Feedback in the clinical setting

Annette Burgess, Christie van Diggele, Chris Roberts, Craig Mellis, Annette Burgess, Christie van Diggele, Chris Roberts, Craig Mellis

Abstract

Provision of feedback forms an integral part of the learning process. Receipt of feedback enriches the learning experience, and helps to narrow the gap between actual and desired performance. Effective feedback helps to reinforce good practice, motivating the learner towards the desired outcome. However, a common complaint from learners is that the receipt of feedback is infrequent and inadequate. This paper briefly explores the role of feedback within the learning process, the barriers to the feedback process, and practical guidelines for facilitating feedback.

Keywords: Clinical teaching; Feedback; Peer teaching; Student peer-to-peer feedback.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The learning cycle during clinical placements

References

    1. Van den Berg I, Admiraal W, Pilot A. Peer assessment in university teaching: evaluating seven course designs. Assess Eval High Educ. 2006;31(1):19–36. doi: 10.1080/02602930500262346.
    1. Burgess A, Mellis C. Feedback and assessment during clinical placements: achieving the right balance. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2015;6:373–381. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S77890.
    1. Boud D, Molloy E. Rethinking models of feedback for learning: the challenge of design. Assess Eval High Educ. 2013;38(6):698–712. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2012.691462.
    1. Zahid A, Hong J, Young C. Surgical supervisor feedback affects performance: a blinded randomized study. Cureus. 2017;9(5):e1276.
    1. Shepard LA. The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educ Res. 2000;29:4–14. doi: 10.3102/0013189X029007004.
    1. Hattie J, Timperley H. The power of feedback. Rev Educ Res. 2007;77:81–112. doi: 10.3102/003465430298487.
    1. Branch WT, Paranjape A. Feedback and reflection: teaching methods for clinical settings. Acad Med. 2002;77:1185–1188. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200212000-00005.
    1. Ende J. Feedback in clinical medical education. Med Educ. 1983;250(6):777–781.
    1. Davis DA, Mazmanian PE, Fordis M, Van Harrison R, Thorpe KE, Perrier L. Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review. JAMA. 2006;296:1094–1102. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.9.1094.
    1. Telio S, Ajjawi R, Regehr G. The “educational alliance” as a framework for reconceptualizing feedback in medical education. Acad Med. 2015;90(5):609–614. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000560.
    1. Burgess A, Roberts C, Black K, Mellis C. Senior medical student perceived ability and experience in giving peer feedback in formative long cases examinations. BMC Med Educ. 2013;13:79. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-79.
    1. Burgess A, Clark T, Chapman R, Mellis C. Senior medical students as peer examiners in an OSCE. Med Teach. 2012;35:58–62. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.731101.
    1. Topping KJ. Trends in peer learning. Educ Psychol. 2005;25(6):631–645. doi: 10.1080/01443410500345172.
    1. Burgess A, McGregor D, Mellis C. A systematic review of peer assisted learning (PAL) in medical schools. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14:115. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-115.
    1. Burgess A, Roberts C, Black K, Mellis K. Student ability to assess their peers in long case clinical examination. IJOCS. 2014;8:1.
    1. Cassidy S. Developing employability skills: peer assessment in higher education. Educ Train. 2006;48(7):508–517. doi: 10.1108/00400910610705890.
    1. Falchikov N, Goldfinch J. Student peer assessment in higher education a meta-analysis comparing peer and teacher marks. Rev Educ Res. 2000;70(3):287–322. doi: 10.3102/00346543070003287.
    1. Pendleton D, Schofield T, Tate P, Havelock P. The consultation: an approach to learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1984.
    1. Burgess A, van Diggele C, Mellis C. Faculty development for junior health professionals. Clin Teach. 2018;15:1–8. doi: 10.1111/tct.12756.
    1. Burgess A, Roberts C, van Diggele V, Mellis C. Peer teacher training program: interprofessional and flipped learning. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17:239. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-1037-6.
    1. Cantillon P, Sargeant J. Giving feedback in clinical settings. BMJ. 2008;337:a1961. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1961.
    1. Chowdhury R, Kalu G. Learning to give feedback in medical education. Obstet Gynaecol. 2004;6:243–247.
    1. Bienstock JL, Katz NT, Cox SM, Hueppchen N, Erickson S. To the point: medical education reviews – providing feedback. Am J Obstet Gynaecol. 2007;196(6):508–513. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.08.021.
    1. Zimmerman BJ. Becoming a self-regulated learner: an overview. Theory Pract. 2002;41(2):64–72. doi: 10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2.
    1. Leggett H, Sanders J, Roberts T. Twelve tips on how to provide self-regulated learning (SRL) enhanced feedback on clinical performance. Med Teach. 2017;11:1–5.
    1. Huggett N, Jeffries WB. An introduction to medical teaching: Springer Netherlands; 2014. 10.1007/978-94-017-9066-6.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorit ja yhteistyökumppanit

Sairaudet

Huumeiden interventiot

3
Tilaa