Preoperative anxiety in adults - a cross-sectional study on specific fears and risk factors

Leopold Eberhart, Hansjörg Aust, Maike Schuster, Theresa Sturm, Markus Gehling, Frank Euteneuer, Dirk Rüsch, Leopold Eberhart, Hansjörg Aust, Maike Schuster, Theresa Sturm, Markus Gehling, Frank Euteneuer, Dirk Rüsch

Abstract

Background: Preoperative anxiety comprising anesthesia and surgery related anxiety is common and perceived by many patients as the worst aspect of the surgical episode. The aim of this study was to identify independent predictors of these three anxieties dimensions and to quantify the relevance of specific fears particularly associated with anesthesia.

Methods: This study was part of a cross-sectional survey in patients scheduled to undergo elective surgery. Anxiety levels were measured with the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS). Modified numeric rating scales (mNRS, range 0-10) were used to assess the severity of eight selected specific fears which were predominantly analyzed descriptively. Multivariate stepwise linear regression was applied to determine independent predictors of all three anxiety dimensions (APAIS anxiety subscales).

Results: 3087 of the 3200 enrolled patients were analyzed. Mean (SD) total preoperative anxiety (APAIS-A-T, range 4-20) was 9.9 (3.6). High anxiety (APAIS-A-T > 10) was reported by 40.5% of subjects. Mean (SD) levels of concern regarding the eight studied specific fears ranged from 3.9 (3.08) concerning "Anesthesiologist error" to 2.4 (2.29) concerning "Fatigue and drowsiness" with an average of 3.2 (2.84) concerning all specific fears. Ranking of all specific fears according to mean mNRS scores was almost identical in patients with high versus those with low anxiety. Among nine independent predictors of anxiety, only 3 variables (female gender, negative and positive anesthetic experience) independently predicted all three APAIS anxiety subscales. Other variables had a selective impact on one or two APAIS anxiety subscales only. Female gender had the strongest impact on all three APAIS anxiety subscales. Adjusted r2 values of the three models were all below 13%.

Conclusions: The high variability of importance assigned to all specific fears suggests an individualized approach is advisable when support of anxious patients is intended. Considering independent predictors of anxiety to estimate each patient's anxiety level is of limited use given the very low predictive capacity of all three models. The clinical benefit of dividing patients into those with high and low anxiety is questionable.

Trial registration: German Registry of Clinical Trials (DRKS00016725), retrospectively registered.

Keywords: Anesthesia related anxiety; Cross-sectional survey; Independent predictors; Multivariate regression; Preoperative anxiety; Specific concerns; Surgery related anxiety.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. Walker EM, Bell M, Cook TM, Grocott MP, Moonesinghe SR. Patient reported outcome of adult perioperative anaesthesia in the United Kingdom: a cross-sectional observational study. Br J Anaesth. 2016;117(6):758–766. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew381.
    1. Aust H, Eberhart L, Sturm T, Schuster M, Nestoriuc Y, Brehm F, et al. A cross-sectional study on preoperative anxiety in adults. J Psychosom Res. 2018;111:133–139. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2018.05.012.
    1. Aust H, Rusch D, Schuster M, Sturm T, Brehm F, Nestoriuc Y. Coping strategies in anxious surgical patients. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16:250. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1492-5.
    1. Matthey P, Finucane BT, Finegan BA. The attitude of the general public towards preoperative assessment and risks associated with general anesthesia. Can J Anaesth. 2001;48(4):333–339. doi: 10.1007/BF03014959.
    1. Kindler CH, Harms C, Amsler F, Ihde-Scholl T, Scheidegger D. The visual analog scale allows effective measurement of preoperative anxiety and detection of patients’ anesthetic concerns. Anesth Analg. 2000;90(3):706–712. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200003000-00036.
    1. Macario A, Weinger M, Carney S, Kim A. Which clinical anesthesia outcomes are important to avoid? The perspective of patients. Anesth Analg. 1999;89(3):652–658.
    1. Mitchell M. General anaesthesia and day-case patient anxiety. J Adv Nurs. 2010;66(5):1059–1071. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05266.x.
    1. McCleane GJ, Cooper R. The nature of pre-operative anxiety. Anaesthesia. 1990;45(2):153–155. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1990.tb14285.x.
    1. Shevde K, Panagopoulos G. A survey of 800 patients’ knowledge, attitudes, and concerns regarding anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1991;73(2):190–198. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199108000-00013.
    1. Nigussie S, Belachew T, Wolancho W. Predictors of preoperative anxiety among surgical patients in Jimma University Specialized Teaching Hospital, South Western Ethiopia. BMC Surg. 2014;14:67. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-14-67.
    1. Mitchell M. Influence of gender and anaesthesia type on day surgery anxiety. J Adv Nurs. 2012;68(5):1014–1025. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05801.x.
    1. Shafer A, Fish MP, Gregg KM, Seavello J, Kosek P. Preoperative anxiety and fear: a comparison of assessments by patients and anesthesia and surgery residents. Anesth Analg. 1996;83(6):1285–1291. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199612000-00027.
    1. Royston D, Cox F. Anaesthesia: the patient's point of view. Lancet. 2003;362(9396):1648–1658. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14800-3.
    1. Moerman N, van Dam FS, Muller MJ, Oosting H. The Amsterdam preoperative anxiety and information scale (APAIS) Anesth Analg. 1996;82(3):445–451.
    1. Domar AD, Everett LL, Keller MG. Preoperative anxiety: is it a predictable entity? Anesth Analg. 1989;69(6):763–767. doi: 10.1213/00000539-198912000-00013.
    1. Badner NH, Nielson WR, Munk S, Kwiatkowska C, Gelb AW. Preoperative anxiety: detection and contributing factors. Can J Anaesth. 1990;37(4 Pt 1):444–447. doi: 10.1007/BF03005624.
    1. Karanci AN, Dirik G. Predictors of pre- and postoperative anxiety in emergency surgery patients. J Psychosom Res. 2003;55(4):363–369. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3999(02)00631-1.
    1. Jawaid M, Mushtaq A, Mukhtar S, Khan Z. Preoperative anxiety before elective surgery. Neurosciences (Riyadh) 2007;12(2):145–148.
    1. Laufenberg-Feldmann R, Kappis B. Assessing preoperative anxiety using a questionnaire and clinical rating: a prospective observational study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2013;30(12):758–763. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283631751.
    1. Goncalves KK, Silva JI, Gomes ET, Pinheiro LL, Figueiredo TR, Bezerra SM. Anxiety in the preoperative period of heart surgery. Rev Bras Enferm. 2016;69(2):397–403. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167.2016690225i.
    1. Caumo W, Schmidt AP, Schneider CN, Bergmann J, Iwamoto CW, Bandeira D, et al. Risk factors for preoperative anxiety in adults. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2001;45(3):298–307. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2001.045003298.x.
    1. Matthias AT, Samarasekera DN. Preoperative anxiety in surgical patients - experience of a single unit. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwanica. 2012;50(1):3–6. doi: 10.1016/j.aat.2012.02.004.
    1. Goebel S, Kaup L, Mehdorn HM. Measuring preoperative anxiety in patients with intracranial tumors: the Amsterdam preoperative anxiety and information scale. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2011;23(4):297–303. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0b013e318222b787.
    1. Williams JB, Alexander KP, Morin JF, Langlois Y, Noiseux N, Perrault LP, et al. Preoperative anxiety as a predictor of mortality and major morbidity in patients aged >70 years undergoing cardiac surgery. Am J Cardiol. 2013;111(1):137–142. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.08.060.
    1. Nishimori M, Moerman N, Fukuhara S, van Dam FS, Muller MJ, Hanaoka K, et al. Translation and validation of the Amsterdam preoperative anxiety and information scale (APAIS) for use in Japan. Qual Life Res. 2002;11(4):361–364. doi: 10.1023/A:1015561129899.
    1. Boker A, Brownell L, Donen N. The Amsterdam preoperative anxiety and information scale provides a simple and reliable measure of preoperative anxiety. Can J Anaesth. 2002;49(8):792–798. doi: 10.1007/BF03017410.
    1. Maurice-Szamburski A, Loundou A, Capdevila X, Bruder N, Auquier P. Validation of the French version of the Amsterdam preoperative anxiety and information scale (APAIS) Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013;11:166. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-166.
    1. Vergara-Romero M, Morales-Asencio JM, Morales-Fernandez A, Canca-Sanchez JC, Rivas-Ruiz F, Reinaldo-Lapuerta JA. Validation of the Spanish version of the Amsterdam preoperative anxiety and information scale (APAIS) Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017;15(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0695-8.
    1. Berth H, Petrowski K, Balck F. The Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS) - the first trial of a German version. Psychosoc Med. 2007;4:Doc01.
    1. Copeland GP, Jones D, Walters M. POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit. Br J Surg. 1991;78(3):355–360. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800780327.
    1. Fathi M, Alavi SM, Joudi M, Joudi M, Mahdikhani H, Ferasatkish R, et al. Preoperative anxiety in candidates for heart surgery. Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci. 2014;8(2):90–96.
    1. Bakhshaie J, Rogers AH, Kauffman BY, Fasteau M, Buckner JD, Schmidt NB, et al. Situational fears: association with negative affect-related smoking cognition among treatment seeking smokers. Addict Behav. 2018;85:158–163. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.06.009.
    1. Svicher A, Zvolensky MJ, Cosci F. Study of the relationship between anxiety sensitivity, smoking abstinence expectancies, nicotine withdrawal, and cigarette dependence among daily smokers. J Addict Dis. 2018;37(1–2):55–63. doi: 10.1080/10550887.2018.1542239.
    1. Zvolensky MJ, Feldner MT, Leen-Feldner EW, Gibson LE, Abrams K, Gregor K. Acute nicotine withdrawal symptoms and anxious responding to bodily sensations: a test of incremental predictive validity among young adult regular smokers. Behav Res Ther. 2005;43(12):1683–1700. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2004.10.010.
    1. Leventhal AM, Ameringer KJ, Osborn E, Zvolensky MJ, Langdon KJ. Anxiety and depressive symptoms and affective patterns of tobacco withdrawal. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013;133(2):324–329. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.06.015.
    1. Baumeister RF, Bratslavsky E, Finkenauer C, Vohs DV. Bad is stronger than good. Rev Gen Psychol. 2001;5(4):323–370. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorit ja yhteistyökumppanit

Sairaudet

Huumeiden interventiot

3
Tilaa