Clinical implications of telemedicine for providers and patients

William T Berg, Marc Goldstein, Alexis P Melnick, Zev Rosenwaks, William T Berg, Marc Goldstein, Alexis P Melnick, Zev Rosenwaks

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in paradigm shifts in the delivery of health care. Lockdowns, quarantines, and local mandates forced many physician practices around the United States to move to remote patient visits and adoption of telemedicine. This has several long-term implications in the future practice of medicine. In this review we outline different models of integrating telemedicine into both male and female fertility practices and recommendations on performing video physical examinations. Moving forward we foresee two general models of integration: one conservative, where initial intake and follow-up is performed remotely, and a second model where most visits are performed via video and patients are only seen preoperatively if necessary. We also discuss the impact THAT telemedicine has on coding and billing and our experience with patient satisfaction.

Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; Telemedicine; health communication; telehealth.

Copyright © 2020 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

References

    1. Institute of Medicine (US) In: Telemedicine: a guide to assessing telecommunications in health care. Field M.J., editor. National Academy Press; Washington, DC: 1996. Committee on Evaluating Clinical Applications of Telemedicine.
    1. Ellimoottil C. Implementing telemedicine in urology: an overview of the benefits and barriers. J Urol. 2019;202:47–48.
    1. Blakemore J.K., Bayer A.H., Smith M.B., Grifo J.A. Infertility influencers: an analysis of information and influence in the fertility webspace. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020;37:1371–1378.
    1. Azar A.M., II Determination that a public health emergency exists. January 31, 2020. Available at:
    1. American Society for Reproductive Medicine Patient management and clinical recommendations during the coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic. 2020. Available at:
    1. American Society for Reproductive Medicine SMRU statement regarding male reproductive health and Covid-19. Available at:
    1. Vance A., Chen S.H., Berman L.M., Bumpers B. Telehealth during the pandemic and beyond: a tool for your clinical arsenal. April 17, Available at:
    1. McKinsey and Company Telehealth: a quarter-trillion-dollar post COVID-19 reality? May 29, 2020. Available at:
    1. Novara G, Checcucci E, Crestani A, Abrate A, Esperto F, Pavan N, et al. Telehealth in urology: a systematic review of the literature. how much can telemedicine be useful during and after the Covid-19 pandemic? Eur Urol. Published online ahead of print June 18, 2020.
    1. Viers B.R., Lightner D.J., Rivera M.E., Tollefson M.K., Boorjian S.A., Karnes R.J., et al. Efficiency, satisfaction, and costs for remote video visits following radical prostatectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Eur Urol. 2015;68:729–735.
    1. Finkelstein J.B., Cahill D., Kurtz M.P., Campbell J., Schumann C., Varda B.K., et al. The use of telemedicine for the postoperative urological care of children: results of a pilot program. J Urol. 2019;202:159–163.
    1. Miller G.G., Levesque K. Telehealth provides effective pediatric surgery care to remote locations. J Pediatr Surg. 2002;37:752–754.
    1. Leong J.R., Sirio C.A., Rotondi A.J. eICU program favorably affects clinical and economic outcomes. Crit Care. 2005;9:E22.
    1. Antoniotti N.M., Drude K.P., Rowe N. Private payer telehealth reimbursement in the United States. Telemed J E Health. 2014;20:539–543.
    1. Castaneda P., Ellimoottil C. Current use of telehealth in urology: a review. World J Urol. 2020;38:2377–2384.
    1. Witherspoon L., Fitzpatrick R., Patel P., Flannigan R., Roberts M.T., Krakowsky Y., et al. Clinical pearls to managing men’s health conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic. Can Urol Assoc J. 2020;14:E161–E166.
    1. Gerris J., Delvigne A., Dhont N., Vandekerckhove F., Madoc B., Buyle M., et al. Self-operated endovaginal telemonitoring versus traditional monitoring of ovarian stimulation in assisted reproduction: an RCT. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:1941–1948.
    1. Pereira I., von Horn K., Depenbusch M., Schultze-Mosgau A., Griesinger G. Self-operated endovaginal telemonitoring: a prospective, clinical validation study. Fertil Steril. 2016;106:306–310.e1.
    1. Tuckson R.V., Edmunds M., Hodgkins M.L. Telehealth. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1585–1592.
    1. Gadzinski A.J., Gore J.L., Ellimoottil C., Odisho A.Y., Watts K.L. Implementing telemedicine in response to the Covid-19 pandemic. J Urol. 2020;204:14–16.
    1. Boehm K., Ziewers S., Brandt M.P., Sparwasser P., Haack M., Willems F., et al. Telemedicine online visits in urology during the Covid-19 pandemic-potential, risk factors, and patients’ perspective. Eur Urol. 2020;78:16–20.
    1. Ramaswamy A., Yu M., Drangsholt S., Ng E., Culligan P.J., Schlegel P.N., et al. Patient satisfaction with telemedicine during the Covid-19 pandemic: retrospective cohort study. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22
    1. Pinar U., Anract J., Perrot O., Tabourin T., Chartier-Kastler E., Parra J., et al. Preliminary assessment of patient and physician satisfaction with the use of teleconsultation in urology during the Covid-19 pandemic. World J Urol. 2020
    1. Chu S., Boxer R., Madison P., Kleinman L., Skolarus T., Altman L., et al. Veterans Affairs telemedicine: bringing urologic care to remote clinics. Urology. 2015;86:255–260.
    1. Duffy S., Lee T.H. In-person health care as option B. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:104–106.
    1. Safir I.J., Gabale S., David S.A., Huang J.H., Gerhard R.S., Pearl J., et al. Implementation of a tele-urology program for outpatient hematuria referrals: initial results and patient satisfaction. Urology. 2016;97:33–39.
    1. Miah S., Dunford C., Edison M., Eldred-Evans D., Gan C., Shah T.T., et al. A prospective clinical, cost and environmental analysis of a clinician-led virtual urology clinic. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2019;101:30–34.
    1. Granja C Janssen W., Johansen M.A. Factors determining the success and failure of eHealth interventions: systematic review of the literature. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20
    1. Farr C. CNBC; November 17, 2019. How men’s health start-ups are turning erectile dysfunction and hair loss treatment into a booming business. Available at:
    1. Houman J.J., Eleswarapu S.V., Mills J.N. Current and future trends in men’s health clinics. Transl Androl Urol. 2020;9(Suppl 2):S116–S122.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorit ja yhteistyökumppanit

Sairaudet

Huumeiden interventiot

3
Tilaa