Mobile Health Physical Activity Intervention Preferences in Cancer Survivors: A Qualitative Study

Michael C Robertson, Edward Tsai, Elizabeth J Lyons, Sanjana Srinivasan, Maria C Swartz, Miranda L Baum, Karen M Basen-Engquist, Michael C Robertson, Edward Tsai, Elizabeth J Lyons, Sanjana Srinivasan, Maria C Swartz, Miranda L Baum, Karen M Basen-Engquist

Abstract

Background: Cancer survivors are at an elevated risk for several negative health outcomes, but physical activity (PA) can decrease those risks. Unfortunately, adherence to PA recommendations among survivors is low. Fitness mobile apps have been shown to facilitate the adoption of PA in the general population, but there are limited apps specifically designed for cancer survivors. This population has unique needs and barriers to PA, and most existing PA apps do not address these issues. Moreover, incorporating user preferences has been identified as an important priority for technology-based PA interventions, but at present there is limited literature that serves to establish these preferences in cancer survivors. This is especially problematic given the high cost of app development and because the majority of downloaded apps fail to engage users over the long term.

Objective: The aim of this study was to take a qualitative approach to provide practical insight regarding this population's preferences for the features and messages of an app to increase PA.

Methods: A total of 35 cancer survivors each attended 2 focus groups; a moderator presented slide shows on potential app features and messages and asked open-ended questions to elicit participant preferences. All sessions were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Three reviewers independently conducted thematic content analysis on all transcripts, then organized and consolidated findings to identify salient themes.

Results: Participants (mean age 63.7, SD 10.8, years) were mostly female (24/35, 69%) and mostly white (25/35, 71%). Participants generally had access to technology and were receptive to engaging with an app to increase PA. Themes identified included preferences for (1) a casual, concise, and positive tone, (2) tools for personal goal attainment, (3) a prescription for PA, and (4) an experience that is tailored to the user. Participants reported wanting extensive background data collection with low data entry burden and to have a trustworthy source translate their personal data into individualized PA recommendations. They expressed a desire for app functions that could facilitate goal achievement and articulated a preference for a more private social experience. Finally, results indicated that PA goals might be best established in the context of personally held priorities and values.

Conclusions: Many of the desired features identified are compatible with both empirically supported methods of behavior change and the relative strengths of an app as a delivery vehicle for behavioral intervention. Participating cancer survivors' preferences contrasted with many current standard practices for mobile app development, including value-based rather than numeric goals, private socialization in small groups rather than sharing with broader social networks, and interpretation of PA data rather than merely providing numerical data. Taken together, these insights may help increase the acceptability of theory-based mHealth PA interventions in cancer survivors.

Keywords: focus groups; mHealth; physical activity; smartphone; survivors; technology.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

©Michael C Robertson, Edward Tsai, Elizabeth J Lyons, Sanjana Srinivasan, Maria C Swartz, Miranda L Baum, Karen M Basen-Engquist. Originally published in JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 24.01.2017.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Example of a presented app feature: sending tailored text messages.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Access to technology.

References

    1. DeSantis CE, Lin CC, Mariotto AB, Siegel RL, Stein KD, Kramer JL, Alteri R, Robbins AS, Jemal A. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64(4):252–71. doi: 10.3322/caac.21235. doi: 10.3322/caac.21235.
    1. Rock CL, Doyle C, Demark-Wahnefried W, Meyerhardt J, Courneya KS, Schwartz AL, Bandera EV, Hamilton KK, Grant B, McCullough M, Byers T, Gansler T. Nutrition and physical activity guidelines for cancer survivors. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62(4):243–74. doi: 10.3322/caac.21142. doi: 10.3322/caac.21142.
    1. Blanchard CM, Courneya KS, Stein K, American Cancer Society's SCS-II Cancer survivors' adherence to lifestyle behavior recommendations and associations with health-related quality of life: results from the American Cancer Society's SCS-II. J Clin Oncol. 2008 May 1;26(13):2198–204. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.6217.
    1. Bellizzi KM, Rowland JH, Jeffery DD, McNeel T. Health behaviors of cancer survivors: examining opportunities for cancer control intervention. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Dec 1;23(34):8884–93. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.2343.
    1. Free C, Phillips G, Galli L, Watson L, Felix L, Edwards P, Patel V, Haines A. The effectiveness of mobile-health technology-based health behaviour change or disease management interventions for health care consumers: a systematic review. PLoS Med. 2013;10(1):e1001362. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001362.
    1. O'Reilly GA, Spruijt-Metz D. Current mHealth technologies for physical activity assessment and promotion. Am J Prev Med. 2013 Oct;45(4):501–7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.05.012.
    1. Pew Research Center. 2016. Older Adults and Technology Use
    1. Bantum EO, Albright CL, White KK, Berenberg JL, Layi G, Ritter PL, Laurent D, Plant K, Lorig K. Surviving and thriving with cancer using a Web-based health behavior change intervention: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(2):e54. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3020.
    1. Hong Y, Goldberg D, Ory MG, Towne Jr SD, Forjuoh SN, Kellstedt D, Wang S. Efficacy of a mobile-enabled web app (iCanFit) in promoting physical activity among older cancer survivors: a pilot study. JMIR Cancer. 2015 Jun 26;1(1):e7. doi: 10.2196/cancer.4389.
    1. Conroy DE, Yang C, Maher JP. Behavior change techniques in top-ranked mobile apps for physical activity. Am J Prev Med. 2014 Jun;46(6):649–52. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.01.010.
    1. Courneya KS, Karvinen KS, Vallance JKH. Exercise motivation and behavior change. In: Michael Feuerstein., editor. Handbook of cancer survivorship. Boston: Springer; 2007. pp. 113–132.
    1. Fisher A, Wardle J, Beeken RJ, Croker H, Williams K, Grimmett C. Perceived barriers and benefits to physical activity in colorectal cancer patients. Support Care Cancer. 2016 Feb;24(2):903–10. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2860-0.
    1. Hefferon K, Murphy H, McLeod J, Mutrie N, Campbell A. Understanding barriers to exercise implementation 5-year post-breast cancer diagnosis: a large-scale qualitative study. Health Educ Res. 2013 Oct;28(5):843–56. doi: 10.1093/her/cyt083.
    1. Blaney JM, Lowe-Strong A, Rankin-Watt J, Campbell A, Gracey JH. Cancer survivors' exercise barriers, facilitators and preferences in the context of fatigue, quality of life and physical activity participation: a questionnaire-survey. Psychooncology. 2013 Jan;22(1):186–94. doi: 10.1002/pon.2072.
    1. Vollmer Dahlke D, Fair K, Hong YA, Beaudoin CE, Pulczinski J, Ory MG. Apps seeking theories: results of a study on the use of health behavior change theories in cancer survivorship mobile apps. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Mar 27;3(1):e31. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.3861.
    1. Middelweerd A, Mollee JS, van der Wal CN, Brug J, Te Velde SJ. Apps to promote physical activity among adults: a review and content analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014;11:97. doi: 10.1186/s12966-014-0097-9.
    1. Direito A, Dale LP, Shields E, Dobson R, Whittaker R, Maddison R. Do physical activity and dietary smartphone applications incorporate evidence-based behaviour change techniques? BMC Public Health. 2014;14:646. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-646.
    1. Irvine AB, Gelatt VA, Seeley JR, Macfarlane P, Gau JM. Web-based intervention to promote physical activity by sedentary older adults: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(2):e19. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2158.
    1. Puszkiewicz P, Roberts AL, Smith L, Wardle J, Fisher A. Assessment of cancer survivors' experiences of using a publicly available physical activity mobile application. JMIR Cancer. 2016 May 31;2(1):e7. doi: 10.2196/cancer.5380.
    1. Localytics. 2016. [2016-10-26]. 23% of Users Abandon an App After One Use .
    1. Eldredge LKB, Markham CM, Kok G, Ruiter RA, Parcel GS. Planning Health Promotion Programs: An Intervention Mapping Approach. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons; 2016.
    1. Kok G, Gottlieb NH, Peters GY, Mullen PD, Parcel GS, Ruiter RA, Fernández ME, Markham C, Bartholomew LK. A taxonomy of behaviour change methods: an intervention mapping approach. Health Psychol Rev. 2015 Oct 15;:1–16. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2015.1077155.
    1. Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, Abraham C, Francis J, Hardeman W, Eccles MP, Cane J, Wood CE. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2013 Aug;46(1):81–95. doi: 10.1007/s12160-013-9486-6.
    1. Bandura A. Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Educ Behav. 2004 Apr;31(2):143–64. doi: 10.1177/1090198104263660.
    1. McAlister A, Perry C, Parcel G. How Individuals, Environments, and Health Behaviors Interact. In: Glanz K, Rimer B, Viswanath K, editors. Health Behavior and Health Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2008. pp. 169–188.
    1. Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjöström M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, Pratt M, Ekelund U, Yngve A, Sallis JF, Oja P. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Aug;35(8):1381–95. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB.
    1. Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc; 1986.
    1. Atlasti. Berlin: 2013. [2017-01-18]. ATLAS.ti Computer software
    1. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006 Jan;3(2):77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
    1. Higgins JP. Smartphone applications for patients' health and fitness. Am J Med. 2016 Jan;129(1):11–9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.05.038.
    1. Miyamoto SW, Henderson S, Young HM, Pande A, Han JJ. Tracking health data is not enough: a qualitative exploration of the role of healthcare partnerships and mHealth technology to promote physical activity and to sustain behavior change. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Jan 20;4(1):e5. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.4814.
    1. Dennison L, Morrison L, Conway G, Yardley L. Opportunities and challenges for smartphone applications in supporting health behavior change: qualitative study. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(4):e86. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2583.
    1. Rabin C, Bock B. Desired features of smartphone applications promoting physical activity. Telemed J E Health. 2011 Dec;17(10):801–3. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2011.0055.
    1. Hong Y, Vollmer Dahlke D, Ory M, Hochhalter A, Reynolds J, Purcell NP, Talwar D, Eugene N. Designing icanfit: a mobile-enabled web application to promote physical activity for older cancer survivors. JMIR Res Protoc. 2013;2(1):e12. doi: 10.2196/resprot.2440.
    1. Martin E, Basen-Engquist K, Cox M, Lyons E, Carmack C, Blalock J, Demark-Wahnefried W. Interest in health behavior intervention delivery modalities among cancer survivors: a cross-sectional study. JMIR Cancer. 2016 Feb 11;2(1) doi: 10.2196/cancer.5247.
    1. Lyons EJ, Baranowski T, Basen-Engquist KM, Lewis ZH, Swartz MC, Jennings K, Volpi E. Testing the effects of narrative and play on physical activity among breast cancer survivors using mobile apps: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2016 Mar 09;16:202. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2244-y.
    1. Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):68–78.
    1. Teixeira PJ, Carraça EV, Markland D, Silva MN, Ryan RM. Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9:78. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-78.
    1. Prochaska J, Redding C, Evers K. The Transtheoretical Model and Stages of Change. In: Glanz K, Rimer B, Viswanath K, editors. Health Behavior and Health Education Theory, Research, and Practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2008. pp. 97–122.
    1. Latham GP, Locke EA. New developments in and directions for goal-setting research. European Psychologist. 2007 Jan;12(4):290–300. doi: 10.1027/1016-9040.12.4.290.
    1. Lustria ML, Cortese J, Noar SM, Glueckauf RL. Computer-tailored health interventions delivered over the Web: review and analysis of key components. Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Feb;74(2):156–73. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.08.023.
    1. Kazdin AE. Evidence-based treatment and practice: new opportunities to bridge clinical research and practice, enhance the knowledge base, and improve patient care. Am Psychol. 2008 Apr;63(3):146–59. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.63.3.146.
    1. Heaney C, Israel B. Social Networks and Social Support. In: Glanz K, Rimer B, Viswanath K, editors. Health Behavior and Health Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2008. pp. 189–210.
    1. Ramirez AG, Villarreal R, McAlister A, Gallion KJ, Suarez L, Gomez P. Advancing the role of participatory communication in the diffusion of cancer screening among Hispanics. J Health Commun. 1999;4(1):31–6. doi: 10.1080/108107399127075.
    1. Champion V, Skinner C. The Health Belief Model. In: Glanz K, Rimer B, Viswanath K, editors. Health Behavior and Health Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2008. pp. 45–66.
    1. Garcia DO, Thomson CA. Physical activity and cancer survivorship. Nutr Clin Pract. 2014 Dec;29(6):768–79. doi: 10.1177/0884533614551969.
    1. Krebber AM, Buffart LM, Kleijn G, Riepma IC, de Bree R, Leemans CR, Becker A, Brug J, van Straten A, Cuijpers P, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM. Prevalence of depression in cancer patients: a meta-analysis of diagnostic interviews and self-report instruments. Psychooncology. 2014 Feb;23(2):121–30. doi: 10.1002/pon.3409. doi: 10.1002/pon.3409.
    1. Meier A, Lyons EJ, Frydman G, Forlenza M, Rimer BK. How cancer survivors provide support on cancer-related Internet mailing lists. J Med Internet Res. 2007 May 14;9(2):e12. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9.2.e12.
    1. Bender JL, Wiljer D, To MJ, Bedard PL, Chung P, Jewett MA, Matthew A, Moore M, Warde P, Gospodarowicz M. Testicular cancer survivors' supportive care needs and use of online support: a cross-sectional survey. Support Care Cancer. 2012 Nov;20(11):2737–46. doi: 10.1007/s00520-012-1395-x.
    1. Bender JL, Katz J, Ferris LE, Jadad AR. What is the role of online support from the perspective of facilitators of face-to-face support groups? A multi-method study of the use of breast cancer online communities. Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Dec;93(3):472–9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.07.009.
    1. Bender JL, Wiljer D, Sawka AM, Tsang R, Alkazaz N, Brierley JD. Thyroid cancer survivors' perceptions of survivorship care follow-up options: a cross-sectional, mixed-methods survey. Support Care Cancer. 2016 May;24(5):2007–15. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2981-5.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorit ja yhteistyökumppanit

Sairaudet

Huumeiden interventiot

3
Tilaa