Physiological and anatomical evidence for a magnocellular defect in developmental dyslexia

M S Livingstone, G D Rosen, F W Drislane, A M Galaburda, M S Livingstone, G D Rosen, F W Drislane, A M Galaburda

Abstract

Several behavioral studies have shown that developmental dyslexics do poorly in tests requiring rapid visual processing. In primates fast, low-contrast visual information is carried by the magnocellular subdivision of the visual pathway, and slow, high-contrast information is carried by the parvocellular division. In this study, we found that dyslexic subjects showed diminished visually evoked potentials to rapid, low-contrast stimuli but normal responses to slow or high-contrast stimuli. The abnormalities in the dyslexic subjects' evoked potentials were consistent with a defect in the magnocellular pathway at the level of visual area 1 or earlier. We then compared the lateral geniculate nuclei from five dyslexic brains to five control brains and found abnormalities in the magnocellular, but not the parvocellular, layers. Studies using auditory and somatosensory tests have shown that dyslexics do poorly in these modalities only when the tests require rapid discriminations. We therefore hypothesize that many cortical systems are similarly divided into a fast and a slow subdivision and that dyslexia specifically affects the fast subdivisions.

References

    1. Neuropsychologia. 1975 Jan;13(1):69-74
    1. Child Dev. 1973 Dec;44(4):841-4
    1. Vision Res. 1991;31(7-8):1143-57
    1. J Neurophysiol. 1957 Jul;20(4):408-34
    1. J Neurophysiol. 1970 Jan;33(1):172-87
    1. Ann Neurol. 1990 Dec;28(6):727-38
    1. J Comp Neurol. 1988 Jun 15;272(3):424-36
    1. J Physiol. 1989 Jul;414:223-43
    1. Science. 1988 Jul 8;241(4862):170-6
    1. Science. 1988 May 6;240(4853):740-9
    1. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1988 Mar-Apr;71(2):89-99
    1. Brain Lang. 1985 Jul;25(2):314-22
    1. J Comp Neurol. 1989 Oct 8;288(2):280-96
    1. Neuropsychologia. 1988;26(6):917-24
    1. J Neurosci. 1987 Nov;7(11):3416-68
    1. Perception. 1987;16(2):215-21
    1. Vision Res. 1987;27(2):165-77
    1. Ann Neurol. 1985 Aug;18(2):222-33
    1. J Neurosci. 1990 Jul;10(7):2223-37
    1. J Am Optom Assoc. 1990 Feb;61(2):137-46
    1. Annu Rev Psychol. 1990;41:635-58
    1. J Physiol. 1982 Sep;330:125-43
    1. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1983 Dec;9(6):923-35
    1. Brain Lang. 1980 Mar;9(2):182-98
    1. Brain Res. 1977 Feb 25;122(3):393-413
    1. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1978 Jul;17(7):652-9
    1. Vision Res. 1973 Aug;13(8):1577-601
    1. J Physiol. 1970 May;207(3):635-52

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa