CD200 expression suppresses natural killer cell function and directly inhibits patient anti-tumor response in acute myeloid leukemia

S J Coles, E C Y Wang, S Man, R K Hills, A K Burnett, A Tonks, R L Darley, S J Coles, E C Y Wang, S Man, R K Hills, A K Burnett, A Tonks, R L Darley

Abstract

Upregulation of the immunosuppressive cell surface glycoprotein, CD200, is a common feature of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and is associated with poor patient outcome. We investigated whether CD200 overexpression on AML cells could specifically compromise patient natural killer (NK) cell anti-tumor responses. We found that CD200(hi) patients showed a 50% reduction in the frequency of activated NK cells (CD56(dim)CD16(+)) compared with CD200(lo) patients. Additionally, NK receptor expression (NKp44 and NKp46) on these cells was also significantly downregulated in CD200(hi) patients. To assess whether NK cell activity was directly influenced by CD200 expression, we examined the effect of ectopic expression of CD200. These assays revealed that both NK cell cytolytic activity and interferon-γ response were significantly reduced toward CD200(+) leukemic targets and that these targets showed increased survival compared with CD200(-) cells. Similarly, NK cells isolated from AML patients were less functionally active toward CD200(hi) autologous blasts from both cytolytic and immunoregulatory perspectives. Finally, blocking CD200 alone was sufficient to recover a significant proportion of NK cell cytolytic activity. Together, these findings provide the first evidence that CD200 has a direct and significant suppressive influence on NK cell activity in AML patients and may contribute to the increased relapse rate in CD200(+) patients.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Expression of CD200 on AML blasts relates to a change in the frequency of NK cell subsets. (a) Representative flow cytometric plots of NK cells in CD200lo and CD200hi AML patients (CD200 expression level is defined in Data acquisition and analysis). Five NK cell sub-populations are shown based on the bivariate expression of CD56 and CD16. Plots are gated on CD45+ + CD19− CD3− lymphocytes. (b) Summary box and whisker plot summarizing the frequency of the five NK cell sub-populations (as percentage of total lymphocytes) between CD200lo (filled boxes) and CD200hi (n=12 per group). ***P<0.001 analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Turkey’s multiple comparison test.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparisons of NK cell activation marker repertoire between CD200lo and CD200hi AML patients. NK cells from CD200lo and CD200hi AML patients were examined by eight color flow cytometry (see Materials and methods). Sub-populations 3, 4 and 5 in CD200lo (filled bars) and CD200hi (open bars) patients were assessed for expression of (a) NKp44, (b) NKp46, (c) NKp30 and (d) NKG2D. Data represent mean±1 s.d. (n=12, per group). *P<0.05 analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Turkey’s multiple comparison test.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Functional assessment of NK cell activity toward K562-CD200− and K562-CD200+ targets. (a) Summarized data illustrating percentage of degranulating NK cells in sub-populations 3, 4 and 5 (defined as in Figure 1a) in response to K562-CD200− or K562-CD200+ targets (Supplementary Figure S3). Background CD107a expression (PBMC control cultures with no targets) is also indicated. Flow cytometric gating strategy for this assay is shown in Supplementary Figure S4). (b) Representative flow cytometric plots illustrating expression of CD107a (open histograms) in sub-population 4 NK cells in response to K562-CD200− and K562-CD200+ targets, or PBMC control. Filled histograms represent isotype-matched controls. (c) IFNγ release in response to K562-CD200− targets compared with K562-CD200+ targets as measured by ELISPOT at different effector to target (E:T) ratios (see Materials and methods; representative data shown in Supplementary Figure S4). Data represent mean±1 s.d. (n=6, per group). *P<0.05 analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Turkey’s multiple comparison test.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Reduced NK cell degranulation corresponds to increased viability of CD200+ targets. K562-CD200− or K562-CD200+ targets were co-cultured with PBMC from healthy donors, for 18 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2 at an effector:target ratio of 2:1 (or in the absence of PBMC; K562 controls). Following this, cells were stained with annexin-V/7AAD and analyzed by flow cytometry, excluding lymphocytes, (deselected based on low FSC/side scatter (SSC)). (a) Summarized data (mean+1 s.d.; n=8). (b) Representative annexin-V/7AAD flow cytometric plots from PBMC co-cultured with K562-CD200− and PBMC co-cultured with K562-CD200+ targets. (c) Representative flow cytometric plots confirming that NK cells degranulated significantly more toward K562-CD200− targets compared with K562-CD200+ targets under the same assay conditions. Figures represent mean percent degranulation for each target type (n=8, P<0.05). *P<0.05 analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Turkey’s multiple comparison test.
Figure 5
Figure 5
CD200R is expressed on AML patient NK cell sub-populations. (a) Representative flow cytometric plots reveal that CD200R expression is expressed on NK cells on sub-populations 3, 4 and 5 in AML patients. (b) Summary data illustrating the CD200R relative expression level within the indicated NK cell sub-populations. Data represent mean+1 s.d. (n=20).
Figure 6
Figure 6
CD200 blocking antibody promotes NK cell activity in CD200hi patients. (a) BMMC from CD200lo and CD200hi AML patients were incubated in the presence of CD107a with 5 μg/ml of unconjugated anti-human CD200 or respective IgG isotype-matched control for 6 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2. The percentage of CD107a-positive NK cells in response to autologous AML blasts was determined by flow cytometric analysis. (b) NK cell IFNγ release from BMMC of AML patients in response to CD200lo or CD200hi autologous blasts, as measured by ELSIPOT. Incubations were carried out in the presence of unconjugated anti-human CD200 or respective IgG isotype-matched control for 18–20 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Data represent mean+1 s.d. (n=6). *P<0.05 one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Turkey’s multiple comparison test.

References

    1. Barclay AN, Clark MJ, McCaughan GW. Neuronal/lymphoid membrane glycoprotein MRC OX-2 is a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily with a light-chain-like structure. Biochem Soc Symp. 1986;51:149–157.
    1. Barclay AN, Wright GJ, Brooke G, Brown MH. CD200 and membrane protein interactions in the control of myeloid cells. Trends Immunol. 2002;23:285–290.
    1. Wright GJ, Puklavec MJ, Willis AC, Hoek RM, Sedgwick JD, Brown MH, et al. Lymphoid/neuronal cell surface OX2 glycoprotein recognizes a novel receptor on macrophages implicated in the control of their function. Immunity. 2000;13:233–242.
    1. Hoek RM, Ruuls SR, Murphy CA, Wright GJ, Goddard R, Zurawski SM, et al. Down-regulation of the macrophage lineage through interaction with OX2 (CD200) Science. 2000;290:1768–1771.
    1. Gorczynski RM, Lee L, Boudakov I. Augmented induction of CD4+CD25+ Treg using monoclonal antibodies to CD200R. Transplantation. 2005;79:488–491.
    1. Gorczynski L, Chen Z, Hu J, Kai Y, Lei J, Ramakrishna V, et al. Evidence that an OX-2-positive cell can inhibit the stimulation of type 1 cytokine production by bone marrow-derived B7-1 (and B7-2)-positive dendritic cells. J Immunol. 1999;162:774–781.
    1. Moreaux J, Veyrune JL, Reme T, De VJ, Klein B. CD200: a putative therapeutic target in cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;366:117–122.
    1. Siva A, Xin H, Qin F, Oltean D, Bowdish KS, Kretz-Rommel A. Immune modulation by melanoma and ovarian tumor cells through expression of the immunosuppressive molecule CD200. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2008;57:987–996.
    1. Tonks A, Pearn L, Musson M, Gilkes A, Mills KI, Burnett AK, et al. Transcriptional dysregulation mediated by RUNX1-RUNX1T1 in normal human progenitor cells and in acute myeloid leukaemia. Leukemia. 2007;21:2495–2505.
    1. Wong KK, Khatri I, Shaha S, Spaner DE, Gorczynski RM. The role of CD200 in immunity to B cell lymphoma. J Leukoc Biol. 2010;88:361–372.
    1. Kretz-Rommel A, Qin F, Dakappagari N, Ravey EP, McWhirter J, Oltean D, et al. CD200 expression on tumor cells suppresses antitumor immunity: new approaches to cancer immunotherapy. J Immunol. 2007;178:5595–5605.
    1. Brunetti L, Di NR, Abate G, Gorrese M, Gravetti A, Raia M, et al. CD200/OX2, a cell surface molecule with immuno-regulatory function, is consistently expressed on hairy cell leukaemia eoplastic cells. Br J Haematol. 2009;145:665–667.
    1. Moreaux J, Hose D, Reme T, Jourdan E, Hundemer M, Legouffe E, et al. CD200 is a new prognostic factor in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2006;108:4194–4197.
    1. Tonks A, Hills R, White P, Rosie B, Mills KI, Burnett AK, et al. CD200 as a prognostic factor in acute myeloid leukaemia. Leukemia. 2007;21:566–568.
    1. Kawasaki BT, Mistree T, Hurt EM, Kalathur M, Farrar WL. Co-expression of the toleragenic glycoprotein, CD200, with markers for cancer stem cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007;364:778–782.
    1. Kawasaki BT, Farrar WL. Cancer stem cells, CD200 and immunoevasion. Trends Immunol. 2008;29:464–468.
    1. Gorczynski RM, Chen Z, Hu J, Kai Y, Lei J. Evidence of a role for CD200 in regulation of immune rejection of leukaemic tumour cells in C57BL/6 mice. Clin Exp Immunol. 2001;126:220–229.
    1. Gorczynski RM. Transplant tolerance modifying antibody to CD200 receptor, but not CD200, alters cytokine production profile from stimulated macrophages. Eur J Immunol. 2001;31:2331–2337.
    1. Zhang L, Stanford M, Liu J, Barrett C, Jiang L, Barclay AN, et al. Inhibition of macrophage activation by the myxoma virus M141 protein (vCD200) J Virol. 2009;83:9602–9607.
    1. Cooper MA, Caligiuri MA. Immunologic manipulation in AML: from bench to bedside. Leukemia. 2002;16:736–737.
    1. Guinn BA, Mohamedali A, Thomas NS, Mills KI. Immunotherapy of myeloid leukaemia. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2007;56:943–957.
    1. Barrett AJ, Le BK. Immunotherapy prospects for acute myeloid leukaemia. Clin Exp Immunol. 2010;161:223–232.
    1. Warren HS, Smyth MJ. NK cells and apoptosis. Immunol Cell Biol. 1999;77:64–75.
    1. Zwirner NW, Domaica CI. Cytokine regulation of natural killer cell effector functions. Biofactors. 2010;36:274–288.
    1. Moretta L, Biassoni R, Bottino C, Cantoni C, Pende D, Mingari MC, et al. Human NK cells and their receptors. Microbes Infect. 2002;4:1539–1544.
    1. Lakshmikanth T, Burke S, Ali TH, Kimpfler S, Ursini F, Ruggeri L, et al. NCRs and DNAM-1 mediate NK cell recognition and lysis of human and mouse melanoma cell lines in vitro and in vivo. J Clin Invest. 2009;119:1251–1263.
    1. Hecht ML, Rosental B, Horlacher T, Hershkovitz O, De Paz JL, Noti C, et al. Natural cytotoxicity receptors NKp30, NKp44 and NKp46 bind to different heparan sulfate/heparin sequences. J Proteome Res. 2009;8:712–720.
    1. Lowdell MW, Craston R, Samuel D, Wood ME, O’Neill E, Saha V, et al. Evidence that continued remission in patients treated for acute leukaemia is dependent upon autologous natural killer cells. Br J Haematol. 2002;117:821–827.
    1. Costello RT, Sivori S, Marcenaro E, Lafage-Pochitaloff M, Mozziconacci MJ, Reviron D, et al. Defective expression and function of natural killer cell-triggering receptors in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2002;99:3661–3667.
    1. Poli A, Michel T, Theresine M, Andres E, Hentges F, Zimmer J. CD56bright natural killer (NK) cells: an important NK cell subset. Immunology. 2009;126:458–465.
    1. Lennon G, Auffray C, Polymeropoulos M, Soares MB. The I.M.A.G.E. consortium: an integrated molecular analysis of genomes and their expression. Genomics. 1996;33:151–152.
    1. Grignani F, Kinsella T, Mencarelli A, Valtieri M, Riganelli D, Grignani F, et al. High-efficiency gene transfer and selection of human hematopoietic progenitor cells with a hybrid EBV/retroviral vector expressing the green fluorescence protein. Cancer Res. 1998;58:14–19.
    1. Derby E, Reddy V, Baseler M, Malyguine A. Flow cytometric assay for the simultaneous analysis of cell-mediated cytotoxicity and effector cell phenotype. Biotechniques. 2001;31:660, 664–665.
    1. Fauriat C, Just-Landi S, Mallet F, Arnoulet C, Sainty D, Olive D, et al. Deficient expression of NCR in NK cells from acute myeloid leukemia: Evolution during leukemia treatment and impact of leukemia cells in NCRdull phenotype induction. Blood. 2007;109:323–330.
    1. Waldhauer I, Steinle A. NK cells and cancer immunosurveillance. Oncogene. 2008;27:5932–5943.
    1. Nowbakht P, Ionescu MC, Rohner A, Kalberer CP, Rossy E, Mori L, et al. Ligands for natural killer cell-activating receptors are expressed upon the maturation of normal myelomonocytic cells but at low levels in acute myeloid leukemias. Blood. 2005;105:3615–3622.
    1. Siegler U, Kalberer CP, Nowbakht P, Sendelov S, Meyer-Monard S, Wodnar-Filipowicz A. Activated natural killer cells from patients with acute myeloid leukemia are cytotoxic against autologous leukemic blasts in NOD/SCID mice. Leukemia. 2005;19:2215–2222.
    1. Cooper MA, Fehniger TA, Caligiuri MA. The biology of human natural killer-cell subsets. Trends Immunol. 2001;22:633–640.
    1. Coudert JD, Zimmer J, Tomasello E, Cebecauer M, Colonna M, Vivier E, et al. Altered NKG2D function in NK cells induced by chronic exposure to NKG2D ligand-expressing tumor cells. Blood. 2005;106:1711–1717.
    1. Alter G, Malenfant JM, Altfeld M. CD107a as a functional marker for the identification of natural killer cell activity. J Immunol Methods. 2004;294:15–22.
    1. Penack O, Gentilini C, Fischer L, Asemissen AM, Scheibenbogen C, Thiel E, et al. CD56dimCD16neg cells are responsible for natural cytotoxicity against tumor targets. Leukemia. 2005;19:35–840.
    1. Zimmer J, Andres E, Hentges F. NK cell subsets and CD107a obilization assay. Leukemia. 2005;19:1849–1851.
    1. Derby EG, Reddy V, Nelson EL, Kopp WC, Baseler MW, Dawson JR, et al. Correlation of human CD56+ cell cytotoxicity and IFN-gamma production. Cytokine. 2001;13:85–90.
    1. Cooper MA, Fehniger TA, Turner SC, Chen KS, Ghaheri BA, Ghayur T, et al. Human natural killer cells: a unique innate immunoregulatory role for the CD56(bright) subset. Blood. 2001;97:3146–3151.
    1. Kretz-Rommel A, Qin F, Dakappagari N, Cofiell R, Faas SJ, Bowdish KS. Blockade of CD200 in the presence or absence of antibody effector function: implications for anti-CD200 therapy. J Immunol. 2008;180:699–705.
    1. Pallasch CP, Ulbrich S, Brinker R, Hallek M, Uger RA, Wendtner CM. Disruption of T cell suppression in chronic lymphocytic leukemia by CD200 blockade. Leuk Res. 2009;33:460–464.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa