Clinical and Epidemiological Profile of Breast Cancer in Mexico: Results of the Seguro Popular

Nancy Reynoso-Noverón, Cynthia Villarreal-Garza, Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis, Claudia Arce-Salinas, Juan Matus-Santos, María Teresa Ramírez-Ugalde, Alberto Alvarado-Miranda, Paula Cabrera-Galeana, Abelardo Meneses-García, Fernando Lara-Medina, Enrique Bargalló-Rocha, Alejandro Mohar, Nancy Reynoso-Noverón, Cynthia Villarreal-Garza, Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis, Claudia Arce-Salinas, Juan Matus-Santos, María Teresa Ramírez-Ugalde, Alberto Alvarado-Miranda, Paula Cabrera-Galeana, Abelardo Meneses-García, Fernando Lara-Medina, Enrique Bargalló-Rocha, Alejandro Mohar

Abstract

Purpose One half of the Mexican population lacks comprehensive health care coverage. In 2003, a reform to the General Health Law was approved that led to the creation of the System of Social Protection in Health and made universal health coverage mandatory. The main innovation of this reform was Seguro Popular, which provided coverage for breast cancer. Here we report the outcomes of women with breast cancer treated at a cancer center in Mexico under Seguro Popular. Materials and Methods This was a retrospective cohort study that included all patients with breast cancer treated in the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología in Mexico City between January 2007 and December 2013 with Seguro Popular coverage. Demographic and clinical information were collected and survival outcomes were analyzed. Results A total of 4,300 women with breast cancer were included in this analysis. Most patients had locally advanced disease at diagnosis (53%, n = 2,293), and 13% (n = 558) presented with stage IV disease. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was administered to 1,834 patients (52%), with a pathologic complete response in 25.1% (n = 460). Median follow-up was 40.5 months. Five-year survival for the entire cohort was 82% (95% CI, 81% to 84%). Five-year survival was 97% for early-stage disease (95% CI, 95% to 98%), 82% for locally advanced disease (95% CI, 80% to 84%), and 36% for metastatic disease (95% CI, 30% to 42%). Conclusion This represents the first description of a cohort of patients with breast cancer treated in Mexico under Seguro Popular. Seguro Popular has allowed our institution, and other Mexican centers, to establish efficient standardized mechanisms to treat patients with breast cancer.

Conflict of interest statement

Nancy Reynoso-Noverón

No relationship to disclose

Cynthia Villarreal-Garza

Consulting or Advisory Role: Myriad Genetics, Roche

Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Myriad Genetics

Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis

Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb

Claudia Arce-Salinas

No relationship to disclose

Juan Matus-Santos

No relationship to disclose

María Teresa Ramírez-Ugalde

No relationship to disclose

Alberto Alvarado-Miranda

No relationship to disclose

Paula Cabrera-Galeana

Consulting or Advisory Role: Pfizer

Abelardo Meneses-García

No relationship to disclose

Fernando Lara-Medina

No relationship to disclose

Enrique Bargalló-Rocha

Speakers' Bureau: Genomic Health

Alejandro Mohar

No relationship to disclose

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
– Overall survival according to relevant clinical and demographic characteristics. (A) Age; (B) clinical stage at diagnosis; (C) histologic grade; and (D) breast cancer subtypes. HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HR, hormone receptor.

References

    1. Frenk J, González-Pier E, Gómez-Dantés O, et al. Comprehensive reform to improve health system performance in Mexico. Lancet. 2006;368:1524–1534.
    1. Strasser-Weippl K, Chavarri-Guerra Y, Villarreal-Garza C, et al. Progress and remaining challenges for cancer control in Latin America and the Caribbean. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:1405–1438.
    1. Programa Nacional de Salud 2001-2006. Secretaria de Salud, Mexico. .
    1. Cámara de Diputados del H. Congreso de la Unión: Sistema de Protección en Salud: Hacia un sistema universal de salud. Firma del decreto por el que se reforma y adiciona la Ley General de Salud, Mexico. .
    1. Comité Técnico del Fideicomiso del Sistema de Protección Social en Salud: Reglas de Operación del Fideicomiso del Sistema de Protección Social en Salud, Mexico. .
    1. Comisión Nacional de Protección Social en Salud: Informe de resultados Enero-Junio 2015. Secretaría de Salud, Mexico. .
    1. Soto-Perez-de-Celis E, Chavarri-Guerra Y. National and regional breast cancer incidence and mortality trends in Mexico 2001-2011: Analysis of a population-based database. Cancer Epidemiol. 2016;41:24–33.
    1. Chávarri-Guerra Y, Villarreal-Garza C, Liedke PE, et al. Breast cancer in Mexico: A growing challenge to health and the health system. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:e335–e343.
    1. Knaul F, Arreola-Ornelas H, Méndez O, et al. Fair health financing and catastrophic health expenditures: potential impact of the coverage extension of the popular health insurance in Mexico [in Spanish] Salud Publica Mex. 2005;47(suppl 1):S54–S65.
    1. Arce-Salinas C, Lara-Medina FU, Alvarado-Miranda A, et al. Evaluation of breast cancer treatment at a tertiary-level institution with Popular Health Insurance in Mexico [in Spanish] Rev Invest Clin. 2012;64:9–16.
    1. Harvey JM, Clark GM, Osborne CK, et al. Estrogen receptor status by immunohistochemistry is superior to the ligand-binding assay for predicting response to adjuvant endocrine therapy in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:1474–1481.
    1. Wolff AC, Hammond ME, Hicks DG, et al. Recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists clinical practice guideline update. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2014;138:241–256.
    1. Consejo de Salubridad G: Identificación de Tratamientos y Medicamentos Asociados a Gastos Catastróficos. PROTOCOLO TÉCNICO. Enfermedad CIE.10: C50 Tumor maligno de la mama. Mexico, 2011.
    1. World Health Organization: WHO Model List of Essential Medicines (ed 19).
    1. Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, et al: SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2012.
    1. Hamy-Petit AS, Belin L, Bonsang-Kitzis H, et al. Pathological complete response and prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for HER2-positive breast cancers before and after trastuzumab era: Results from a real-life cohort. Br J Cancer. 2016;114:44–52.
    1. Villarreal-Garza C, Aguila C, Magallanes-Hoyos MC, et al. Breast cancer in young women in Latin America: An unmet, growing burden. Oncologist. 2013;18(suppl):26–34.
    1. Goss PE, Lee BL, Badovinac-Crnjevic T, et al. Planning cancer control in Latin America and the Caribbean. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:391–436.
    1. Justo N, Wilking N, Jönsson B, et al. A review of breast cancer care and outcomes in Latin America. Oncologist. 2013;18:248–256.
    1. Nigenda G, Caballero M, González-Robledo LM. Access barriers in early diagnosis of breast cancer in the Federal District and Oaxaca [in Spanish] Salud Publica Mex. 2009;51(suppl 2):s254–s262.
    1. Anderson BO, Cazap E, El Saghir NS, et al. Optimisation of breast cancer management in low-resource and middle-resource countries: Executive summary of the Breast Health Global Initiative consensus, 2010. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:387–398.
    1. von Minckwitz G, Untch M, Blohmer JU, et al. Definition and impact of pathologic complete response on prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various intrinsic breast cancer subtypes. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:1796–1804.
    1. Cortazar P, Zhang L, Untch M, et al. Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: The CTNeoBC pooled analysis. Lancet. 2014;384:164–172.
    1. Flores-Luna L, Salazar-Martínez E, Duarte-Torres RM, et al. Prognostic factors related to breast cancer survival [in Spanish] Salud Publica Mex. 2008;50:119–125.
    1. Cancer Research UK. Statistics by Cancer Type: Breast Cancer. .
    1. Chastek B, Harley C, Kallich J, et al. Health care costs for patients with cancer at the end of life. J Oncol Pract. 2012;8:75s–80s.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa