Comparing Laparoscopic Elective Sigmoid Resection With Conservative Treatment in Improving Quality of Life of Patients With Diverticulitis: The Laparoscopic Elective Sigmoid Resection Following Diverticulitis (LASER) Randomized Clinical Trial

Alexandre Santos, Panu Mentula, Tarja Pinta, Shamel Ismail, Tero Rautio, Risto Juusela, Aleksi Lähdesmäki, Tom Scheinin, Ville Sallinen, Alexandre Santos, Panu Mentula, Tarja Pinta, Shamel Ismail, Tero Rautio, Risto Juusela, Aleksi Lähdesmäki, Tom Scheinin, Ville Sallinen

Abstract

Importance: Diverticulitis has a tendency to recur and affect quality of life.

Objective: To assess whether sigmoid resection is superior to conservative treatment in improving quality of life of patients with recurrent, complicated, or persistent painful diverticulitis.

Design, setting, and participants: This open-label randomized clinical trial assessed for eligibility 128 patients with recurrent, complicated, or persistent painful diverticulitis in 6 Finnish hospitals from September 29, 2014, to October 10, 2018. Exclusion criteria included age younger than 18 years or older than 75 years; lack of (virtual) colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy data within 2 years, or presence of cancer, contraindication to laparoscopy, or fistula. Outcomes were assessed using intention-to-treat analysis. A prespecified interim analysis was undertaken when 66 patients had been randomized and their 6-month follow-up was assessable. Data were analyzed from June 2018 to May 2020.

Interventions: Laparoscopic sigmoid resection or conservative treatment.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was difference in Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) score between randomization and 6 months.

Results: Of 128 patients assessed for eligibility, 90 were randomized (28 male [31%]; mean [SD] age, 54.11 [11.9] years; 62 female [69%]; mean [SD] age, 57.13 [7.6] years). A total of 72 patients were included in analyses for the primary outcome (37 in the surgery group and 35 in the conservative treatment group), and 85 were included in analyses for clinical outcomes (41 in the surgery group and 44 in the conservative treatment group). The difference between GIQLI score at randomization and 6 months was a mean of 11.96 points higher in the surgery group than in the conservative treatment group (mean [SD] of 11.76 [15.89] points vs -0.2 [19.07] points; difference, 11.96; 95% CI, 3.72-20.19; P = .005). Four patients (10%) in the surgery group and no patients in the conservative treatment group experienced major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher). There were 2 patients (5%) in the surgery group and 12 patients (31%) in the conservative treatment group who had new episodes of diverticulitis within 6 months.

Conclusions and relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, elective laparoscopic sigmoid resection improved quality of life in patients with recurrent, complicated, or persistent painful diverticulitis but carried a 10% risk of major complications.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02174926.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Santos reports grants from The Finnish Medical Foundation during the conduct of the study. Dr Sallinen reports grants from Vatsatautien Tutkimussäätiö Foundation, Mary and Georg Ehrnrooth’s Foundation, Martti I. Turunen Foundation, and Helsinki University Hospital research funds during the conduct of the study as well as grants from Academy of Finland, Finnish Cancer Foundation (Syöpäsäätiö), and Finnish Gastroenterological Society and personal fees from Finnish Gastroenterological Society, City of Vantaa, and University of Helsinki outside the submitted work. Dr Scheinin reports personal fees from Johnson & Johnson outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure.. CONSORT Flow Chart
Figure.. CONSORT Flow Chart
CT indicates computed tomography. aOne because of severe obesity and one because of myasthenia gravis. bDid not meet inclusion criteria (right-sided diverticulitis). cCompleted both baseline and 6-month quality of life questionnaires.

References

    1. Munie ST, Nalamati SPM. Epidemiology and pathophysiology of diverticular disease. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2018;31(4):209-213. doi:10.1055/s-0037-1607464
    1. Mali JP, Mentula PJ, Leppäniemi AK, Sallinen VJ. Symptomatic treatment for uncomplicated acute diverticulitis: a prospective cohort study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2016;59(6):529-534. doi:10.1097/DCR.0000000000000579
    1. Daniels L, Ünlü Ç, de Korte N, et al. ; Dutch Diverticular Disease (3D) Collaborative Study Group . Randomized clinical trial of observational versus antibiotic treatment for a first episode of CT-proven uncomplicated acute diverticulitis. Br J Surg. 2017;104(1):52-61. doi:10.1002/bjs.10309
    1. Chabok A, Påhlman L, Hjern F, Haapaniemi S, Smedh K; AVOD Study Group . Randomized clinical trial of antibiotics in acute uncomplicated diverticulitis. Br J Surg. 2012;99(4):532-539. doi:10.1002/bjs.8688
    1. Sallinen VJ, Leppäniemi AK, Mentula PJ. Staging of acute diverticulitis based on clinical, radiologic, and physiologic parameters. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;78(3):543-551. doi:10.1097/TA.0000000000000540
    1. Sartelli M, Catena F, Moore EE, et al. . WSES Guidelines for the management of acute left sided colonic diverticulitis in the emergency setting. World J Emerg Surg. 2016;11(1):37. doi:10.1186/s13017-016-0095-0
    1. Wong WD, Wexner SD, Lowry A, et al. ; The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons . Practice parameters for the treatment of sigmoid diverticulitis—supporting documentation. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43(3):290-297. doi:10.1007/BF02258291
    1. Ritz JP, Lehmann KS, Frericks B, Stroux A, Buhr HJ, Holmer C. Outcome of patients with acute sigmoid diverticulitis: multivariate analysis of risk factors for free perforation. Surgery. 2011;149(5):606-613. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2010.10.005
    1. Chapman JR, Dozois EJ, Wolff BG, Gullerud RE, Larson DR. Diverticulitis: a progressive disease? do multiple recurrences predict less favorable outcomes? Ann Surg. 2006;243(6):876-830. doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000219682.98158.11
    1. Rafferty J, Shellito P, Hyman NH, Buie WD; Standards Committee of American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons . Practice parameters for sigmoid diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49(7):939-944. doi:10.1007/s10350-006-0578-2
    1. Feingold D, Steele SR, Lee S, et al. . Practice parameters for the treatment of sigmoid diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014;57(3):284-294. doi:10.1097/DCR.0000000000000075
    1. Sallinen V, Mali J, Leppäniemi A, Mentula P. Assessment of risk for recurrent diverticulitis: a proposal of risk score for complicated recurrence. Medicine. 2015;94(8):e557. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000000557
    1. Gaertner WB, Willis DJ, Madoff RD, et al. . Percutaneous drainage of colonic diverticular abscess: is colon resection necessary? Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56(5):622-626. doi:10.1097/DCR.0b013e31828545e3
    1. van de Wall BJM, Draaisma WA, van Iersel JJ, Consten ECJ, Wiezer MJ, Broeders IAMJ. Elective resection for ongoing diverticular disease significantly improves quality of life. Dig Surg. 2013;30(3):190-197. doi:10.1159/000346482
    1. Forgione A, Leroy J, Cahill RA, et al. . Prospective evaluation of functional outcome after laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy. Ann Surg. 2009;249(2):218-224. doi:10.1097/SLA.0b013e318195c5fc
    1. Pasternak I, Wiedemann N, Basilicata G, Melcher GA. Gastrointestinal quality of life after laparoscopic-assisted sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012;27(6):781-787. doi:10.1007/s00384-011-1386-2
    1. Hall J, Hardiman K, Lee S, et al. ; Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons . The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of left-sided colonic diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2020;63(6):728-747. doi:10.1097/DCR.0000000000001679
    1. van de Wall BJ, Draaisma WA, Consten EC, et al. . Dutch Diverticular Disease. (3D) Collaborative Study Group . Surgery versus conservative management for recurrent and ongoing left-sided diverticulitis (DIRECT trial): an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;2(1):13-22. doi:10.1016/S2468-1253(16)30109-1
    1. Bolkenstein HE, Consten ECJ, van der Palen J, et al. ; Dutch Diverticular Disease (3D) Collaborative Study Group . Long-term outcome of surgery versus conservative management for recurrent and ongoing complaints after an episode of diverticulitis: 5-year follow-up results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial (DIRECT-Trial). Ann Surg. 2019;269(4):612-620. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000003033
    1. Jayadevappa R, Cook R, Chhatre S. Minimal important difference to infer changes in health-related quality of life—a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017;89:188-198. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.009
    1. Taft C, Karlsson J, Sullivan M, Do. Do SF-36 summary component scores accurately summarize subscale scores? Qual Life Res. 2001;10(5):395-404. doi:10.1023/A:1012552211996
    1. Regenbogen SE, Hardiman KM, Hendren S, Morris AM. Surgery for diverticulitis in the 21st century: a systematic review. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(3):292-303. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2013.5477
    1. van de Wall BJM, Draaisma WA, van Iersel JJ, Consten ECJ, Wiezer MJ, Broeders IAMJ. Elective resection for ongoing diverticular disease significantly improves quality of life. Dig Surg. 2013;30(3):190-197. doi:10.1159/000346482
    1. Andeweg CS, Berg R, Staal JB, ten Broek RP, van Goor H. Patient-reported outcomes after conservative or surgical management of recurrent and chronic complaints of diverticulitis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;14(2):183-190. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2015.08.020

Source: PubMed

3
Tilaa