Intraoperative neuromonitoring versus visual nerve identification for prevention of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury in adults undergoing thyroid surgery

Abstract

Background: Injuries to the recurrent inferior laryngeal nerve (RILN) remain one of the major post-operative complications after thyroid and parathyroid surgery. Damage to this nerve can result in a temporary or permanent palsy, which is associated with vocal cord paresis or paralysis. Visual identification of the RILN is a common procedure to prevent nerve injury during thyroid and parathyroid surgery. Recently, intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) has been introduced in order to facilitate the localisation of the nerves and to prevent their injury during surgery. IONM permits nerve identification using an electrode, where, in order to measure the nerve response, the electric field is converted to an acoustic signal.

Objectives: To assess the effects of IONM versus visual nerve identification for the prevention of RILN injury in adults undergoing thyroid surgery.

Search methods: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, ICTRP Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov. The date of the last search of all databases was 21 August 2018. We did not apply any language restrictions.

Selection criteria: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing IONM nerve identification plus visual nerve identification versus visual nerve identification alone for prevention of RILN injury in adults undergoing thyroid surgery DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently screened titles and abstracts for relevance. One review author carried out screening for inclusion, data extraction and 'Risk of bias' assessment and a second review author checked them. For dichotomous outcomes, we calculated risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). For continuous outcomes, we calculated mean differences (MDs) with 95% CIs. We assessed trials for certainty of the evidence using the GRADE instrument.

Main results: Five RCTs with 1558 participants (781 participants were randomly assigned to IONM and 777 to visual nerve identification only) met the inclusion criteria; two trials were performed in Poland and one trial each was performed in China, Korea and Turkey. Inclusion and exclusion criteria differed among trials: previous thyroid or parathyroid surgery was an exclusion criterion in three trials. In contrast, this was a specific inclusion criterion in another trial. Three trials had central neck compartment dissection or lateral neck dissection and Graves' disease as exclusion criteria. The mean duration of follow-up ranged from 6 to 12 months. The mean age of participants ranged between 41.7 years and 51.9 years.There was no firm evidence of an advantage or disadvantage comparing IONM with visual nerve identification only for permanent RILN palsy (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.33 to 1.77; P = 0.54; 4 trials; 2895 nerves at risk; very low-certainty evidence) or transient RILN palsy (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.08; P = 0.09; 4 trials; 2895 nerves at risk; very low-certainty evidence). None of the trials reported health-related quality of life. Transient hypoparathyroidism as an adverse event was not substantially different between intervention and comparator groups (RR 1.25; 95% CI 0.45 to 3.47; P = 0.66; 2 trials; 286 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Operative time was comparable between IONM and visual nerve monitoring alone (MD 5.5 minutes, 95% CI -0.7 to 11.8; P = 0.08; 3 trials; 1251 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Three of five included trials provided data on all-cause mortality: no deaths were reported. None of the trials reported socioeconomic effects. The evidence reported in this review was mostly of very low certainty, particularly because of risk of bias, a high degree of imprecision due to wide confidence intervals and substantial between-study heterogeneity.

Authors' conclusions: Results from this systematic review and meta-analysis indicate that there is currently no conclusive evidence for the superiority or inferiority of IONM over visual nerve identification only on any of the outcomes measured. Well-designed, executed, analysed and reported RCTs with a larger number of participants and longer follow-up, employing the latest IONM technology and applying new surgical techniques are needed.

Conflict of interest statement

RC: none known AA: none known VA: none known IA: none known GP: none known NA: none known RP: none known CG: Chiara Gerardi and her institution (along with other collegues) are involved in investigator‐initiated trials on the use of HIPEC in the surgical treatment of gastric and colorectal cancer. These studies receive an unconditional grants from a commercial entity. BMH: none known JR: none known MB: was the principal investigator of Barczyński 2009; Barczynski 2012.

Figures

1

Nerve integrity monitoring endotracheal tube for electromyography signals of a patient's laryngeal muscles (drawn by Silvia Marola)

2

Monitoring endotracheal tube in position positioned at the patient's vocal folds (drawn by Silvia Marola)

3

Basic monitoring equipment setup (drawn by Silvia Marola)
EMG: electromyography;ET: endotracheal tube; GND: ground electrodes; REC: recording electrodes

4

Trial flow diagram

5

'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included trial ((blank cells indicate that the particular outcome was not measured in the associated trial)

6

'Risk of bias' graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included trials (blank cells indicate that the particular outcome was not measured in some or all trials)