Functional somatic disorders: discussion paper for a new common classification for research and clinical use

Christopher Burton, Per Fink, Peter Henningsen, Bernd Löwe, Winfried Rief, EURONET-SOMA Group, Christopher Burton, Per Fink, Peter Henningsen, Bernd Löwe, Winfried Rief, EURONET-SOMA Group

Abstract

Background: Functional somatic symptoms and disorders are common and complex phenomena involving both bodily and brain processes. They pose major challenges across medical specialties. These disorders are common and have significant impacts on patients' quality of life and healthcare costs.

Main body: We outline five problems pointing to the need for a new classification: (1) developments in understanding aetiological mechanisms; (2) the current division of disorders according to the treating specialist; (3) failure of current classifications to cover the variety of disorders and their severity (for example, patients with symptoms from multiple organs systems); (4) the need to find acceptable categories and labels for patients that promote therapeutic partnership; and (5) the need to develop clinical services and research for people with severe disorders. We propose 'functional somatic disorders' (FSD) as an umbrella term for various conditions characterised by persistent and troublesome physical symptoms. FSDs are diagnosed clinically, on the basis of characteristic symptom patterns. As with all diagnoses, a diagnosis of FSD should be made after considering other possible somatic and mental differential diagnoses. We propose that FSD should occupy a neutral space within disease classifications, favouring neither somatic disease aetiology, nor mental disorder. FSD should be subclassified as (a) multisystem, (b) single system, or (c) single symptom. While additional specifiers may be added to take account of psychological features or co-occurring diseases, neither of these is sufficient or necessary to make the diagnosis. We recommend that FSD criteria are written so as to harmonise with existing syndrome diagnoses. Where currently defined syndromes fall within the FSD spectrum - and also within organ system-specific chapters of a classification - they should be afforded dual parentage (for example, irritable bowel syndrome can belong to both gastrointestinal disorders and FSD).

Conclusion: We propose a new classification, 'functional somatic disorder', which is neither purely somatic nor purely mental, but occupies a neutral space between these two historical poles. This classification reflects both emerging aetiological evidence of the complex interactions between brain and body and the need to resolve the historical split between somatic and mental disorders.

Keywords: Bodily distress; Classification; Functional disorders; Medically unexplained symptoms; Psychophysiologic disorders; Psychosomatic medicine; Somatic symptom disorder; Somatoform disorders.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Structure of the proposed classification showing the relationship between main category, sub-categories and additional features

References

    1. Haller H, Cramer H, Lauche R, Dobos G. Somatoform disorders and medically unexplained symptoms in primary care. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015;112:279–287.
    1. Nimnuan C, Hotopf M, Wessely S. Medically unexplained symptoms: an epidemiological study in seven specialities. J Psychosom Res. 2001;51:361–367. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3999(01)00223-9.
    1. Weigel A, Husing P, Kohlmann S, Lehmann M, Shedden-Mora M, Toussaint A, et al. A European research network to improve diagnosis, treatment and care for patients with persistent somatic symptoms: work report of the EURONET-SOMA conference series. J Psychosom Res. 2017;97:136–138. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.04.003.
    1. van der Feltz-Cornelis CM, Elfeddali I, Werneke U, Malt UF, Van den Bergh O, Schaefert R, et al. A European research agenda for somatic symptom disorders, bodily distress disorders, and functional disorders: results of an estimate-talk-estimate Delphi expert study. Front Psychiatr. 2018;9:151. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00151.
    1. Rief W, Burton C, Frostholm L, Henningsen P, Kleinstauber M, Kop WJ, et al. Core outcome domains for clinical trials on somatic symptom disorder, bodily distress disorder, and functional somatic syndromes: European network on somatic symptom disorders recommendations. Psychosom Med. 2017;79:1008–1015. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000502.
    1. Henningsen P, Gundel H, Kop WJ, Lowe B, Martin A, Rief W, et al. Persistent physical symptoms as perceptual dysregulation: a neuropsychobehavioral model and its clinical implications. Psychosom Med. 2018;80:422–431. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000588.
    1. Kohlmann S, Lowe B, Shedden-Mora MC. Health care for persistent somatic symptoms across Europe: a qualitative evaluation of the EURONET-SOMA expert discussion. Front Psychiatry. 2018;9:646. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00646.
    1. EURONET-SOMA. . Accessed 20 Jan 2020.
    1. Rief W, Isaac M. The future of somatoform disorders: somatic symptom disorder, bodily distress disorder or functional syndromes? Curr Opin Psychiatr. 2014;27:315–319. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000089.
    1. Creed F, Guthrie E, Fink P, Henningsen P, Rief W, Sharpe M, et al. Is there a better term than ‘medically unexplained symptoms’? J Psychosom Res. 2010;68:5–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.09.004.
    1. Wessely S, Nimnuan M, Sharpe M. Functional somatic syndromes: one or many. Lancet. 1999;354:936–939. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)08320-2.
    1. Kroenke K, Sharpe M, Sykes R. Revising the classification of somatoform disorders: key questions and preliminary recommendations. Psychosomatics. 2007;48:277–285. doi: 10.1176/appi.psy.48.4.277.
    1. World Health Organization (WHO) International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems (11th revision) Geneva: WHO; 2018.
    1. American Psychiatric Association (APA) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5) Washington, DC: APA; 2013.
    1. Fink P, Schroder A. One single diagnosis, bodily distress syndrome, succeeded to capture 10 diagnostic categories of functional somatic syndromes and somatoform disorders. J Psychosom Res. 2010;68:415–426. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2010.02.004.
    1. Goldberg DP, Reed GM, Robles R, Bobes J, Iglesias C, Fortes S, et al. Multiple somatic symptoms in primary care: a field study for ICD-11 PHC, WHO’s revised classification of mental disorders in primary care settings. J Psychosom Res. 2016;91:48–54. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2016.10.002.
    1. Gureje O, Reed GM. Bodily distress disorder in ICD-11: problems and prospects. World Psychiatry. 2016;15:291–292. doi: 10.1002/wps.20353.
    1. Fink P, Toft T, Hansen MS, Ornbol E, Olesen F. Symptoms and syndromes of bodily distress: an exploratory study of 978 internal medical, neurological, and primary care patients. Psychosom Med. 2007;69:30–39. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e31802e46eb.
    1. Lam TP, Goldberg DP, Dowell AC, Fortes S, Mbatia JK, Minhas FA, et al. Proposed new diagnoses of anxious depression and bodily stress syndrome in ICD-11-PHC: an international focus group study. Fam Pract. 2013;30:76–87. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cms037.
    1. Drossman DA, Hasler WL. Rome IV – functional GI disorders: disorders of gut–brain interaction. Gastroenterology. 2016;150:1257–1261. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.03.035.
    1. Wolfe F, Clauw DJ, Fitzcharles M-A, Goldenberg DL, Häuser W, Katz RL, et al. 2016 revisions to the 2010/2011 fibromyalgia diagnostic criteria. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2016;46:319–329. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2016.08.012.
    1. Russell A, Hepgul N, Nikkheslat N, Borsini A, Zajkowska Z, Moll N, et al. Persistent fatigue induced by interferon-alpha: a novel, inflammation-based, proxy model of chronic fatigue syndrome. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2019;100:276–285. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.11.032.
    1. Rizzi M, Radovanovic D, Santus P, Airoldi A, Frassanito F, Vanni S, et al. Influence of autonomic nervous system dysfunction in the genesis of sleep disorders in fibromyalgia patients. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2017;35(Suppl 105):74–80.
    1. Nijs J, Meeus M, Van Oosterwijck J, Ickmans K, Moorkens G, Hans G, et al. In the mind or in the brain? Scientific evidence for central sensitisation in chronic fatigue syndrome. Eur J Clin Investig. 2012;42:203–212. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2011.02575.x.
    1. Tomas C, Newton J. Metabolic abnormalities in chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis: a mini-review. Biochem Soc Trans. 2018;46:547–553. doi: 10.1042/BST20170503.
    1. Bourke JH, Langford RM, White PD. The common link between functional somatic syndromes may be central sensitisation. J Psychosom Res. 2015;78:228–236. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2015.01.003.
    1. McAndrew LM, Crede M, Maestro K, Slotkin S, Kimber J, Phillips LA. Using the common-sense model to understand health outcomes for medically unexplained symptoms: a meta-analysis. Health Psychol Rev. 2018;13:427–446. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2018.1521730.
    1. Nimnuan C, Rabe-Hesketh S, Wessely S, Hotopf M. How many functional somatic syndromes? J Psychosom Res. 2001;51:549–557. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3999(01)00224-0.
    1. McAndrew LM, Friedlander ML, Alison Phillips L, L Santos S, Helmer DA. Concordance of illness perceptions: The key to improving care of medically unexplained symptoms. J Psychosom Res. 2018;111:140–142. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2018.05.015.
    1. Burton C, Lucassen P, Aamland A, TO H. Explaining symptoms after negative tests: towards a rational explanation. J R Soc Med. 2015;108:84–88. doi: 10.1177/0141076814559082.
    1. Picariello F, Ali S, Moss-Morris R, Chalder T. The most popular terms for medically unexplained symptoms: the views of CFS patients. J Psychosom Res. 2015;78:420–426. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2015.02.013.
    1. Marks EM, Hunter MS. Medically unexplained symptoms: an acceptable term? Br J Pain. 2015;9:109–114. doi: 10.1177/2049463714535372.
    1. Stone J, Wojcik W, Durrance D, Carson A, Lewis S, MacKenzie L, et al. What should we say to patients with symptoms unexplained by disease? The ‘number needed to offend’. BMJ. 2002;325:1449–1450. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7378.1449.
    1. Rosendal M, Olde Hartman TC, Aamland A, van der Horst H, Lucassen P, Budtz-Lilly A, et al. ‘Medically unexplained’ symptoms and symptom disorders in primary care: prognosis-based recognition and classification. BMC Fam Pract. 2017;18:18. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0592-6.
    1. Johansen M-L, Risor MB. What is the problem with medically unexplained symptoms for GPs? A meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100:647–654. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.11.015.
    1. Shattock L, Williamson H, Caldwell K, Anderson K, Peters S. ‘They’ve just got symptoms without science’: medical trainees’ acquisition of negative attitudes towards patients with medically unexplained symptoms. Patient Educ Counsel. 2013;91:249–254. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.12.015.
    1. Treede RD, Rief W, Barke A, Aziz Q, Bennett MI, Benoliel R, et al. Chronic pain as a symptom or a disease: the IASP classification of chronic Ppain for the international classification of diseases (ICD-11) Pain. 2019;160:19–27. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001384.
    1. Nicholas M, Vlaeyen JWS, Rief W, Barke A, Aziz Q, Benoliel R, et al. The IASP classification of chronic pain for ICD-11: chronic primary pain. Pain. 2019;160:28–37. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001390.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorit ja yhteistyökumppanit

Sairaudet

Huumeiden interventiot

3
Tilaa