Recombinant Erwinia asparaginase (JZP458) in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results from the phase 2/3 AALL1931 study

Luke Maese, Mignon L Loh, Mi Rim Choi, Tong Lin, Etsuko Aoki, Michelle Zanette, Shirali Agarwal, Robert Iannone, Jeffrey A Silverman, Lewis B Silverman, Elizabeth A Raetz, Rachel E Rau, Luke Maese, Mignon L Loh, Mi Rim Choi, Tong Lin, Etsuko Aoki, Michelle Zanette, Shirali Agarwal, Robert Iannone, Jeffrey A Silverman, Lewis B Silverman, Elizabeth A Raetz, Rachel E Rau

Abstract

AALL1931, a phase 2/3 study conducted in collaboration with the Children's Oncology Group, investigated the efficacy and safety of JZP458 (asparaginase erwinia chrysanthemi [recombinant]-rywn), a recombinant Erwinia asparaginase derived from a novel expression platform, in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoblastic lymphoma who developed hypersensitivity/silent inactivation to Escherichia coli-derived asparaginases. Each dose of a pegylated E coli-derived asparaginase remaining in patients' treatment plan was substituted by 6 doses of intramuscular (IM) JZP458 on Monday/Wednesday/Friday (MWF). Three regimens were evaluated: cohort 1a, 25 mg/m2 MWF; cohort 1b, 37.5 mg/m2 MWF; and cohort 1c, 25/25/50 mg/m2 MWF. Efficacy was evaluated by the proportion of patients maintaining adequate nadir serum asparaginase activity (NSAA ≥0.1 IU/mL) at 72 hours and at 48 hours during the first treatment course. A total of 167 patients were enrolled: cohort 1a (n = 33), cohort 1b (n = 83), and cohort 1c (n = 51). Mean serum asparaginase activity levels (IU/mL) at 72 hours were cohort 1a, 0.16, cohort 1b, 0.33, and cohort 1c, 0.47, and at 48 hours were 0.45, 0.88, and 0.66, respectively. The proportion of patients achieving NSAA ≥0.1 IU/mL at 72 and 48 hours in cohort 1c was 90% (44/49) and 96% (47/49), respectively. Simulated data from a population pharmacokinetic model matched the observed data well. Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 86 of 167 (51%) patients; those leading to discontinuation included pancreatitis (6%), allergic reactions (5%), increased alanine aminotransferase (1%), and hyperammonemia (1%). Results demonstrate that IM JZP458 at 25/25/50 mg/m2 MWF is efficacious and has a safety profile consistent with other asparaginases. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT04145531.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest disclosure: L.M. served on an advisory board and speakers bureau for Jazz Pharmaceuticals. M.R.C., T.L., E.A., M.Z., S.A., and R.I. are employees of and hold stock ownership and/or stock options in Jazz Pharmaceuticals. J.A.S. was an employee of Jazz Pharmaceuticals at the time of the study and holds stock ownership and/or stock options in Jazz Pharmaceuticals. L.B.S. served on scientific advisory boards for Jazz Pharmaceuticals and Servier Pharmaceuticals. E.A.R. received institutional research funding from Pfizer and serves on a Data and Safety Monitoring Board for Bristol Myers Squibb. R.E.R. served on advisory boards for Jazz Pharmaceuticals and Servier Pharmaceuticals. The remaining authors declare no competing financial interests.

Michelle Zanette died on 30 June 2022.

© 2023 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.

Figures

Graphical abstract
Graphical abstract
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
CONSORT diagram of patient disposition by cohort.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
NSAA levels in the first treatment course by cohort. (A) Proportion of patients achieving NSAA levels ≥0.1 IU/mL in the first treatment course. Error bars represent 95% CIs calculated by the Wald method. (B) Mean NSAA levels for evaluable patients in the first treatment course. Error bars represent 95% CIs.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Mean SAA-time profiles and corresponding mean plasma L-asparagine levels in the first treatment course by cohort and dosing schedule. The lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) values were as follows: SAA = 0.0350 IU/mL; L-asparagine = 0.0250 μg/mL. Values below the LLOQ were graphed as 0 on the linear scale or omitted from the semilogarithmic scale. Only SAA is graphed on a semilogarithmic scale. aFor cohort 1a, the sample size for mean SAA levels and plasma asparagine levels ranged from 8 to 12 patients for all time points. For cohort 1b, the sample size ranged from 15 to 22 patients for all time points. For cohort 1c, the sample size ranged from 17 to 19 patients for all time points. bFor cohort 1a, the sample size for mean SAA levels and plasma asparagine levels was 7 patients for all time points. For cohort 1b, the sample size ranged from 27 to 32 patients for all time points. For cohort 1c, the sample size ranged from 18 to 23 for all time points. cFor cohort 1a, the sample size for mean SAA levels and plasma asparagine levels ranged from 6 to 8 patients for all time points. For cohort 1b, the sample size ranged from 23 to 29 patients for all time points. For cohort 1c, the sample size ranged from 6 to 8 patients for all time points.

References

    1. Hijiya N, van der Sluis IM. Asparaginase-associated toxicity in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma. 2016;57(4):748–757.
    1. Raetz EA, Salzer WL. Tolerability and efficacy of L-asparaginase therapy in pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2010;32(7):554–563.
    1. van der Sluis IM, Vrooman LM, Pieters R, et al. Consensus expert recommendations for identification and management of asparaginase hypersensitivity and silent inactivation. Haematologica. 2016;101(3):279–285.
    1. Lin T, Hernandez-Illas M, Rey A, et al. A randomized phase I study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of recombinant Erwinia asparaginase (JZP-458) in healthy adult volunteers. Clin Transl Sci. 2021;14(3):870–879.
    1. Willer A, Gerss J, König T, et al. Anti-Escherichia coli asparaginase antibody levels determine the activity of second-line treatment with pegylated E coli asparaginase: a retrospective analysis within the ALL-BFM trials. Blood. 2011;118(22):5774–5782.
    1. Wang B, Relling MV, Storm MC, et al. Evaluation of immunologic crossreaction of antiasparaginase antibodies in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and lymphoma patients. Leukemia. 2003;17(8):1583–1588.
    1. Zalewska-Szewczyk B, Gach A, Wyka K, Bodalski J, Młynarski W. The cross-reactivity of anti-asparaginase antibodies against different L-asparaginase preparations. Clin Exp Med. 2009;9(2):113–116.
    1. Jazz Pharmaceuticals Ireland Limited; 2021. RYLAZE™ (asparaginase erwinia chrysanthemi (recombinant)-rywn) [package insert]. Leinster.
    1. Lin T, Dumas T, Kaullen J, et al. Population pharmacokinetic model development and simulation for recombinant Erwinia asparaginase produced in Pseudomonas fluorescens (JZP-458) Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2021;10(12):1503–1513.
    1. Tong WH, Pieters R, Kaspers GJ, et al. A prospective study on drug monitoring of PEGasparaginase and Erwinia asparaginase and asparaginase antibodies in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood. 2014;123(13):2026–2033.
    1. Bender C, Maese L, Carter-Febres M, Verma A. Clinical utility of pegaspargase in children, adolescents and young adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a review. Blood Lymphat Cancer. 2021;11:25–40.
    1. Jarrar M, Gaynon PS, Periclou AP, et al. Asparagine depletion after pegylated E. coli asparaginase treatment and induction outcome in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first bone marrow relapse: a Children's Oncology Group study (CCG-1941) Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2006;47(2):141–146.
    1. Gupta S, Wang C, Raetz EA, et al. Impact of asparaginase discontinuation on outcome in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a report from the Children's Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(17):1897–1905.
    1. Maese L, Rizzari C, Coleman R, Power A, van der Sluis I, Rau RE. Can recombinant technology address asparaginase Erwinia chrysanthemi shortages? Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2021;68(10):e29169.
    1. Asselin B, Rizzari C. Asparaginase pharmacokinetics and implications of therapeutic drug monitoring. Leuk Lymphoma. 2015;56(8):2273–2280.
    1. Pieters R, Hunger SP, Boos J, et al. L-asparaginase treatment in acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a focus on Erwinia asparaginase. Cancer. 2011;117(2):238–249.
    1. Angiolillo AL, Schore RJ, Devidas M, et al. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of calaspargase pegol Escherichia coli L-asparaginase in the treatment of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results from Children's Oncology Group Study AALL07P4. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(34):3874–3882.
    1. US Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. Application number 761179Orig1s000. Multi-discipline review.
    1. Vrooman LM, Kirov II, Dreyer ZE, et al. Activity and toxicity of intravenous Erwinia asparaginase following allergy to E. coli-derived asparaginase in children and adolescents with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2016;63(2):228–233.
    1. Avramis VI, Sencer S, Periclou AP, et al. A randomized comparison of native Escherichia coli asparaginase and polyethylene glycol conjugated asparaginase for treatment of children with newly diagnosed standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a Children's Cancer Group study. Blood. 2002;99(6):1986–1994.
    1. van der Sluis IM, de Groot-Kruseman H, Te Loo M, et al. Efficacy and safety of recombinant E. coli asparaginase in children with previously untreated acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a randomized multicenter study of the Dutch Childhood Oncology Group. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2018;65(8):e27083.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa