The impact of a lay counselor led collaborative care intervention for common mental disorders in public and private primary care: a qualitative evaluation nested in the MANAS trial in Goa, India

Sachin Shinde, Gracy Andrew, Omer Bangash, Alex Cohen, Betty Kirkwood, Vikram Patel, Sachin Shinde, Gracy Andrew, Omer Bangash, Alex Cohen, Betty Kirkwood, Vikram Patel

Abstract

The MANAS trial evaluated the effectiveness of a lay counselor led collaborative stepped care intervention for Common Mental Disorders (CMD) in public and private sector primary care settings in Goa, India. This paper describes the qualitative findings of the experience of the intervention and its impact on health and psychosocial outcomes. Twenty four primary care facilities (12 public and private each) were randomized to provide either collaborative stepped care (CSC) or enhanced usual care (EUC) to adults who screen positive for CMDs. Participants were sampled purposively based on two criteria: gender and, in the CSC arm, adherence with the intervention. The qualitative study component involved two semi-structured interviews with participants of both arms (N = 115); the first interview within 2 months of recruitment and the second 6-8 months after recruitment. Data were collected between September 2007 and November 2009. More participants in the CSC than EUC arm reported relief from symptoms and an improvement in social functioning and positive impact on work and activities of daily life. The CSC participants attributed their improvement both to medication received from the doctors and the strategies suggested by the lay Health Counselors (HC). However, two key differences were observed in the results for the two types of facilities. First, the CSC participants in the public sector clinics were more likely to consider the HCs to be an important component of providing care who served as a link between patient and the doctor, provided them skills on stress management and helped in adherence to medication. Second, in the private sector, doctors performed roles similar to those of the HCs and participants in both arms placed much faith in the doctor who acted as a confidante and was perceived to understand the participant's health and context intimately. Lay counselors working in a CSC model have a positive effect on symptomatic relief, social functioning and satisfaction with care in patients with CMD attending primary care clinics although the impact, compared with usual care, is greater in the public sector.

Copyright © 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

References

    1. Anderson S., Lindberg G., Troein M. What shapes GPs' work with depressed patients? A qualitative interview study. Family Practice. 2002;19(6):623–631.
    1. Andrew G., Cohen A., Salgaonkar S., Patel V. The explanatory models of depression and anxiety in primary care: a qualitative study from India. BMC Research Notes. 2012;5:499.
    1. Aronson J. A pragmatic view of thematic analysis. The Qualitative Report. 1994;2(1)
    1. Aurback C., Silverstein L. New York University Press; USA: 2003. Qualitative data: An introduction to coding and analysis.
    1. Bower P., Gilbody S., Richards D., Flecher J. Collaborative care for depression- making sense of a complex intervention: systematic review and meta-regression. British Journal of Psychiatry. 2006;189:484–493.
    1. Braun V., Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006;3(2):77–101.
    1. Cape J. Patient-rated therapeutic relationship and outcome in general practitioner treatment of psychological problems. British Journal of Clinical Psychology. 2000;39(4):383–395.
    1. Chatterjee S., Chowdhary N., Pednekar S., Cohen A. Integrating evidence-based treatments for common mental disorders in routine primary care: feasibility and acceptability of the MANAS intervention in Goa, India. World Psychiatry. 2008;7(1):45–53.
    1. Criag P., Dieppe P., Macintyre S., Michie S., Nazareth I. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new medical research council guidance. British Medical Journal. 2008;337(a1655)
    1. Glenton C., Lewin S., Scheel I. Still too little qualitative research to shed light on results from reviews of effectiveness trials: a case study of a Cochrane review on the use of lay health workers. Implementation Science. 2011;6(1):53.
    1. Hawe P., Shiell A., Riley T., Gold L. Methods for exploring implementation variation and local context within a cluster randomised community intervention trial. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health. 2004;58(9):788–793.
    1. Kohn R., Saxena S., Levav I., Saraceno B. The treatment gap in mental health care. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2004;82:858–866.
    1. Lewin S., Glenton C., Oxman A. Use of qualitative methods alongside randomised controlled trials of complex healthcare interventions: methodological study. British Medical Journal. 2009:339–345.
    1. Marcus M., Yasamy T., Ommeren M., Chisholm D., Saxena S. Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, World Health Organization; 2012. Depression: A global public health concern. Accessed on.
    1. Miles M., Huberman M. Sage Publications; USA: 1994. Qualitative data analysis.
    1. Neuendorf K. Sage Publications; USA: 2002. The content analysis: A guidebook.
    1. Oakley A., Strange V., Bonell C., Allen E., Stephenson J. Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions. British Medical Journal. 2006;332(7538):413–416.
    1. Patel V., Araya R., Chowdhary N., King M., Kirkwood B. Detecting Common mental disorders in primary care in India: a comparison of five screening questionnaires. Psychological Medicine. 2008;38:221–228.
    1. Patel V., Weiss H., Chowdhary N., Naik S. Effectiveness of an intervention led by lay health counselors for depressive and anxiety disorders in primary care in Goa, India (MANAS): a cluster randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2010;376(9758):2086–2095.
    1. Patel V., Weiss H., Chowdhary N., Naik S. Lay health worker led intervention for depressive and anxiety disorders in India: impact on clinical and disability outcomes over 12 months. British Journal of Psychiatry. 2011;199:459–466.
    1. Pereira B., Andrew G., Pednekar S., Kirkwood B., Patel V. The integration of the treatment for common mental disorders in primary care: experience of healthcare providers in the MANAS trial in Goa, India. International Journal of Mental Health System. 2011;5(26):2–9.
    1. Strauss A. Cambridge University Press; UK: 1987. Qualitative analysis for social scientists.
    1. World Health Organization. The World Health Report 2001: Mental health: New understanding, new hope. Geneva: WHO.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa