Bioavailability Evaluation of Venetoclax Lower-Strength Tablets and Oral Powder Formulations to Establish Interchangeability with the 100 mg Tablet

Mohamed Badawi, Xin Chen, Patrick Marroum, Ahmed A Suleiman, Sven Mensing, Anette Koenigsdorfer, Julia Teresa Schiele, Tammy Palenski, Divya Samineni, David Hoffman, Rajeev Menon, Ahmed Hamed Salem, Mohamed Badawi, Xin Chen, Patrick Marroum, Ahmed A Suleiman, Sven Mensing, Anette Koenigsdorfer, Julia Teresa Schiele, Tammy Palenski, Divya Samineni, David Hoffman, Rajeev Menon, Ahmed Hamed Salem

Abstract

Background and objective: Venetoclax is an approved BCL-2 inhibitor, currently under evaluation in different hematological malignancies in adult and pediatric populations. Venetoclax is available as 10, 50, and 100 mg tablets. To provide an alternative to patients who find taking the commonly prescribed 100 mg tablet a challenge, the interchangeability of lower-strength tablets with the 100 mg tablet was investigated. Additionally, newly developed oral suspension powder formulations to facilitate dosing in pediatrics were evaluated.

Methods: Pharmacokinetic data from 80 healthy female participants from three phase I studies were utilized to evaluate the bioavailability of (1) 10 and 50 mg tablets relative to a 100 mg tablet; (2) 0.72 and 7.2% (drug to total weight) oral powder formulations relative to the 100 mg tablet; and (3) oral powder formulations administered using different vehicles (apple juice, apple sauce, and yogurt) relative to water under fed conditions.

Results: Bioavailability assessments at a 100 mg dose of venetoclax demonstrated bioequivalence across the 10, 50, and 100 mg tablet strengths. Oral powder formulations met the bioequivalence criteria (0.80-1.25) with respect to area under the concentration-time curve to time of the last measurable concentration (AUCt) and to infinite time (AUC∞) but exhibited a slightly lower maximum plasma concentration (Cmax). Exposure-response analyses were utilized to demonstrate that the lower Cmax observed with the powder formulations is not clinically meaningful. The delivery vehicles tested did not affect the bioavailability of venetoclax oral powder formulations.

Conclusions: The smaller-sized tablets (10 and 50 mg) and the newly developed oral powder formulations of venetoclax can be used interchangeably with the 100 mg tablets to improve the patients' experience, while maintaining adequate exposure. CLINICAL TRIALS IDENTIFIERS: NCT01682616, 11 September 2012; NCT02005471, 9 December 2013; NCT02242942, 17 September 2014; NCT02203773, 30 July 2014; NCT02287233, 10 November 2014; NCT02993523, 15 December 2016; NCT03069352, 3 March 2017.

Conflict of interest statement

Mohamed Badawi, Xin Chen, Patrick Marroum, Ahmed A. Suleiman, Sven Mensing, Anette Koenigsdorfer, Julia Teresa Schiele, David Hoffman, Rajeev Menon, and Ahmed Hamed Salem are employees of AbbVie Inc. and may hold AbbVie stock and/or stock options. Divya Samineni is an employee of Genentech and may hold Genentech stock and/or stock options. Tammy Palenski is a former employee of AbbVie and may hold AbbVie stock and/or stock options.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Venetoclax mean (± SD) plasma concentration–time profiles for a venetoclax tablet strength bioavailability assessments in Study 1; b venetoclax 7.2% oral powder formulation bioavailability assessments in Study 2; and c vehicle bioavailability assessments of venetoclax 7.2% oral powder formulation in Study 3. All groups in all three studies were administered a dose of 100 mg of venetoclax. N number of participants in each group, SD standard deviation
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Exposure–response quartile plots of venetoclax Cmax,ss vs. efficacy endpoints in CLL or AML patients receiving a venetoclax with rituximab (Studies NCT01682616 and NCT02005471); b venetoclax with obinutuzumab (Study NCT02242942); c venetoclax with hypomethylating agent (Studies NCT02203773 and NCT02993523); and d venetoclax with low-dose cytarabine (Studies NCT02287233 and NCT03069352). Note: Mean venetoclax Cmax,ss and 28% lower Cmax,ss for patients receiving 400 mg of venetoclax with RTX were 1.85 and 1.33 μg/mL, respectively. Mean venetoclax Cmax,ss and 28% lower Cmax,ss for patients receiving 400 mg of venetoclax with OBZ were 1.58 and 1.14 μg/mL, respectively. Mean venetoclax Cmax,ss and 28% lower Cmax,ss for patients receiving 400 mg of venetoclax in combination with HMA were 2.83 and 2.04 μg/mL, respectively. Mean venetoclax Cmax,ss and 28% lower Cmax,ss for patients receiving 600 mg of venetoclax in combination with LDAC were 3.42 and 2.46 μg/mL, respectively. AML acute myeloid leukemia, BEND bendamustine, CHLOR chlorambucil, CLL chronic lymphocytic leukemia, Cmax,ss steady-state maximum plasma concentration, CR complete response, CRi complete response with incomplete marrow recovery, HMA hypomethylating agent, LDAC low-dose cytarabine, OBZ obinutuzumab, ORR overall response rate, RTX rituximab, VEN venetoclax

References

    1. AbbVie Inc. Venclexta (venetoclax) [package insert]. US Food and Drug Administration. Revised November 2020. Available at: . Accessed Jan 2022.
    1. Kaufman JL, Gasparetto C, Schjesvold FH, Moreau P, Touzeau C, Facon T, et al. Targeting BCL-2 with venetoclax and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory t(11;14) multiple myeloma. Am J Hematol. 2021;96(4):418–427. doi: 10.1002/ajh.26083.
    1. Alaarg A, Menon R, Rizzo D, Liu Y, Bien J, Elkinton T, et al. A microdosing framework for absolute bioavailability assessment of poorly soluble drugs: a case study on cold-labeled venetoclax, from chemistry to the clinic. Clin Transl Sci. 2022;15(1):244–254. doi: 10.1111/cts.13144.
    1. Choo EF, Boggs J, Zhu C, Lubach JW, Catron ND, Jenkins G, et al. The role of lymphatic transport on the systemic bioavailability of the Bcl-2 protein family inhibitors navitoclax (ABT-263) and ABT-199. Drug Metab Dispos. 2014;42(2):207–212. doi: 10.1124/dmd.113.055053.
    1. Salem AH, Agarwal SK, Dunbar M, Enschede SL, Humerickhouse RA, Wong SL. Pharmacokinetics of venetoclax, a novel BCL-2 inhibitor, in patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia or non-Hodgkin lymphoma. J Clin Pharmacol. 2017;57(4):484–492. doi: 10.1002/jcph.821.
    1. Salem AH, Agarwal SK, Dunbar M, Nuthalapati S, Chien D, Freise KJ, et al. Effect of low- and high-fat meals on the pharmacokinetics of venetoclax, a selective first-in-class BCL-2 inhibitor. J Clin Pharmacol. 2016;56(11):1355–1361. doi: 10.1002/jcph.741.
    1. AbbVie Inc. Summary of product characteristics: venclyxto film-coated tablets 100mg (Great Britain). Electronic Medicines Compendium (EMC). Last updated 3 March 2022. Available at: . Accessed 25 May 2022.
    1. AbbVie Inc. Summary of product characteristics: venclyxto film-coated tablets 10mg (Great Britain). Electronic Medicines Compendium (EMC). Last updated 3 March 2022. Available at: . Accessed 25 May 2022.
    1. AbbVie Inc. Summary of product characteristics: venclyxto 50 mg film-coated tablets (Great Britain). Electronic Medicines Compendium (EMC). Last updated 3 March 2022. Available at: . Accessed 25 May 2022.
    1. AbbVie, Inc. VENCLEXTA (venetoclax) [package insert]. US Food and Drug Administration. Available at: . Revised October 2021. Accessed 25 Mar 2022.
    1. AbbVie Inc. Prescribing information for venclexta. North Chicago: AbbVie Inc; 2018.
    1. US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health. National Cancer Institute DCTD Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis. Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 5.0. Published 27 November 2017. Available at: . Accessed 20 May 2022.
    1. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191–2194. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053.
    1. Liu H, Michmerhuizen MJ, Lao Y, Wan K, Salem AH, Sawicki J, et al. Metabolism and disposition of a novel B-cell lymphoma-2 inhibitor venetoclax in humans and characterization of its unusual metabolites. Drug Metab Dispos. 2017;45(3):294–305. doi: 10.1124/dmd.116.071613.
    1. Salem AH, Hu B, Freise KJ, Agarwal SK, Sidhu DS, Wong SL. Evaluation of the pharmacokinetic interaction between venetoclax, a selective BCL-2 inhibitor, and warfarin in healthy volunteers. Clin Drug Investig. 2017;37(3):303–309. doi: 10.1007/s40261-016-0485-9.
    1. Seymour JF, Ma S, Brander DM, Choi MY, Barrientos J, Davids MS, et al. Venetoclax plus rituximab in relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: a phase 1b study. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(2):230–240. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30012-8.
    1. Roberts AW, Ma S, Kipps TJ, Coutre SE, Davids MS, Eichhorst B, et al. Efficacy of venetoclax in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia is influenced by disease and response variables. Blood. 2019;134(2):111–122. doi: 10.1182/blood.2018882555.
    1. Seymour JF, Kipps TJ, Eichhorst B, Hillmen P, D’Rozario J, Assouline S, et al. Venetoclax-rituximab in relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(12):1107–1120. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1713976.
    1. Al-Sawaf O, Zhang C, Tandon M, Sinha A, Fink AM, Robrecht S, et al. Venetoclax plus obinutuzumab versus chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab for previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL14): follow-up results from a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(9):1188–1200. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30443-5.
    1. DiNardo CD, Pratz KW, Letai A, Jonas BA, Wei AH, Thirman M, et al. Safety and preliminary efficacy of venetoclax with decitabine or azacitidine in elderly patients with previously untreated acute myeloid leukaemia: a non-randomised, open-label, phase 1b study. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19(2):216–228. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30010-X.
    1. DiNardo CD, Jonas BA, Pullarkat V, Thirman MJ, Garcia JS, Wei AH, et al. Azacitidine and venetoclax in previously untreated acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(7):617–629. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2012971.
    1. Wei AH, Strickland SA, Jr, Hou JZ, Fiedler W, Lin TL, Walter RB, et al. Venetoclax combined with low-dose cytarabine for previously untreated patients with acute myeloid leukemia: results from a phase Ib/II study. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(15):1277–1284. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01600.
    1. Wei AH, Montesinos P, Ivanov V, DiNardo CD, Novak J, Laribi K, et al. Venetoclax plus LDAC for newly diagnosed AML ineligible for intensive chemotherapy: a phase 3 randomized placebo-controlled trial. Blood. 2020;135(24):2137–2145. doi: 10.1182/blood.2020004856.
    1. Fischer K, Al-Sawaf O, Bahlo J, Fink AM, Tandon M, Dixon M, et al. Venetoclax and obinutuzumab in patients with CLL and coexisting conditions. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(23):2225–2236. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1815281.
    1. Gong JQX, Suleiman AA, Mensing S, Salem AH. Pooled population pharmacokinetic analyses of venetoclax in multiple patient populations and healthy subjects: analyses of phase 1, 2 and 3 clinical trials. In preparation.
    1. Atreja A, Bellam N, Levy SR. Strategies to enhance patient adherence: making it simple. MedGenMed. 2005;7(1):4.
    1. Salem AH, Tao ZF, Bueno OF, Chen J, Chen S, Edalji R, et al. Expanding the repertoire for “Large Small Molecules”: prodrug ABBV-167 efficiently converts to venetoclax with reduced food effect in healthy volunteers. Mol Cancer Ther. 2021;20(6):999–1008. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-21-0077.
    1. Nunn T, Williams J. Formulation of medicines for children. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2005;59(6):674–676. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2005.02410.x.
    1. Pal A, Brasseur JG, Abrahamsson B. A stomach road or "Magenstrasse" for gastric emptying. J Biomech. 2007;40(6):1202–1210. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.06.006.
    1. Deng R, Gibiansky L, Lu T, Li X, Lu D, Li C, et al. Exposure-response analysis of venetoclax in combination with rituximab in patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia: pooled results from a phase 1b study and the phase 3 MURANO study. Leuk Lymphoma. 2020;61(1):56–65. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2019.1657575.
    1. Freise KJ, Jones AK, Menon R, Verdugo M, Humerickhouse R, Awni W, et al. Relationship between venetoclax exposure, rituximab coadministration, and progression-free survival in patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia: demonstration of synergy. Hematol Oncol. 2017;35(4):679–684. doi: 10.1002/hon.2373.
    1. Agarwal SK, Mangal N, Menon RM, Freise KJ, Salem AH. Response rates as predictors of overall survival: a meta-analysis of acute myeloid leukemia trials. J Cancer. 2017;8(9):1562–1567. doi: 10.7150/jca.18686.
    1. Freise KJ, Jones AK, Eckert D, Mensing S, Wong SL, Humerickhouse RA, et al. Impact of venetoclax exposure on clinical efficacy and safety in patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2017;56(5):515–523. doi: 10.1007/s40262-016-0453-9.
    1. Agarwal S, Gopalakrishnan S, Mensing S, Potluri J, Hayslip J, Kirschbrown W, et al. Optimizing venetoclax dose in combination with low intensive therapies in elderly patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia: an exposure-response analysis. Hematol Oncol. 2019;37(4):464–473. doi: 10.1002/hon.2646.
    1. Coupland JN, Hayes JE. Physical approaches to masking bitter taste: lessons from food and pharmaceuticals. Pharm Res. 2014;31(11):2921–2939. doi: 10.1007/s11095-014-1480-6.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa