Is telephone counselling a useful addition to physician advice and nicotine replacement therapy in helping patients to stop smoking? A randomized controlled trial

R D Reid, A Pipe, W A Dafoe, R D Reid, A Pipe, W A Dafoe

Abstract

Background: The authors evaluated the incremental efficacy of telephone counselling by a nurse in addition to physician advice and nicotine replacement therapy in helping patients to stop smoking.

Methods: The trial was conducted at the University of Ottawa Heart Institute. A total of 396 volunteers who smoked 15 or more cigarettes daily were randomly assigned to either of 2 groups: usual care (control group) and usual care plus telephone counselling (intervention group); the groups were stratified by sex and degree of nicotine dependence. Usual care involved the receipt of physician advice on 3 occasions, self-help materials and 12 weeks of nicotine replacement therapy. Telephone counselling was provided by a nurse at 2, 6 and 13 weeks after the target quit date. Point-prevalent quit rates were determined at 52 weeks after the target quit date.

Results: The point-prevalent quit rates at 52 weeks did not differ significantly between the control and intervention groups (24.1% v. 23.4% respectively). The quit rates did not differ significantly at the secondary measurement points of 4, 12 and 26 weeks.

Interpretation: Brief physician assistance, along with nicotine replacement therapy, can help well-motivated smokers to quit. Three additional sessions of telephone counselling by a nurse were ineffective in increasing quit rates. This form of assistance may be useful in the absence of physician advice or when self-selected by patients.

References

    1. Med Care. 1993 Jan;31(1):65-72
    1. Arch Intern Med. 1993 Aug 23;153(16):1881-90
    1. Lancet. 1994 Jan 15;343(8890):139-42
    1. Med J Aust. 1994 Feb 7;160(3):152-9
    1. BMJ. 1994 Jan 1;308(6920):21-6
    1. JAMA. 1994 Feb 23;271(8):595-600
    1. Chest. 1994 Feb;105(2):524-33
    1. Ann Intern Med. 1994 May 1;120(9):721-9
    1. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1993;45(6):519-28
    1. JAMA. 1994 Jun 22-29;271(24):1940-7
    1. Arch Intern Med. 1994 Aug 8;154(15):1697-704
    1. JAMA. 1995 Nov 1;274(17):1347-52
    1. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1995 Dec;63(6):1005-14
    1. Health Educ Res. 1996 Jun;11(2):243-57
    1. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1996 Feb;64(1):202-11
    1. Cancer Prev Control. 1997 Oct;1(4):289-303
    1. Addict Behav. 1978;3(3-4):235-41
    1. NIDA Res Monogr. 1983;48:6-26
    1. Health Psychol. 1986;5 Suppl:3-11
    1. J Behav Med. 1989 Apr;12(2):159-82
    1. Ann Intern Med. 1990 Jul 15;113(2):118-23
    1. N Engl J Med. 1991 Aug 1;325(5):311-5
    1. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991 Jun;59(3):439-48
    1. Br J Addict. 1991 May;86(5):543-7
    1. Psychol Bull. 1992 Jan;111(1):23-41
    1. Health Psychol. 1992;11(2):119-26
    1. J Fam Pract. 1992 Jun;34(6):701-8
    1. Prog Behav Modif. 1992;28:183-218
    1. Am J Med. 1992 Jul 15;93(1A):43S-47S
    1. J Appl Psychol. 1992 Aug;77(4):554-61

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa