Transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells genetically engineered to overexpress interleukin-10 promotes alternative inflammatory response in rat model of traumatic brain injury

S T Peruzzaro, M M M Andrews, A Al-Gharaibeh, O Pupiec, M Resk, D Story, P Maiti, J Rossignol, G L Dunbar, S T Peruzzaro, M M M Andrews, A Al-Gharaibeh, O Pupiec, M Resk, D Story, P Maiti, J Rossignol, G L Dunbar

Abstract

Background: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause for long-term disability, yet the treatments available that improve outcomes after TBI limited. Neuroinflammatory responses are key contributors to determining patient outcomes after TBI. Transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), which release trophic and pro-repair cytokines, represents an effective strategy to reduce inflammation after TBI. One such pro-repair cytokine is interleukin-10 (IL-10), which reduces pro-inflammatory markers and trigger alternative inflammatory markers, such as CD163. In this study, we tested the therapeutic effects of MSCs that were engineered to overexpress IL-10 when transplanted into rats following TBI in the medial frontal cortex.

Methods: Thirty-six hours following TBI, rats were transplanted with MSCs and then assessed for 3 weeks on a battery of behavioral tests that measured motor and cognitive abilities. Histological evaluation was then done to measure the activation of the inflammatory response. Additionally, immunomodulatory effects were evaluated by immunohistochemistry and Western blot analyses.

Results: A significant improvement in fine motor function was observed in rats that received transplants of MSCs engineered to overexpress IL-10 (MSCs + IL-10) or MSCs alone compared to TBI + vehicle-treated rats. Although tissue spared was unchanged, anti-inflammatory effects were revealed by a reduction in the number of glial fibrillary acidic protein cells and CD86 cells in both TBI + MSCs + IL-10 and TBI + MSC groups compared to TBI + vehicle rats. Microglial activation was significantly increased in the TBI + MSC group when compared to the sham + vehicle group. Western blot data suggested a reduction in tumor necrosis factor-alpha in the TBI + MSCs + IL-10 group compared to TBI + MSC group. Immunomodulatory effects were demonstrated by a shift from classical inflammation expression (CD86) to an alternative inflammation state (CD163) in both treatments with MSCs and MSCs + IL-10. Furthermore, co-labeling of both CD86 and CD163 was detected in the same cells, suggesting a temporal change in macrophage expression.

Conclusions: Overall, our findings suggest that transplantation of MSCs that were engineered to overexpress IL-10 can improve functional outcomes by providing a beneficial perilesion environment. This improvement may be explained by the shifting of macrophage expression to a more pro-repair state, thereby providing a possible new therapy for treating TBI.

Keywords: CD163; Interleukin-10; Mesenchymal stem cells; Neuroinflammation; Traumatic brain injury.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All animal procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Central Michigan University (#16-11). Viral construction was approved by the Institutional Biosafety Committee at Central Michigan University.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
MSCs transduced with IL-10 lentivirus. a PCR product confirmed that IL-10 sequence was successfully integrated in the plasmid and detectable in transduced MSCs and absent in control virus plasmid and MSCs. b MSCs infected with lentivirus expressed GFP (green). MSCs were characterized by staining with the following antibodies: CD11b, CD45, CD34, CD44, CD90, and CD105 using appropriate secondary AlexaFlour 594 shown in the red. MSCs were negative for CD11b, CD45, and CD34. MSCs were positive for CD44, CD90, and CD105 (scale bar = 50 μm)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
In vitro expression of IL-10 in transduced MSCs. a Representative immunocytochemistry images of MSCs with and without IL-10 overexpression. MSCs + IL10-GFP group appeared to have higher IL-10 immunofluorescent signal than MSCs + GFP group. b Mean integrated density of IL-10 showed that MSCs + IL-10 had significantly higher expression of IL-10 than MSCs + GFP (***p < 0.001). c RT-qPCR resulted in significant mean fold changes of IL-10 expression in MSCs + IL-10 group in comparison to MSCs + GFP (**p < 0.01). d Western blot IL-10 levels were compared between the two MSC groups. e MSCs + IL-10-GFP cells expressed a significantly higher amount of IL-10 level in comparison to MSCs + GFP (*p < 0.05; scale bar = 50 μm). Error bars represent standard error of the mean (± SEM)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Behavioral outcomes after treatment with MSCs + IL-10. a Mean latency to find the platform in the MWM task across 4 days with platform in the northeast (NE) quadrant, all TBI groups took a significantly longer time to find the target platform than the sham + vehicle group (***p < 0.001). b Reversal trials with the platform in the southwest (SW) quadrant (mean latency across 3 days) indicated sham + vehicle group was significantly faster in finding the platform than TBI + vehicle (*p < 0.05) and TBI + MSCs (**p < 0.01) but not TBI + MSCs + IL-10. c Mean number of foot faults in the ladder rung walking task. Ladder rung test was run once a week for 3 weeks. TBI + vehicle group had significantly more foot faults than all other groups (*p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001), and the sham + vehicle group had significantly fewer foot faults than all other groups (##p < 0.01). d Mean latency (sec) to remain on the rotating rod in the rotarod test. The rotarod test was performed for 5 days, 4 trials per day. An injury effect was observed in TBI groups, whereas sham + vehicle group stayed on the rod significantly longer time than all other groups (**p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001). Error bars represent ± SEM
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Mean volume of tissue spared were analyzed in rat brain sections at bregma + 3, + 2, + 1, and 0 mm. a Representative photomicrograph of lesions in the frontal cortex of each group. (Scale bar = 1 mm). b A significant reduction in tissue remaining was seen in TBI + vehicle group compared to sham + vehicle (*p < 0.05). Error bars represent ± SEM
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Astrocytes labeled with GFAP antibody in the frontal cortex and hippocampus. a Representive images of GFAP-postive cells in the frontal cortex and CA1 and CA3 region of the hippocampus. b A significant reduction in GFAP-positive cells was seen in TBI + MSCs (***p < 0.001) and TBI + MSCs + IL-10 (***p < 0.001) groups in the frontal cortex in comparison to TBI + vehicle group. c In the CA1 region of the hippocampus, a significant reduction of GFAP-positive cells were found in the TBI + MSCs + IL-10 (***p < 0.001) and sham + vehicle group (*p < 0.05) in comparison to TBI + vehicle group. d In the CA3 region of the hippocampus, TBI + vehicle group had a significant increase in GFAP-positive cells when compared to all other groups (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01; scale bar = 50 μm). Error bars represent ± SEM
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Macrophages/microglia labeled with Iba1 antibody in the frontal cortex and hippocampus. a Representive images of Iba1-postive cells in the frontal cortex and CA1 and CA3 region of the hippocampus. b In the frontal cortex, an injury effect was seen with an increased number of Iba1-positive cells in all TBI groups (*p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001). c No significant differences were seen among the groups in the CA1 region of the hippocampus. d No significant differences were seen among the groups in the CA3 region of the hippocampus (scale bar = 50 μm). Error bars represent ± SEM
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Microglia activation state in the frontal cortex. Microglia were more activated in TBI + MSC group compared to sham + vehicle group (***p < 0.001). Error bars represent ± SEM
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
CD86 and CD163-labeled cells in the frontal cortex and hippocampus. ac The images in the frontal cortex, CA1 region of the hippocampus, and CA3 region of the hippocampus are as follows: CD86 is in red, CD163 is green, and merge in yellow images show co-labeling of CD163 and CD86, arrows show an example of a co-labeled cell. Hoechst 33258 was used as a counterstain in blue (scale bar = 50 μm). d In the frontal cortex, a significant increase in the number of CD163-expressing cells was seen in all TBI groups compared to sham + vehicle group (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01). e The mean number of CD163-labeled cells in the CA1 region of the hippocampus was significantly increased in the TBI + vehicle (*p < 0.05) and the TBI + MSCs + IL-10 (*p < 0.05) groups compared to sham + vehicle. f In the CA3 region of the hippocampus, CD163-positive cells were significantly increased in TBI + vehicle group compared to sham + vehicle (**p < 0.01). g Mean number of CD86-positive cells in the frontal cortex was significantly increased in TBI + vehicle group compared to all other groups (**p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001). h, i In the CA1 and CA3 region of the hippocampus, no significant differences in number of CD86-positive cells between groups were observed. jl Cell counts for CD163 and CD86 were used to find the ratio of CD163:CD86 and multiplied by 100 to get the percent. j A significant shift to alternative macrophage/microglia state was seen in the frontal cortex (*p < 0.05). kl No significant differences were observed among the groups in the CA1 and CA3 region of the hippocampus. Error bars represent ± SEM
Fig. 9
Fig. 9
Western blots showed the levels of IL-10, TNF-α, and CD163 in the cortex. ab IL-10 levels in TBI + MSCs + IL-10 group was elevated compared to TBI + vehicle (*p < 0.05). c, d TNF-α levels in the cortex was significantly elevated in TBI + MSC group when compared to all other groups (*p < 0.05). e, f CD163 levels were significantly elevated in TBI + MSCs and TBI + MSCs + IL-10 compared to sham + vehicle group (*p < 0.05). Error bars represent ± SEM

References

    1. Taylor CA, Bell JM, Breiding MJ, Xu L. Traumatic brain injury-related emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths - United States, 2007 and 2013. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2017;66(9):1–16. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6609a1.
    1. Majdan M, Plancikova D, Brazinova A, Rusnak M, Nieboer D, Feigin V, et al. Epidemiology of traumatic brain injuries in Europe: a cross-sectional analysis. Lancet Public Health. 2016;1(2):e76–e83. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(16)30017-2.
    1. Quan F-S, Chen J, Zhong Y, Ren W-Z. Comparative effect of immature neuronal or glial cell transplantation on motor functional recovery following experimental traumatic brain injury in rats. Exp Ther Med. 2016;12(3):1671–1680. doi: 10.3892/etm.2016.3527.
    1. Karve IP, Taylor JM, Crack PJ. The contribution of astrocytes and microglia to traumatic brain injury. Br J Pharmacol. 2016;173(4):692–702. doi: 10.1111/bph.13125.
    1. Martinez FO, Gordon S. The M1 and M2 paradigm of macrophage activation: time for reassessment. F1000Prime Rep. 2014;6:13. doi: 10.12703/P6-13.
    1. Wang G, Zhang J, Hu X, Zhang L, Mao L, Jiang X, et al. Microglia/macrophage polarization dynamics in white matter after traumatic brain injury. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2013;33(12):1864–1874. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2013.146.
    1. Rőszer T. Understanding the mysterious M2 macrophage through activation markers and effector mechanisms. Mediat Inflamm. 2015;2015:816460. doi: 10.1155/2015/816460.
    1. Garcia JM, Stillings SA, Leclerc JL, Phillips H, Edwards NJ, Robicsek SA, et al. Role of interleukin-10 in acute brain injuries. Front Neurol. 2017;8:244. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00244.
    1. Zhang B, Bailey WM, Braun KJ, Gensel JC. Age decreases macrophage IL-10 expression: implications for functional recovery and tissue repair in spinal cord injury. Exp Neurol. 2015;273:83–91. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2015.08.001.
    1. Knoblach SM, Faden AI. Interleukin-10 improves outcome and alters proinflammatory cytokine expression after experimental traumatic brain injury. Exp Neurol. 1998;153(1):143–151. doi: 10.1006/exnr.1998.6877.
    1. Nakajima M, Nito C, Sowa K, Suda S, Nishiyama Y, Nakamura-Takahashi A, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells overexpressing interleukin-10 promote neuroprotection in experimental acute ischemic stroke. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. 2017;6:102–111. doi: 10.1016/j.omtm.2017.06.005.
    1. Sharma S, Yang B, Xi X, Grotta JC, Aronowski J, Savitz SI. IL-10 directly protects cortical neurons by activating PI-3 kinase and STAT-3 pathways. Brain Res. 2011;1373:189–194. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.11.096.
    1. Balasingam V, Yong VW. Attenuation of astroglial reactivity by interleukin-10. J Neurosci. 1996;16(9):2945–2955. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.16-09-02945.1996.
    1. Philippidis P, Mason JC, Evans BJ, Nadra I, Taylor KM, Haskard DO, et al. Hemoglobin scavenger receptor CD163 mediates interleukin-10 release and heme oxygenase-1 synthesis: antiinflammatory monocyte-macrophage responses in vitro, in resolving skin blisters in vivo, and after cardiopulmonary bypass surgery. Circ Res. 2004;94(1):119–126. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000109414.78907.F9.
    1. Zhang R, Liu Y, Yan K, Chen L, Chen X-R, Li P, et al. Anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory mechanisms of mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in experimental traumatic brain injury. J Neuroinflammation. 2013;10:106.
    1. Mastro-Martínez I, Pérez-Suárez E, Melen G, González-Murillo Á, Casco F, Lozano-Carbonero N, et al. Effects of local administration of allogenic adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells on functional recovery in experimental traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2015;29(12):1497-510.
    1. Zanier ER, Pischiutta F, Riganti L, Marchesi F, Turola E, Fumagalli S, et al. Bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells drive protective M2 microglia polarization after brain trauma. Neurotherapeutics. 2014;11(3):679–695. doi: 10.1007/s13311-014-0277-y.
    1. Kline AE, Bolinger BD, Kochanek PM, Carlos TM, Yan HQ, Jenkins LW, et al. Acute systemic administration of interleukin-10 suppresses the beneficial effects of moderate hypothermia following traumatic brain injury in rats. Brain Res. 2002;937(1–2):22–31. doi: 10.1016/S0006-8993(02)02458-7.
    1. Choi J-J, Yoo S-A, Park S-J, Kang Y-J, Kim W-U, Oh I-H, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells overexpressing interleukin-10 attenuate collagen-induced arthritis in mice. Clin Exp Immunol. 2008;153(2):269–276. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2008.03683.x.
    1. Liao W, Pham V, Liu L, Riazifar M, Pone EJ, Zhang SX, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells engineered to express selectin ligands and IL-10 exert enhanced therapeutic efficacy in murine experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Biomaterials. 2016;77:87–97. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.11.005.
    1. Manning E, Pham S, Li S, Vazquez-Padron RI, Mathew J, Ruiz P, et al. Interleukin-10 delivery via mesenchymal stem cells: a novel gene therapy approach to prevent lung ischemia–reperfusion injury. Hum Gene Ther. 2010;21(6):713–727. doi: 10.1089/hum.2009.147.
    1. Min C-K, Kim B-G, Park G, Cho B, Oh I-H. IL-10-transduced bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells can attenuate the severity of acute graft-versus-host disease after experimental allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2007;39(10):637–645. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705644.
    1. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(−Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262.
    1. Peruzzaro ST, Gallagher J, Dunkerson J, Fluharty S, Mudd D, Hoane MR, et al. The impact of enriched environment and transplantation of murine cortical embryonic stem cells on recovery from controlled cortical contusion injury. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2013;31(4):431–450.
    1. Morris R. Developments of a water-maze procedure for studying spatial learning in the rat. J Neurosci Methods. 1984;11(1):47–60. doi: 10.1016/0165-0270(84)90007-4.
    1. Smith JS, Fulop ZL, Levinsohn SA, Darrell RS, Stein DG. Effects of the novel NMDA receptor antagonist gacyclidine on recovery from medial frontal cortex contusion injury in rats. Neural Plasticity. 2000;7(1–2):73–91. doi: 10.1155/NP.2000.73.
    1. Metz GA, Whishaw IQ. The Ladder Rung Walking Task: A Scoring System and its Practical Application. JoVE (J Vis Exp). 2009;(28):e1204. 10.3791/1204.
    1. Hamm RJ, Pike BR, O’dell DM, Lyeth BG, Jenkins LW. The rotarod test: an evaluation of its effectiveness in assessing motor deficits following traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 1994;11(2):187–196. doi: 10.1089/neu.1994.11.187.
    1. Colburn RW, DeLeo JA, Rickman AJ, Yeager MP, Kwon P, Hickey WF. Dissociation of microglial activation and neuropathic pain behaviors following peripheral nerve injury in the rat. J Neuroimmunol. 1997;79(2):163–175. doi: 10.1016/S0165-5728(97)00119-7.
    1. Njoroge JM, Mitchell LB, Centola M, Kastner D, Raffeld M, Miller JL. Characterization of viable autofluorescent macrophages among cultured peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Cytometry. 2001;44(1):38–44. doi: 10.1002/1097-0320(20010501)44:1<38::AID-CYTO1080>;2-T.
    1. Sołtys Z, Ziaja M, Pawliński R, Setkowicz Z, Janeczko K. Morphology of reactive microglia in the injured cerebral cortex. Fractal analysis and complementary quantitative methods. J Neurosci Res. 2001;63(1):90–97. doi: 10.1002/1097-4547(20010101)63:1<90::AID-JNR11>;2-9.
    1. Kowal K, Silver R, Sławińska E, Bielecki M, Chyczewski L, Kowal-Bielecka O. CD163 and its role in inflammation. Folia Histochem Cytobiol. 2011;49(3):365–374. doi: 10.5603/FHC.2011.0052.
    1. Cho D-I, Kim MR, Jeong H, Jeong HC, Jeong MH, Yoon SH, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells reciprocally regulate the M1/M2 balance in mouse bone marrow-derived macrophages. Exp Mol Med. 2014;46(1):e70. doi: 10.1038/emm.2013.135.
    1. Holladay C, Power K, Sefton M, O’Brien T, Gallagher WM, Pandit A. Functionalized scaffold-mediated interleukin 10 gene delivery significantly improves survival rates of stem cells in vivo. Mol Ther. 2011;19(5):969–978. doi: 10.1038/mt.2010.311.
    1. Morganti JM, Riparip L-K, Rosi S. Call off the dog(ma): M1/M2 polarization is concurrent following traumatic brain injury. PLoS One. 2016;11(1):e0148001. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0148001.
    1. Shechter R, London A, Varol C, Raposo C, Cusimano M, Yovel G, et al. Infiltrating blood-derived macrophages are vital cells playing an anti-inflammatory role in recovery from spinal cord injury in mice. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000113. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000113.
    1. Zhang Z, Zhang Z-Y, Wu Y, Schluesener HJ. Lesional accumulation of CD163+ macrophages/microglia in rat traumatic brain injury. Brain Res. 2012;1461:102–110. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.04.038.
    1. Walker PA, Bedi SS, Shah SK, Jimenez F, Xue H, Hamilton JA, et al. Intravenous multipotent adult progenitor cell therapy after traumatic brain injury: modulation of the resident microglia population. J Neuroinflammation. 2012;9(1):228. doi: 10.1186/1742-2094-9-228.
    1. Coyne TM, Marcus AJ, Woodbury D, Black IB. Marrow stromal cells transplanted to the adult brain are rejected by an inflammatory response and transfer donor labels to host neurons and glia. Stem Cells. 2006;24(11):2483–2492. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2006-0174.
    1. Evans HG, Roostalu U, Walter GJ, Gullick NJ, Frederiksen KS, Roberts CA, et al. TNF-α blockade induces IL-10 expression in human CD4+ T cells. Nat Commun. 2014;5:3199. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4199.
    1. Hasan A, Deeb G, Rahal R, Atwi K, Mondello S, Marei HE, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of traumatic brain injury. Front Neurol. 2017;8:28. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00028.
    1. Chen X, Duan X-S, Xu L-J, Zhao J-J, She Z-F, Chen W-W, et al. Interleukin-10 mediates the neuroprotection of hyperbaric oxygen therapy against traumatic brain injury in mice. Neuroscience. 2014;266:235–243. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.11.036.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa