The Ipswich Touch Test: a simple and novel method to identify inpatients with diabetes at risk of foot ulceration

Gerry Rayman, Prashanth R Vas, Neil Baker, Charles G Taylor Jr, Catherine Gooday, Amanda I Alder, Mollie Donohoe, Gerry Rayman, Prashanth R Vas, Neil Baker, Charles G Taylor Jr, Catherine Gooday, Amanda I Alder, Mollie Donohoe

Abstract

Objective: To promote foot screening of inpatients with diabetes, we simplified sensory testing to lightly touching the tips of the first, third, and fifth toes (the Ipswich Touch Test [IpTT]).

Research design and methods: Respective performances of the IpTT and 10-g monofilament (MF) were compared with a vibration perception threshold of ≥25 V indicating at-risk feet in 265 individuals. The IpTT and MF were also directly compared.

Results: With ≥2 of 6 insensate areas signifying at-risk feet, sensitivities and specificities, respectively, were IpTT (77 and 90%), MF (81 and 91%); positive predictive values were IpTT (89%), MF (91%); and negative predictive values were IpTT (77%), MF (81%). Directly compared, agreement between the IpTT and MF was almost perfect (κ=0.88, P<0.0001). Interrater agreement for the IpTT was substantial (κ=0.68).

Conclusions: The IpTT performs well against a recognized standard for ulcer prediction. Simple to teach, reliable, without expense, and always at hand, it should encourage uptake of screening and detection of high-risk inpatients requiring foot protection.

References

    1. Abbott CA, Carrington AL, Ashe H, et al. ; North-West Diabetes Foot Care Study The North-West Diabetes Foot Care Study: incidence of, and risk factors for, new diabetic foot ulceration in a community-based patient cohort. Diabet Med 2002;19:377–384
    1. Leese GP, Reid F, Green V, et al. Stratification of foot ulcer risk in patients with diabetes: a population-based study. Int J Clin Pract 2006;60:541–545
    1. Adler AI, Boyko EJ, Ahroni JH, Stensel V, Forsberg RC, Smith DG. Risk factors for diabetic peripheral sensory neuropathy. Results of the Seattle Prospective Diabetic Foot Study. Diabetes Care 1997;20:1162–1167
    1. Rith-Najarian SJ, Stolusky T, Gohdes DM. Identifying diabetic patients at high risk for lower-extremity amputation in a primary health care setting. A prospective evaluation of simple screening criteria. Diabetes Care 1992;15:1386–1389
    1. Rayman G. The National Diabetes Inpatient Audit Day. A great success and a powerful tool with which to improve inpatient diabetes care. Summary of the paper presented to Diabetes UK APC March 2010 [article online], 2010. Available from Accessed 14 December 2010
    1. Armstrong DG, Lavery LA, Vela SA, Quebedeaux TL, Fleischli JG. Choosing a practical screening instrument to identify patients at risk for diabetic foot ulceration. Arch Intern Med 1998;158:289–292
    1. Shy ME, Frohman EM, So YT, et al. ; Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology Quantitative sensory testing: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology 2003;60:898–904
    1. Dros J, Wewerinke A, Bindels PJ, van Weert HC. Accuracy of monofilament testing to diagnose peripheral neuropathy: a systematic review. Ann Fam Med 2009;7:555–558
    1. Singh N, Armstrong DG, Lipsky BA. Preventing foot ulcers in patients with diabetes. JAMA 2005;293:217–228
    1. Young MJ, Breddy JL, Veves A, Boulton AJ. The prediction of diabetic neuropathic foot ulceration using vibration perception thresholds. A prospective study. Diabetes Care 1994;17:557–560
    1. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159–174
    1. Diabetes UK. Putting feet first: commissioning specialist services for the management and prevention of diabetic foot disease in hospitals [article online]. Available from Accessed 14 December 2010

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa