Comparison of perioperative stress in patients undergoing thyroid surgery with and without neuromonitoring-a pilot study

Dominika Babińska, Marcin Barczyński, Tomasz Osęka, Maciej Śledziński, Andrzej J Łachiński, Dominika Babińska, Marcin Barczyński, Tomasz Osęka, Maciej Śledziński, Andrzej J Łachiński

Abstract

Purpose: A comprehensive psychological comparison of preoperative stress in patients scheduled for thyroidectomy with versus without intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (IONM) has never been reported. The aim of this study was to assess whether a planned utilization of IONM had any effect on the reduction of stress and anxiety level before and after thyroid surgery.

Methods: The outcomes of 32 patients scheduled for thyroidectomy with IONM were compared to the outcomes of a carefully matched control group of 39 patients operated on without IONM. All the patients were tested before the surgery and at 1-7 days postoperatively employing psychological self-report instruments: the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ), Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head and Neck Scale (FACT H&N), and the visual analog scale (VAS).

Results: The examined groups were homogenous and carefully matched in terms of mental health (GHQ), the quality of life (FACT H&N), and the intensity of depression level (DASS). The IONM group showed a significantly lower level of "the state anxiety"(STAI) 1 day before the operation (p < 0.05), greater trust in the doctor (VAS) (p < 0.05), and greater confidence in the treatment method (VAS) as compared to the patients in the control group (p < 0.05), while no significant differences were found when the remaining items were compared.

Conclusions: The planned use of IONM during thyroidectomy may reduce patient anxiety before surgery. However, further research in this area is necessary to confirm this preliminary finding in a larger population of patients.

Keywords: Anxiety; Intraoperative neuromonitoring; Stress; Thyroidectomy.

Conflict of interest statement

Funding

No funding was received for research or publication.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Significant negative correlation between A-state before the operation and “satisfaction with surgery” after the operation, as presented by VAS (r = −0.31324, p < 0.05)

References

    1. Vileikyte L. Stress and wound healing. Clin Dermatol. 2007;25:49–55. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2006.09.005.
    1. Maes M, Song C, Lin A, De Jongh R, Van Gastel A, Kenis G, Bosmans E, De Meester I, Benoy I, Neels H, Demedts P, Janca A, Scharpé S, Smith RS. The effects of psychological stress on humans: increased production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and a Th1-like response in stress-induced anxiety. Cytokine. 1998;10(4):313–318. doi: 10.1006/cyto.1997.0290.
    1. Gouin JP, Kiecolt-Glaser JK. The impact of psychological stress on wound healing: methods and mechanisms. Immunol Allergy Clin N Am. 2011;31(1):81–93. doi: 10.1016/j.iac.2010.09.010.
    1. Appels A, Bär FW, Bär J, Bruggeman C, de Baets M. Inflammation, depressive symptomatology, and coronary artery disease. Psychosom Med. 2000;62(5):601–605. doi: 10.1097/00006842-200009000-00001.
    1. Pradhan AD, Manson JE, Rifai N, Buring JE, Ridker PM. C-reactive protein, interleukin 6, and risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus. JAMA. 2001;286(3):327–334. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.3.327.
    1. Harris TB, Ferrucci L, Tracy RP, Corti MC, Wacholder S, Ettinger WH, Jr, Heimovitz H, Cohen HJ, Wallace R. Associations of elevated interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein levels with mortality in the elderly. Am J Med. 1999;106(5):506–512. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9343(99)00066-2.
    1. Schulz R, Beach SR. Caregiving as a risk factor for mortality: the caregiver health effects study. JAMA. 1999;282(23):2215–2219. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.23.2215.
    1. Selye H. Stress without distress. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott Co.; 1974. pp. 137–141.
    1. Szabo S, Tache Y, Somogyi A. The legacy of Hans Selye and the origins of stress research: a retrospective 75 years after his landmark brief “letter” to the editor# of nature. Stress. 2012;15(5):472–478. doi: 10.3109/10253890.2012.710919.
    1. Broadbent E, Petrie KJ, Alley PG, Booth RJ. Psychological stress impairs early wound repair following surgery. Psychosom Med. 2003;65(5):865–869. doi: 10.1097/01.PSY.0000088589.92699.30.
    1. Linn BS, Linn MW, Klimas NG. Effects of psychophysical stress on surgical outcome. Psychosom Med. 1988;50(3):230–244. doi: 10.1097/00006842-198805000-00002.
    1. Barczyński M, Konturek A, Pragacz K, Papier A, Stopa M, Nowak W. Intraoperative nerve monitoring can reduce prevalence of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury in thyroid reoperations: results of a retrospective cohort study. World J Surg. 2014;38:599–606. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2260-x.
    1. Lovibond SH, Lovibond PF. Manual for the depression anxiety stress scales. Sydney: Psychology Foundation; 1995.
    1. Crawford JR, Henry JD. The depression anxiety stress scales (DASS): normative data and latent structure in a large non-clinical sample. Br J Clin Psychol. 2003;42:111–131. doi: 10.1348/014466503321903544.
    1. Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene R, Vagg PR, Jacobs GA. Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1983.
    1. Grös DF, Antony MM, Simms LJ, McCabe RE. Psychometric properties of the state-trait inventory for cognitive and somatic anxiety (STICSA): comparison to the state-trait anxiety inventory (STAI) Psychol Assess. 2007;19(4):369–381. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.19.4.369.
    1. Goldberg DP. Manual of the general health questionnaire. Windsor: NFER-Nelson; 1978.
    1. Goldberg D, Williams P. A user’s guide to the general health questionnaire. Windsor: NFER-Nelson; 1988.
    1. Goldberg DP, Gater R, Sartorius N, Ustun TB, Piccinelli M, Gureje O, Rutter C. The validity of two versions of the GHQ in the WHO study of mental illness in general health care. Psychol Med. 1997;27(1):191–197. doi: 10.1017/S0033291796004242.
    1. Makowska Z, Merecz D. The usefulness of the Health Status Questionnaire: D. Goldberg’s GHQ-12 and GHQ-28 for diagnosis of mental disorders in workers. Med Pr. 2000;51(6):589–601.
    1. List MA, D’Antonio LL, Cella DF, Siston A, Mumby P, Haraf D, Vokes E. The performance status scale for head and neck cancer patients and the functional assessment of cancer therapy-head and neck scale. A study of utility and validity. Cancer. 1996;77(11):2294–2301. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960601)77:11<2294::AID-CNCR17>;2-S.
    1. Cella DF, Tulsky DS, Gray G, Sarafian B, Linn E, Bonomi A, Silberman M, Yellen SB, Winicour P, Brannon J, et al. The functional assessment of cancer therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure. J Clin Oncol. 1993;11:570–579. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.3.570.
    1. D’Antonio LL, Zimmerman GJ, Cella DF, Long SA. Quality of life and functional status measures in patients with head and neck cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;122:482–487. doi: 10.1001/archotol.1996.01890170018005.
    1. Ringash J, Bezjak A, O’Sullivan B, Redelmeier DA. Interpreting differences in quality of life: the FACT-H&N in laryngeal cancer patients. Qual Life Res. 2004;13(4):725–733. doi: 10.1023/B:QURE.0000021703.47079.46.
    1. Wewers ME, Lowe NK. A critical review of visual analogue scales in the measurement of clinical phenomena. Res Nurs Health. 1990;13:227–236. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770130405.
    1. Elliott T, Shewchuk R, Richards JS. Family caregiver problem solving abilities and adjustment during the initial year of the caregiving role. J Couns Psychol. 2001;48:223–232. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.48.2.223.
    1. Shewchuk R, Richards JS, Elliott T. Dynamic processes in health outcomes among caregivers of patients with spinal cord injuries. Health Psychol. 1998;17:125–129. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.17.2.125.
    1. Rosenberger PH, Jokl P, Ickovics J. Psychosocial factors and surgical outcomes: an evidence-based literature review. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006;14(7):397–405. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200607000-00002.
    1. Bodian CA, Freedman G, Hossain S, Eisenkraft JB, Beilin Y. The visual analog scale for pain: clinical significance in postoperative patients. Anesthesiology. 2001;95(6):1356–1361. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200112000-00013.
    1. Ahearn EP. The use of visual analog scales in mood disorders: a critical review. J Psychiatr Res. 1997;31(5):569–579. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3956(97)00029-0.
    1. Mendl M. Performing under pressure: stress and cognitive function. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 1999;65:221–244. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(99)00088-X.
    1. McEwen BS, Sapolsky RM. Stress and cognitive function. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1995;5:205–216. doi: 10.1016/0959-4388(95)80028-X.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorit ja yhteistyökumppanit

Sairaudet

Huumeiden interventiot

3
Tilaa