MCC). CRTs, which are often pragmatic, may eschew such restrictions. Failure to account for imbalance may induce bias and reducing validity. This article focuses on the complexities of randomization in the design of CRTs, such as the inclusion of patients with MCC, and imbalances in covariate factors across clusters.

Keywords: Cluster Randomized Trials; Experimental Design; Multiple Chronic Conditions; Randomization.

References

    1. Research C for DE and Conducting Clinical Trials - US Department of Health and Human Services’ Initiative on Multiple Chronic Conditions. . Accessed November 25, 2015.
    1. FDA: Policies and Procedures for Proposed Trial Design Aimed at Multiple Chronic Conditions - Policy and Medicine. . Accessed November 25, 2015.
    1. Cornfield J. Randomization by group: a formal analysis. Am J Epidemiol. 1978;108(2):100–102.
    1. Donner A, Klar N. Design and Analysis of Cluster Randomization Trials in Health Research. 1. Chichester England: Wiley; 2010.
    1. Campbell MK, Elbourne DR, Altman DG, CONSORT group CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials. BMJ. 2004;328(7441):702–708. .
    1. Suresh K. An overview of randomization techniques: An unbiased assessment of outcome in clinical research. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2011;4(1):8–11. .
    1. Hayes RJ, Moulton LH. Cluster Randomised Trials. 1. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC; 2009. .
    1. Ivers NM, Halperin IJ, Barnsley J, et al. Allocation techniques for balance at baseline in cluster randomized trials: a methodological review. Trials. 2012;13:120. .
    1. Donner A, Klar N. Pitfalls of and controversies in cluster randomization trials. Am J Public Health. 2004;94(3):416–422. .
    1. Pocock SJ, Simon R. Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial. Biometrics. 1975;31(1):103–115. .
    1. Wolfson M, Champion H, McCoy TP, et al. Impact of a randomized campus/community trial to prevent high-risk drinking among college students. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2012;36(10):1767–1778. .
    1. Signorini DF, Leung O, Simes RJ, Beller E, Gebski VJ, Callaghan T. Dynamic balanced randomization for clinical trials. Stat Med. 1993;12(24):2343–2350. .
    1. Moulton LH. Covariate-based constrained randomization of group-randomized trials. Clin Trials. 2004;1(3):297–305. .
    1. Chaudhary MA, Moulton LH. A SAS macro for constrained randomization of group-randomized designs. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2006;83(3):205–210. .
    1. Hahn S, Puffer S, Torgerson DJ, Watson J. Methodological bias in cluster randomised trials. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2005;5(1):10. .
    1. Weijer C, Grimshaw JM, Taljaard M, et al. Ethical issues posed by cluster randomized trials in health research. Trials. 2011;12(1):100. .
    1. Christie J, O’Halloran P, Stevenson M. Planning a cluster randomized controlled trial: methodological issues. Nurs Res. 2009;58(2):128–134. .
    1. Farrin A, Russell I, Torgerson D, Underwood M, UK BEAM Trial Team Differential recruitment in a cluster randomized trial in primary care: the experience of the UK back pain, exercise, active management and manipulation (UK BEAM) feasibility study. Clin Trials. 2005;2(2):119–124. .
    1. Eldridge SM, Ashby D, Feder GS, Rudnicka AR, Ukoumunne OC. Lessons for cluster randomized trials in the twenty-first century: a systematic review of trials in primary care. Clin Trials. 2004;1(1):80–90. .
    1. Foster JM, Sawyer SM, Smith L, Reddel HK, Usherwood T. Barriers and facilitators to patient recruitment to a cluster randomized controlled trial in primary care: lessons for future trials. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015;15 .
    1. Liddy C, Hogg W, Singh J, et al. A real-world stepped wedge cluster randomized trial of practice facilitation to improve cardiovascular care. Implement Sci. 2015;10 .
    1. Brown AW, Li P, Bohan Brown MM, et al. Best (but oft-forgotten) practices: designing, analyzing, and reporting cluster randomized controlled trials. Am J Clin Nutr. 2015;102(2):241–248. .
    1. Walleser S, Hill SR, Bero LA. Characteristics and quality of reporting of cluster randomized trials in children: reporting needs improvement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1331–1340. .
    1. Ersek M, Polissar N, Du Pen A, Jablonski A, Herr K, Neradilek MB. Addressing methodological challenges in implementing the nursing home pain management algorithm randomized controlled trial. Clin Trials. 2012;9(5):634–644. .
    1. Froud R, Eldridge S, Diaz Ordaz K, Marinho VCC, Donner A. Quality of cluster randomized controlled trials in oral health: a systematic review of reports published between 2005 and 2009. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology. 2012;40:3–14. .
    1. Mbonye AK, Magnussen P, Lal S, et al. A Cluster Randomised Trial Introducing Rapid Diagnostic Tests into Registered Drug Shops in Uganda: Impact on Appropriate Treatment of Malaria. PLoS One. 2015;10(7) .
    1. Taljaard M, McGowan J, Grimshaw JM, et al. Electronic search strategies to identify reports of cluster randomized trials in MEDLINE: low precision will improve with adherence to reporting standards. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:15. .
    1. Wright N, Ivers N, Eldridge S, Taljaard M, Bremner S. A review of the use of covariates in cluster randomized trials uncovers marked discrepancies between guidance and practice. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68(6):603–609. .
    1. Zhao W, Hill MD, Palesch Y. Minimal sufficient balance–a new strategy to balance baseline covariates and preserve randomness of treatment allocation. Stat Methods Med Res. 2015;24(6):989–1002. .
    1. Zhang L, Rosenberger WF. Response-Adaptive Randomization for Clinical Trials with Continuous Outcomes. Biometrics. 2006;62(2):562–569. .
    1. Bather JA. Randomized Allocation of Treatments in Sequential Experiments. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Methodological) 1981;43(3):265–292.
    1. Thompson WR. On the Likelihood That One Unknown Probability Exceeds Another in View of the Evidence of Two Samples. Biometrika. 1933;25(3–4):285–294. .
    1. Zelen M. Play the Winner Rule and the Controlled Clinical Trial. Journal of the American Statistical Association. 1969;64(325):131–146. .
    1. Sobel Weiss: Play-the-Winner Rule and Inverse Sampling for Selecting the Best of k > 3 Binomial Populations. Ann Math Stat. 1972;43(6):1808–1826.
    1. Berry DA, Fristedt B. Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability. Springer; 1985. Bandit problems: Sequential Allocation of Experiments.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorit ja yhteistyökumppanit

Sairaudet

Huumeiden interventiot

3
Tilaa