The Microbiome-Gut-Brain axis regulates social cognition & craving in young binge drinkers

Carina Carbia, Thomaz F S Bastiaanssen, Luigi Francesco Iannone, Rubén García-Cabrerizo, Serena Boscaini, Kirsten Berding, Conall R Strain, Gerard Clarke, Catherine Stanton, Timothy G Dinan, John F Cryan, Carina Carbia, Thomaz F S Bastiaanssen, Luigi Francesco Iannone, Rubén García-Cabrerizo, Serena Boscaini, Kirsten Berding, Conall R Strain, Gerard Clarke, Catherine Stanton, Timothy G Dinan, John F Cryan

Abstract

Background: Binge drinking is the consumption of an excessive amount of alcohol in a short period of time. This pattern of consumption is highly prevalent during the crucial developmental period of adolescence. Recently, the severity of alcohol use disorders (AUDs) has been linked with microbiome alterations suggesting a role for the gut microbiome in its development. Furthermore, a strong link has emerged too between microbiome composition and socio-emotional functioning across different disorders including AUD. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential link (and its predictive value) between alcohol-related altered microbial profile, social cognition, impulsivity and craving.

Methods: Young people (N = 71) aged 18-25 reported their alcohol use and underwent a neuropsychological evaluation. Craving was measured at baseline and three months later. Diet was controlled for. Blood, saliva and hair samples were taken for inflammatory, kynurenine and cortisol analysis. Stool samples were provided for shotgun metagenomic sequencing and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) were measured.

Findings: Binge drinking was associated with distinct microbiome alterations and emotional recognition difficulties. Associations were found for several microbiome species with emotional processing and impulsivity. Craving showed a strong link with alterations in microbiome composition and neuroactive potential over time.

Interpretation: In conclusion, this research demonstrates alterations in the gut microbiome of young binge drinkers (BDs) and identifies early biomarkers of craving. Associations between emotional processing and microbiome composition further support the growing literature on the gut microbiome as a regulator of social cognition. These findings are of relevance for new gut-derived interventions directed at improving early alcohol-related alterations during the vulnerability period of adolescence.

Funding: C.C. and R.G-C. received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement No. 754535. APC Microbiome Ireland is a research centre funded by Science Foundation Ireland (SFI), through the Irish Government's National Development Plan [grant no. SFI/12/RC/2273_P2]. J.F.C has research support from Cremo, Pharmavite, DuPont and Nutricia. He has spoken at meetings sponsored by food and pharmaceutical companies. G.C. has received honoraria from Janssen, Probi, and Apsen as an invited speaker; is in receipt of research funding from Pharmavite, Fonterra, Nestle and Reckitt; and is a paid consultant for Yakult, Zentiva and Heel pharmaceuticals. All the authors declare no competing interests.

Keywords: Adolescence; Binge drinking; Gut-brain axis; Microbiome; Social cognition.

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests J.F.C has research support from Cremo, Pharmavite, DuPont and Nutricia. He has spoken at meetings sponsored by food and pharmaceutical companies. G.C. has received honoraria from Janssen, Probi, and Apsen as an invited speaker; is in receipt of research funding from Pharmavite, Fonterra, Nestle and Reckitt; and is a paid consultant for Yakult, Zentiva and Heel pharmaceuticals. All the authors declare no competing interests.

Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study design and outline. Young binge and non-binge drinkers (N = 71) aged 18–25 were recruited. The study comprised three sessions, stool, blood and saliva samples were collected and cognitive performance was assessed. Craving levels were recorded again three months later (N = 56). Multiple regression models were used incorporating relevant covariables such as diet and correcting for multiple comparisons. Strict inclusion criteria were applied including not having an alcohol use disorder, other drug use or current medication. Findings show binge drinking is associated with a specific microbiome signature and suggest a role of the gut microbiome in regulating social cognition and craving. Biological samples provided differed (saliva N = 64; blood N = 56; hair N = 61).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Inflammatory markers associations for binge drinking (BD) and craving.a.Alcohol consumption data. Raw drinking scores showing the high correlation between BD episodes (i.e., 60 g or more of pure alcohol on one occasion) in the last month (measured by the TLFB), with maximum drinks and BD in the past year (measured by AUDIT question 3 in which items 2–3 indicate monthly and weekly BD respectively). b. Binge drinking and inflammatory markers. BD correlated positively with higher stimulated inflammatory markers. c. Days since the last binge drinking episode and inflammatory markers. Significant negative correlations were found for number of days since last BD episode and stimulated inflammatory markers, i.e., the more recent the BD episode, the higher the inflammation. d. Craving and inflammatory markers. Higher craving (expectancy dimension) correlated with higher responsiveness of stimulated inflammatory markers.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Neuropsychological performance in social cognition and binge drinking(BD).a. Emotional functioning and binge drinking: raw data divided by tertiles. Higher BD was associated to poor emotion recognition for sadness and disgust (lower correct responses) in the Emotional Recognition Task (ERT). The Tertiles visualization depicts raw data. Statistical models with regression coefficients are described in text and full models can be found in Supplementary Material. b. Affective bias and binge drinking: raw data divided by tertiles. Higher BD was associated to slower reaction time (measured as higher latencies for correct responses) in the Affective Go/No-go (AGN). The Tertiles visualization depicts raw data. Statistical models with regression coefficients are described in text and Supplementary Material.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Microbiome alterations in young binge drinkers.a. Alpha diversity by drinking tertiles. Alpha diversity was computed using the iNEXT library. Alpha diversity was not associated with BD variables. b. Beta diversity by drinking tertiles. Beta diversity was computed in terms of Aitchison distance, or Euclidean distance between clr-transformed data. Beta diversity changes were linked to maximum drinks per session (PERMANOVA [p = 0.007, R2 = 0.023]), depicted here as a principal component analysis (PCA) graph. c. Gut microbiome composition and binge drinking. Regression models (lm() function) of CLR-transformed species counts were related to drinking variables, adjusting for BMI, dietary intake and the number of days since the last BD episode. False Discovery Rate (FDR) using sequential modified Bonferroni correction for multiple testing was applied. Compositional results (revealed alterations in some species of the genus Alistipes (reductions) and Veillonella (increases) linked to higher number of drinks per occasion. The effect (β) is represented in red (increased) or blue (reduced) with higher colour intensity representing a bigger effect. Opaque points represent effects that pass FDR. d. Recency of binge dsrinking episodes and gut microbiome composition. A recent BD episode (the covariable days since last BD episode) was associated with further widespread microbiome alterations such as Bacteroides spp., Alistipes spp., Blautia wexlerae, Ruminococcus lactaris, Coprococcus euctactus among others. e. Gut microbiome composition by drinking tertiles. Compositional results are shown by drinking tertiles (low drinkers, BDs and high BDs) based on maximum drinks, in order to facilitate visualization of regression models depicted in c. The Tertiles visualization depicts raw data. Statistical models with regression coefficients are described in text (and in c and f) and full models can be found in Supplementary Material. f. Gut-metabolic modules and binge drinking. Gut-metabolic modules (R Gomixer tool) showed reduced histidine and maltose degradation linked to higher BD. g. Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) and binge drinking. Higher BD (higher number of drinks per session) was associated with lower isovalerate.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Gut microbiome and craving. Regression models (lm() function) of CLR-transformed species counts were related to craving variables, adjusting for BMI, dietary intake and the number of days since the last BD episode. False Discovery Rate (FDR) using sequential modified Bonferroni correction for multiple testing was applied. The effect (β) is represented in red (increased) or blue (reduced) with higher colour intensity representing a bigger effect. Opaque points represent effects that pass FDR. Craving was associated with reductions in the Ruthenibacterium lactiformas species, both at baseline and at follow-up (3 months later). Gut-brain modules (the potential of the microbiome to produce chemicals with neuroactive potential) was calculated with R Gomixer tool. A number of gut-brain modules showed associations with craving, such as reduced butyrate and inositol synthesis and increased acetate, glutamate and tryptophan synthesis. Associations were found for craving at baseline and at follow-up (3 months later). Baseline craving dimensions showing significant associations were expectancy and purposefulness (first and second column respectively) and at follow-up obsessed and regulated dimensions (third and fourth column).
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Microbiome associations with social cognition and impulsivity.a. Gut microbiome composition and emotional functioning and impulsivity. Regression models (lm () function) of CLR-transformed species counts were related to social cognition difficulties and impulsivity, adjusting for BMI, dietary intake and the number of days since the last BD episode. False Discovery Rate (FDR) using sequential modified Bonferroni correction for multiple testing was applied. The effect (β) is represented in red (increased) or blue (reduced) with higher colour intensity representing a bigger effect. Opaque points represent effects that pass FDR. Emotion recognition showed a strong association with microbiome composition. Particularly, a decrease in Clostridium spp., Flavonifractor plautii, Eggerthella lenta and an increase of Coprococcus spp. was associated with poor recognition of sadness. Higher motor impulsivity was associated with several species, e.g., reduction of Collinsella, increased Roseburia and Parabacteroidetes. b and c. Gut microbiome and cognitive performance and impulsivity by drinking tertiles. Previous results are visualized by tertiles depending on emotion recognition performance and impulsivity, respectively. Tertiles represent raw data as a complementary visualization strategy.

References

    1. Rolland B., Chazeron I de, Carpentier F., et al. Comparison between the WHO and NIAAA criteria for binge drinking on drinking features and alcohol-related aftermaths: results from a cross-sectional study among eight emergency wards in France. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017;175:92–98.
    1. Kraus L., Seitz N.N., Piontek D., et al. ‘Are The Times A-changin’? Trends in adolescent substance use in Europe. Addiction. 2018;113(7):1317–1332.
    1. Sawyer S.M., Azzopardi P.S., Wickremarathne D., Patton G.C. The age of adolescence. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2018;2(3):223–228.
    1. Carbia C., López-Caneda E., Corral M., Cadaveira F. A systematic review of neuropsychological studies involving young binge drinkers. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2018;90:332–349.
    1. Almeida-Antunes N., Crego A., Carbia C., et al. Electroencephalographic signatures of the binge drinking pattern during adolescence and young adulthood: a PRISMA-driven systematic review. Neuroimage Clin. 2021;29
    1. Cservenka A., Brumback T. The burden of binge and heavy drinking on the brain: effects on adolescent and young adult neural structure and function. Front Psychol. 2017;8:1111.
    1. Dawson D.A., Grant B.F., Stinson F.S., Chou P.S. Psychopathology associated with drinking and alcohol use disorders in the college and general adult populations. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2005;77(2):139–150.
    1. Leclercq S., Le Roy T., Furgiuele S., et al. Gut microbiota-induced changes in β-hydroxybutyrate metabolism are linked to altered sociability and depression in alcohol use disorder. Cell Rep. 2020;33(2)
    1. Leclercq S., Matamoros S., Cani P.D., et al. Intestinal permeability, gut-bacterial dysbiosis, and behavioral markers of alcohol-dependence severity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(42):E4485–E4493.
    1. Cryan J.F., O'Riordan K.J., Cowan C.S.M., et al. The microbiota-gut-brain axis. Physiol Rev. 2019;99(4):1877–2013.
    1. Leclercq S., De Saeger C., Delzenne N., de Timary P., Stärkel P. Role of inflammatory pathways, blood mononuclear cells, and gut-derived bacterial products in alcohol dependence. Biol Psychiatry. 2014;76(9):725–733.
    1. Sherwin E., Bordenstein S.R., Quinn J.L., Dinan T.G., Cryan J.F. Microbiota and the social brain. Science. 2019;366(6465)
    1. Wu W.L., Adame M.D., Liou C.W., et al. Microbiota regulate social behaviour via stress response neurons in the brain. Nature. 2021;595(7867):409–414.
    1. Vuong H.E., Hsiao E.Y. Gut microbes join the social network. Neuron. 2019;101(2):196–198.
    1. Sgritta M., Dooling S.W., Buffington S.A., et al. Mechanisms underlying microbial-mediated changes in social behavior in mouse models of autism spectrum disorder. Neuron. 2019;101(2):246–259.e6.
    1. Sharon G., Cruz N.J., Kang D.W., et al. Human gut microbiota from autism spectrum disorder promote behavioral symptoms in mice. Cell. 2019;177(6):1600–1618.e17.
    1. Andrews J.L., Ahmed S.P., Blakemore S.J. Navigating the social environment in adolescence: the role of social brain development. Biol Psychiatry. 2021;89(2):109–118.
    1. Schweizer S., Gotlib I.H., Blakemore S.J. The role of affective control in emotion regulation during adolescence. Emotion. 2020;20(1):80–86.
    1. Lannoy S., Duka T., Carbia C., et al. Emotional processes in binge drinking: a systematic review and perspective. Clin Psychol Rev. 2021;84
    1. Vetreno R.P., Massey V., Crews F.T. Long-lasting microbial dysbiosis and altered enteric neurotransmitters in adult rats following adolescent binge ethanol exposure. Addict Biol. 2021;26(1):e12869.
    1. Carbia C., Lannoy S., Maurage P., et al. A biological framework for emotional dysregulation in alcohol misuse: from gut to brain. Mol Psychiatry. 2021;26(4):1098–1118.
    1. Flannery J., Callaghan B., Sharpton T., Fisher P., Pfeifer J. Is adolescence the missing developmental link in Microbiome-Gut-Brain axis communication? Dev Psychobiol. 2019;61(5):783–795.
    1. Borre Y.E., O'Keeffe G.W., Clarke G., Stanton C., Dinan T.G., Cryan J.F. Microbiota and neurodevelopmental windows: implications for brain disorders. Trends Mol Med. 2014;20(9):509–518.
    1. García-Cabrerizo R., Carbia C., O´Riordan K.J., Schellekens H., Cryan J.F. Microbiota-gut-brain axis as a regulator of reward processes. J Neurochem. 2021;157(5):1495–1524.
    1. Meckel K.R., Kiraly D.D. A potential role for the gut microbiome in substance use disorders. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2019;236(5):1513–1530.
    1. O'Mahony S.M., Clarke G., Borre Y.E., Dinan T.G., Cryan J.F. Serotonin, tryptophan metabolism and the brain-gut-microbiome axis. Behav Brain Res. 2015;277:32–48.
    1. Schmidt K., Cowen P.J., Harmer C.J., Tzortzis G., Errington S., Burnet P.W.J. Prebiotic intake reduces the waking cortisol response and alters emotional bias in healthy volunteers. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 2015;232(10):1793–1801.
    1. Alcohol research: current reviews editorial staff. Drinking patterns and their definitions. Alcohol Res. 2018;39(1):17–18.
    1. Maurage P., Lannoy S., Mange J., et al. What we talk about when we talk about binge drinking: towards an integrated conceptualization and evaluation. Alcohol Alcohol. 2020;55(5):468–479.
    1. Saunders J.B., Aasland O.G., Babor T.F., De La Fuente J.R., Grant M. Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO collaborative project on early detection of persons with harmful alcohol consumption-II. Addiction. 1993;88(6):791–804.
    1. Mann R.E., Sobell L.C., Sobell M.B., Pavan D. Reliability of a family tree questionnaire for assessing family history of alcohol problems. Drug Alcohol Depend. 1985;15(1–2):61–67.
    1. Sobell L.C., Kwan E., Sobell M.B. Reliability of a drug history questionnaire (DHQ) Addict Behav. 1995;20(2):233–241.
    1. Sobell L.C., Maisto S.A., Sobell M.B., Cooper A.M. Reliability of alcohol abusers' self-reports of drinking behavior. Behav Res Ther. 1979;17(2):157–160.
    1. McEvoy P.M., Stritzke W.G.K., French D.J., Lang A.R., Ketterman R. Comparison of three models of alcohol craving in young adults: a cross-validation. Addiction. 2004;99(4):482–497.
    1. Harrington J., Fitzgerald A.P., Layte R., Lutomski J., Molcho M., Perry I.J. Sociodemographic, health and lifestyle predictors of poor diets. Public Health Nutr. 2011;14(12):2166–2175.
    1. Butler M.I., Bastiaanssen T.F.S., Long-Smith C., et al. Recipe for a healthy gut: intake of unpasteurised milk is associated with increased lactobacillus abundance in the human gut microbiome. Nutrients. 2020;12(5):1468.
    1. Beck A.T., Steer R.A., Carbin M.G. Psychometric properties of the Beck depression inventory: twenty-five years of evaluation. Clin Psychol Rev. 1988;8(1):77–100.
    1. Speilberger C.D., Vagg P.R. Psychometric properties of the STAI: a reply to ramanaiah, franzen, and schill. J Pers Assess. 1984;48(1):95–97.
    1. Patton J.H., Stanford M.S., Barratt E.S. Factor structure of the Barratt impulsiveness scale. J Clin Psychol. 1995;51(6):768–774.
    1. Pascual M., Montesinos J., Guerri C. Role of the innate immune system in the neuropathological consequences induced by adolescent binge drinking. J Neurosci Res. 2017;96(5):765–780.
    1. Clarke G., McKernan D.P., Gaszner G., Quigley E.M., Cryan J.F., Dinan T.G. A distinct profile of tryptophan metabolism along the kynurenine pathway downstream of toll-like receptor activation in irritable bowel syndrome. Front Pharmacol. 2012;3:90.
    1. Kennedy P.J., Cryan J.F., Quigley E.M.M., Dinan T.G., Clarke G. A sustained hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis response to acute psychosocial stress in irritable bowel syndrome. Psychol Med. 2014;44(14):3123–3134.
    1. Fouhy F., Deane J., Rea M.C., et al. The effects of freezing on faecal microbiota as determined using MiSeq sequencing and culture-based investigations. PLoS One. 2015;10(3)
    1. Mirzayi C., Renson A., Genomic Standards Consortium, Massive Analysis and Quality Control Society, et al. Reporting guidelines for human microbiome research: the STORMS checklist. Nat Med. 2021;27(11):1885–1892.
    1. McIver L.J., Abu-Ali G., Franzosa E.A., et al. bioBakery: a meta’omic analysis environment. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(7):1235–1237.
    1. Truong D.T., Franzosa E.A., Tickle T.L., et al. MetaPhlAn2 for enhanced metagenomic taxonomic profiling. Nat Methods. 2015;12(10):902–903.
    1. Franzosa E.A., McIver L.J., Rahnavard G., et al. Species-level functional profiling of metagenomes and metatranscriptomes. Nat Methods. 2018;15(11):962–968.
    1. Bolger A.M., Lohse M., Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(15):2114–2120.
    1. Langmead B., Salzberg S.L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012;9(4):357–359.
    1. Valles-Colomer M., Falony G., Darzi Y., et al. The neuroactive potential of the human gut microbiota in quality of life and depression. Nat Microbiol. 2019;4(4):623–632.
    1. Spichak S., Bastiaanssen T.F.S., Berding K., et al. Mining microbes for mental health: determining the role of microbial metabolic pathways in human brain health and disease. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021;125:698–761.
    1. Gloor G.B., Macklaim J.M., Pawlowsky-Glahn V., Egozcue J.J. Microbiome datasets are compositional: and this is not optional. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:2224.
    1. Fernandes A.D., Reid J.N., Macklaim J.M., McMurrough T.A., Edgell D.R., Gloor G.B. Unifying the analysis of high-throughput sequencing datasets: characterizing RNA-seq, 16S rRNA gene sequencing and selective growth experiments by compositional data analysis. Microbiome. 2014;2(1):15.
    1. Hsieh T.C., Ma K.H., Chao A. iNEXT: an R package for rarefaction and extrapolation of species diversity ( H ill numbers) Methods Ecol Evol. 2016;7(12):1451–1456.
    1. Leclercq S., Cani P.D., Neyrinck A.M., et al. Role of intestinal permeability and inflammation in the biological and behavioral control of alcohol-dependent subjects. Brain Behav Immun. 2012;26(6):911–918.
    1. Bala S., Marcos M., Gattu A., Catalano D., Szabo G. Acute binge drinking increases serum endotoxin and bacterial DNA levels in healthy individuals. PLoS One. 2014;9(5)
    1. Maurage P., Lannoy S., Naassila M., Rolland B., Billieux J. Neuroscience of alcohol [internet] Elsevier; 2019. Impulsivity and binge drinking: a neurocognitive perspective; pp. 335–343. [cited 2022 Aug 18]. Available from:
    1. Lannoy S., Benzerouk F., Maurage P., et al. Disrupted fear and sadness recognition in binge drinking: a combined group and individual analysis. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2019;43(9):1978–1985.
    1. Carbia C., Corral M., Caamaño-Isorna F., Cadaveira F. Emotional memory bias in binge drinking women. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020;209
    1. Lannoy S., Gilles F., Benzerouk F., et al. Disentangling the role of social cognition processes at early steps of alcohol abuse: the influence of affective theory of mind. Addict Behav. 2020;102
    1. Segovia-Rodríguez L., Echeverry-Alzate V., Rincón-Pérez I., et al. Gut microbiota and voluntary alcohol consumption. Transl Psychiatry. 2022;12(1):146.
    1. Parker B.J., Wearsch P.A., Veloo A.C.M., Rodriguez-Palacios A. The genus Alistipes: gut bacteria with emerging implications to inflammation, cancer, and mental health. Front Immunol. 2020;11:906.
    1. Peterson V.L., Jury N.J., Cabrera-Rubio R., et al. Drunk bugs: chronic vapour alcohol exposure induces marked changes in the gut microbiome in mice. Behav Brain Res. 2017;323:172–176.
    1. Iebba V., Guerrieri F., Di Gregorio V., et al. Combining amplicon sequencing and metabolomics in cirrhotic patients highlights distinctive microbiota features involved in bacterial translocation, systemic inflammation and hepatic encephalopathy. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):8210.
    1. Shao L., Ling Z., Chen D., Liu Y., Yang F., Li L. Disorganized gut microbiome contributed to liver cirrhosis progression: a meta-omics-based study. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:3166.
    1. Bajaj J.S., Shamsaddini A., Fagan A., et al. Distinct gut microbial compositional and functional changes associated with impaired inhibitory control in patients with cirrhosis. Gut Microbes. 2021;13(1)
    1. Deng Y.D., Peng X.B., Zhao R.R., Ma C.Q., ning Li J., Yao L.Q. The intestinal microbial community dissimilarity in hepatitis B virus-related liver cirrhosis patients with and without at alcohol consumption. Gut Pathog. 2019;11(1):58.
    1. Smirnova E., Puri P., Muthiah M.D., et al. Fecal microbiome distinguishes alcohol consumption from alcoholic hepatitis but does not discriminate disease severity. Hepatology. 2020;72(1):271–286.
    1. López-Rituerto E., Avenoza A., Busto J.H., Peregrina J.M. NMR study of histidine metabolism during alcoholic and malolactic fermentations of wine and their influence on histamine production. J Agric Food Chem. 2013;61(39):9464–9469.
    1. Milam J., Slaughter R., Meeske K., et al. Substance use among adolescent and young adult cancer survivors. Psychooncology. 2016;25(11):1357–1362.
    1. Smolinska S., Jutel M., Crameri R., O'Mahony L. Histamine and gut mucosal immune regulation. Allergy. 2014;69(3):273–281.
    1. Rapp C., Hamilton J., Richer K., Sajjad M., Yao R., Thanos P.K. Alcohol binge drinking decreases brain glucose metabolism and functional connectivity in adolescent rats. Metab Brain Dis. 2022;37(6):1901–1908.
    1. Bajaj J.S., Gavis E.A., Fagan A., et al. A randomized clinical trial of fecal microbiota transplant for alcohol use disorder. Hepatology. 2021;73(5):1688–1700.
    1. Szczesniak O., Hestad K.A., Hanssen J.F., Rudi K. Isovaleric acid in stool correlates with human depression. Nutr Neurosci. 2016;19(7):279–283.
    1. Jiang X.W., Li Y.T., Ye J.Z., et al. New strain of Pediococcus pentosaceus alleviates ethanol-induced liver injury by modulating the gut microbiota and short-chain fatty acid metabolism. World J Gastroenterol. 2020;26(40):6224–6240.
    1. Reyes R.E., Gao L., Zhang Z., Davies D.L., Asatryan L. Supplementation with sodium butyrate protects against antibiotic-induced increases in ethanol consumption behavior in mice. Alcohol. 2022;100:1–9.
    1. Dubinkina V.B., Tyakht A.V., Odintsova V.Y., et al. Links of gut microbiota composition with alcohol dependence syndrome and alcoholic liver disease. Microbiome. 2017;5(1):141.
    1. Martino C., Zaramela L.S., Gao B., et al. Acetate reprograms gut microbiota during alcohol consumption. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):4630.
    1. Wilson S., Bair J.L., Thomas K.M., Iacono W.G. Problematic alcohol use and reduced hippocampal volume: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Med. 2017;47(13):2288–2301.
    1. Tanabe J., Yamamoto D.J., Sutton B., et al. Effects of alcohol and acetate on cerebral blood flow: a pilot study. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2019;43(10):2070–2078.
    1. Volkow N.D., Kim S.W., Wang G.J., et al. Acute alcohol intoxication decreases glucose metabolism but increases acetate uptake in the human brain. Neuroimage. 2013;64:277–283.
    1. Mews P., Egervari G., Nativio R., et al. Alcohol metabolism contributes to brain histone acetylation. Nature. 2019;574(7780):717–721.
    1. Volkow N.D., Michaelides M., Baler R. The neuroscience of drug reward and addiction. Physiol Rev. 2019;99(4):2115–2140.
    1. Chen Y., Xu J., Chen Y. Regulation of neurotransmitters by the gut microbiota and effects on cognition in neurological disorders. Nutrients. 2021;13(6):2099.
    1. Bauer E.E., Shoeman A., Buhr T.J., Daniels K.M., Lyte M., Clark P.J. Voluntary binge-patterned alcohol drinking and sex-specific influences on monoamine-related neurochemical signatures in the mouse gut and brain. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2021;45(5):996–1012.
    1. Ciccocioppo R. The role of serotonin in craving: from basic research to human studies. Alcohol Alcohol. 1999;34(2):244–253.
    1. Levine J. Controlled trials of inositol in psychiatry. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 1997;7(2):147–155.
    1. Jadhav K.S., Peterson V.L., Halfon O., et al. Gut microbiome correlates with altered striatal dopamine receptor expression in a model of compulsive alcohol seeking. Neuropharmacology. 2018;141:249–259.
    1. Peterson V.L., Richards J.B., Meyer P.J., et al. Sex-dependent associations between addiction-related behaviors and the microbiome in outbred rats. EBioMedicine. 2020;55
    1. Stevens A.J., Purcell R.V., Darling K.A., Eggleston M.J.F., Kennedy M.A., Rucklidge J.J. Human gut microbiome changes during a 10 week Randomised Control Trial for micronutrient supplementation in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1)
    1. Tamanai-Shacoori Z., Smida I., Bousarghin L., et al. Roseburia spp.: a marker of health? Future Microbiol. 2017;12(2):157–170.
    1. Tillisch K., Mayer E.A., Gupta A., et al. Brain structure and response to emotional stimuli as related to gut microbial profiles in healthy women. Psychosom Med. 2017;79(8):905–913.
    1. Hranilovic D., Bucan M., Wang Y. Emotional response in dopamine D2L receptor-deficient mice. Behav Brain Res. 2008;195(2):246–250.
    1. Dinan T.G., Stanton C., Cryan J.F. Psychobiotics: a novel class of psychotropic. Biol Psychiatry. 2013;74(10):720–726.
    1. Bagga D., Reichert J.L., Koschutnig K., et al. Probiotics drive gut microbiome triggering emotional brain signatures. Gut Microbes. 2018;9(6):486–496.
    1. Rode J., Edebol Carlman H.M.T., König J., et al. Probiotic mixture containing lactobacillus helveticus, bifidobacterium longum and lactiplantibacillus plantarum affects brain responses toward an emotional task in healthy subjects: a randomized clinical trial. Front Nutr. 2022;9
    1. Tillisch K., Labus J., Kilpatrick L., et al. Consumption of fermented milk product with probiotic modulates brain activity. Gastroenterology. 2013;144(7):1394–1401.e4.
    1. Chong H.X., Yusoff N.A.A., Hor Y.Y., et al. Lactobacillus plantarum DR7 alleviates stress and anxiety in adults: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Benef Microbes. 2019;10(4):355–373.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa