Validity of the Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale to measure subjective perception of spine deformity in patients with idiopathic scoliosis

Sonia Pineda, Juan Bago, Carmen Gilperez, Jose M Climent, Sonia Pineda, Juan Bago, Carmen Gilperez, Jose M Climent

Abstract

Background: The Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale (WRVAS) was designed to allow idiopathic scoliosis patients to describe their perception of their deformity. In a previous stduy, the scale has shown good correlation with magnitude of the curve

Methods: The study included 70 patients (60 women and 10 men), mean age 19.4 years (range 12-40), with idiopathic scoliosis. Each patient filled out the WRVAS and the SRS-22 questionnaire. Thoracic and lumbar curve angles were determined in standing X-rays and the largest was named Cobbmax. WRVAS internal consistency was assessed with Cronbach's alpha. Correlation coefficients were calculated between Cobbmax and the various WRVAS questions, and Cobbmax and the SRS-22 scales. The correlation between the WRVAS and SRS-22 was also determined

Results: Mean magnitudes were thoracic curve, 36.6 degrees and lumbar curve, 33.2 degrees; average Cobbmax was 37.9 degrees. The mean total WRVAS score was 15.6. Mean scores for the various SRS-22 scales were function 4.6, pain 4.3, self-image 3.7, mental health 4.2, and total score 84.1. Internal consistency for the WRVAS was excellent (Cronbach's alpha, 0.9), and there were no signs of collinearity among the seven questions (tolerance range 0.2-0.5). All the items on the WRVAS correlated significantly with Cobbmax (correlation coefficients, 0.4 to 0.7). The correlation between the total WRVAS and total SRS-22 score was -0.54 (P = .0001) and between WRVAS total score and SRS-22 image domain score was -0.57 (p = 0.0001)

Conclusion: The WRVAS showed excellent internal consistency and absence of collinearity. There was a highly significant correlation between the results of the test and the magnitude of the deformity. The WRVAS correlated significantly with the SRS-22 image scale. The WRVAS is a valid instrument to assess scoliosis patients perception of their deformity.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The Walter Reed Visual Assessment Scale. (used with permission from Sanders et al.18).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Plot of WRVAS total score and Cobbmax.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Plot of SRS-22 total score and Cobbmax. Comparing the slope of the regression line from figures 1 and 2, it is evident that a better correlation exists between WRVAS and Cobbmax.

References

    1. Bridwell KH, Shufflebarger HL, Lenke LG, Lowe TG, Betz RR. Parents' and patients' preferences and concerns in idiopathic adolescent scoliosis. A cross-sectional preoperative analysis. Spine. 2000;25:2392–2399. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200009150-00020.
    1. Negrini S, Grivas TB, Kotwicki T, Maruyama T, Rigo M, Weiss HR, the members of the Scientific Society On Scoliosis Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Treatment (SOSORT) Why do we treat adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? What we want to obtain and to avoid for our patients. SOSORT 2005 Consensus paper. Scoliosis. 2006;1:4. doi: 10.1186/1748-7161-1-4.
    1. Daruwalla JS, Balasubramaniam P. Moiré topography in scoliosis. Its accuracy in detecting the site and size of the curve. J Bone Jt Surg (Br) 1985;67:211–213.
    1. Denton TE, Randall FM, Deinlein DA. The use of instant Moiré photographs to reduce exposure from scoliosis radiographs. Spine. 1992;17:509–512. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199205000-00007.
    1. Carr AJ, Jefferson RJ, Turner-Smith AR, Beavis A. An analysis of normal back shape measured by ISIS scanning. Spine. 1991;16:656–659. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199106000-00011.
    1. Asher M, Min LS, Burton D, Manna B. The Influence of Spine and Trunk Deformity on Preoperative Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients' Health-related Quality of Life Questionnaire Responses. Spine. 2004;29:861–868. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200404150-00008.
    1. Goldberg CJ, Kaliszer M, Moore DP, Fogarty EE, Dowling FE. Surface topography, Cobb angles and cosmetic change in scoliosis. Spine. 2001;26:E55–E63. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200102150-00005.
    1. Sanders JO, Polly DW, Cats-Baril W, Jones JA, Lenke LG, O'Brien MF, Richards BS, Sucato DJ. Analysis of patient and parent assessment of deformity in idiopathic scoliosis using the Walter-Reed Visual Assessment Scale. Spine. 2003;28:2158–2163. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000084629.97042.0B.
    1. Theologis TN, Jefferson RJ, Simpson AHRW, Turner-Smith AR, Fairbank JCT. Quantifying the cosmetic defect of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 1993;18:909–912. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199306000-00016.
    1. Climent JM, Reig A, Sanchez J, Roda C. Construction and validation of a specific quality of life instrument for adolescents with spine deformities. Spine. 1995;20:2006–2011. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199509150-00011.
    1. Asher M, Min LS, Burton D, Manna B. Discrimination validity of the scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire: relationship to idiopathic scoliosis curve pattern and curve size. Spine. 2003;28:74–78. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200301010-00017.
    1. Asher M, Min LS, Burton D, Manna B. Scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire: responsiveness to change associated with surgical treatment. Spine. 2003;28:70–73. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200301010-00016.
    1. Asher M, Min LS, Burton D, Manna B. The reliability and concurrent validity of the scoliosis research society-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2003;28:63–69. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200301010-00015.
    1. Asher MA, Lai SM, Glattes RC, Burton DC, Alanay A, Bago J. Refinement of the SRS-22 Health-Related Quality of Life questionnaire Function domain. Spine. 2006;31:593–597. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000201331.50597.ea.
    1. Bago J, Climent JM, Ey A, Perez-Grueso FJS, Izquierdo E. The Spanish version of the SRS-22 patient questionnaire for idiopathic scoliosis: transcultural adaptation and reliability analysis. Spine. 2004;29:1676–1680. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000132306.53942.10.
    1. Climent JM, Bago J, Ey A, Perez-Grueso FJS, Izquierdo E. Validity of the Spanish version of the Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) Patient Questionnaire. Spine. 2005;30:705–709. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000155408.76606.8f.
    1. Belsley DA, Kuh E, Wiklund I. Regression diagnostics. Identifying influential data and source of collinearity. New York, Wiley; 1980.
    1. Bland JM, Altman DG. Validating scales and indexes. BMJ. 2002;324:606–607. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7337.606.
    1. Lai SM, Asher M, Burton D. Estimating SRS-22 quality of life measures with SF-36: application inidiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2006;31:473–478. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000200049.94329.f4.
    1. Danielsson AJ, Wiklund I, Pehrsson , Nachemson A. Health-related quality of life in patients with idiopathic scoliosis: a matched follow-up at least 20 years after treatment with brace or surgery. Eur Spine J. 2001;10:278–288. doi: 10.1007/s005860100309.
    1. Raso J, Lou EM, Hill DL, Mahood JK, Moreau MJ, Durdle NG. Trunk distortion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 1998;18:222–226. doi: 10.1097/00004694-199803000-00017.
    1. Pratt RK, Burwell RG, Cole AA, Webb JK. Patient and parental perception of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis before and after surgery in comparison with surface and radiographic measurements. Spine. 2002;27:1543–50. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200207150-00012.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa