Noninvasive estimation of intravascular volume status in cirrhosis by dynamic size and collapsibility indices of the inferior vena cava using bedside echocardiography

Madhumita Premkumar, Devaraja Rangegowda, Kamal Kajal, Jelen S Khumuckham, Madhumita Premkumar, Devaraja Rangegowda, Kamal Kajal, Jelen S Khumuckham

Abstract

Background and aim: Echocardiographic assessment of the inferior vena cava diameter (IVCD) and collapsibility index (IVCCI) is a noninvasive estimate of intravascular volume status (IVS) but requires validation for cirrhosis. We evaluated IVC dynamics in cirrhosis and correlated it with conventional tools such as central venous pressure (CVP), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), and right atrial pressure (RAP).

Methods: A total of 673 consecutive cirrhotic patients were screened by echocardiography, and 125 patients underwent right heart catheterization with recording of hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG), RAP, pulmonary artery (PA) pressure, and PCWP. CVP data were available for 80 (64%) patients, and finally, 76 patients (84% male, 50% ethanol related, mean age 52.1 years, 57.8% with ascites) with complete data were enrolled.

Results: The mean CVP measured was 12.8 ± 4.8 mmHg, and IVCCI was 29.5 ± 10.9%. The IVCD ranged from 0.97 to 2.26 cm and from 0.76 to 1.84 cm during expiration and inspiration, respectively, with a mean of 1.8 ± 0.9 cm. The mean IVCD correlated with RAP (r = 0.633, P = 0.043) but not with HVPG (r = 0.344, P = 0.755), PCWP (r = 0.562, P = 0.072), or PA pressure (r = 0.563, P = 0.588). A negative linear correlation was observed between the CVP and the IVCCI (r = -0.827, P = 0.023) in all patients and substratified for those with (r = -0.748, P = 0.039) and without ascites (r = -0.761, P = 0.047). A positive correlation was observed between CVP and IVCDmax (r = 0.671, P = 0.037) and IVCDmin (r = 0.612, P = 0.040).

Conclusions: IVCD and collapsibility index provides noninvasive IVS assessment, independent of HVPG or ascites, with the potential for calculating fluid requirements in cirrhosis.

Keywords: central venous pressure; cirrhotic cardiomyopathy; echocardiography; inferior vena cava; inferior vena cava collapsibility; intravascular volume status.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) Correlation between central venous pressure and inferior vena cava collapsibility index in all subjects (n = 76). (b) Correlation between central venous pressure and inferior vena cava (IVC) collapsibility index in patients with ascites.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Correlation between expiratory inferior vena cava (IVC) diameter and central venous pressure. (b) Correlation between inspiratory IVC diameter and central venous pressure.

References

    1. Angeli P, Sanyal A, Moller S et al. Current limits and future challenges in the management of renal dysfunction in patients with cirrhosis: report from the International Club of Ascites. Liver Int. 2013; 33: 16–23.
    1. Abelmann WH. Hyperdynamic circulation in cirrhosis: a historical perspective. Hepatology. 1994; 20: 1356–8.
    1. Salerno F, Cazzaniga M, Merli M et al. Diagnosis, treatment and survival of patients with hepatorenal syndrome: a survey on daily medical practice. J. Hepatol. 2011; 55: 1241–8.
    1. Brinch K, Moller S, Bendtsen F, Becker U, Henriksen J. Plasma volume expansion by albumin in cirrhosis. Relation to blood volume distribution, arterial compliance and severity of disease. J. Hepatol. 2003; 39: 24–31.
    1. Marik PE, Baram M, Vahid B. Does central venous pressure predict fluid responsiveness A systematic review of the literature and the tale of seven mares. Chest. 2008; 134: 172–8.
    1. Mintz GS, Kotler MN, Parry WR, Iskandrian AS, Kane SA. Reat‐time inferior vena caval ultrasonography: normal and abnormal findings and its use in assessing right‐heart function. Circulation. 1981; 64: 1018–25.
    1. Gödje O, Peyerl M, Seebauer T, Lamm P, Mair H, Reichart B. Central venous pressure, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and intrathoracic blood volumes as preload indicators in cardiac surgery patients. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 1998; 13: 533–9.
    1. Kumar A, Anel R, Bunnell E et al. Pulmonary artery occlusion pressure and central venous pressure fail to predict ventricular filling volume, cardiac performance, or the response to volume infusion in normal subjects. Crit. Care Med. 2004; 32: 691–9.
    1. Davenport A, Argawal B, Wright G et al. Can non‐invasive measurements aid clinical assessment of volume in patients with cirrhosis? World J. Hepatol. 2013; 5: 433–8.
    1. Sampaio F, Pimenta J, Bettencourt N et al. Systolic and diastolic dysfunction in cirrhosis: a tissue‐Doppler and speckle tracking echocardiography study. Liver Int. 2013; 33: 1158–65.
    1. Renner J, Gruenewald M, Brand P et al. Global end‐diastolic volume as a variable of fluid responsiveness during acute changing loading conditions. J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 2007; 21: 650–4.
    1. Arthur ME, Landolfo C, Wade M, Castresana MR. Inferior vena cava diameter (IVCD) measured with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) can be used to derive the central venous pressure (CVP) in anesthetized mechanically ventilated patients. Echocardiography. 2009; 26: 140–9.
    1. Donahue SP, Wood JP, Patel BM, Quinn JV. Correlation of sonographic measurements of the internal jugular vein with central venous pressure. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2009; 27: 851–5.
    1. Rudski LG, Lai WW, Afilalo J et al. Guidelines for the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart in adults: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2010; 23: 685–713.
    1. Nagueh SF, Appleton CP, Gillebert TC et al. Recommendations for the evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function by echocardiography. Eur. J. Echocardiogr. 2009; 10: 165–93.
    1. Gorcsan J 3rd, Tanaka H. Echocardiographic assessment of myocardial strain. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2011; 58: 1401–13.
    1. Wong F. Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy. Hepatol. Int. 2009; 3: 294–304.
    1. Ruíz‐Del‐Árbol L, Achécar L, Serradilla R et al. Diastolic dysfunction is a predictor of poor outcomes in patients with cirrhosis, portal hypertension, and a normal creatinine. Hepatology. 2013; 58: 1732–41.
    1. Wadhawan M, Dubey S, Sharma BC, Sarin SK, Sarin SK. Hepatic venous pressure gradient in cirrhosis: correlation with the size of varices, bleeding, ascites, and child's status. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2006; 51: 2264–9.
    1. Magder S, Bafaqeeh F. The clinical role of central venous pressure measurements. J. Intensive Care Med. 2007; 22: 44–51.
    1. Dellinger RP, Carlet JM, Masur H et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit. Care Med. 2004; 32: 858–73.
    1. Brennan JM, Blair JE, Goonewardena S et al. Reappraisal of the use of inferior vena cava for estimating right atrial pressure. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2007; 20: 857–61.
    1. Ciozda W, Kedan I, Kehl DW, Zimmer R, Khandwalla R, Kimchi A. The efficacy of sonographic measurement of inferior vena cava diameter as an estimate of central venous pressure. Cardiovasc. Ultrasound. 2016; 14: 33.
    1. Moreno FL, Hagan AD, Holmen JR, Pryor TA, Strickland RD, Castle CH. Evaluation of size and dynamics of the inferior vena cava as an index of right‐sided cardiac function. Am. J. Cardiol. 1984; 53: 579–85.
    1. Simonson JS, Schiller NB. Sonospirometry: a new method for noninvasive estimation of mean right atrial pressure based on two‐dimensional echocardiographic measurements of the inferior vena cava during measured inspiration. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 1988; 11: 557–64.
    1. Beigel R, Cercek B, Luo H, Siegel RJ. Noninvasive evaluation of right atrial pressure. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 2013; 26: 1033–42.
    1. Kircher BJ, Himelman RB, Schiller NB. Noninvasive estimation of right atrial pressure from the inspiratory collapse of the inferior vena cava. Am. J. Cardiol. 1990; 66: 493–6.
    1. Stawicki SP, Braslow BM, Panebianco NL et al. Intensivist use of hand‐carried ultrasonography to measure IVC collapsibility in estimating intravascular volume status: correlations with CVP. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2009; 209: 55–61.
    1. Barbier C, Loubières Y, Schmit C. Respiratory changes in inferior vena cava diameter are helpful in predicting fluid responsiveness in ventilated septic patients. Intensive Care Med. 2004; 30: 1740–6.
    1. Valeriano V, Funaro S, Lionetti R et al. Modification of cardiac function in cirrhotic patients with and without ascites. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2000; 95: 3200–5.
    1. Moreau R, Hadengue A, Soupison T et al. Septic shock in patients with cirrhosis: hemodynamic and metabolic characteristics and intensive care unit outcome. Crit. Care Med. 1992; 20: 746–50.
    1. Tiukinhoy‐Laing SD, Rossi JS, Bayram M et al. Cardiac hemodynamic and coronary angiographic characteristics of patients being evaluated for liver transplantation. Am. J. Cardiol. 2006; 98: 178–81.
    1. Premkumar M, Devurgowda D, Vyas T et al. Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction is associated with renal dysfunction, poor survival and low health related quality of life in cirrhosis. J. Clin. Exp. Hepatol. 2018. 10.1016/j.jceh.2018.08.008.
    1. Seif D, Mailhot T, Perera P, Mandavia D. Caval sonography in shock. A noninvasive method for evaluating intravascular volume in critically ill patients. J. Ultrasound Med. 2012; 31: 1885–90.
    1. Kitamura H, Kobayashi C. Impairment of change in diameter of the hepatic portion of the inferior vena cava: a sonographic sign of liver fibrosis or cirrhosis. J. Ultrasound Med. 2005; 24: 355–9.
    1. Haydar S, Moore ET, Higgins GLIII, Irish CB, Owens WB, Strout TD. Effect of bedside ultrasonography on the certainty of physician clinical decision making for septic patients in the emergency department. Ann. Emerg. Med. 2012; 60: 346–358.e4.
    1. Yanagawa Y, Sakamoto T, Okada Y. Hypovolemic shock evaluated by sonographic measurement of the inferior vena cava during resuscitation in trauma patients. J. Trauma. 2007; 63: 1245–8.
    1. Ferrada P, Anand RJ, Whelan J. Qualitative assessment of the inferior vena cava: useful tool for the valuation of fluid status in critically ill patients. Am. Surg. 2012; 78: 468–70.

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa