Multicentre cross-sectional study assessing content validity of the International Classification of Functioning, disability and health core set for post-acute musculoskeletal conditions in primary care physiotherapy services

Héctor Hernández-Lázaro, Sandra Jiménez-Del Barrio, Luis Ceballos-Laita, Silvia Lahuerta-Martin, Ricardo Medrano-de-la-Fuente, Ignacio Hernando-Garijo, Maria Teresa Mingo-Gómez, Héctor Hernández-Lázaro, Sandra Jiménez-Del Barrio, Luis Ceballos-Laita, Silvia Lahuerta-Martin, Ricardo Medrano-de-la-Fuente, Ignacio Hernando-Garijo, Maria Teresa Mingo-Gómez

Abstract

Objective: To assess content validity of the comprehensive International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Core Set for post-acute musculoskeletal conditions in primary care physiotherapy services.

Design: Multicentre cross-sectional study.

Subjects: Patients with musculoskeletal disorders referred to primary care physiotherapy services.

Methods: Structured interviews were conducted using categories from the ICF Core Set, and their relevance was assessed using a visual analogue scale. An ICF category had to represent a problem for at least 5% of the sample in order to be validated.

Results: The study sample comprised 274 patients. All categories in the ICF Core Set were confirmed. Body functions related to pain and movement were the most commonly impaired, with ICF categories "b280 Sensation of pain" and "b710 Mobility of joint functions" having the highest prevalence (87.2% and 84.7%, respectively). Activity limitations and participation restrictions were concentrated in chapters "d4 Mobility" (63.5% for "d430 Lifting and carrying objects") and "d2 General tasks and demands" (59.5% for "d240 Handling stress and other psychological demands"). The most relevant environmental factors were "e225 Climate" (55.8%) and "e580 Health services, systems and policies" (39.4%).

Conclusion: The ICF Core Set for post-acute musculoskeletal conditions shows appropriate content validity for primary care physiotherapy services.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interests to declare.

References

    1. Cieza A, Causey K, Kamenov K, Hanson SW, Chatterji S, Vos T. Global estimates of the need for rehabilitation based on the Global Burden of Disease study 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet 2020; 396: 2006–2017. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32340-0.
    1. Budtz CR, Mose S, Christiansen DH. Socio-demographic, clinical and psychological predictors of healthcare utilization among patients with musculoskeletal disorders: a prospective cohort study. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20: 239. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-020-05100-0.
    1. Cimmino MA, Ferrone C, Cutolo M. Epidemiology of chronic musculoskeletal pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2011; 25: 173–183. DOI: 10.1016/j.berh.2010.01.012.
    1. Meerhoff GA, van Dulmen SA, Maas MJ, Bakker-Jacobs A, Nijhuis-Van der Sanden MW, van der Wees PJ. Exploring the perspective of patients with musculoskeletal health problems in primary care on the use of patient-reported outcome measures to stimulate quality improvement in physiotherapist practice; a qualitative study. Physiother Theory Pract 2021; 37: 993–1004. DOI: 10.1080/09593985.2019.1678205.
    1. Churruca K, Pomare C, Ellis LA, Long JC, Henderson SB, Murphy LEDet al. . Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): a review of generic and condition-specific measures and a discussion of trends and issues. Health Expect 2021; 24: 1015–1024. DOI: 10.1111/hex.13254.
    1. Fennelly O, Blake C, Desmeules F, Stokes D, Cunningham C. Patient-reported outcome measures in advanced musculoskeletal physiotherapy practice: a systematic review. Musculoskeletal Care 2018; 16: 188–208. DOI: 10.1002/msc.1200.
    1. Terwee CB, Prinsen CAC, Chiarotto A, Westerman MJ, Patrick DL, Alonso Jet al. . COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study. Qual Life Res 2018; 27: 1159–1170. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-018-1829-0.
    1. Brockow T, Cieza A, Kuhlow H, Sigl T, Franke T, Harder Met al. . Identifying the concepts contained in outcome measures of clinical trials on musculoskeletal disorders and chronic widespread pain using the international classification of functioning, disability and health as a reference. J Rehabil Med 2004; Suppl 44: 30–36. DOI: 10.1080/16501960410015371.
    1. Engel G. The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science 1977; 196: 129–136. DOI: 10.1126/science.847460.
    1. World Health Organization . Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health: ICF. The international classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002, p. 1–22.
    1. World Health Organization . International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
    1. Bickenbach J, Cieza A, Selb M, Stucki G. ICF Core Sets. Manual for clinical practice. 2nd edn. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2021.
    1. Stoll T, Brach M, Huber EO, Scheuringer M, Schwarzkopf SR, Konstanjsek Net al. . ICF Core Set for patients with musculoskeletal conditions in the acute hospital. Disabil Rehabil 2005; 27: 381–387. DOI: 10.1080/09638280400013990.
    1. Scheuringer M, Stucki G, Huber EO, Brach M, Schwarzkopf SR, Kostanjsek Net al. . ICF Core Set for patients with musculoskeletal conditions in early post-acute rehabilitation facilities. Disabil Rehabil 2005; 27: 405–410. DOI: 10.1080/09638280400014006.
    1. Grill E, Ewert T, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Stucki G. ICF Core Sets development for the acute hospital and early post-acute rehabilitation facilities. Disabil Rehabil 2005; 27: 361–366. DOI: 10.1080/09638280400013974.
    1. Hernandez-Lazaro H, Mingo-Gómez MT, Ceballos-Laita L, Medrano-de-la-Fuente R, Jimenez-del Barrio S. Validation of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) Core Sets for musculoskeletal conditions in a primary health care setting from physiotherapists’ perspective using the Delphi method. Disabil Rehabil 2023; 45: 2458–2468. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2096128.
    1. Karlsson E, Gustafsson J. Validation of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Core Sets from 2001 to 2019 – a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil 2022; 44: 3736–3748. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1878562.
    1. Cieza A, Ewert T, Ustün TB, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Stucki G. Development of ICF Core Sets for patients with chronic conditions. J Rehabil Med 2004; 44 Suppl: 9–11. DOI: 10.1080/16501960410015353.
    1. Grill E, Stucki G. Criteria for validating comprehensive ICF Core Sets and developing Brief ICF core set versions. J Rehabil Med 2011; 43: 87–91. DOI: 10.2340/16501977-0616.
    1. Müller M, Grill E, Stier-Jarmer M, Strobl R, Gutenbrunner C, Fialka-Moser Vet al. . Validation of the comprehensive ICF Core Sets for patients receiving rehabilitation interventions in the acute care setting. J Rehabil Med 2011; 43: 92–101. DOI: 10.2340/16501977-0622.
    1. Kus S, Oberhauser C, Cieza A. Validation of the Brief International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) Core Set for hand conditions. J Hand Ther 2012; 25: 274–286. DOI: 10.1016/j.jht.2012.02.003.
    1. Riberto M, Chiappetta L, Lopes K, Batisttella. A transversal multicenter study assessing functioning, disability and environmental factors with the comprehensive ICF Core Set for low back pain in Brazil. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2014; 50: 153–160.
    1. Weigl M, Wild H. European validation of The Comprehensive International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Core Set for Osteoarthritis from the perspective of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee or hip. Disabil Rehabil 2018; 40: 3104–3112. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1377295.
    1. Karlsson E, Mäki-Torkko E, Widén S, Gustafsson J, Manchaiah V, Mahomed-Asmail Fet al. . Validation of the Brief International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) core set for hearing loss: an international multicentre study. Int J Audiol 2021; 60: 412–420. DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2020.1846088.
    1. Swiontkowski MF, Engelberg R, Martin DP, Agel J. Short musculoskeletal function assessment questionnaire: validity, reliability, and responsiveness. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999; 81: 1245–1260. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199909000-00006.
    1. Guevara CJ, Cook C, Pietrobon R, Rodríguez G, Nunley J 2nd, Higgins LDet al. . Validation of a Spanish version of the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment Questionnaire (SMFA). J Orthop Trauma 2006; 20: 623–629. DOI: 10.1097/01.bot.0000246417.07498.4b.
    1. Sangha O, Stucki G, Liang M, Fossel A, Katz J. The Self-Administered Comorbidity Questionnaire (SCQ): a new method to assess comorbidity for clinical and health services research. Arthritis Rheum 2003; 49: 156–163. DOI: 10.1002/art.10993.
    1. Cohen SP, Vase L, Hooten WM. Chronic pain: an update on burden, best practices, and new advances. Lancet 2021; 397: 2082–2097. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00393-7.
    1. Generaal E, Vogelzangs N, Penninx BW, Dekker J. Insomnia, sleep duration, depressive symptoms, and the onset of chronic multisite musculoskeletal pain. Sleep 2017; 40. DOI: 10.1093/sleep/zsw030.
    1. Simons LE, Elman I, Borsook D. Psychological processing in chronic pain: a neural systems approach. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2014; 39: 61–78. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.12.006.
    1. Mills S, Torrance N, Smith BH. Identification and Management of chronic pain in primary care: a review. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2016; 18: 22. DOI: 10.1007/s11920-015-0659-9.
    1. Hernández-Lázaro H, Mingo-Gómez MT, Jiménez-del-Barrio S, Lahuerta-Martín S, Hernando-Garijo I, Medrano-de-la-Fuente Ret al. . Researcher’s Perspective on musculoskeletal conditions in primary care physiotherapy units through the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF): a scoping review. Biomedicines 2023; 11: 290. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines11020290.
    1. Hartvigsen J, Hancock MJ, Kongsted A, Louw Q, Ferreira ML, Genevay Set al. . What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention. Lancet 2018; 391: 2356–2367. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30480-X.
    1. Tschiesner U, Linseisen E, Baumann S, Siedek V, Stelter K, Berghaus Aet al. . Assessment of Functioning in patients with head and neck cancer according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF): a multicenter study. Laryngoscope 2009; 119: 915–923. DOI: 10.1002/lary.20211.
    1. Wang P, Li H, Guo Y, Xie Y, Ge R, Qiu Z. The feasibility and validity of the comprehensive ICF core set for stroke in Chinese clinical settings. Clin Rehabil 2014; 28: 159–171. DOI: 10.1177/0269215513496659.
    1. Bagraith KS, Strong J. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) can be used to describe multidisciplinary clinical assessments of people with chronic musculoskeletal conditions. Clin Rheumatol 2013; 32: 383–389. DOI: 10.1007/s10067-012-2130-1.
    1. Leonardi M, Lee H, Kostanjsek N, Fornari A, Raggi A, Martinuzzi Aet al. . 20 Years of ICF – International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: uses and applications around the world. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19: 11321. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191811321.
    1. MacDermid JC. ICF Linking and cognitive interviewing are complementary methods for optimizing content validity of outcome measures: an integrated methods review. Front Rehabil Sci 2021; 2: 702596. DOI: 10.3389/fresc.2021.702596.
    1. Papelard A, Daste C, Alami S, Sanchez K, Roren A, Segretin Fet al. . Construction of an ICF core set and ICF-based questionnaire assessing activities and participation in patients with systemic sclerosis. Rheumatology 2019; 58: 2260–2272. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez209.
    1. Selb M, Nicol R, Hartvigsen J, Segerer W, Côté P; ICF Manual Medicine Expert Group . An ICF-based assessment schedule to facilitate the assessment and reporting of functioning in manual medicine – low back pain as a case in point. Disabil Rehabil 2022; 44: 8339–8348. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2021.2012842.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa